LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt defers bill easing divorce law

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]

Code Context



        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }

$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]

deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]

Code Context



        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }

$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]

deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]

Code Context

            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {

$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680e11fd9649e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680e11fd9649e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680e11fd9649e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15149,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt defers bill easing divorce law&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown&#039;&#039; provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House&#039;&#039; was that it should be taken up later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband&#039;s residential property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,&#039;&#039; the letter said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children&#039;s share which means that the husband gets a greater share. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 22 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law/articleshow/13366515.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15274,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15149,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt defers bill easing divorce law&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;divorce,Gender,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

-The Times of India

Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown&#039;&#039; provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House&#039;&#039; was that it should be taken up later.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband&#039;s residential property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,&#039;&#039; the letter said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children&#039;s share which means that the husband gets a greater share. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15149,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt defers bill easing divorce law&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown&#039;&#039; provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House&#039;&#039; was that it should be taken up later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband&#039;s residential property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,&#039;&#039; the letter said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children&#039;s share which means that the husband gets a greater share. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 22 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law/articleshow/13366515.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15274,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15149
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt defers bill easing divorce law&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;divorce,Gender,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

-The Times of India

Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown&#039;&#039; provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House&#039;&#039; was that it should be taken up later.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband&#039;s residential property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,&#039;&#039; the letter said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children&#039;s share which means that the husband gets a greater share. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt defers bill easing divorce law | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

-The Times of India

Under pressure from political parties and women's organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage'' among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt defers bill easing divorce law</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />Under pressure from political parties and women's organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage'' among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.<br /><br />Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &quot;irretrievable breakdown'' provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.<br /><br />But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House'' was that it should be taken up later.<br /><br />Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband's residential property.<br /><br />In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.<br /><br />``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,'' the letter said.<br /><br />The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children's share which means that the husband gets a greater share. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'

Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]

Code Context

            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));

$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680e11fd9649e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680e11fd9649e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680e11fd9649e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15149,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt defers bill easing divorce law&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown&#039;&#039; provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House&#039;&#039; was that it should be taken up later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband&#039;s residential property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,&#039;&#039; the letter said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children&#039;s share which means that the husband gets a greater share. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 22 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law/articleshow/13366515.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15274,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15149,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt defers bill easing divorce law&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;divorce,Gender,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

-The Times of India

Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown&#039;&#039; provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House&#039;&#039; was that it should be taken up later.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband&#039;s residential property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,&#039;&#039; the letter said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children&#039;s share which means that the husband gets a greater share. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15149,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt defers bill easing divorce law&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown&#039;&#039; provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House&#039;&#039; was that it should be taken up later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband&#039;s residential property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,&#039;&#039; the letter said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children&#039;s share which means that the husband gets a greater share. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 22 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law/articleshow/13366515.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15274,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15149
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt defers bill easing divorce law&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;divorce,Gender,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

-The Times of India

Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown&#039;&#039; provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House&#039;&#039; was that it should be taken up later.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband&#039;s residential property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,&#039;&#039; the letter said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children&#039;s share which means that the husband gets a greater share. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt defers bill easing divorce law | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

-The Times of India

Under pressure from political parties and women's organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage'' among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt defers bill easing divorce law</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />Under pressure from political parties and women's organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage'' among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.<br /><br />Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &quot;irretrievable breakdown'' provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.<br /><br />But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House'' was that it should be taken up later.<br /><br />Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband's residential property.<br /><br />In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.<br /><br />``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,'' the letter said.<br /><br />The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children's share which means that the husband gets a greater share. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'

header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Code Context

                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;

$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680e11fd9649e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680e11fd9649e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680e11fd9649e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680e11fd9649e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15149,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt defers bill easing divorce law&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown&#039;&#039; provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House&#039;&#039; was that it should be taken up later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband&#039;s residential property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,&#039;&#039; the letter said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children&#039;s share which means that the husband gets a greater share. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 22 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law/articleshow/13366515.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15274,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15149,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt defers bill easing divorce law&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;divorce,Gender,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

-The Times of India

Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown&#039;&#039; provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House&#039;&#039; was that it should be taken up later.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband&#039;s residential property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,&#039;&#039; the letter said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children&#039;s share which means that the husband gets a greater share. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15149,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt defers bill easing divorce law&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown&#039;&#039; provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House&#039;&#039; was that it should be taken up later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband&#039;s residential property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,&#039;&#039; the letter said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children&#039;s share which means that the husband gets a greater share. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 22 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law/articleshow/13366515.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15274,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15149
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt defers bill easing divorce law&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;divorce,Gender,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

-The Times of India

Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under pressure from political parties and women&#039;s organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&#039;&#039; among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &amp;quot;irretrievable breakdown&#039;&#039; provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House&#039;&#039; was that it should be taken up later.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband&#039;s residential property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,&#039;&#039; the letter said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children&#039;s share which means that the husband gets a greater share. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt defers bill easing divorce law | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

-The Times of India

Under pressure from political parties and women's organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage'' among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt defers bill easing divorce law</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />Under pressure from political parties and women's organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include &quot;irretrievable breakdown of marriage'' among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.<br /><br />Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the &quot;irretrievable breakdown'' provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.<br /><br />But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House'' was that it should be taken up later.<br /><br />Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband's residential property.<br /><br />In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.<br /><br />``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,'' the letter said.<br /><br />The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children's share which means that the husband gets a greater share. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'

header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head> <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15149, 'title' => 'Govt defers bill easing divorce law', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => ' <div align="justify"> -The Times of India Under pressure from political parties and women's organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include "irretrievable breakdown of marriage'' among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context. Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the "irretrievable breakdown'' provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed. But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House'' was that it should be taken up later. Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband's residential property. In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property. ``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,'' the letter said. The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children's share which means that the husband gets a greater share. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law/articleshow/13366515.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15274, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15149, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt defers bill easing divorce law', 'metaKeywords' => 'divorce,Gender,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Under pressure from political parties and women's organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include "irretrievable breakdown of marriage'' among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP...', 'disp' => ' <div align="justify">-The Times of India Under pressure from political parties and women's organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include "irretrievable breakdown of marriage'' among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context. Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the "irretrievable breakdown'' provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed. But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House'' was that it should be taken up later. Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband's residential property. In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property. ``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,'' the letter said. The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children's share which means that the husband gets a greater share. </div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15149, 'title' => 'Govt defers bill easing divorce law', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => ' <div align="justify"> -The Times of India Under pressure from political parties and women's organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include "irretrievable breakdown of marriage'' among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context. Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the "irretrievable breakdown'' provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed. But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House'' was that it should be taken up later. Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband's residential property. In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property. ``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,'' the letter said. The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children's share which means that the husband gets a greater share. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 22 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law/articleshow/13366515.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-defers-bill-easing-divorce-law-15274', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15274, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15149 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt defers bill easing divorce law' $metaKeywords = 'divorce,Gender,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Under pressure from political parties and women's organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include "irretrievable breakdown of marriage'' among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP...' $disp = ' <div align="justify">-The Times of India Under pressure from political parties and women's organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include "irretrievable breakdown of marriage'' among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context. Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the "irretrievable breakdown'' provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed. But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House'' was that it should be taken up later. Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband's residential property. In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property. ``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,'' the letter said. The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children's share which means that the husband gets a greater share. </div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

-The Times of India

Under pressure from political parties and women's organizations, the government on Monday deferred passage of the bill that seeks to include "irretrievable breakdown of marriage'' among the reasons for divorce, along with other provisions, which the BJP has opposed on the ground that it could prove detrimental to women in the Indian social context.

Law minister Salman Khurshid told Rajya Sabha said most of the concerns raised on this first-ever move to bring the "irretrievable breakdown'' provision in the Hindu Marriage Act had been addressed.

But, he added, the amendment bill could be deferred for more consideration if the the ``sense of the House'' was that it should be taken up later.

Women rights activists have serious differences in the amendments in particular the provision that provides for 50% share to wife and children in her husband's residential property.

In a letter to Khurshid, former RS member Brinda Karat supported by women organizations including Sudha Sundarraman and Kirti Singh from AIDWA have demanded that women be given equal right to all marital property.

``We regret that we are unable to support the proposed amendment which does not adequately protect women in a situation created due to the liberalization of divorce laws. We would like to point out that in countries where divorce laws are liberalized as is now proposed in India, women are protected by laws which mandate equal share in matrimonial property. For the Government to propose one without the other is unfair and unjust to women,'' the letter said.

The communication added that the proposal to give an equal share to women only in residential property will not be sufficient adding that the bill legislates a wife and children's share which means that the husband gets a greater share.