Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28833,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt land law climbdown&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA&#039;s current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Switch back to &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;private entity&amp;quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill&#039;s provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 3 August, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150804/jsp/nation/story_35332.jsp#.VcBQHvk1t_k&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676886,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 28833,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt land law climbdown&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.

Sources said that even the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA&#039;s current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Switch back to &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;private entity&amp;quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill&#039;s provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28833,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt land law climbdown&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA&#039;s current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Switch back to &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;private entity&amp;quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill&#039;s provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 3 August, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150804/jsp/nation/story_35332.jsp#.VcBQHvk1t_k&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676886,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 28833
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt land law climbdown&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.

Sources said that even the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA&#039;s current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Switch back to &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;private entity&amp;quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill&#039;s provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt land law climbdown | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA's 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.

Sources said that even the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt land law climbdown</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA's 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.<br /><br />Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA's current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.<br /><br />This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.<br /><br />They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:<br /><br />&diams; Switch back to &quot;private company&quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &quot;private company&quot; with &quot;private entity&quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.<br /><br />&diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.<br /><br />&diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.<br /><br />Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill's provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.<br /><br />The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.<br /><br />The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.<br /><br />Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.<br /><br />At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28833,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt land law climbdown&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA&#039;s current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Switch back to &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;private entity&amp;quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill&#039;s provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 3 August, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150804/jsp/nation/story_35332.jsp#.VcBQHvk1t_k&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676886,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 28833,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt land law climbdown&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.

Sources said that even the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA&#039;s current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Switch back to &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;private entity&amp;quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill&#039;s provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28833,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt land law climbdown&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA&#039;s current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Switch back to &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;private entity&amp;quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill&#039;s provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 3 August, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150804/jsp/nation/story_35332.jsp#.VcBQHvk1t_k&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676886,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 28833
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt land law climbdown&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.

Sources said that even the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA&#039;s current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Switch back to &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;private entity&amp;quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill&#039;s provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt land law climbdown | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA's 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.

Sources said that even the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt land law climbdown</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA's 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.<br /><br />Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA's current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.<br /><br />This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.<br /><br />They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:<br /><br />&diams; Switch back to &quot;private company&quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &quot;private company&quot; with &quot;private entity&quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.<br /><br />&diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.<br /><br />&diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.<br /><br />Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill's provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.<br /><br />The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.<br /><br />The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.<br /><br />Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.<br /><br />At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ef81dd6ecc4-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28833,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt land law climbdown&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA&#039;s current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Switch back to &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;private entity&amp;quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill&#039;s provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 3 August, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150804/jsp/nation/story_35332.jsp#.VcBQHvk1t_k&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676886,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 28833,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt land law climbdown&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.

Sources said that even the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA&#039;s current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Switch back to &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;private entity&amp;quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill&#039;s provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28833,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt land law climbdown&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA&#039;s current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Switch back to &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;private entity&amp;quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill&#039;s provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 3 August, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150804/jsp/nation/story_35332.jsp#.VcBQHvk1t_k&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676886,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 28833
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt land law climbdown&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.

Sources said that even the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA&#039;s 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA&#039;s current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Switch back to &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &amp;quot;private company&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;private entity&amp;quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill&#039;s provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt land law climbdown | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA's 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.

Sources said that even the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt land law climbdown</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA's 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.<br /><br />Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA's current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.<br /><br />This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.<br /><br />They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:<br /><br />&diams; Switch back to &quot;private company&quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &quot;private company&quot; with &quot;private entity&quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.<br /><br />&diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.<br /><br />&diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.<br /><br />Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill's provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.<br /><br />The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.<br /><br />The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.<br /><br />Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.<br /><br />At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 28833,
		'title' => 'Govt land law climbdown',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA's 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.<br />
<br />
Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA's current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.<br />
<br />
This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.<br />
<br />
They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:<br />
<br />
&diams; Switch back to &quot;private company&quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &quot;private company&quot; with &quot;private entity&quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.<br />
<br />
&diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.<br />
<br />
&diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.<br />
<br />
Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill's provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.<br />
<br />
The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.<br />
<br />
The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.<br />
<br />
Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.<br />
<br />
At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 3 August, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150804/jsp/nation/story_35332.jsp#.VcBQHvk1t_k',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4676886,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 28833,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt land law climbdown',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA's 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.

Sources said that even the...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA's 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.<br /><br />Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA's current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.<br /><br />This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.<br /><br />They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:<br /><br />&diams; Switch back to &quot;private company&quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &quot;private company&quot; with &quot;private entity&quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.<br /><br />&diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.<br /><br />&diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.<br /><br />Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill's provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.<br /><br />The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.<br /><br />The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.<br /><br />Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.<br /><br />At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 28833,
	'title' => 'Govt land law climbdown',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA's 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.<br />
<br />
Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA's current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.<br />
<br />
This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.<br />
<br />
They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:<br />
<br />
&diams; Switch back to &quot;private company&quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &quot;private company&quot; with &quot;private entity&quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.<br />
<br />
&diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.<br />
<br />
&diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.<br />
<br />
Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill's provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.<br />
<br />
The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.<br />
<br />
The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.<br />
<br />
Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.<br />
<br />
At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 3 August, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150804/jsp/nation/story_35332.jsp#.VcBQHvk1t_k',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'govt-land-law-climbdown-4676886',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4676886,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 28833
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt land law climbdown'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA's 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.

Sources said that even the...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA's 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government.<br /><br />Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA's current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions.<br /><br />This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added.<br /><br />They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations:<br /><br />&diams; Switch back to &quot;private company&quot; in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced &quot;private company&quot; with &quot;private entity&quot; to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc.<br /><br />&diams; Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.<br /><br />&diams; Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision.<br /><br />Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill's provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years.<br /><br />The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament.<br /><br />The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it.<br /><br />Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill.<br /><br />At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Govt land law climbdown

-The Telegraph New Delhi: A joint parliamentary committee has favoured restoring most of the provisions of the UPA's 2013 land law into the land acquisition bill the Centre wants to pass, signalling a climb-down by the government. Sources said that even the BJP members on the 30-member panel had favoured scrapping the exemptions that the NDA's current bill provided from the social impact assessment (SIA) and consent provisions. This would not have been possible without a nod from the Centre, they added. They said the panel, headed by BJP member S.S. Ahulwalia, had discussed the amendments suggested by each party and made the following recommendations: ♦ Switch back to "private company" in the clause stipulating the consent of 80 per cent landowners for acquisition for private projects. The bill, which mirrors the currently enforced ordinance, had replaced "private company" with "private entity" to make room for NGOs, corporations, proprietorships, etc. ♦ Make the SIA mandatory for all projects except for acquisition under the urgency clause (mainly national security projects), as provided under the 2013 law. The current bill exempts national security projects, rural electrification and housing, industrial corridors and public-private-partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects. ♦ Revoke the exemption given to industrial corridor and PPP projects from the (70 per cent) consent provision. Tomorrow, the panel will discuss the bill's provision to extend the deadline for return of unutilised land to any length of time specified in the project proposal. The 2013 law limits the period to five years. The committee is expected to hand in its report on August 7. Its new bill will be placed before Parliament. The Centre had been saying that the 2013 law was stalling development projects by making land acquisition extremely tough, and that several states had sought amendments to it. Most Opposition parties, however, staunchly opposed the bill and prevented its passage in the Rajya Sabha, where the government lacks the numbers, during the budget session. Various Sangh affiliates, especially the farmer and labour arms, too opposed the bill. At a recent Niti Aayog meeting, the NDA-ruled states had said they were keen to have their own land laws to facilitate growth if the Opposition delayed the central law. The Union cabinet too has discussed the possibility of letting state laws bypass the central law.