Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6539,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan&#039;s nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant&#039;s detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan&#039;s nuclear crisis settles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
India&#039;s nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India&#039;s west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &amp;ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &amp;ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 March, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-Jaitapur-N-plant/articleshow/7732065.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6635,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6539,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Environment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.

The widely televised and reported struggle of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan&#039;s nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant&#039;s detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan&#039;s nuclear crisis settles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;India&#039;s nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India&#039;s west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &amp;ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &amp;ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6539,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan&#039;s nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant&#039;s detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan&#039;s nuclear crisis settles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
India&#039;s nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India&#039;s west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &amp;ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &amp;ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 March, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-Jaitapur-N-plant/articleshow/7732065.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6635,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6539
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Environment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.

The widely televised and reported struggle of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan&#039;s nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant&#039;s detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan&#039;s nuclear crisis settles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;India&#039;s nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India&#039;s west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &amp;ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &amp;ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.

The widely televised and reported struggle of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.<br /><br />The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan's nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.<br /><br />Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant's detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan's nuclear crisis settles.<br /><br />India's nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India's west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)<br /><br />Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)<br /><br />But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.<br /><br />It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6539,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan&#039;s nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant&#039;s detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan&#039;s nuclear crisis settles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
India&#039;s nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India&#039;s west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &amp;ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &amp;ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 March, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-Jaitapur-N-plant/articleshow/7732065.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6635,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6539,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Environment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.

The widely televised and reported struggle of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan&#039;s nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant&#039;s detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan&#039;s nuclear crisis settles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;India&#039;s nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India&#039;s west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &amp;ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &amp;ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6539,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan&#039;s nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant&#039;s detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan&#039;s nuclear crisis settles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
India&#039;s nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India&#039;s west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &amp;ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &amp;ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 March, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-Jaitapur-N-plant/articleshow/7732065.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6635,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6539
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Environment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.

The widely televised and reported struggle of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan&#039;s nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant&#039;s detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan&#039;s nuclear crisis settles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;India&#039;s nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India&#039;s west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &amp;ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &amp;ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.

The widely televised and reported struggle of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.<br /><br />The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan's nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.<br /><br />Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant's detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan's nuclear crisis settles.<br /><br />India's nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India's west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)<br /><br />Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)<br /><br />But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.<br /><br />It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6822c71c55bdd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6539,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan&#039;s nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant&#039;s detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan&#039;s nuclear crisis settles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
India&#039;s nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India&#039;s west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &amp;ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &amp;ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 March, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-Jaitapur-N-plant/articleshow/7732065.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6635,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6539,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Environment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.

The widely televised and reported struggle of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan&#039;s nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant&#039;s detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan&#039;s nuclear crisis settles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;India&#039;s nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India&#039;s west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &amp;ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &amp;ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6539,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan&#039;s nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant&#039;s detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan&#039;s nuclear crisis settles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
India&#039;s nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India&#039;s west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &amp;ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &amp;ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 18 March, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-Jaitapur-N-plant/articleshow/7732065.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6635,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6539
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Environment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.

The widely televised and reported struggle of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan&#039;s nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant&#039;s detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan&#039;s nuclear crisis settles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;India&#039;s nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India&#039;s west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &amp;ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &amp;ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.

The widely televised and reported struggle of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.<br /><br />The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan's nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.<br /><br />Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant's detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan's nuclear crisis settles.<br /><br />India's nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India's west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)<br /><br />Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)<br /><br />But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.<br /><br />It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 6539,
		'title' => 'Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.<br />
<br />
The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan's nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.<br />
<br />
Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant's detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan's nuclear crisis settles.<br />
<br />
India's nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India's west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)<br />
<br />
Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)<br />
<br />
But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.<br />
<br />
It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 March, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-Jaitapur-N-plant/articleshow/7732065.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 6635,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 6539,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Environment',
	'metaDesc' => '

An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.

The widely televised and reported struggle of...',
	'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.<br /><br />The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan's nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.<br /><br />Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant's detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan's nuclear crisis settles.<br /><br />India's nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India's west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)<br /><br />Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)<br /><br />But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.<br /><br />It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 6539,
	'title' => 'Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.<br />
<br />
The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan's nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.<br />
<br />
Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant's detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan's nuclear crisis settles.<br />
<br />
India's nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India's west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)<br />
<br />
Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)<br />
<br />
But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.<br />
<br />
It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 March, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-Jaitapur-N-plant/articleshow/7732065.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'govt-likely-to-go-slow-on-jaitapur-n-plant-6635',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 6635,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 6539
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant'
$metaKeywords = 'Environment'
$metaDesc = '

An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.

The widely televised and reported struggle of...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged.<br /><br />The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan's nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well.<br /><br />Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant's detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan's nuclear crisis settles.<br /><br />India's nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India's west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia)<br /><br />Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors &ndash; the reason for the crisis at Fukushima &ndash; will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam)<br /><br />But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach.<br /><br />It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Govt likely to go slow on Jaitapur N-plant

An amber light is flashing on the proposed Jaitapur nuclear power plant with the project expected to proceed only after apprehensions raised by the Japanese tsunami in the public mind have been thoroughly assuaged. The widely televised and reported struggle of Japan's nuclear establishment in containing overheating nuclear cores at the Fukushima power plant have rung alarm bells in India with environment minister Jairam Ramesh calling for more reviews and the Maharashtra government striking a cautious note as well. Official sources said the state government is keen that the plant's detractors do not gain the upper hand and give political traction to opposition to the Jaitapur project. It is felt that the project will move forward only after the dust raised by Japan's nuclear crisis settles. India's nuclear establishment, including former atomic bosses, argue that the elevation of 25 metres at Jaitapur makes the site safe even if a 7-metre tsunami like the one that hit north Japan were to occur. It is also said the probability of a tsunami off India's west coast is minuscule. (Read: Reactors in India four times safer, says Russia) Nuclear experts also say that the failure to cool the core of the reactors – the reason for the crisis at Fukushima – will not happen at Indian plants where safeguards have factored in such situations. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has also ordered a thorough review. (Read: Safety review begins at Kalpakkam) But images of the radiation laden steam clouds arising from four tsunami-struck nuclear reactors in Japan have made the political leadership wary of the costs of a disaster. Jaitapur is in a seismically active zone and the effects of a massive quake are not predictable. A swift cost-benefit analysis indicates a wait and watch approach. It will be left to the nuclear agencies to respond to popular fears as well as scientific data put out by activists before the state government takes the next step. Local queries on why the plant was not being moved to constituencies represented by political bigwigs if it was such a boon are harder to answer while forceful measures will be avoided.