Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15075,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee&#039;s blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry&#039;s vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel&#039;s report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Observers said Centre&#039;s predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define &#039;public purpose&#039; - a provision which justifies state&#039;s power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for &#039;production of public goods&#039; or &#039;provision of public services&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include &#039;all land under agricultural cultivation&#039;. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill&#039;s concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 17 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-House/articleshow/13177727.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15199,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15075,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee&#039;s blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry&#039;s vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel&#039;s report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Observers said Centre&#039;s predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define &#039;public purpose&#039; - a provision which justifies state&#039;s power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for &#039;production of public goods&#039; or &#039;provision of public services&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include &#039;all land under agricultural cultivation&#039;. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill&#039;s concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15075,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee&#039;s blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry&#039;s vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel&#039;s report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Observers said Centre&#039;s predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define &#039;public purpose&#039; - a provision which justifies state&#039;s power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for &#039;production of public goods&#039; or &#039;provision of public services&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include &#039;all land under agricultural cultivation&#039;. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill&#039;s concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 17 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-House/articleshow/13177727.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15199,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15075
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee&#039;s blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry&#039;s vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel&#039;s report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Observers said Centre&#039;s predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define &#039;public purpose&#039; - a provision which justifies state&#039;s power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for &#039;production of public goods&#039; or &#039;provision of public services&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include &#039;all land under agricultural cultivation&#039;. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill&#039;s concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre's plan to facilitate acquisition..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre's plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.<br /><br />The standing committee's blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.<br /><br />The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry's vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.<br /><br />Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel's report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.<br /><br />Observers said Centre's predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.<br /><br />Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define 'public purpose' - a provision which justifies state's power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for 'production of public goods' or 'provision of public services'.<br /><br />Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.<br /><br />The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include 'all land under agricultural cultivation'. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill's concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.<br /><br />The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15075,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee&#039;s blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry&#039;s vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel&#039;s report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Observers said Centre&#039;s predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define &#039;public purpose&#039; - a provision which justifies state&#039;s power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for &#039;production of public goods&#039; or &#039;provision of public services&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include &#039;all land under agricultural cultivation&#039;. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill&#039;s concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 17 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-House/articleshow/13177727.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15199,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15075,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee&#039;s blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry&#039;s vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel&#039;s report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Observers said Centre&#039;s predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define &#039;public purpose&#039; - a provision which justifies state&#039;s power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for &#039;production of public goods&#039; or &#039;provision of public services&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include &#039;all land under agricultural cultivation&#039;. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill&#039;s concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15075,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee&#039;s blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry&#039;s vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel&#039;s report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Observers said Centre&#039;s predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define &#039;public purpose&#039; - a provision which justifies state&#039;s power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for &#039;production of public goods&#039; or &#039;provision of public services&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include &#039;all land under agricultural cultivation&#039;. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill&#039;s concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 17 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-House/articleshow/13177727.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15199,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15075
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee&#039;s blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry&#039;s vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel&#039;s report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Observers said Centre&#039;s predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define &#039;public purpose&#039; - a provision which justifies state&#039;s power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for &#039;production of public goods&#039; or &#039;provision of public services&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include &#039;all land under agricultural cultivation&#039;. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill&#039;s concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre's plan to facilitate acquisition..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre's plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.<br /><br />The standing committee's blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.<br /><br />The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry's vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.<br /><br />Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel's report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.<br /><br />Observers said Centre's predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.<br /><br />Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define 'public purpose' - a provision which justifies state's power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for 'production of public goods' or 'provision of public services'.<br /><br />Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.<br /><br />The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include 'all land under agricultural cultivation'. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill's concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.<br /><br />The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8f0ad8adaa-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15075,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee&#039;s blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry&#039;s vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel&#039;s report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Observers said Centre&#039;s predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define &#039;public purpose&#039; - a provision which justifies state&#039;s power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for &#039;production of public goods&#039; or &#039;provision of public services&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include &#039;all land under agricultural cultivation&#039;. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill&#039;s concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 17 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-House/articleshow/13177727.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15199,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15075,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee&#039;s blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry&#039;s vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel&#039;s report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Observers said Centre&#039;s predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define &#039;public purpose&#039; - a provision which justifies state&#039;s power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for &#039;production of public goods&#039; or &#039;provision of public services&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include &#039;all land under agricultural cultivation&#039;. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill&#039;s concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15075,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee&#039;s blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry&#039;s vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel&#039;s report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Observers said Centre&#039;s predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define &#039;public purpose&#039; - a provision which justifies state&#039;s power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for &#039;production of public goods&#039; or &#039;provision of public services&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include &#039;all land under agricultural cultivation&#039;. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill&#039;s concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 17 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-House/articleshow/13177727.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15199,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15075
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre&#039;s plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee&#039;s blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry&#039;s vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel&#039;s report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Observers said Centre&#039;s predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define &#039;public purpose&#039; - a provision which justifies state&#039;s power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for &#039;production of public goods&#039; or &#039;provision of public services&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include &#039;all land under agricultural cultivation&#039;. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill&#039;s concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre's plan to facilitate acquisition..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre's plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.<br /><br />The standing committee's blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.<br /><br />The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry's vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.<br /><br />Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel's report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.<br /><br />Observers said Centre's predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.<br /><br />Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define 'public purpose' - a provision which justifies state's power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for 'production of public goods' or 'provision of public services'.<br /><br />Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.<br /><br />The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include 'all land under agricultural cultivation'. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill's concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.<br /><br />The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 15075,
		'title' => 'Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India<br />
<br />
A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre's plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.<br />
<br />
The standing committee's blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.<br />
<br />
The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry's vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.<br />
<br />
Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel's report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.<br />
<br />
Observers said Centre's predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.<br />
<br />
Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define 'public purpose' - a provision which justifies state's power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for 'production of public goods' or 'provision of public services'.<br />
<br />
Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.<br />
<br />
The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include 'all land under agricultural cultivation'. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill's concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.<br />
<br />
The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 17 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-House/articleshow/13177727.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 15199,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 15075,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Times of India

A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre's plan to facilitate acquisition...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre's plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.<br /><br />The standing committee's blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.<br /><br />The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry's vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.<br /><br />Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel's report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.<br /><br />Observers said Centre's predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.<br /><br />Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define 'public purpose' - a provision which justifies state's power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for 'production of public goods' or 'provision of public services'.<br /><br />Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.<br /><br />The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include 'all land under agricultural cultivation'. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill's concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.<br /><br />The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 15075,
	'title' => 'Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India<br />
<br />
A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre's plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.<br />
<br />
The standing committee's blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.<br />
<br />
The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry's vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.<br />
<br />
Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel's report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.<br />
<br />
Observers said Centre's predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.<br />
<br />
Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define 'public purpose' - a provision which justifies state's power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for 'production of public goods' or 'provision of public services'.<br />
<br />
Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.<br />
<br />
The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include 'all land under agricultural cultivation'. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill's concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.<br />
<br />
The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 17 May, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-House/articleshow/13177727.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'govt-mustnt-buy-land-for-private-parties-house-15199',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 15199,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 15075
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
-The Times of India

A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre's plan to facilitate acquisition...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br />A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre's plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation.<br /><br />The standing committee's blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition.<br /><br />The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry's vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation.<br /><br />Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel's report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth.<br /><br />Observers said Centre's predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too.<br /><br />Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define 'public purpose' - a provision which justifies state's power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for 'production of public goods' or 'provision of public services'.<br /><br />Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc.<br /><br />The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include 'all land under agricultural cultivation'. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill's concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years.<br /><br />The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Govt mustn’t buy land for private parties: House

-The Times of India A parliamentary panel has recommended that government keep away from land purchase for private parties, contrary to the provision made in the pending land acquisition bill, striking at the heart of the Centre's plan to facilitate acquisition for industry and townships with better compensation. The standing committee's blanket bar on acquisition for private bodies, including Public Private Partnership for projects defined as public purpose, strikes down the clause which explicitly allowed the state to step in to help the private sector. The bill tabled in Parliament in September provides for private parties to seek government help to buy a part of land marked for acquisition. The bid to leave the private sector to fend for itself at a time when landowners are up in arms against the sale of land to corporates sharply conflicts with the rural development ministry's vision of using the amendment to the 1894 bill to facilitate land acquisition. RD minister Jairam Ramesh had said there was need for land for industrialization and urbanization and the bill provided for a fair compensation. Having made it its war cry for UP polls following the Bhatta Parsaul agitation, the panel's report would test the government resolve to stay in the picture to help private parties who argue that bar on government role in acquisition for them would halt industrial growth. Observers said Centre's predicament is that while it could face political opposition from BJP if it dilutes the provision for private parties, it may end up facing a hostile civil society too. Besides ban on acquisitions for private sector, the panel has asked the Centre to tightly define 'public purpose' - a provision which justifies state's power to take over land forcibly. It has opposed vast discretion to the executive by allowing acquisition for PPP projects for 'production of public goods' or 'provision of public services'. Interestingly, the panel said all 16 central laws which talk of land acquisition should be aligned with the LA amendment bill. It said exemption to the 16 Acts, as the proposed bill provides for, would leave out 95% of land acquisition. These central acts include those of railways, SEZ etc. The panel report wants the tough conditions for acquisition of multi-cropped land to include 'all land under agricultural cultivation'. It said that rainfed areas which grow coarse grains, pulses and oilseeds cannot be left out in the bill's concern for food security, listing the drop in their production over last few years. The panel has sought to extend the liberal resettlement and rehabilitation package to all acquisitions, including land purchase by private parties on their own, which are above the ceiling set by states. The central bill spoke of 100 acres in rural areas and 50 acres in urban pockets.