Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12785, 'title' => 'Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes&rsquo; leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government&rsquo;s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata&rsquo;s plea but its copies were not given to Tata&rsquo;s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist&rsquo;s right to privacy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia&rsquo;s conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,&rdquo; Rohatgi argued. &ldquo;Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,&rdquo; Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata&rsquo;s private conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,&rdquo; he further said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia&rsquo;s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/nation/story_15077673.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12905, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12785, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes', 'metaKeywords' => '2G,Law and Justice,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. The report was submitted...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes&rsquo; leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government&rsquo;s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata&rsquo;s plea but its copies were not given to Tata&rsquo;s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist&rsquo;s right to privacy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia&rsquo;s conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,&rdquo; Rohatgi argued. &ldquo;Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,&rdquo; Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata&rsquo;s private conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,&rdquo; he further said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia&rsquo;s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12785, 'title' => 'Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes&rsquo; leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government&rsquo;s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata&rsquo;s plea but its copies were not given to Tata&rsquo;s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist&rsquo;s right to privacy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia&rsquo;s conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,&rdquo; Rohatgi argued. &ldquo;Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,&rdquo; Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata&rsquo;s private conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,&rdquo; he further said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia&rsquo;s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/nation/story_15077673.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12905, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12785 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes' $metaKeywords = '2G,Law and Justice,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. The report was submitted...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes&rsquo; leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government&rsquo;s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata&rsquo;s plea but its copies were not given to Tata&rsquo;s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist&rsquo;s right to privacy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia&rsquo;s conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,&rdquo; Rohatgi argued. &ldquo;Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,&rdquo; Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata&rsquo;s private conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,&rdquo; he further said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia&rsquo;s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. The report was submitted..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes’ leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government’s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata’s plea but its copies were not given to Tata’s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist’s right to privacy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia’s conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,” Rohatgi argued. “Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,” Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata’s private conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,” he further said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia’s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12785, 'title' => 'Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes&rsquo; leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government&rsquo;s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata&rsquo;s plea but its copies were not given to Tata&rsquo;s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist&rsquo;s right to privacy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia&rsquo;s conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,&rdquo; Rohatgi argued. &ldquo;Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,&rdquo; Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata&rsquo;s private conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,&rdquo; he further said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia&rsquo;s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/nation/story_15077673.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12905, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12785, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes', 'metaKeywords' => '2G,Law and Justice,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. The report was submitted...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes&rsquo; leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government&rsquo;s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata&rsquo;s plea but its copies were not given to Tata&rsquo;s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist&rsquo;s right to privacy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia&rsquo;s conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,&rdquo; Rohatgi argued. &ldquo;Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,&rdquo; Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata&rsquo;s private conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,&rdquo; he further said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia&rsquo;s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12785, 'title' => 'Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes&rsquo; leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government&rsquo;s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata&rsquo;s plea but its copies were not given to Tata&rsquo;s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist&rsquo;s right to privacy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia&rsquo;s conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,&rdquo; Rohatgi argued. &ldquo;Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,&rdquo; Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata&rsquo;s private conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,&rdquo; he further said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia&rsquo;s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/nation/story_15077673.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12905, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12785 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes' $metaKeywords = '2G,Law and Justice,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. The report was submitted...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes&rsquo; leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government&rsquo;s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata&rsquo;s plea but its copies were not given to Tata&rsquo;s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist&rsquo;s right to privacy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia&rsquo;s conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,&rdquo; Rohatgi argued. &ldquo;Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,&rdquo; Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata&rsquo;s private conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,&rdquo; he further said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia&rsquo;s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. The report was submitted..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes’ leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government’s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata’s plea but its copies were not given to Tata’s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist’s right to privacy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia’s conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,” Rohatgi argued. “Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,” Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata’s private conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,” he further said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia’s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f8a2b2c4d5d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12785, 'title' => 'Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes&rsquo; leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government&rsquo;s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata&rsquo;s plea but its copies were not given to Tata&rsquo;s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist&rsquo;s right to privacy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia&rsquo;s conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,&rdquo; Rohatgi argued. &ldquo;Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,&rdquo; Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata&rsquo;s private conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,&rdquo; he further said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia&rsquo;s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/nation/story_15077673.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12905, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12785, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes', 'metaKeywords' => '2G,Law and Justice,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. The report was submitted...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes&rsquo; leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government&rsquo;s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata&rsquo;s plea but its copies were not given to Tata&rsquo;s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist&rsquo;s right to privacy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia&rsquo;s conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,&rdquo; Rohatgi argued. &ldquo;Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,&rdquo; Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata&rsquo;s private conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,&rdquo; he further said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia&rsquo;s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12785, 'title' => 'Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes&rsquo; leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government&rsquo;s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata&rsquo;s plea but its copies were not given to Tata&rsquo;s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist&rsquo;s right to privacy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia&rsquo;s conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,&rdquo; Rohatgi argued. &ldquo;Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,&rdquo; Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata&rsquo;s private conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,&rdquo; he further said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia&rsquo;s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/nation/story_15077673.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12905, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12785 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes' $metaKeywords = '2G,Law and Justice,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. The report was submitted...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes&rsquo; leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government&rsquo;s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata&rsquo;s plea but its copies were not given to Tata&rsquo;s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist&rsquo;s right to privacy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia&rsquo;s conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,&rdquo; Rohatgi argued. &ldquo;Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,&rdquo; Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata&rsquo;s private conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,&rdquo; he further said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia&rsquo;s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. The report was submitted..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes’ leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government’s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata’s plea but its copies were not given to Tata’s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist’s right to privacy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia’s conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,” Rohatgi argued. “Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,” Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata’s private conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,” he further said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia’s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12785, 'title' => 'Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes’ leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government’s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata’s plea but its copies were not given to Tata’s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist’s right to privacy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia’s conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,” Rohatgi argued. “Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,” Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata’s private conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,” he further said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia’s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/nation/story_15077673.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12905, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12785, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes', 'metaKeywords' => '2G,Law and Justice,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. The report was submitted...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes’ leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government’s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata’s plea but its copies were not given to Tata’s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist’s right to privacy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia’s conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,” Rohatgi argued. “Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,” Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata’s private conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,” he further said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia’s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12785, 'title' => 'Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes’ leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government’s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata’s plea but its copies were not given to Tata’s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist’s right to privacy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia’s conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,” Rohatgi argued. “Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,” Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata’s private conversations. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,” he further said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia’s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120201/jsp/nation/story_15077673.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-raises-tamper-doubt-on-radia-tapes-12905', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12905, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12785 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes' $metaKeywords = '2G,Law and Justice,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. The report was submitted...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes’ leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government’s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata’s plea but its copies were not given to Tata’s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist’s right to privacy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia’s conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,” Rohatgi argued. “Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,” Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata’s private conversations.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,” he further said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia’s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Govt raises tamper doubt on Radia tapes |
-The Telegraph A government report on the Niira Radia tapes that was submitted to the Supreme Court today mentioned discrepancies between the original recordings and the conversations broadcast by the media, suggesting they may have been tampered with. The report was submitted in a sealed cover to the bench of Justices G.S. Singhvi and Asok Kumar Ganguly. It was not made public but Justice Singhvi read out parts of it that said the beginning and the end of the conversations released by the media do not match with the original tapes. The judge read aloud another part of the report in which the government denied any hand in the tapes’ leak to the press. There were several agencies involved in the taping, the government said, indicating some other source leaked the recordings. Several private telecom operators were also involved in this operation. The government’s report was submitted by the directorate of investigation (income tax department) in compliance with a court notice on industrialist Ratan Tata’s plea but its copies were not given to Tata’s counsel who had moved the court seeking to protect the industrialist’s right to privacy. Tata had demanded that the government stop more leaks of such tapes and ensure that private conversations with no relevance to the public or with any bearing on public interest be screened by the appropriate taping authorities right at the beginning to prevent any misuse in the future. The conversations between corporate lobbyist Niira Radia and others were recorded jointly by the Enforcement Directorate and the income tax department in a bid to keep an eye on financial irregularities allegedly committed by Radia. The government authorities had tapped 180 days of Radia’s conversations. Counsel Mukul Rohatgi today submitted to the Supreme Court that despite being a public figure, the Tata group chief had the right to privacy and the media cannot violate it by publishing or telecasting his private conversations contained in Radia tapes. “I am entitled to the freedom of privacy and the right to privacy. I have a right to be left alone,” Rohatgi argued. “Does a public figure have no private life? There has to be responsible journalism. There is a difference between public interest and interest of public which includes gossips,” Rohatgi said, adding that the media should not have broadcast and publish Tata’s private conversations. “Nobody has the right to disseminate my private conversations,” he further said. Tata had contended that as corporate lobbyist Radia’s phone was tapped for probing alleged tax evasion, the tapes should not have been used for any other purpose. |