Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9b73962e05-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9b73962e05-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9b73962e05-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27945, 'title' => 'Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu<br /> <br /> <em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /> </em><br /> India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We take no cognizance of this report,&rdquo; a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /> <br /> The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a &ldquo;systematic, ongoing, and egregious&rdquo; standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /> <br /> India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the &ldquo;Tier 2&rdquo; category. Marking concern over &ldquo;Hindu nationalist&rdquo; groups for programmes of forced conversion, &ldquo;Ghar Wapsi&rdquo;, attacks on churches and &ldquo;hate campaigns&rdquo; against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India&rsquo;s status as a &ldquo;Tier 2 Country of concern&rdquo; on religious freedom.<br /> <br /> The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /> <br /> However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /> <br /> In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should &ldquo;integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India&rdquo;, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /> <br /> For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to &ldquo;publicly rebuke&rdquo; officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /> <br /> It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where &ldquo;communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur&rdquo; which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /> <br /> <em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /> </em><br /> While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry&rsquo;s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /> <br /> The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /> <br /> With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi&rsquo;s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring &ldquo;complete freedom of faith&rdquo;, as a &ldquo;positive development.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, &ldquo;This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,&rdquo; referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as &ldquo;the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department&rsquo;s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 May, 2015, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom/article7159762.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675997, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27945, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar', 'metaKeywords' => 'Religious Tolerance,Religious Freedom,Human Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction. India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br /><em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /></em><br />India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;We take no cognizance of this report,&rdquo; a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /><br />The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a &ldquo;systematic, ongoing, and egregious&rdquo; standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /><br />India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the &ldquo;Tier 2&rdquo; category. Marking concern over &ldquo;Hindu nationalist&rdquo; groups for programmes of forced conversion, &ldquo;Ghar Wapsi&rdquo;, attacks on churches and &ldquo;hate campaigns&rdquo; against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India&rsquo;s status as a &ldquo;Tier 2 Country of concern&rdquo; on religious freedom.<br /><br />The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /><br />However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /><br />In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should &ldquo;integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India&rdquo;, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /><br />For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to &ldquo;publicly rebuke&rdquo; officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /><br />It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where &ldquo;communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur&rdquo; which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /><br /><em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /></em><br />While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry&rsquo;s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /><br />The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /><br />With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi&rsquo;s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring &ldquo;complete freedom of faith&rdquo;, as a &ldquo;positive development.&rdquo;<br /><br />However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, &ldquo;This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,&rdquo; referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as &ldquo;the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department&rsquo;s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27945, 'title' => 'Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu<br /> <br /> <em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /> </em><br /> India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We take no cognizance of this report,&rdquo; a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /> <br /> The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a &ldquo;systematic, ongoing, and egregious&rdquo; standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /> <br /> India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the &ldquo;Tier 2&rdquo; category. Marking concern over &ldquo;Hindu nationalist&rdquo; groups for programmes of forced conversion, &ldquo;Ghar Wapsi&rdquo;, attacks on churches and &ldquo;hate campaigns&rdquo; against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India&rsquo;s status as a &ldquo;Tier 2 Country of concern&rdquo; on religious freedom.<br /> <br /> The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /> <br /> However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /> <br /> In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should &ldquo;integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India&rdquo;, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /> <br /> For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to &ldquo;publicly rebuke&rdquo; officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /> <br /> It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where &ldquo;communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur&rdquo; which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /> <br /> <em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /> </em><br /> While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry&rsquo;s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /> <br /> The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /> <br /> With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi&rsquo;s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring &ldquo;complete freedom of faith&rdquo;, as a &ldquo;positive development.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, &ldquo;This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,&rdquo; referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as &ldquo;the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department&rsquo;s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 May, 2015, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom/article7159762.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675997, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27945 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar' $metaKeywords = 'Religious Tolerance,Religious Freedom,Human Rights' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction. India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br /><em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /></em><br />India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;We take no cognizance of this report,&rdquo; a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /><br />The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a &ldquo;systematic, ongoing, and egregious&rdquo; standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /><br />India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the &ldquo;Tier 2&rdquo; category. Marking concern over &ldquo;Hindu nationalist&rdquo; groups for programmes of forced conversion, &ldquo;Ghar Wapsi&rdquo;, attacks on churches and &ldquo;hate campaigns&rdquo; against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India&rsquo;s status as a &ldquo;Tier 2 Country of concern&rdquo; on religious freedom.<br /><br />The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /><br />However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /><br />In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should &ldquo;integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India&rdquo;, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /><br />For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to &ldquo;publicly rebuke&rdquo; officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /><br />It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where &ldquo;communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur&rdquo; which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /><br /><em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /></em><br />While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry&rsquo;s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /><br />The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /><br />With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi&rsquo;s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring &ldquo;complete freedom of faith&rdquo;, as a &ldquo;positive development.&rdquo;<br /><br />However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, &ldquo;This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,&rdquo; referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as &ldquo;the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department&rsquo;s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction. India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a “limited..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br /><em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /></em><br />India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a “limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.”<br /><br />“We take no cognizance of this report,” a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /><br />The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a “systematic, ongoing, and egregious” standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /><br />India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the “Tier 2” category. Marking concern over “Hindu nationalist” groups for programmes of forced conversion, “Ghar Wapsi”, attacks on churches and “hate campaigns” against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India’s status as a “Tier 2 Country of concern” on religious freedom.<br /><br />The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /><br />However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /><br />In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should “integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India”, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /><br />For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to “publicly rebuke” officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /><br />It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where “communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur” which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /><br /><em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /></em><br />While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry’s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /><br />The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /><br />With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring “complete freedom of faith”, as a “positive development.”<br /><br />However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, “This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,” referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as “the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.”<br /><br />The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department’s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9b73962e05-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9b73962e05-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9b73962e05-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27945, 'title' => 'Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu<br /> <br /> <em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /> </em><br /> India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We take no cognizance of this report,&rdquo; a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /> <br /> The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a &ldquo;systematic, ongoing, and egregious&rdquo; standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /> <br /> India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the &ldquo;Tier 2&rdquo; category. Marking concern over &ldquo;Hindu nationalist&rdquo; groups for programmes of forced conversion, &ldquo;Ghar Wapsi&rdquo;, attacks on churches and &ldquo;hate campaigns&rdquo; against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India&rsquo;s status as a &ldquo;Tier 2 Country of concern&rdquo; on religious freedom.<br /> <br /> The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /> <br /> However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /> <br /> In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should &ldquo;integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India&rdquo;, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /> <br /> For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to &ldquo;publicly rebuke&rdquo; officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /> <br /> It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where &ldquo;communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur&rdquo; which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /> <br /> <em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /> </em><br /> While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry&rsquo;s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /> <br /> The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /> <br /> With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi&rsquo;s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring &ldquo;complete freedom of faith&rdquo;, as a &ldquo;positive development.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, &ldquo;This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,&rdquo; referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as &ldquo;the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department&rsquo;s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 May, 2015, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom/article7159762.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675997, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27945, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar', 'metaKeywords' => 'Religious Tolerance,Religious Freedom,Human Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction. India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br /><em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /></em><br />India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;We take no cognizance of this report,&rdquo; a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /><br />The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a &ldquo;systematic, ongoing, and egregious&rdquo; standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /><br />India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the &ldquo;Tier 2&rdquo; category. Marking concern over &ldquo;Hindu nationalist&rdquo; groups for programmes of forced conversion, &ldquo;Ghar Wapsi&rdquo;, attacks on churches and &ldquo;hate campaigns&rdquo; against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India&rsquo;s status as a &ldquo;Tier 2 Country of concern&rdquo; on religious freedom.<br /><br />The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /><br />However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /><br />In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should &ldquo;integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India&rdquo;, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /><br />For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to &ldquo;publicly rebuke&rdquo; officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /><br />It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where &ldquo;communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur&rdquo; which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /><br /><em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /></em><br />While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry&rsquo;s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /><br />The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /><br />With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi&rsquo;s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring &ldquo;complete freedom of faith&rdquo;, as a &ldquo;positive development.&rdquo;<br /><br />However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, &ldquo;This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,&rdquo; referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as &ldquo;the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department&rsquo;s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27945, 'title' => 'Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu<br /> <br /> <em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /> </em><br /> India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We take no cognizance of this report,&rdquo; a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /> <br /> The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a &ldquo;systematic, ongoing, and egregious&rdquo; standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /> <br /> India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the &ldquo;Tier 2&rdquo; category. Marking concern over &ldquo;Hindu nationalist&rdquo; groups for programmes of forced conversion, &ldquo;Ghar Wapsi&rdquo;, attacks on churches and &ldquo;hate campaigns&rdquo; against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India&rsquo;s status as a &ldquo;Tier 2 Country of concern&rdquo; on religious freedom.<br /> <br /> The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /> <br /> However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /> <br /> In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should &ldquo;integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India&rdquo;, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /> <br /> For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to &ldquo;publicly rebuke&rdquo; officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /> <br /> It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where &ldquo;communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur&rdquo; which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /> <br /> <em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /> </em><br /> While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry&rsquo;s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /> <br /> The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /> <br /> With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi&rsquo;s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring &ldquo;complete freedom of faith&rdquo;, as a &ldquo;positive development.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, &ldquo;This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,&rdquo; referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as &ldquo;the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department&rsquo;s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 May, 2015, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom/article7159762.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675997, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27945 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar' $metaKeywords = 'Religious Tolerance,Religious Freedom,Human Rights' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction. India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br /><em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /></em><br />India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;We take no cognizance of this report,&rdquo; a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /><br />The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a &ldquo;systematic, ongoing, and egregious&rdquo; standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /><br />India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the &ldquo;Tier 2&rdquo; category. Marking concern over &ldquo;Hindu nationalist&rdquo; groups for programmes of forced conversion, &ldquo;Ghar Wapsi&rdquo;, attacks on churches and &ldquo;hate campaigns&rdquo; against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India&rsquo;s status as a &ldquo;Tier 2 Country of concern&rdquo; on religious freedom.<br /><br />The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /><br />However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /><br />In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should &ldquo;integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India&rdquo;, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /><br />For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to &ldquo;publicly rebuke&rdquo; officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /><br />It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where &ldquo;communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur&rdquo; which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /><br /><em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /></em><br />While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry&rsquo;s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /><br />The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /><br />With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi&rsquo;s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring &ldquo;complete freedom of faith&rdquo;, as a &ldquo;positive development.&rdquo;<br /><br />However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, &ldquo;This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,&rdquo; referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as &ldquo;the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department&rsquo;s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction. India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a “limited..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br /><em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /></em><br />India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a “limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.”<br /><br />“We take no cognizance of this report,” a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /><br />The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a “systematic, ongoing, and egregious” standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /><br />India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the “Tier 2” category. Marking concern over “Hindu nationalist” groups for programmes of forced conversion, “Ghar Wapsi”, attacks on churches and “hate campaigns” against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India’s status as a “Tier 2 Country of concern” on religious freedom.<br /><br />The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /><br />However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /><br />In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should “integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India”, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /><br />For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to “publicly rebuke” officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /><br />It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where “communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur” which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /><br /><em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /></em><br />While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry’s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /><br />The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /><br />With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring “complete freedom of faith”, as a “positive development.”<br /><br />However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, “This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,” referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as “the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.”<br /><br />The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department’s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9b73962e05-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9b73962e05-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9b73962e05-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9b73962e05-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27945, 'title' => 'Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu<br /> <br /> <em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /> </em><br /> India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We take no cognizance of this report,&rdquo; a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /> <br /> The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a &ldquo;systematic, ongoing, and egregious&rdquo; standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /> <br /> India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the &ldquo;Tier 2&rdquo; category. Marking concern over &ldquo;Hindu nationalist&rdquo; groups for programmes of forced conversion, &ldquo;Ghar Wapsi&rdquo;, attacks on churches and &ldquo;hate campaigns&rdquo; against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India&rsquo;s status as a &ldquo;Tier 2 Country of concern&rdquo; on religious freedom.<br /> <br /> The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /> <br /> However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /> <br /> In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should &ldquo;integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India&rdquo;, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /> <br /> For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to &ldquo;publicly rebuke&rdquo; officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /> <br /> It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where &ldquo;communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur&rdquo; which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /> <br /> <em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /> </em><br /> While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry&rsquo;s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /> <br /> The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /> <br /> With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi&rsquo;s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring &ldquo;complete freedom of faith&rdquo;, as a &ldquo;positive development.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, &ldquo;This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,&rdquo; referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as &ldquo;the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department&rsquo;s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 May, 2015, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom/article7159762.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675997, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27945, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar', 'metaKeywords' => 'Religious Tolerance,Religious Freedom,Human Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction. India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br /><em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /></em><br />India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;We take no cognizance of this report,&rdquo; a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /><br />The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a &ldquo;systematic, ongoing, and egregious&rdquo; standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /><br />India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the &ldquo;Tier 2&rdquo; category. Marking concern over &ldquo;Hindu nationalist&rdquo; groups for programmes of forced conversion, &ldquo;Ghar Wapsi&rdquo;, attacks on churches and &ldquo;hate campaigns&rdquo; against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India&rsquo;s status as a &ldquo;Tier 2 Country of concern&rdquo; on religious freedom.<br /><br />The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /><br />However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /><br />In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should &ldquo;integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India&rdquo;, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /><br />For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to &ldquo;publicly rebuke&rdquo; officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /><br />It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where &ldquo;communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur&rdquo; which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /><br /><em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /></em><br />While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry&rsquo;s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /><br />The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /><br />With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi&rsquo;s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring &ldquo;complete freedom of faith&rdquo;, as a &ldquo;positive development.&rdquo;<br /><br />However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, &ldquo;This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,&rdquo; referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as &ldquo;the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department&rsquo;s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27945, 'title' => 'Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu<br /> <br /> <em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /> </em><br /> India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We take no cognizance of this report,&rdquo; a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /> <br /> The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a &ldquo;systematic, ongoing, and egregious&rdquo; standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /> <br /> India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the &ldquo;Tier 2&rdquo; category. Marking concern over &ldquo;Hindu nationalist&rdquo; groups for programmes of forced conversion, &ldquo;Ghar Wapsi&rdquo;, attacks on churches and &ldquo;hate campaigns&rdquo; against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India&rsquo;s status as a &ldquo;Tier 2 Country of concern&rdquo; on religious freedom.<br /> <br /> The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /> <br /> However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /> <br /> In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should &ldquo;integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India&rdquo;, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /> <br /> For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to &ldquo;publicly rebuke&rdquo; officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /> <br /> It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where &ldquo;communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur&rdquo; which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /> <br /> <em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /> </em><br /> While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry&rsquo;s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /> <br /> The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /> <br /> With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi&rsquo;s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring &ldquo;complete freedom of faith&rdquo;, as a &ldquo;positive development.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, &ldquo;This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,&rdquo; referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as &ldquo;the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department&rsquo;s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 May, 2015, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom/article7159762.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675997, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27945 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar' $metaKeywords = 'Religious Tolerance,Religious Freedom,Human Rights' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction. India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br /><em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /></em><br />India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a &ldquo;limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.&rdquo;<br /><br />&ldquo;We take no cognizance of this report,&rdquo; a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /><br />The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a &ldquo;systematic, ongoing, and egregious&rdquo; standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /><br />India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the &ldquo;Tier 2&rdquo; category. Marking concern over &ldquo;Hindu nationalist&rdquo; groups for programmes of forced conversion, &ldquo;Ghar Wapsi&rdquo;, attacks on churches and &ldquo;hate campaigns&rdquo; against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India&rsquo;s status as a &ldquo;Tier 2 Country of concern&rdquo; on religious freedom.<br /><br />The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /><br />However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /><br />In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should &ldquo;integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India&rdquo;, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /><br />For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to &ldquo;publicly rebuke&rdquo; officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /><br />It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where &ldquo;communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur&rdquo; which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /><br /><em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /></em><br />While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry&rsquo;s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /><br />The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /><br />With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi&rsquo;s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring &ldquo;complete freedom of faith&rdquo;, as a &ldquo;positive development.&rdquo;<br /><br />However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, &ldquo;This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,&rdquo; referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as &ldquo;the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department&rsquo;s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction. India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a “limited..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br /><em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /></em><br />India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a “limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.”<br /><br />“We take no cognizance of this report,” a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /><br />The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a “systematic, ongoing, and egregious” standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /><br />India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the “Tier 2” category. Marking concern over “Hindu nationalist” groups for programmes of forced conversion, “Ghar Wapsi”, attacks on churches and “hate campaigns” against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India’s status as a “Tier 2 Country of concern” on religious freedom.<br /><br />The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /><br />However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /><br />In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should “integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India”, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /><br />For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to “publicly rebuke” officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /><br />It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where “communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur” which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /><br /><em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /></em><br />While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry’s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /><br />The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /><br />With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring “complete freedom of faith”, as a “positive development.”<br /><br />However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, “This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,” referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as “the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.”<br /><br />The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department’s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27945, 'title' => 'Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu<br /> <br /> <em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /> </em><br /> India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a “limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.”<br /> <br /> “We take no cognizance of this report,” a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /> <br /> The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a “systematic, ongoing, and egregious” standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /> <br /> India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the “Tier 2” category. Marking concern over “Hindu nationalist” groups for programmes of forced conversion, “Ghar Wapsi”, attacks on churches and “hate campaigns” against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India’s status as a “Tier 2 Country of concern” on religious freedom.<br /> <br /> The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /> <br /> However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /> <br /> In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should “integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India”, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /> <br /> For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to “publicly rebuke” officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /> <br /> It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where “communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur” which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /> <br /> <em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /> </em><br /> While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry’s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /> <br /> The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /> <br /> With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring “complete freedom of faith”, as a “positive development.”<br /> <br /> However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, “This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,” referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as “the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.”<br /> <br /> The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department’s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 May, 2015, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom/article7159762.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675997, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27945, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar', 'metaKeywords' => 'Religious Tolerance,Religious Freedom,Human Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction. India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a “limited...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br /><em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /></em><br />India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a “limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.”<br /><br />“We take no cognizance of this report,” a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /><br />The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a “systematic, ongoing, and egregious” standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /><br />India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the “Tier 2” category. Marking concern over “Hindu nationalist” groups for programmes of forced conversion, “Ghar Wapsi”, attacks on churches and “hate campaigns” against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India’s status as a “Tier 2 Country of concern” on religious freedom.<br /><br />The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /><br />However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /><br />In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should “integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India”, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /><br />For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to “publicly rebuke” officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /><br />It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where “communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur” which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /><br /><em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /></em><br />While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry’s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /><br />The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /><br />With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring “complete freedom of faith”, as a “positive development.”<br /><br />However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, “This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,” referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as “the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.”<br /><br />The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department’s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27945, 'title' => 'Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu<br /> <br /> <em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /> </em><br /> India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a “limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.”<br /> <br /> “We take no cognizance of this report,” a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /> <br /> The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a “systematic, ongoing, and egregious” standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /> <br /> India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the “Tier 2” category. Marking concern over “Hindu nationalist” groups for programmes of forced conversion, “Ghar Wapsi”, attacks on churches and “hate campaigns” against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India’s status as a “Tier 2 Country of concern” on religious freedom.<br /> <br /> The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /> <br /> However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /> <br /> In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should “integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India”, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /> <br /> For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to “publicly rebuke” officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /> <br /> It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where “communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur” which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /> <br /> <em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /> </em><br /> While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry’s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /> <br /> The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /> <br /> With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring “complete freedom of faith”, as a “positive development.”<br /> <br /> However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, “This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,” referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as “the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.”<br /> <br /> The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department’s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 1 May, 2015, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom/article7159762.ece?homepage=true', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-rejects-us-panels-report-on-religious-freedom-suhasini-haidar-4675997', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675997, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27945 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar' $metaKeywords = 'Religious Tolerance,Religious Freedom,Human Rights' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction. India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a “limited...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br /><em>With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction.<br /></em><br />India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a “limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.”<br /><br />“We take no cognizance of this report,” a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said.<br /><br />The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a “systematic, ongoing, and egregious” standard for failing to protect religious freedoms.<br /><br />India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the “Tier 2” category. Marking concern over “Hindu nationalist” groups for programmes of forced conversion, “Ghar Wapsi”, attacks on churches and “hate campaigns” against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India’s status as a “Tier 2 Country of concern” on religious freedom.<br /><br />The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature.<br /><br />However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities.<br /><br />In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should “integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India”, referring even to the strategic dialogue level.<br /><br />For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to “publicly rebuke” officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities.<br /><br />It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where “communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur” which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India.<br /><br /><em>U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi<br /></em><br />While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry’s strictures against the Ford Foundation.<br /><br />The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952.<br /><br />With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring “complete freedom of faith”, as a “positive development.”<br /><br />However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, “This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,” referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as “the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.”<br /><br />The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department’s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Govt. rejects US panel’s report on religious freedom -Suhasini Haidar |
-The Hindu
With its references to Modi, the report is likely to cause more India-U.S. friction. India reacted coldly to the report of the U.S. commission on religious freedom that criticises the government, and said that it was based on a “limited understanding of India, its constitution and its society.” “We take no cognizance of this report,” a statement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said. The Congressional body, the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), released its annual report for 2015 on Thursday, placing India amid more than 30 countries that meet a “systematic, ongoing, and egregious” standard for failing to protect religious freedoms. India has been on the list since 2009 as a country in the “Tier 2” category. Marking concern over “Hindu nationalist” groups for programmes of forced conversion, “Ghar Wapsi”, attacks on churches and “hate campaigns” against Muslim minorities, the U.S. commission has retained India’s status as a “Tier 2 Country of concern” on religious freedom. The reaction of the MEA is a departure from the past, when the government had made no comment, as it was an internal report of the U.S. legislature. However, the language used this year is particularly critical of the government, for not taking on the groups it alleges are carrying out attacks on minorities. In the 5-page focus on India, the commission recommends that the U.S. government should “integrate concern for religious freedom into bilateral contacts with India”, referring even to the strategic dialogue level. For the first time, the USCIRF report says that the U.S. must urge the Indian government to “publicly rebuke” officials and religious leaders making derogatory statements about religious communities. It advocates that the U.S. Ambassador visit areas where “communal violence has occurred or is likely to occur” which could be seen as interference in the internal affairs of India. U.S. report on religious freedom bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi While diplomats dismiss the prospect of India-U.S. relations being strained over the religious freedom report and its recommendations, given the upsurge in ties with two state visits between New Delhi and Washington by President Obama and Prime Minister Modi, it is bound to ruffle feathers in Delhi. This week also saw tense moments as a U.S. delegation led by Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, raised the issue of the Home Ministry’s strictures against the Ford Foundation. The Hindu has learnt the U.S. expressed concerns over what it sees as the targeting of the Ford Foundation, which has worked in India since 1952. With its references to PM Modi, the USCIRF report is likely to cause more friction between India and the U.S. For example, the report notes Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s speech to Catholic bishops in February 2015, where he spoke of ensuring “complete freedom of faith”, as a “positive development.” However in a stinging personalised addition, it says, “This statement is notable given longstanding allegations that as Chief Minister of Gujarat in 2002, Mr. Modi was complicit in anti-Muslim riots in the state,” referring to his visa revocation in 2005 by the State Department as “the only person known to have been denied a visa based on this provision.” The Congressional commission is an independent bipartisan body that has no legislative or executive powers itself. It significantly influences the State Department’s own annual report on religious freedom, and is cited whenever the U.S. government chooses to invoke its International Religious Freedom Act. |