Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6802521c25055-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6802521c25055-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6802521c25055-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28712, 'title' => 'Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /> <br /> It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have &quot;pro-people&quot; measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /> <br /> Sources said the central law would have &quot;five sweeteners&quot; and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as &quot;pro-industry&quot;.<br /> <br /> The new bill would mandate a &quot;four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas&quot;. The UPA law had provided for &quot;sliding scale of compensation&quot; of &quot;up to four times&quot; of market value &mdash; which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /> <br /> Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /> <br /> In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /> <br /> Given that land acquisition is in the &quot;concurrent list&quot; of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between &quot;welfare&quot; and &quot;industrialization&quot;.<br /> <br /> This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like &quot;consent clause&quot; and &quot;social impact assessment&quot;. The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being &quot;anti-farmer&quot;.<br /> <br /> With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /> <br /> The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /> <br /> The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 July, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide/articleshow/48180267.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676765, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28712, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide', 'metaKeywords' => 'Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation,land grab,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Consent', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions. It is learnt that the...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /><br />It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have &quot;pro-people&quot; measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /><br />Sources said the central law would have &quot;five sweeteners&quot; and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as &quot;pro-industry&quot;.<br /><br />The new bill would mandate a &quot;four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas&quot;. The UPA law had provided for &quot;sliding scale of compensation&quot; of &quot;up to four times&quot; of market value &mdash; which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /><br />Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /><br />In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /><br />Given that land acquisition is in the &quot;concurrent list&quot; of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between &quot;welfare&quot; and &quot;industrialization&quot;.<br /><br />This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like &quot;consent clause&quot; and &quot;social impact assessment&quot;. The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being &quot;anti-farmer&quot;.<br /><br />With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /><br />The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28712, 'title' => 'Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /> <br /> It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have &quot;pro-people&quot; measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /> <br /> Sources said the central law would have &quot;five sweeteners&quot; and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as &quot;pro-industry&quot;.<br /> <br /> The new bill would mandate a &quot;four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas&quot;. The UPA law had provided for &quot;sliding scale of compensation&quot; of &quot;up to four times&quot; of market value &mdash; which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /> <br /> Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /> <br /> In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /> <br /> Given that land acquisition is in the &quot;concurrent list&quot; of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between &quot;welfare&quot; and &quot;industrialization&quot;.<br /> <br /> This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like &quot;consent clause&quot; and &quot;social impact assessment&quot;. The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being &quot;anti-farmer&quot;.<br /> <br /> With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /> <br /> The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /> <br /> The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 July, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide/articleshow/48180267.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676765, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 8 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 9 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 10 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28712 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide' $metaKeywords = 'Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation,land grab,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Consent' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions. It is learnt that the...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /><br />It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have &quot;pro-people&quot; measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /><br />Sources said the central law would have &quot;five sweeteners&quot; and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as &quot;pro-industry&quot;.<br /><br />The new bill would mandate a &quot;four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas&quot;. The UPA law had provided for &quot;sliding scale of compensation&quot; of &quot;up to four times&quot; of market value &mdash; which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /><br />Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /><br />In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /><br />Given that land acquisition is in the &quot;concurrent list&quot; of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between &quot;welfare&quot; and &quot;industrialization&quot;.<br /><br />This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like &quot;consent clause&quot; and &quot;social impact assessment&quot;. The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being &quot;anti-farmer&quot;.<br /><br />With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /><br />The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions. It is learnt that the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /><br />It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have "pro-people" measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /><br />Sources said the central law would have "five sweeteners" and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as "pro-industry".<br /><br />The new bill would mandate a "four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas". The UPA law had provided for "sliding scale of compensation" of "up to four times" of market value — which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /><br />Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /><br />In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /><br />Given that land acquisition is in the "concurrent list" of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between "welfare" and "industrialization".<br /><br />This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like "consent clause" and "social impact assessment". The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being "anti-farmer".<br /><br />With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /><br />The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6802521c25055-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6802521c25055-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6802521c25055-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28712, 'title' => 'Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /> <br /> It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have &quot;pro-people&quot; measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /> <br /> Sources said the central law would have &quot;five sweeteners&quot; and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as &quot;pro-industry&quot;.<br /> <br /> The new bill would mandate a &quot;four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas&quot;. The UPA law had provided for &quot;sliding scale of compensation&quot; of &quot;up to four times&quot; of market value &mdash; which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /> <br /> Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /> <br /> In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /> <br /> Given that land acquisition is in the &quot;concurrent list&quot; of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between &quot;welfare&quot; and &quot;industrialization&quot;.<br /> <br /> This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like &quot;consent clause&quot; and &quot;social impact assessment&quot;. The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being &quot;anti-farmer&quot;.<br /> <br /> With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /> <br /> The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /> <br /> The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 July, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide/articleshow/48180267.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676765, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28712, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide', 'metaKeywords' => 'Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation,land grab,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Consent', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions. It is learnt that the...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /><br />It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have &quot;pro-people&quot; measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /><br />Sources said the central law would have &quot;five sweeteners&quot; and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as &quot;pro-industry&quot;.<br /><br />The new bill would mandate a &quot;four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas&quot;. The UPA law had provided for &quot;sliding scale of compensation&quot; of &quot;up to four times&quot; of market value &mdash; which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /><br />Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /><br />In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /><br />Given that land acquisition is in the &quot;concurrent list&quot; of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between &quot;welfare&quot; and &quot;industrialization&quot;.<br /><br />This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like &quot;consent clause&quot; and &quot;social impact assessment&quot;. The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being &quot;anti-farmer&quot;.<br /><br />With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /><br />The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28712, 'title' => 'Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /> <br /> It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have &quot;pro-people&quot; measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /> <br /> Sources said the central law would have &quot;five sweeteners&quot; and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as &quot;pro-industry&quot;.<br /> <br /> The new bill would mandate a &quot;four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas&quot;. The UPA law had provided for &quot;sliding scale of compensation&quot; of &quot;up to four times&quot; of market value &mdash; which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /> <br /> Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /> <br /> In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /> <br /> Given that land acquisition is in the &quot;concurrent list&quot; of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between &quot;welfare&quot; and &quot;industrialization&quot;.<br /> <br /> This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like &quot;consent clause&quot; and &quot;social impact assessment&quot;. The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being &quot;anti-farmer&quot;.<br /> <br /> With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /> <br /> The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /> <br /> The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 July, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide/articleshow/48180267.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676765, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 8 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 9 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 10 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28712 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide' $metaKeywords = 'Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation,land grab,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Consent' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions. It is learnt that the...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /><br />It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have &quot;pro-people&quot; measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /><br />Sources said the central law would have &quot;five sweeteners&quot; and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as &quot;pro-industry&quot;.<br /><br />The new bill would mandate a &quot;four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas&quot;. The UPA law had provided for &quot;sliding scale of compensation&quot; of &quot;up to four times&quot; of market value &mdash; which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /><br />Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /><br />In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /><br />Given that land acquisition is in the &quot;concurrent list&quot; of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between &quot;welfare&quot; and &quot;industrialization&quot;.<br /><br />This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like &quot;consent clause&quot; and &quot;social impact assessment&quot;. The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being &quot;anti-farmer&quot;.<br /><br />With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /><br />The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions. It is learnt that the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /><br />It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have "pro-people" measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /><br />Sources said the central law would have "five sweeteners" and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as "pro-industry".<br /><br />The new bill would mandate a "four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas". The UPA law had provided for "sliding scale of compensation" of "up to four times" of market value — which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /><br />Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /><br />In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /><br />Given that land acquisition is in the "concurrent list" of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between "welfare" and "industrialization".<br /><br />This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like "consent clause" and "social impact assessment". The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being "anti-farmer".<br /><br />With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /><br />The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6802521c25055-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6802521c25055-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6802521c25055-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6802521c25055-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28712, 'title' => 'Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /> <br /> It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have &quot;pro-people&quot; measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /> <br /> Sources said the central law would have &quot;five sweeteners&quot; and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as &quot;pro-industry&quot;.<br /> <br /> The new bill would mandate a &quot;four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas&quot;. The UPA law had provided for &quot;sliding scale of compensation&quot; of &quot;up to four times&quot; of market value &mdash; which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /> <br /> Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /> <br /> In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /> <br /> Given that land acquisition is in the &quot;concurrent list&quot; of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between &quot;welfare&quot; and &quot;industrialization&quot;.<br /> <br /> This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like &quot;consent clause&quot; and &quot;social impact assessment&quot;. The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being &quot;anti-farmer&quot;.<br /> <br /> With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /> <br /> The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /> <br /> The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 July, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide/articleshow/48180267.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676765, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28712, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide', 'metaKeywords' => 'Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation,land grab,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Consent', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions. It is learnt that the...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /><br />It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have &quot;pro-people&quot; measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /><br />Sources said the central law would have &quot;five sweeteners&quot; and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as &quot;pro-industry&quot;.<br /><br />The new bill would mandate a &quot;four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas&quot;. The UPA law had provided for &quot;sliding scale of compensation&quot; of &quot;up to four times&quot; of market value &mdash; which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /><br />Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /><br />In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /><br />Given that land acquisition is in the &quot;concurrent list&quot; of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between &quot;welfare&quot; and &quot;industrialization&quot;.<br /><br />This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like &quot;consent clause&quot; and &quot;social impact assessment&quot;. The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being &quot;anti-farmer&quot;.<br /><br />With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /><br />The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28712, 'title' => 'Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /> <br /> It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have &quot;pro-people&quot; measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /> <br /> Sources said the central law would have &quot;five sweeteners&quot; and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as &quot;pro-industry&quot;.<br /> <br /> The new bill would mandate a &quot;four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas&quot;. The UPA law had provided for &quot;sliding scale of compensation&quot; of &quot;up to four times&quot; of market value &mdash; which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /> <br /> Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /> <br /> In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /> <br /> Given that land acquisition is in the &quot;concurrent list&quot; of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between &quot;welfare&quot; and &quot;industrialization&quot;.<br /> <br /> This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like &quot;consent clause&quot; and &quot;social impact assessment&quot;. The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being &quot;anti-farmer&quot;.<br /> <br /> With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /> <br /> The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /> <br /> The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 July, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide/articleshow/48180267.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676765, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 8 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 9 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 10 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28712 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide' $metaKeywords = 'Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation,land grab,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Consent' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions. It is learnt that the...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /><br />It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have &quot;pro-people&quot; measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /><br />Sources said the central law would have &quot;five sweeteners&quot; and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as &quot;pro-industry&quot;.<br /><br />The new bill would mandate a &quot;four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas&quot;. The UPA law had provided for &quot;sliding scale of compensation&quot; of &quot;up to four times&quot; of market value &mdash; which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /><br />Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /><br />In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /><br />Given that land acquisition is in the &quot;concurrent list&quot; of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between &quot;welfare&quot; and &quot;industrialization&quot;.<br /><br />This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like &quot;consent clause&quot; and &quot;social impact assessment&quot;. The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being &quot;anti-farmer&quot;.<br /><br />With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /><br />The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions. It is learnt that the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /><br />It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have "pro-people" measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /><br />Sources said the central law would have "five sweeteners" and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as "pro-industry".<br /><br />The new bill would mandate a "four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas". The UPA law had provided for "sliding scale of compensation" of "up to four times" of market value — which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /><br />Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /><br />In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /><br />Given that land acquisition is in the "concurrent list" of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between "welfare" and "industrialization".<br /><br />This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like "consent clause" and "social impact assessment". The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being "anti-farmer".<br /><br />With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /><br />The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28712, 'title' => 'Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /> <br /> It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have "pro-people" measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /> <br /> Sources said the central law would have "five sweeteners" and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as "pro-industry".<br /> <br /> The new bill would mandate a "four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas". The UPA law had provided for "sliding scale of compensation" of "up to four times" of market value — which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /> <br /> Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /> <br /> In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /> <br /> Given that land acquisition is in the "concurrent list" of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between "welfare" and "industrialization".<br /> <br /> This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like "consent clause" and "social impact assessment". The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being "anti-farmer".<br /> <br /> With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /> <br /> The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /> <br /> The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 July, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide/articleshow/48180267.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676765, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28712, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide', 'metaKeywords' => 'Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation,land grab,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Consent', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions. It is learnt that the...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /><br />It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have "pro-people" measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /><br />Sources said the central law would have "five sweeteners" and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as "pro-industry".<br /><br />The new bill would mandate a "four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas". The UPA law had provided for "sliding scale of compensation" of "up to four times" of market value — which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /><br />Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /><br />In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /><br />Given that land acquisition is in the "concurrent list" of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between "welfare" and "industrialization".<br /><br />This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like "consent clause" and "social impact assessment". The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being "anti-farmer".<br /><br />With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /><br />The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28712, 'title' => 'Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India<br /> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /> <br /> It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have "pro-people" measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /> <br /> Sources said the central law would have "five sweeteners" and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as "pro-industry".<br /> <br /> The new bill would mandate a "four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas". The UPA law had provided for "sliding scale of compensation" of "up to four times" of market value — which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /> <br /> Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /> <br /> In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /> <br /> Given that land acquisition is in the "concurrent list" of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between "welfare" and "industrialization".<br /> <br /> This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like "consent clause" and "social impact assessment". The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being "anti-farmer".<br /> <br /> With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /> <br /> The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /> <br /> The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 23 July, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide/articleshow/48180267.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'govt-to-strip-land-bill-of-sticky-clauses-let-states-decide-4676765', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676765, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 8 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 9 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 10 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28712 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide' $metaKeywords = 'Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation,Land Acquisition Bill,Land Alienation,land grab,land grabbing,Land Ordinance,Consent' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions. It is learnt that the...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions.<br /><br />It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have "pro-people" measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry.<br /><br />Sources said the central law would have "five sweeteners" and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as "pro-industry".<br /><br />The new bill would mandate a "four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas". The UPA law had provided for "sliding scale of compensation" of "up to four times" of market value — which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas.<br /><br />Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition.<br /><br />In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign.<br /><br />Given that land acquisition is in the "concurrent list" of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between "welfare" and "industrialization".<br /><br />This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like "consent clause" and "social impact assessment". The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being "anti-farmer".<br /><br />With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law.<br /><br />The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Govt to strip land bill of sticky clauses, let states decide |
-The Times of India
NEW DELHI: The Centre is likely to work out the contours of the reworked land acquisition bill by next week amid indications that it may be purged of all the politically unpopular provisions. It is learnt that the Modi government may allow states to draft their own acquisition laws with the frame of reference being the central law which would only have "pro-people" measures; a tack aimed at neutralizing the Congress-led opposition charge that the Centre has amended the UPA law to help industry. Sources said the central law would have "five sweeteners" and none of the measures that have given a handle to the opposition to target the government as "pro-industry". The new bill would mandate a "four-fold and two-fold compensation in rural and urban areas". The UPA law had provided for "sliding scale of compensation" of "up to four times" of market value — which meant that the value of acquired land would increase with its distance from urban areas. Another clause would provide for one job for every family displaced by acquisition. In contrast, the Centre would remove the contentious clauses that have led to the opposition campaign. Given that land acquisition is in the "concurrent list" of the Constitution, the move envisages a regime in which states can have their own laws with provisions as they feel constitutes the right balance between "welfare" and "industrialization". This, the Centre hopes, will rid it of the problem of dealing with problematic provisions like "consent clause" and "social impact assessment". The NDA regime had amended the UPA law and dropped the twin provisions, attracting serious criticism from Congress and other opposition parties as being "anti-farmer". With the central law leaving it to states to deal with the contentious provisions, the ruling camp believes it will neutralize the anger that it attracted by amending the UPA law. The contours of the new bill are almost ready and a final shape will be clinched after the joint committee of Parliament gives its report. The bill was referred to the parliamentary panel after the Centre failed to hammer out a consensus with the opposition to ensure its passage in Rajya Sabha. The proposal to allow states to have their own laws came from BJP-ruled states at the recent Niti Aayog meeting. If it has been lapped up by the Centre, it is because the move will help it lob the ball in states' court and rid it of a major political conundrum. |