Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 13739,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Economic Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there&#039;s been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa&#039;s share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra&#039;s an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
UP&#039;s low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 21 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/editorial/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help/articleshow/12349076.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13862,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13739,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;NREGS,NREGA,Poverty,bpl&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

-The Economic Times

Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did....&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Economic Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there&#039;s been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa&#039;s share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra&#039;s an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;UP&#039;s low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 13739,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Economic Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there&#039;s been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa&#039;s share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra&#039;s an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
UP&#039;s low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 21 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/editorial/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help/articleshow/12349076.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13862,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 13739
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;NREGS,NREGA,Poverty,bpl&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

-The Economic Times

Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did....&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Economic Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there&#039;s been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa&#039;s share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra&#039;s an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;UP&#039;s low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

-The Economic Times

Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India's poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did...."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br />Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India's poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.<br /><br />States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there's been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.<br /><br />Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa's share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra's an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.<br /><br />That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.<br /><br />UP's low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 13739,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Economic Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there&#039;s been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa&#039;s share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra&#039;s an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
UP&#039;s low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 21 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/editorial/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help/articleshow/12349076.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13862,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13739,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;NREGS,NREGA,Poverty,bpl&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

-The Economic Times

Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did....&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Economic Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there&#039;s been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa&#039;s share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra&#039;s an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;UP&#039;s low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 13739,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Economic Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there&#039;s been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa&#039;s share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra&#039;s an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
UP&#039;s low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 21 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/editorial/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help/articleshow/12349076.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13862,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 13739
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;NREGS,NREGA,Poverty,bpl&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

-The Economic Times

Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did....&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Economic Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there&#039;s been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa&#039;s share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra&#039;s an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;UP&#039;s low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

-The Economic Times

Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India's poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did...."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br />Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India's poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.<br /><br />States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there's been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.<br /><br />Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa's share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra's an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.<br /><br />That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.<br /><br />UP's low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680ef5e0a7d9b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 13739,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Economic Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there&#039;s been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa&#039;s share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra&#039;s an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
UP&#039;s low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 21 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/editorial/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help/articleshow/12349076.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13862,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13739,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;NREGS,NREGA,Poverty,bpl&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

-The Economic Times

Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did....&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Economic Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there&#039;s been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa&#039;s share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra&#039;s an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;UP&#039;s low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 13739,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Economic Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there&#039;s been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa&#039;s share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra&#039;s an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
UP&#039;s low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 21 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/editorial/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help/articleshow/12349076.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13862,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 13739
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;NREGS,NREGA,Poverty,bpl&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

-The Economic Times

Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did....&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Economic Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India&#039;s poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there&#039;s been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa&#039;s share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra&#039;s an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;UP&#039;s low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

-The Economic Times

Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India's poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did...."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br />Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India's poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.<br /><br />States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there's been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.<br /><br />Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa's share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra's an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.<br /><br />That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.<br /><br />UP's low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 13739,
		'title' => 'Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
-The Economic Times<br />
<br />
Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India's poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.<br />
<br />
States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there's been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.<br />
<br />
Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa's share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra's an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.<br />
<br />
That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.<br />
<br />
UP's low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 21 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/editorial/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help/articleshow/12349076.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 13862,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 13739,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help',
	'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS,NREGA,Poverty,bpl',
	'metaDesc' => '

-The Economic Times

Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India's poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did....',
	'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br />Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India's poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.<br /><br />States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there's been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.<br /><br />Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa's share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra's an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.<br /><br />That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.<br /><br />UP's low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 13739,
	'title' => 'Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
-The Economic Times<br />
<br />
Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India's poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.<br />
<br />
States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there's been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.<br />
<br />
Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa's share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra's an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.<br />
<br />
That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.<br />
<br />
UP's low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 21 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/editorial/growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help/articleshow/12349076.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'growth-is-necessary-to-remove-poverty-and-interventions-like-nrega-help-13862',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 13862,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 13739
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help'
$metaKeywords = 'NREGS,NREGA,Poverty,bpl'
$metaDesc = '

-The Economic Times

Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India's poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did....'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">-The Economic Times<br /><br />Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India's poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10.<br /><br />States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there's been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions.<br /><br />Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa's share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra's an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty.<br /><br />That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction.<br /><br />UP's low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Growth is necessary to remove poverty, and interventions like NREGA help

-The Economic Times Over the first five years of the UPA government, the number of India's poor fell from 37% of the population to a little less than 30% of the population and rural poverty fell faster than urban poverty did. A closer look at the numbers shows that states performed very differently when it came to poverty reduction through the years 2004-05 to 2009-10. States like Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Orissa saw the biggest falls in poverty numbers; Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Assam were the worst laggards. Ever since the UPA launched its flagship welfare scheme the NREGA, there's been a lot of bickering about whether such interventions are necessary to reduce poverty and whether growth, by itself, will lift people from poverty to well-being. Looking at poverty reduction, growth and NREGA implementation numbers, we can now come to some conclusions. Of the three best performing poverty-reducing states, two, Maharashtra and Orissa, grew faster than the national average in the five years till 2009-10. Both are among the worst implementers of the NREGA scheme: in 2009-10 of all households that accessed the benefits of the scheme, Orissa's share was a measly 2.7% and Maharashtra's an even worse 1.1%. So, it is tempting to conclude that growth, not intervention, lifted people out of poverty. That would be too hasty. Madhya Pradesh, one of the best performers in poverty reduction, grew below the national average at 7.1% through these five years. Its success is attributable to effective intervention: an impressive 9% of all NREGA beneficiaries belong to MP. Bihar is a complete outlier, where neither growth nor intervention works. Bihar grew 10% on average through the period and has impressive NREGA numbers, but lags in poverty reduction. UP's low growth rate is a drag on its fairly impressive NREGA numbers, Assam suffered from both poor growth and NREGA implementation. Growth is necessary to lift people out of poverty, but states like Madhya Pradesh show that even when growth lags, schemes like NREGA, implemented well, can do a wonderful job. The growth versus intervention debate is pointless; growth with intervention makes sense.