Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20133, 'title' => 'Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman. </p> <p align="justify"> The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner. </p> <p align="justify"> The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with. </p> <p align="justify"> The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment. </p> <p align="justify"> Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: &quot;Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's &quot;no-nonsense approach to corruption&quot; that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 3 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed/article4575255.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20274, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 20133, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai', 'metaKeywords' => 'Lokayukta,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify">Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman.</p><p align="justify">The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner.</p><p align="justify">The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with.</p><p align="justify">The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment.</p><p align="justify">Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: &quot;Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative.</p><p align="justify">The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's &quot;no-nonsense approach to corruption&quot; that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20133, 'title' => 'Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman. </p> <p align="justify"> The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner. </p> <p align="justify"> The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with. </p> <p align="justify"> The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment. </p> <p align="justify"> Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: &quot;Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's &quot;no-nonsense approach to corruption&quot; that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 3 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed/article4575255.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20274, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 20133 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai' $metaKeywords = 'Lokayukta,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify">Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman.</p><p align="justify">The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner.</p><p align="justify">The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with.</p><p align="justify">The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment.</p><p align="justify">Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: &quot;Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative.</p><p align="justify">The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's &quot;no-nonsense approach to corruption&quot; that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify">Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman.</p><p align="justify">The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner.</p><p align="justify">The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with.</p><p align="justify">The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment.</p><p align="justify">Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: "Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta."</p><p align="justify">The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative.</p><p align="justify">The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's "no-nonsense approach to corruption" that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20133, 'title' => 'Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman. </p> <p align="justify"> The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner. </p> <p align="justify"> The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with. </p> <p align="justify"> The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment. </p> <p align="justify"> Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: &quot;Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's &quot;no-nonsense approach to corruption&quot; that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 3 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed/article4575255.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20274, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 20133, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai', 'metaKeywords' => 'Lokayukta,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify">Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman.</p><p align="justify">The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner.</p><p align="justify">The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with.</p><p align="justify">The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment.</p><p align="justify">Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: &quot;Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative.</p><p align="justify">The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's &quot;no-nonsense approach to corruption&quot; that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20133, 'title' => 'Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman. </p> <p align="justify"> The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner. </p> <p align="justify"> The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with. </p> <p align="justify"> The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment. </p> <p align="justify"> Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: &quot;Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's &quot;no-nonsense approach to corruption&quot; that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 3 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed/article4575255.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20274, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 20133 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai' $metaKeywords = 'Lokayukta,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify">Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman.</p><p align="justify">The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner.</p><p align="justify">The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with.</p><p align="justify">The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment.</p><p align="justify">Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: &quot;Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative.</p><p align="justify">The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's &quot;no-nonsense approach to corruption&quot; that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify">Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman.</p><p align="justify">The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner.</p><p align="justify">The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with.</p><p align="justify">The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment.</p><p align="justify">Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: "Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta."</p><p align="justify">The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative.</p><p align="justify">The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's "no-nonsense approach to corruption" that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6819bcf9390a1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20133, 'title' => 'Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman. </p> <p align="justify"> The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner. </p> <p align="justify"> The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with. </p> <p align="justify"> The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment. </p> <p align="justify"> Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: &quot;Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's &quot;no-nonsense approach to corruption&quot; that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 3 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed/article4575255.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20274, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 20133, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai', 'metaKeywords' => 'Lokayukta,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify">Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman.</p><p align="justify">The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner.</p><p align="justify">The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with.</p><p align="justify">The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment.</p><p align="justify">Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: &quot;Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative.</p><p align="justify">The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's &quot;no-nonsense approach to corruption&quot; that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20133, 'title' => 'Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman. </p> <p align="justify"> The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner. </p> <p align="justify"> The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with. </p> <p align="justify"> The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment. </p> <p align="justify"> Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: &quot;Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's &quot;no-nonsense approach to corruption&quot; that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 3 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed/article4575255.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20274, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 20133 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai' $metaKeywords = 'Lokayukta,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify">Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman.</p><p align="justify">The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner.</p><p align="justify">The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with.</p><p align="justify">The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment.</p><p align="justify">Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: &quot;Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative.</p><p align="justify">The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's &quot;no-nonsense approach to corruption&quot; that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify">Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman.</p><p align="justify">The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner.</p><p align="justify">The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with.</p><p align="justify">The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment.</p><p align="justify">Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: "Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta."</p><p align="justify">The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative.</p><p align="justify">The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's "no-nonsense approach to corruption" that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20133, 'title' => 'Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman. </p> <p align="justify"> The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner. </p> <p align="justify"> The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with. </p> <p align="justify"> The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment. </p> <p align="justify"> Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: "Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta." </p> <p align="justify"> The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's "no-nonsense approach to corruption" that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 3 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed/article4575255.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20274, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 20133, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai', 'metaKeywords' => 'Lokayukta,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify">Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman.</p><p align="justify">The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner.</p><p align="justify">The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with.</p><p align="justify">The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment.</p><p align="justify">Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: "Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta."</p><p align="justify">The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative.</p><p align="justify">The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's "no-nonsense approach to corruption" that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20133, 'title' => 'Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Hindu </div> <p align="justify"> Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman. </p> <p align="justify"> The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner. </p> <p align="justify"> The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with. </p> <p align="justify"> The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment. </p> <p align="justify"> Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation. </p> <p align="justify"> Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers. </p> <p align="justify"> In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: "Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta." </p> <p align="justify"> The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's "no-nonsense approach to corruption" that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 3 April, 2013, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed/article4575255.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'gujarat-bill-ending-role-of-governor-cj-to-choose-ombudsman-passed-darshan-desai-20274', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20274, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 20133 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai' $metaKeywords = 'Lokayukta,Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu</div><p align="justify">Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman.</p><p align="justify">The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner.</p><p align="justify">The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with.</p><p align="justify">The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment.</p><p align="justify">Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation.</p><p align="justify">Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers.</p><p align="justify">In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: "Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta."</p><p align="justify">The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative.</p><p align="justify">The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's "no-nonsense approach to corruption" that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Gujarat Bill ending role of Governor, CJ to choose ombudsman passed-Darshan Desai |
-The Hindu Amid protests and a walkout by Opposition MLAs in the Assembly, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party on Tuesday pushed through a new Gujarat Lokayukta Aayog Bill, 2013 that ostensibly seeks to end the role of the Governor and the Chief Justice of the High Court in appointing the ombudsman. The Bill proposes a seven-member selection panel headed by the Chief Minister, which will recommend a candidate for the Lokayukta's post and the Governor only needs to ratify it. The other members will be a minister hand-picked by the Chief Minister, the Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition, a High Court judge nominated by the Chief Justice and the State Vigilance Commissioner. The existing Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986, empowers the Governor to appoint the ombudsman in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of Opposition. This has now been done away with. The proposed law comes in the wake of a veritable slugfest between Governor Kamla Beniwal and Chief Minister Narendra Modi after the Raj Bhavan appointed retired judge R.A. Mehta in August 2011 in consultation with the Chief Justice and the Leader of the Opposition, ignoring the Council of Ministers. The government lost this battle in the Supreme Court and after its review petition was also rejected, it moved a curative petition in the court challenging Justice Mehta's appointment. Defending the government in the Assembly, Finance Minister Nitin Patel refuted the charge that the Bill sought to curtail the Governor's powers and that its sole purpose was to prevent Justice Mehta from taking charge. The BJP in an explanatory note, later, also stated that the Bill protects the right of Justice Mehta to take charge though he has passed the age of 72 years as prescribed by the new legislation. Interestingly, the BJP's central leadership has strongly defended Gujarat, stating that the bill in fact diluted the powers of the Council of Ministers. In a note distributed to the media, the BJP said: "Contrary to the misrepresentation, it is dilution of the powers of the Council of Ministers. Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding in Gujarat Lokayukta matter has categorically held that irrespective of the language of the statute, the Governor is supposed to act as head of state on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers while deciding on appointment of Lokayukta." The party pointed out that instead of the Council of Ministers, it was an elaborate panel that would now recommend the name of the Lokayukta. The legislation proposes to bring virtually the entire government machinery, as well as councillors and elected representatives of all local bodies, in its purview. The new Lokayukta Commission will have four up-lokayuktas, two of whom will be judicial members and two administrative. The BJP says it is only because of Mr. Modi's "no-nonsense approach to corruption" that his government could bring in a multilayered bill that puts even the Chief Minister in its purview. Scoffing at this, Leader of the Opposition Shankersinh Vaghela said the Bill was an attempt by Mr. Modi to usurp the constitutional process and have a Lokayukta who could dance to his tune. |