Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681faf3e65374-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681faf3e65374-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681faf3e65374-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 13752,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &amp;#039;No&amp;#039;&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in &#039;No&#039; that means they don&#039;t think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in &#039;Yes&#039; that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - &#039;Can&#039;t say&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 20 March, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Has-poverty-reduced-in-India-Surfers-say-No/Article1-828457.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13875,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13752,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &amp;#039;No&amp;#039;&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Poverty,bpl&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindustan Times

The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.

According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in &#039;No&#039; that means they don&#039;t think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in &#039;Yes&#039; that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - &#039;Can&#039;t say&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 13752,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &amp;#039;No&amp;#039;&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in &#039;No&#039; that means they don&#039;t think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in &#039;Yes&#039; that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - &#039;Can&#039;t say&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 20 March, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Has-poverty-reduced-in-India-Surfers-say-No/Article1-828457.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13875,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 13752
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &amp;#039;No&amp;#039;&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Poverty,bpl&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindustan Times

The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.

According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in &#039;No&#039; that means they don&#039;t think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in &#039;Yes&#039; that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - &#039;Can&#039;t say&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &#039;No&#039; | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindustan Times

The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.

According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &#039;No&#039;</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times<br /><br />The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.<br /><br />According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.<br /><br />The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.<br /><br />On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.<br /><br />According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in 'No' that means they don't think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.<br /><br />Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in 'Yes' that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.<br /><br />However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - 'Can't say'.<br />&nbsp;<br />In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.<br />&nbsp;<br />After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681faf3e65374-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681faf3e65374-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681faf3e65374-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 13752,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &amp;#039;No&amp;#039;&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in &#039;No&#039; that means they don&#039;t think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in &#039;Yes&#039; that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - &#039;Can&#039;t say&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 20 March, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Has-poverty-reduced-in-India-Surfers-say-No/Article1-828457.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13875,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13752,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &amp;#039;No&amp;#039;&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Poverty,bpl&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindustan Times

The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.

According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in &#039;No&#039; that means they don&#039;t think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in &#039;Yes&#039; that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - &#039;Can&#039;t say&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 13752,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &amp;#039;No&amp;#039;&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in &#039;No&#039; that means they don&#039;t think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in &#039;Yes&#039; that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - &#039;Can&#039;t say&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 20 March, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Has-poverty-reduced-in-India-Surfers-say-No/Article1-828457.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13875,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 13752
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &amp;#039;No&amp;#039;&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Poverty,bpl&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindustan Times

The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.

According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in &#039;No&#039; that means they don&#039;t think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in &#039;Yes&#039; that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - &#039;Can&#039;t say&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &#039;No&#039; | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindustan Times

The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.

According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &#039;No&#039;</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times<br /><br />The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.<br /><br />According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.<br /><br />The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.<br /><br />On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.<br /><br />According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in 'No' that means they don't think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.<br /><br />Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in 'Yes' that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.<br /><br />However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - 'Can't say'.<br />&nbsp;<br />In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.<br />&nbsp;<br />After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681faf3e65374-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681faf3e65374-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681faf3e65374-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681faf3e65374-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 13752,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &amp;#039;No&amp;#039;&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in &#039;No&#039; that means they don&#039;t think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in &#039;Yes&#039; that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - &#039;Can&#039;t say&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 20 March, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Has-poverty-reduced-in-India-Surfers-say-No/Article1-828457.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13875,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13752,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &amp;#039;No&amp;#039;&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Poverty,bpl&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindustan Times

The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.

According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in &#039;No&#039; that means they don&#039;t think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in &#039;Yes&#039; that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - &#039;Can&#039;t say&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 13752,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &amp;#039;No&amp;#039;&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in &#039;No&#039; that means they don&#039;t think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in &#039;Yes&#039; that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - &#039;Can&#039;t say&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 20 March, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Has-poverty-reduced-in-India-Surfers-say-No/Article1-828457.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 13875,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 13752
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &amp;#039;No&amp;#039;&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Poverty,bpl&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindustan Times

The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.

According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in &#039;No&#039; that means they don&#039;t think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in &#039;Yes&#039; that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - &#039;Can&#039;t say&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &#039;No&#039; | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindustan Times

The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.

According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &#039;No&#039;</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times<br /><br />The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.<br /><br />According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.<br /><br />The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.<br /><br />On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.<br /><br />According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in 'No' that means they don't think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.<br /><br />Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in 'Yes' that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.<br /><br />However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - 'Can't say'.<br />&nbsp;<br />In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.<br />&nbsp;<br />After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 13752,
		'title' => 'Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say 'No'',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindustan Times<br />
<br />
The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.<br />
<br />
According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.<br />
<br />
The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.<br />
<br />
On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.<br />
<br />
According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in 'No' that means they don't think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.<br />
<br />
Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in 'Yes' that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.<br />
<br />
However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - 'Can't say'.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 20 March, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Has-poverty-reduced-in-India-Surfers-say-No/Article1-828457.aspx',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 13875,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 13752,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &#039;No&#039;',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Hindustan Times

The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.

According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times<br /><br />The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.<br /><br />According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.<br /><br />The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.<br /><br />On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.<br /><br />According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in 'No' that means they don't think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.<br /><br />Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in 'Yes' that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.<br /><br />However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - 'Can't say'.<br />&nbsp;<br />In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.<br />&nbsp;<br />After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 13752,
	'title' => 'Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &#039;No&#039;',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindustan Times<br />
<br />
The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.<br />
<br />
According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.<br />
<br />
The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.<br />
<br />
On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.<br />
<br />
According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in 'No' that means they don't think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.<br />
<br />
Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in 'Yes' that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.<br />
<br />
However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - 'Can't say'.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 20 March, 2012, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Has-poverty-reduced-in-India-Surfers-say-No/Article1-828457.aspx',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'has-poverty-reduced-in-india-surfers-say-039no039-13875',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 13875,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 13752
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say &#039;No&#039;'
$metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl'
$metaDesc = '
-The Hindustan Times

The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.

According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times<br /><br />The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey.<br /><br />According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10.<br /><br />The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas.<br /><br />On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm.<br /><br />According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in 'No' that means they don't think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years.<br /><br />Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in 'Yes' that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down.<br /><br />However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - 'Can't say'.<br />&nbsp;<br />In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.<br />&nbsp;<br />After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Has poverty reduced in India? Surfers say 'No'

-The Hindustan Times The planning commission has released poverty data based on the 66th round of the National Sample Survey (2009-10) on household consumer expenditure survey. According to the new estimate, number of poor in India were 29.8% in 2009-10, down from 37.2% in 2004-05. The data is based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs 28 in urban cities and Rs 22 in rural areas in 2009-10. The same for June 2011 would be Rs 32.2 for urban areas and Rs 25.3 for rural areas. On Tuesday, HT.com asked the surfers to respond to the poll question -- Do you believe that poverty in India has actually reduced? -- and received more than 500 responses till 11 pm. According to the poll results, 89% of the total respondents have replied in 'No' that means they don't think that poverty has actually reduced in the country in the last five years. Nine per cent of the total respondents have replied in 'Yes' that means they support the report submitted by the plan panel stating the number of poor people in the country have actually gone down. However, 2% of total respondents were not sure about their answer and they responded with the option - 'Can't say'.   In the report released on Monday, poverty estimates by the Planning Commission showed that 29.8% or 360 million Indians were poor in 2009-10 as compared to 37.2% or 400 million in 2004-05 - the difference being equal to the population of countries such as Spain, Argentina and Canada.   After being accused by the BJP and the CPI(M) for fudging the reports, the planning commission has reportedly admitted of a serious flaw in the National Sample Survey data and national accounts which led to pegging the poverty line at Rs 28 per capita daily consumption in cities.