Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6820e0326872e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6820e0326872e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6820e0326872e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10627, 'title' => 'HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also ordered that &quot;no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of &quot;planned industrial development&quot;. However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lawyer representing the farmers said, &quot;There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders,&quot; he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, &quot;We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in &quot;land use&quot;, pointing out that while the government notifications stated &quot;planned industrial development&quot; as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 21 October, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-g-noida-villages/194993-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10738, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10627, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -IBN &nbsp; In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. As per the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also ordered that &quot;no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of &quot;planned industrial development&quot;. However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lawyer representing the farmers said, &quot;There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders,&quot; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, &quot;We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in &quot;land use&quot;, pointing out that while the government notifications stated &quot;planned industrial development&quot; as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10627, 'title' => 'HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also ordered that &quot;no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of &quot;planned industrial development&quot;. However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lawyer representing the farmers said, &quot;There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders,&quot; he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, &quot;We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in &quot;land use&quot;, pointing out that while the government notifications stated &quot;planned industrial development&quot; as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 21 October, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-g-noida-villages/194993-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10738, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10627 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -IBN &nbsp; In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. As per the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also ordered that &quot;no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of &quot;planned industrial development&quot;. However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lawyer representing the farmers said, &quot;There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders,&quot; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, &quot;We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in &quot;land use&quot;, pointing out that while the government notifications stated &quot;planned industrial development&quot; as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -IBN In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. As per the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also ordered that "no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of "planned industrial development". However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lawyer representing the farmers said, "There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders," he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, "We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in "land use", pointing out that while the government notifications stated "planned industrial development" as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6820e0326872e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6820e0326872e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6820e0326872e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10627, 'title' => 'HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also ordered that &quot;no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of &quot;planned industrial development&quot;. However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lawyer representing the farmers said, &quot;There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders,&quot; he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, &quot;We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in &quot;land use&quot;, pointing out that while the government notifications stated &quot;planned industrial development&quot; as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 21 October, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-g-noida-villages/194993-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10738, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10627, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -IBN &nbsp; In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. As per the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also ordered that &quot;no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of &quot;planned industrial development&quot;. However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lawyer representing the farmers said, &quot;There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders,&quot; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, &quot;We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in &quot;land use&quot;, pointing out that while the government notifications stated &quot;planned industrial development&quot; as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10627, 'title' => 'HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also ordered that &quot;no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of &quot;planned industrial development&quot;. However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lawyer representing the farmers said, &quot;There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders,&quot; he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, &quot;We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in &quot;land use&quot;, pointing out that while the government notifications stated &quot;planned industrial development&quot; as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 21 October, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-g-noida-villages/194993-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10738, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10627 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -IBN &nbsp; In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. As per the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also ordered that &quot;no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of &quot;planned industrial development&quot;. However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lawyer representing the farmers said, &quot;There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders,&quot; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, &quot;We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in &quot;land use&quot;, pointing out that while the government notifications stated &quot;planned industrial development&quot; as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -IBN In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. As per the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also ordered that "no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of "planned industrial development". However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lawyer representing the farmers said, "There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders," he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, "We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in "land use", pointing out that while the government notifications stated "planned industrial development" as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6820e0326872e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820e0326872e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6820e0326872e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6820e0326872e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10627, 'title' => 'HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also ordered that &quot;no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of &quot;planned industrial development&quot;. However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lawyer representing the farmers said, &quot;There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders,&quot; he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, &quot;We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in &quot;land use&quot;, pointing out that while the government notifications stated &quot;planned industrial development&quot; as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 21 October, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-g-noida-villages/194993-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10738, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10627, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -IBN &nbsp; In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. As per the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also ordered that &quot;no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of &quot;planned industrial development&quot;. However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lawyer representing the farmers said, &quot;There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders,&quot; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, &quot;We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in &quot;land use&quot;, pointing out that while the government notifications stated &quot;planned industrial development&quot; as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10627, 'title' => 'HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also ordered that &quot;no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of &quot;planned industrial development&quot;. However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lawyer representing the farmers said, &quot;There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders,&quot; he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, &quot;We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in &quot;land use&quot;, pointing out that while the government notifications stated &quot;planned industrial development&quot; as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 21 October, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-g-noida-villages/194993-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10738, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10627 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -IBN &nbsp; In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. As per the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also ordered that &quot;no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of &quot;planned industrial development&quot;. However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lawyer representing the farmers said, &quot;There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders,&quot; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, &quot;We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in &quot;land use&quot;, pointing out that while the government notifications stated &quot;planned industrial development&quot; as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -IBN In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. As per the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also ordered that "no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of "planned industrial development". However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lawyer representing the farmers said, "There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders," he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, "We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in "land use", pointing out that while the government notifications stated "planned industrial development" as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10627, 'title' => 'HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also ordered that "no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of "planned industrial development". However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lawyer representing the farmers said, "There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders," he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, "We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in "land use", pointing out that while the government notifications stated "planned industrial development" as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 21 October, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-g-noida-villages/194993-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10738, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10627, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -IBN In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. As per the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also ordered that "no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of "planned industrial development". However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lawyer representing the farmers said, "There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders," he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, "We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in "land use", pointing out that while the government notifications stated "planned industrial development" as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10627, 'title' => 'HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -IBN </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also ordered that "no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of "planned industrial development". However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lawyer representing the farmers said, "There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders," he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, "We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in "land use", pointing out that while the government notifications stated "planned industrial development" as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'CNN-IBN, 21 October, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-g-noida-villages/194993-3.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-cancels-land-acquisition-of-3-greater-noida-villages-10738', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10738, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10627 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -IBN In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. As per the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-IBN</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also ordered that "no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of "planned industrial development". However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lawyer representing the farmers said, "There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders," he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, "We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in "land use", pointing out that while the government notifications stated "planned industrial development" as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>(With Additional Inputs from PTI)</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
HC cancels land acquisition of 3 Greater Noida villages |
-IBN In a major setback for the Uttar Pradesh government, the Allahabad High Court on Friday cancelled the land acquisition of three villages in Greater Noida. The land acquisition of Asadallapur, Devla and Saberi villages were cancelled by the court. As per the order, the farmers who have already taken the compensation, can return the amount and claim back their land. The farmers in the remaining 37 villages, where planning has already taken place, will get 64 per cent additional compensation and 10 per cent of developed land. The High Court further said that an officer of the Principal Secretary level would be appointed to look into the functioning of Greater Noida authority. The order was passed by a specially-constituted three-judge bench comprising justices Ashok Bhushan, S U Khan and V K Shukla on the writ petition of 491 farmers who had challenged the acquisition of more than 3000 hectares of land by the state government. The court also ordered that "no further construction shall take place in the area unless approval for the same is given by the National Capital Region Planning Board". The court took serious note of the fact that vast tracts of land in the district were acquired by invoking the urgency clause, for the purpose of "planned industrial development". However, they were later handed over to private builders for construction of residential complexes". "The Chief Secretary of the state is hereby directed to get an inquiry conducted into the entire process of allotment of land to private builders, by an officer not below the rank of Secretary, and submit its report to the state government". A lawyer representing the farmers said, "There was a kind of a mafia working in collusion with the officials of the authority because the manner in which they had taken land was unfair". "I have all sympathy with the investors, but the Supreme Court has said the dispute is purely between the farmers and builders," he said. Surender Yadav, a farmer whose land in Itara village would fetch him compensation said, "We are not satisfied with this order. There is nothing new in it. We would have anyway got this deal two-three months back. If they don't scrap it, we will go to the Supreme Court". The invoking of the Land Acquisition Act's urgency clause by the state government had been a major cause of resentment among the petitioners who had claimed that this had deprived them of an opportunity for raising objections and bargain for a better compensation. Moreover, they had also been objecting to the change in "land use", pointing out that while the government notifications stated "planned industrial development" as the objective of acquiring their land, it was being later handed over to real estate developers for construction of housing complexes. A number of builders and thousands of flat buyers who had invested in the aforesaid housing projects had also approached the High Court with the plea that any adverse order would badly affect them for no fault of theirs. (With Additional Inputs from PTI)
|