Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f489051ddb0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f489051ddb0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f489051ddb0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16156, 'title' => 'HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,&rdquo; the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,&rdquo; the court observed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically &mdash; it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,&rdquo; the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by &ldquo;persons with vested interests&rdquo; who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box) </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state&rsquo;s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 July, 2012, http://ww.telegraphindia.com/1120717/jsp/frontpage/story_15736619.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16284, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16156, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;. The...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,&rdquo; the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,&rdquo; the court observed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically &mdash; it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,&rdquo; the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by &ldquo;persons with vested interests&rdquo; who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box)</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state&rsquo;s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16156, 'title' => 'HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,&rdquo; the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,&rdquo; the court observed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically &mdash; it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,&rdquo; the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by &ldquo;persons with vested interests&rdquo; who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box) </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state&rsquo;s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 July, 2012, http://ww.telegraphindia.com/1120717/jsp/frontpage/story_15736619.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16284, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16156 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;. The...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,&rdquo; the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,&rdquo; the court observed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically &mdash; it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,&rdquo; the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by &ldquo;persons with vested interests&rdquo; who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box)</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state&rsquo;s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’ | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for “blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate”. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for “blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,” the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,” the court observed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically — it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,” the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by “persons with vested interests” who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box)</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state’s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f489051ddb0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f489051ddb0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f489051ddb0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16156, 'title' => 'HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,&rdquo; the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,&rdquo; the court observed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically &mdash; it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,&rdquo; the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by &ldquo;persons with vested interests&rdquo; who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box) </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state&rsquo;s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 July, 2012, http://ww.telegraphindia.com/1120717/jsp/frontpage/story_15736619.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16284, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16156, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;. The...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,&rdquo; the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,&rdquo; the court observed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically &mdash; it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,&rdquo; the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by &ldquo;persons with vested interests&rdquo; who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box)</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state&rsquo;s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16156, 'title' => 'HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,&rdquo; the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,&rdquo; the court observed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically &mdash; it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,&rdquo; the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by &ldquo;persons with vested interests&rdquo; who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box) </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state&rsquo;s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 July, 2012, http://ww.telegraphindia.com/1120717/jsp/frontpage/story_15736619.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16284, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16156 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;. The...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,&rdquo; the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,&rdquo; the court observed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically &mdash; it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,&rdquo; the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by &ldquo;persons with vested interests&rdquo; who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box)</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state&rsquo;s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’ | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for “blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate”. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for “blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,” the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,” the court observed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically — it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,” the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by “persons with vested interests” who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box)</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state’s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f489051ddb0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f489051ddb0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f489051ddb0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f489051ddb0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16156, 'title' => 'HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,&rdquo; the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,&rdquo; the court observed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically &mdash; it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,&rdquo; the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by &ldquo;persons with vested interests&rdquo; who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box) </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state&rsquo;s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 July, 2012, http://ww.telegraphindia.com/1120717/jsp/frontpage/story_15736619.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16284, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16156, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;. The...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,&rdquo; the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,&rdquo; the court observed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically &mdash; it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,&rdquo; the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by &ldquo;persons with vested interests&rdquo; who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box)</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state&rsquo;s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16156, 'title' => 'HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,&rdquo; the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,&rdquo; the court observed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically &mdash; it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,&rdquo; the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by &ldquo;persons with vested interests&rdquo; who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box) </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state&rsquo;s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 July, 2012, http://ww.telegraphindia.com/1120717/jsp/frontpage/story_15736619.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16284, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16156 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;. The...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for &ldquo;blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate&rdquo;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,&rdquo; the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,&rdquo; the court observed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically &mdash; it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,&rdquo; the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by &ldquo;persons with vested interests&rdquo; who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box)</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state&rsquo;s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’ | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for “blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate”. The..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for “blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,” the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,” the court observed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically — it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,” the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by “persons with vested interests” who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box)</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state’s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16156, 'title' => 'HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for “blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate”. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,” the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,” the court observed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically — it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,” the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by “persons with vested interests” who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box) </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state’s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 July, 2012, http://ww.telegraphindia.com/1120717/jsp/frontpage/story_15736619.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16284, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16156, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for “blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate”. The...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for “blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,” the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,” the court observed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically — it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,” the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by “persons with vested interests” who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box)</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state’s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16156, 'title' => 'HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for “blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate”. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,” the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,” the court observed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically — it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,” the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by “persons with vested interests” who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box) </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state’s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 July, 2012, http://ww.telegraphindia.com/1120717/jsp/frontpage/story_15736619.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'hc-hauls-up-nagri-vested-interests-16284', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16284, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16156 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’' $metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for “blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate”. The...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for “blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate”.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,” the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,” the court observed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically — it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,” the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by “persons with vested interests” who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box)</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state’s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
HC hauls up Nagri ‘vested interests’ |
-The Telegraph Jharkhand High Court today ruled out return of land acquired by the state government in Nagri way back in 1957-58, even as it reproached public representatives for “blowing the issue out of proportion and misguiding the poor and illiterate”. The court also asked the government to translate all earlier court orders into Hindi and regional languages for circulation among the villagers so that they understood the issue better. “Land acquired cannot be returned as it has been taken over by the government for the purpose of development of the state,” the court said, in an apparent reference to JMM chief Shibu Soren who exhorted Nagri villagers to plough their land yesterday. A division bench of Chief Justice Prakash Tatia and Justice Jaya Roy was hearing a public interest litigation filed by the Bar Association of Jharkhand High Court. The bench observed that chaos was being perpetuated by a handful of people who were not interested in the growth and prosperity of the state. The court said Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 says if the government wants to withdraw acquisition, it can do only for the land of which possession has not been taken. “In this case, not only possession has been taken by the government but possession has been handed over to three prestigious institutions (IIM, NUSRL and IIIT) coming up in the state,” the court observed. The bench also made it clear that in land acquisition proceedings, possession of land is taken symbolically — it is not necessary for the government to build a boundary wall or put a lock and key or chowkidars. The bench observed that if acquired land has to be returned by the government, then the entire process of acquisition is wasted. Commenting on the Nagri dispute, the bench said the image of the state was being tarnished, adding that issues could not be resolved on the streets or through violence. The court rapped the government for not handling the matter deftly and said that land had been acquired legally and it has to be accepted and obeyed. “If land acquired in the past few decades are to be returned then there will be no PSUs or RIMS in the state,” the court observed, directing advocate-general Anil Kumar Sinha to convey the observations of the bench to the high powered committee constituted by the chief minister to deal with the Nagri issue. The court wondered why the particular 227 acres had been chosen by “persons with vested interests” who were now showing support to villagers by misguiding them. The court said a picture was being painted that the state would have to starve because there would be no land left to cultivate. The court said that the government should keep in mind several points while taking any decision to return the land. (See box) The bench also directed Sinha to coordinate with the committee and table a status report before it on July 31. The case will be taken up for hearing on August 6. Sinha while clarifying the stand of the government said that the committee is holding meetings with the ryots of Nagri who have lost their land to strike a compromise and solve the dispute. The dispute centres around the ownership of around 227 acres in Nagri, including 13 acres for a proposed Ring Road, where the campuses of IIM-R, NUSRL and IIIT are coming up. Villagers claim the state’s land acquisition procedure followed in the 1950s was faulty and that they were in possession of the land and also paid tax to the government till 2011.
|