Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68273a1a03643-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68273a1a03643-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68273a1a03643-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15072,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;House panel echoes Mamata on land&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &amp;mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &amp;mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rural development ministry will study the panel&amp;rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 17 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120517/jsp/nation/story_15497950.jsp#.T7SHiZgYmDE&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15196,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15072,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House panel echoes Mamata on land&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.

The National Land Acquisition and...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &amp;mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &amp;mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The rural development ministry will study the panel&amp;rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15072,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;House panel echoes Mamata on land&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &amp;mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &amp;mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rural development ministry will study the panel&amp;rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 17 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120517/jsp/nation/story_15497950.jsp#.T7SHiZgYmDE&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15196,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15072
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House panel echoes Mamata on land&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.

The National Land Acquisition and...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &amp;mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &amp;mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The rural development ministry will study the panel&amp;rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House panel echoes Mamata on land | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

Mamata Banerjee&rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.

The National Land Acquisition and..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>House panel echoes Mamata on land</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />Mamata Banerjee&rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.<br /><br />The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo;.<br /><br />In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.<br /><br />But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.<br /><br />The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.<br /><br />The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.<br /><br />Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.<br /><br />A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.<br /><br />However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.<br /><br />The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.<br /><br />The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.<br /><br />The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.<br /><br />The rural development ministry will study the panel&rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68273a1a03643-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68273a1a03643-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68273a1a03643-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15072,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;House panel echoes Mamata on land&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &amp;mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &amp;mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rural development ministry will study the panel&amp;rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 17 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120517/jsp/nation/story_15497950.jsp#.T7SHiZgYmDE&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15196,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15072,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House panel echoes Mamata on land&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.

The National Land Acquisition and...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &amp;mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &amp;mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The rural development ministry will study the panel&amp;rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15072,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;House panel echoes Mamata on land&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &amp;mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &amp;mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rural development ministry will study the panel&amp;rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 17 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120517/jsp/nation/story_15497950.jsp#.T7SHiZgYmDE&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15196,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15072
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House panel echoes Mamata on land&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.

The National Land Acquisition and...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &amp;mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &amp;mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The rural development ministry will study the panel&amp;rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House panel echoes Mamata on land | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

Mamata Banerjee&rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.

The National Land Acquisition and..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>House panel echoes Mamata on land</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />Mamata Banerjee&rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.<br /><br />The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo;.<br /><br />In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.<br /><br />But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.<br /><br />The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.<br /><br />The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.<br /><br />Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.<br /><br />A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.<br /><br />However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.<br /><br />The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.<br /><br />The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.<br /><br />The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.<br /><br />The rural development ministry will study the panel&rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68273a1a03643-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68273a1a03643-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68273a1a03643-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68273a1a03643-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15072,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;House panel echoes Mamata on land&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &amp;mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &amp;mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rural development ministry will study the panel&amp;rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 17 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120517/jsp/nation/story_15497950.jsp#.T7SHiZgYmDE&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15196,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15072,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House panel echoes Mamata on land&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.

The National Land Acquisition and...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &amp;mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &amp;mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The rural development ministry will study the panel&amp;rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15072,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;House panel echoes Mamata on land&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &amp;mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &amp;mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rural development ministry will study the panel&amp;rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 17 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120517/jsp/nation/story_15497950.jsp#.T7SHiZgYmDE&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15196,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15072
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House panel echoes Mamata on land&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.

The National Land Acquisition and...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mamata Banerjee&amp;rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &amp;ldquo;public purpose&amp;rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &amp;mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &amp;mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The rural development ministry will study the panel&amp;rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House panel echoes Mamata on land | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

Mamata Banerjee&rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.

The National Land Acquisition and..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>House panel echoes Mamata on land</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />Mamata Banerjee&rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.<br /><br />The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo;.<br /><br />In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.<br /><br />But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.<br /><br />The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.<br /><br />The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.<br /><br />Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.<br /><br />A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.<br /><br />However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.<br /><br />The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.<br /><br />The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.<br /><br />The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.<br /><br />The rural development ministry will study the panel&rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 15072,
		'title' => 'House panel echoes Mamata on land',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
Mamata Banerjee&rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.<br />
<br />
The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.<br />
<br />
But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.<br />
<br />
The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.<br />
<br />
The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.<br />
<br />
Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.<br />
<br />
A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.<br />
<br />
However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.<br />
<br />
The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.<br />
<br />
The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.<br />
<br />
The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.<br />
<br />
The rural development ministry will study the panel&rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.<br />
<br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120517/jsp/nation/story_15497950.jsp#.T7SHiZgYmDE',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 15196,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 15072,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House panel echoes Mamata on land',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph

Mamata Banerjee&rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.

The National Land Acquisition and...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />Mamata Banerjee&rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.<br /><br />The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo;.<br /><br />In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.<br /><br />But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.<br /><br />The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.<br /><br />The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.<br /><br />Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.<br /><br />A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.<br /><br />However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.<br /><br />The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.<br /><br />The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.<br /><br />The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.<br /><br />The rural development ministry will study the panel&rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.<br /><br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 15072,
	'title' => 'House panel echoes Mamata on land',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
Mamata Banerjee&rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.<br />
<br />
The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.<br />
<br />
But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.<br />
<br />
The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.<br />
<br />
The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.<br />
<br />
Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.<br />
<br />
A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.<br />
<br />
However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.<br />
<br />
The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.<br />
<br />
The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.<br />
<br />
The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.<br />
<br />
The rural development ministry will study the panel&rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.<br />
<br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 17 May, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120517/jsp/nation/story_15497950.jsp#.T7SHiZgYmDE',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'house-panel-echoes-mamata-on-land-15196',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 15196,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 15072
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House panel echoes Mamata on land'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph

Mamata Banerjee&rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.

The National Land Acquisition and...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />Mamata Banerjee&rsquo;s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own.<br /><br />The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo;.<br /><br />In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered.<br /><br />But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a &ldquo;public purpose&rdquo;. The panel, headed by the BJP&rsquo;s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow.<br /><br />The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded.<br /><br />The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose.<br /><br />Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors.<br /><br />A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations.<br /><br />However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this.<br /><br />The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision.<br /><br />The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas.<br /><br />The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate &mdash; the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood &mdash; in urban areas and six times in rural belts.<br /><br />The rural development ministry will study the panel&rsquo;s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.<br /><br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

House panel echoes Mamata on land

-The Telegraph Mamata Banerjee’s suggestion that the government should keep away from land acquisition for private industry has got the backing of a parliamentary standing committee, which has suggested that private enterprises buy plots on their own. The National Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, which was introduced in Parliament last year by rural development minister Jairam Ramesh, had laid down that the government could acquire land only for a “public purpose”. In the original bill, the scope of public purpose was wide. It included strategic units like defence establishments, railways, highways, ports, power and irrigation facilities for use by a public sector company or corporation, residential purposes for the poor and educational and health schemes. PPP projects and private ventures where benefits largely accrue to the general public were also covered. But the standing committee on rural development conducted a thorough examination and recommended that land acquisition for private industries could not be considered a “public purpose”. The panel, headed by the BJP’s Sumitra Mahajan, will submit its report in the Lok Sabha tomorrow. The committee said private companies had to find ways to get the required land without the government intervening in the processes, sources said. Such companies are in business essentially make profits and the acquisition of land for them should not be considered a public purpose, the panel is said to have concluded. The same yardstick should apply to land acquired for public-private-partnership projects and they too should be kept out of the term public purpose. Mamata had earlier suggested that the government should have no role in acquiring land for projects set up by private investors. A committee of experts set up by the Bengal chief minister soon after she came to power almost a year ago to examine land issues had made similar recommendations. However, when the government wants to acquire land for its own projects, it will have to seek the approval of the gram sabha, the House committee has recommended. The original bill was silent on this. The original blueprint also had a provision that multi-crop land could not be acquired. The panel has not changed this provision. The original bill said compensation in urban areas should not be less than twice the market value determined for the land. It should not be less than four times the market value in rural areas. The committee is now learnt to have suggested that the compensation should not be less than three times the circle rate — the minimum rate for valuation of a plot in a neighbourhood — in urban areas and six times in rural belts. The rural development ministry will study the panel’s suggestions and incorporate those it deems appropriate. After that, the bill will be vetted by the cabinet and reintroduced in Parliament.