Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68017727ec7a7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68017727ec7a7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68017727ec7a7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28749,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&amp;rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee said: &amp;ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adding, &amp;ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee concluded that the government&amp;rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &amp;ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &amp;ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&amp;rdquo;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Business Standard, 25 July, 2015, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-115072401351_1.html?utm_content=buffer23970&amp;a&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676802,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 28749,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ecological Security,Environment,Environmental Clearance,Environmental degradation&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Business Standard

The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms

The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&amp;rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee said: &amp;ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Adding, &amp;ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee concluded that the government&amp;rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &amp;ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &amp;ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28749,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&amp;rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee said: &amp;ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adding, &amp;ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee concluded that the government&amp;rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &amp;ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &amp;ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&amp;rdquo;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Business Standard, 25 July, 2015, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-115072401351_1.html?utm_content=buffer23970&amp;a&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676802,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 28749
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Ecological Security,Environment,Environmental Clearance,Environmental degradation&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Business Standard

The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms

The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&amp;rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee said: &amp;ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Adding, &amp;ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee concluded that the government&amp;rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &amp;ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &amp;ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Business Standard

The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms

The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Business Standard<br /><br /><em>The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms<br /></em><br />The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.<br /><br />The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.<br /><br />The standing committee said: &ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&rdquo;<br /><br />Adding, &ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&rdquo;<br /><br />The standing committee concluded that the government&rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.<br /><br />The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&rdquo;<br /><br />The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&rdquo;</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68017727ec7a7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68017727ec7a7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68017727ec7a7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28749,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&amp;rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee said: &amp;ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adding, &amp;ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee concluded that the government&amp;rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &amp;ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &amp;ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&amp;rdquo;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Business Standard, 25 July, 2015, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-115072401351_1.html?utm_content=buffer23970&amp;a&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676802,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 28749,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ecological Security,Environment,Environmental Clearance,Environmental degradation&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Business Standard

The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms

The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&amp;rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee said: &amp;ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Adding, &amp;ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee concluded that the government&amp;rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &amp;ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &amp;ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28749,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&amp;rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee said: &amp;ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adding, &amp;ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee concluded that the government&amp;rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &amp;ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &amp;ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&amp;rdquo;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Business Standard, 25 July, 2015, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-115072401351_1.html?utm_content=buffer23970&amp;a&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676802,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 28749
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Ecological Security,Environment,Environmental Clearance,Environmental degradation&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Business Standard

The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms

The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&amp;rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee said: &amp;ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Adding, &amp;ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee concluded that the government&amp;rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &amp;ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &amp;ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Business Standard

The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms

The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Business Standard<br /><br /><em>The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms<br /></em><br />The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.<br /><br />The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.<br /><br />The standing committee said: &ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&rdquo;<br /><br />Adding, &ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&rdquo;<br /><br />The standing committee concluded that the government&rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.<br /><br />The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&rdquo;<br /><br />The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&rdquo;</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68017727ec7a7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68017727ec7a7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68017727ec7a7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68017727ec7a7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28749,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&amp;rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee said: &amp;ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adding, &amp;ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee concluded that the government&amp;rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &amp;ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &amp;ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&amp;rdquo;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Business Standard, 25 July, 2015, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-115072401351_1.html?utm_content=buffer23970&amp;a&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676802,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 28749,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ecological Security,Environment,Environmental Clearance,Environmental degradation&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Business Standard

The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms

The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&amp;rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee said: &amp;ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Adding, &amp;ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee concluded that the government&amp;rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &amp;ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &amp;ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28749,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&amp;rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee said: &amp;ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adding, &amp;ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The standing committee concluded that the government&amp;rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &amp;ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &amp;ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&amp;rdquo;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Business Standard, 25 July, 2015, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-115072401351_1.html?utm_content=buffer23970&amp;a&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676802,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 28749
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Ecological Security,Environment,Environmental Clearance,Environmental degradation&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Business Standard

The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms

The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Business Standard&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&amp;rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee said: &amp;ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Adding, &amp;ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The standing committee concluded that the government&amp;rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &amp;ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &amp;ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Business Standard

The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms

The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Business Standard<br /><br /><em>The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms<br /></em><br />The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.<br /><br />The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.<br /><br />The standing committee said: &ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&rdquo;<br /><br />Adding, &ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&rdquo;<br /><br />The standing committee concluded that the government&rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.<br /><br />The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&rdquo;<br /><br />The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&rdquo;</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 28749,
		'title' => 'House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-Business Standard<br />
<br />
<em>The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms<br />
</em><br />
The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.<br />
<br />
The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.<br />
<br />
The standing committee said: &ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Adding, &ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The standing committee concluded that the government&rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.<br />
<br />
The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&rdquo;
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'Business Standard, 25 July, 2015, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-115072401351_1.html?utm_content=buffer23970&a',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4676802,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 28749,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Ecological Security,Environment,Environmental Clearance,Environmental degradation',
	'metaDesc' => '
-Business Standard

The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms

The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Business Standard<br /><br /><em>The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms<br /></em><br />The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.<br /><br />The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.<br /><br />The standing committee said: &ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&rdquo;<br /><br />Adding, &ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&rdquo;<br /><br />The standing committee concluded that the government&rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.<br /><br />The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&rdquo;<br /><br />The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&rdquo;</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 28749,
	'title' => 'House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-Business Standard<br />
<br />
<em>The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms<br />
</em><br />
The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.<br />
<br />
The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.<br />
<br />
The standing committee said: &ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Adding, &ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The standing committee concluded that the government&rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.<br />
<br />
The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&rdquo;
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'Business Standard, 25 July, 2015, http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-115072401351_1.html?utm_content=buffer23970&a',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'house-panel-rejects-subramanian-report-on-overhaul-of-green-laws-nitin-sethi-4676802',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4676802,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 28749
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi'
$metaKeywords = 'Ecological Security,Environment,Environmental Clearance,Environmental degradation'
$metaDesc = '
-Business Standard

The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms

The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-Business Standard<br /><br /><em>The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms<br /></em><br />The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament&rsquo;s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday.<br /><br />The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards.<br /><br />The standing committee said: &ldquo;Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.&rdquo;<br /><br />Adding, &ldquo;Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.&rdquo;<br /><br />The standing committee concluded that the government&rsquo;s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India.<br /><br />The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: &ldquo;The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.&rdquo;<br /><br />The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, &ldquo;Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.&rdquo;</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

House Panel rejects Subramanian report on overhaul of green laws -Nitin Sethi

-Business Standard The Subramanian report had been panned by environmentalists and tribal rights groups for seeking dilution of existing safeguards in the name of reforms The report of the Subramanian committee to revise environment laws should be scrapped and the issue looked at afresh, Parliament’s standing committee on the sector has recommended. The committee, headed by Ashwani Kumar, a Rajya Sabha member from the Congress party and an ex-Union minister, gave its report on Tuesday. The report it said should be scrapped came from a committee chaired by T S R Subramanian, former cabinet secretary and also an ex-chief secretary of Uttar Pradesh. It had asked for a complete overhaul of six environmental laws. The report had been criticised by many environmental and tribal rights groups, for recommending dilution of some existing safeguards. The standing committee said: “Some of the essential recommendations would result in an unacceptable dilution of the existing legal and policy architecture established to protect our environment. Further, an impression should not be created that a committee whose constitution and jurisdiction are itself in doubt has been used to tinker with the established law and policy.” Adding, “Should the government wish to consider specific areas of environmental policy afresh, it may consider appointing another committee by following established procedures and comprising of acclaimed experts in the field, who should be given enough time for comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders so that the recommendations are creditworthy and well considered, which is not the case with the recommendations under review.” The standing committee concluded that the government’s panel headed by ex-cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian had hurried through its deliberations in the short time of three months it was given while it was reviewing multiple laws that make the foundation of environmental governance in India. The environment ministry in its replies to the standing committee on most issues raised during the review had a stock reply: “The recommendations of the High Level Committee are under consideration. The suggestions provided in the memoranda will be kept in view while taking a final decision in the matter.” The environment ministry also defended the capability of the high level panel members. The standing committee had received recommendations and views from over 50 organisations and experts from the civil society as well. All most all the representations received by the Parliamentary standing committee were critical of the Subramanian committee report for one or several reasons including a challenge to the legal validity of the committee itself which had been formed by the environment ministry when a high level panel needs approval of the Prime Minister. The standing Committee concluded, “Considering the various objections as aforesaid and comments of the Ministry, the Committee finds that objections raised by members of civil society/NGOs/experts are prima facie valid and require serious reflection.”