Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f10548c1409-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f10548c1409-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f10548c1409-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6067,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &amp;ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &amp;mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC&#039;s website the &amp;ldquo;key elements&amp;rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &amp;mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &amp;ldquo;general category&amp;rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Trinamool stand&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &amp;mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &amp;mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 19 February, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article1470549.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6161,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6067,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &amp;ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &amp;mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC&#039;s website the &amp;ldquo;key elements&amp;rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &amp;mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &amp;ldquo;general category&amp;rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Trinamool stand&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &amp;mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &amp;mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6067,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &amp;ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &amp;mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC&#039;s website the &amp;ldquo;key elements&amp;rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &amp;mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &amp;ldquo;general category&amp;rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Trinamool stand&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &amp;mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &amp;mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 19 February, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article1470549.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6161,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6067
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &amp;ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &amp;mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC&#039;s website the &amp;ldquo;key elements&amp;rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &amp;mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &amp;ldquo;general category&amp;rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Trinamool stand&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &amp;mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &amp;mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div style="text-align: justify">The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC's website the &ldquo;key elements&rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &ldquo;general category&rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Trinamool stand</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f10548c1409-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f10548c1409-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f10548c1409-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6067,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &amp;ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &amp;mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC&#039;s website the &amp;ldquo;key elements&amp;rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &amp;mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &amp;ldquo;general category&amp;rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Trinamool stand&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &amp;mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &amp;mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 19 February, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article1470549.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6161,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6067,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &amp;ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &amp;mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC&#039;s website the &amp;ldquo;key elements&amp;rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &amp;mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &amp;ldquo;general category&amp;rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Trinamool stand&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &amp;mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &amp;mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6067,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &amp;ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &amp;mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC&#039;s website the &amp;ldquo;key elements&amp;rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &amp;mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &amp;ldquo;general category&amp;rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Trinamool stand&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &amp;mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &amp;mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 19 February, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article1470549.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6161,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6067
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &amp;ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &amp;mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC&#039;s website the &amp;ldquo;key elements&amp;rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &amp;mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &amp;ldquo;general category&amp;rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Trinamool stand&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &amp;mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &amp;mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div style="text-align: justify">The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC's website the &ldquo;key elements&rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &ldquo;general category&rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Trinamool stand</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f10548c1409-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f10548c1409-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f10548c1409-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f10548c1409-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6067,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &amp;ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &amp;mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC&#039;s website the &amp;ldquo;key elements&amp;rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &amp;mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &amp;ldquo;general category&amp;rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Trinamool stand&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &amp;mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &amp;mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 19 February, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article1470549.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6161,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6067,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &amp;ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &amp;mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC&#039;s website the &amp;ldquo;key elements&amp;rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &amp;mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &amp;ldquo;general category&amp;rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Trinamool stand&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &amp;mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &amp;mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6067,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &amp;ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &amp;mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC&#039;s website the &amp;ldquo;key elements&amp;rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &amp;mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &amp;ldquo;general category&amp;rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Trinamool stand&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &amp;mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &amp;mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 19 February, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article1470549.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6161,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6067
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &amp;ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &amp;mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC&#039;s website the &amp;ldquo;key elements&amp;rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &amp;mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &amp;ldquo;general category&amp;rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Trinamool stand&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &amp;mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &amp;mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div style="text-align: justify">The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC's website the &ldquo;key elements&rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &ldquo;general category&rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Trinamool stand</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 6067,
		'title' => 'Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify">The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC's website the &ldquo;key elements&rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &ldquo;general category&rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Trinamool stand</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 19 February, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article1470549.ece',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 6161,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 6067,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Governance',
	'metaDesc' => 'The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which...',
	'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC's website the &ldquo;key elements&rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &ldquo;general category&rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Trinamool stand</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 6067,
	'title' => 'Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify">The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC's website the &ldquo;key elements&rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &ldquo;general category&rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Trinamool stand</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 19 February, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article1470549.ece',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'ignoring-nac-objections-union-home-ministry-goes-ahead-on-communal-violence-bill-by-smita-gupta-6161',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 6161,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 6067
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta'
$metaKeywords = 'Governance'
$metaDesc = 'The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which...'
$disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, &ldquo;The government can come up with amendments &mdash; it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC's website the &ldquo;key elements&rdquo; of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention &mdash; not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the &ldquo;general category&rdquo; (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Trinamool stand</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula &mdash; that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding &mdash; the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Ignoring NAC objections, Union Home Ministry goes ahead on communal violence Bill by Smita Gupta

The Union Home Ministry is pressing ahead with pushing the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation) Bill, 2005 for consideration and passing in the budget session of Parliament, even though it was summarily rejected by the National Advisory Council, which is currently drafting an entirely new law. Expressing surprise, NAC sources told The Hindu that Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had communicated to the government that the Council was drafting a new Bill, and they had assumed that until it was ready, the government would not move ahead. Asked about this, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Bansal said the list of government business identified for the session was the outcome of discussions with various Ministries. Pressed on the Communal Violence Bill, he said, “The government can come up with amendments — it is for the Ministry of Home Affairs to decide.” The NAC Working Group on the Communal Violence Bill, soon after the Council meeting on July 14, 2010, placed on the NAC's website the “key elements” of what it wished the law to contain, and invited public comments, adding it would be ready by February 2011. The sources confirmed to The Hinduthat at the next NAC meeting on February 26, the new Bill would be taken up for discussion. The NAC felt that the government Bill would empower the State and Central Governments rather than ensure action and accountability on the part of public authorities. It wanted to widen the scope of the law to include sectarian violence, definitions of new crimes, a National Authority, national norms from rescue to restitution, compensation norms and provisions for victim-witness rights. Meanwhile, in the list of Bills to be taken up in the budget session, the Food Security Bill, which has also become a bone of contention between the NAC and the United Progressive Alliance government, finds no mention — not even for introduction. The NAC is still valiantly pushing for acceptance of its draft Bill, which seeks to cover 75 per cent of the population and include special measures for the most vulnerable groups. This even after the Rangarajan panel, set up to examine the draft Bill, has not only rejected the idea of legal guarantees for the “general category” (earlier known as Above the Poverty Line or APL) but also the special measures, citing lack of funds and availability of foodgrains. On the other hand, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill, 2011 and the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011, both of which the NAC is in the process of critiquing, have been listed for introduction in the session, the sources said. The government wanted to bring in the Land Acquisition Bill in the winter session itself after Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi pushed for its early introduction, but the session itself got washed out. Trinamool stand The Trinamool Congress was not keen on having the Land Acquisition Bill introduced in the House until after the Assembly elections in West Bengal, scheduled for May, are over, as it is opposed to the 70:30 formula — that 70 per cent of land should be acquired by private industry and 30 per cent by government. The TMC wants the private sector to acquire all 100 per cent for any project. The TMC, which opposed land acquisition in Singur and Nandigram in West Bengal, does not want to be seen as accepting a dilution of the position it had taken. However, the Congress and the TMC, it is learnt, have come to an understanding — the Bill will be introduced towards the end of the session so that it comes up for consideration only in the monsoon session, by which time the West Bengal elections will be over