Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680496eed8aa2-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680496eed8aa2-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680496eed8aa2-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1592, 'title' => 'In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law&rsquo;s ambit. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the &ldquo;framers of the RTI Act&rdquo; failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,&rdquo; the CJI wrote. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The list of &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a &ldquo;public authority&rdquo; under the RTI, &ldquo;several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India&rdquo; may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out to the judges&rsquo; move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how &ldquo;every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India&rdquo;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the CJI wrote in his letter. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as &ldquo;Justice Balakrishnan ji&rdquo;, that &ldquo;I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.&rdquo;<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 13 April, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary/605521/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1670, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1592, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the Right to Information Act, 2005 to exempt judiciary...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law&rsquo;s ambit. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the &ldquo;framers of the RTI Act&rdquo; failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,&rdquo; the CJI wrote. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The list of &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a &ldquo;public authority&rdquo; under the RTI, &ldquo;several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India&rdquo; may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out to the judges&rsquo; move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how &ldquo;every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India&rdquo;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the CJI wrote in his letter. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as &ldquo;Justice Balakrishnan ji&rdquo;, that &ldquo;I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.&rdquo;<br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1592, 'title' => 'In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law&rsquo;s ambit. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the &ldquo;framers of the RTI Act&rdquo; failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,&rdquo; the CJI wrote. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The list of &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a &ldquo;public authority&rdquo; under the RTI, &ldquo;several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India&rdquo; may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out to the judges&rsquo; move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how &ldquo;every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India&rdquo;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the CJI wrote in his letter. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as &ldquo;Justice Balakrishnan ji&rdquo;, that &ldquo;I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.&rdquo;<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 13 April, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary/605521/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1670, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1592 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the Right to Information Act, 2005 to exempt judiciary...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law&rsquo;s ambit. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the &ldquo;framers of the RTI Act&rdquo; failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,&rdquo; the CJI wrote. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The list of &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a &ldquo;public authority&rdquo; under the RTI, &ldquo;several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India&rdquo; may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out to the judges&rsquo; move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how &ldquo;every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India&rdquo;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the CJI wrote in his letter. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as &ldquo;Justice Balakrishnan ji&rdquo;, that &ldquo;I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.&rdquo;<br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country’s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the Right to Information Act, 2005 to exempt judiciary..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br /><font >Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country’s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law’s ambit. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the “framers of the RTI Act” failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,” the CJI wrote. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The list of “sensitive” matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister’s Office. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a “public authority” under the RTI, “several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India” may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out to the judges’ move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how “every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India”. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,” the CJI wrote in his letter. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as “Justice Balakrishnan ji”, that “I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.”<br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680496eed8aa2-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680496eed8aa2-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680496eed8aa2-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1592, 'title' => 'In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law&rsquo;s ambit. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the &ldquo;framers of the RTI Act&rdquo; failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,&rdquo; the CJI wrote. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The list of &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a &ldquo;public authority&rdquo; under the RTI, &ldquo;several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India&rdquo; may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out to the judges&rsquo; move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how &ldquo;every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India&rdquo;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the CJI wrote in his letter. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as &ldquo;Justice Balakrishnan ji&rdquo;, that &ldquo;I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.&rdquo;<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 13 April, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary/605521/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1670, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1592, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the Right to Information Act, 2005 to exempt judiciary...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law&rsquo;s ambit. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the &ldquo;framers of the RTI Act&rdquo; failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,&rdquo; the CJI wrote. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The list of &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a &ldquo;public authority&rdquo; under the RTI, &ldquo;several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India&rdquo; may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out to the judges&rsquo; move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how &ldquo;every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India&rdquo;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the CJI wrote in his letter. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as &ldquo;Justice Balakrishnan ji&rdquo;, that &ldquo;I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.&rdquo;<br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1592, 'title' => 'In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law&rsquo;s ambit. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the &ldquo;framers of the RTI Act&rdquo; failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,&rdquo; the CJI wrote. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The list of &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a &ldquo;public authority&rdquo; under the RTI, &ldquo;several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India&rdquo; may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out to the judges&rsquo; move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how &ldquo;every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India&rdquo;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the CJI wrote in his letter. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as &ldquo;Justice Balakrishnan ji&rdquo;, that &ldquo;I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.&rdquo;<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 13 April, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary/605521/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1670, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1592 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the Right to Information Act, 2005 to exempt judiciary...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law&rsquo;s ambit. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the &ldquo;framers of the RTI Act&rdquo; failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,&rdquo; the CJI wrote. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The list of &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a &ldquo;public authority&rdquo; under the RTI, &ldquo;several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India&rdquo; may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out to the judges&rsquo; move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how &ldquo;every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India&rdquo;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the CJI wrote in his letter. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as &ldquo;Justice Balakrishnan ji&rdquo;, that &ldquo;I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.&rdquo;<br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country’s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the Right to Information Act, 2005 to exempt judiciary..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br /><font >Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country’s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law’s ambit. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the “framers of the RTI Act” failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,” the CJI wrote. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The list of “sensitive” matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister’s Office. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a “public authority” under the RTI, “several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India” may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out to the judges’ move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how “every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India”. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,” the CJI wrote in his letter. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as “Justice Balakrishnan ji”, that “I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.”<br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680496eed8aa2-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680496eed8aa2-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680496eed8aa2-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680496eed8aa2-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1592, 'title' => 'In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law&rsquo;s ambit. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the &ldquo;framers of the RTI Act&rdquo; failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,&rdquo; the CJI wrote. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The list of &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a &ldquo;public authority&rdquo; under the RTI, &ldquo;several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India&rdquo; may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out to the judges&rsquo; move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how &ldquo;every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India&rdquo;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the CJI wrote in his letter. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as &ldquo;Justice Balakrishnan ji&rdquo;, that &ldquo;I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.&rdquo;<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 13 April, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary/605521/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1670, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1592, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the Right to Information Act, 2005 to exempt judiciary...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law&rsquo;s ambit. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the &ldquo;framers of the RTI Act&rdquo; failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,&rdquo; the CJI wrote. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The list of &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a &ldquo;public authority&rdquo; under the RTI, &ldquo;several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India&rdquo; may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out to the judges&rsquo; move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how &ldquo;every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India&rdquo;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the CJI wrote in his letter. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as &ldquo;Justice Balakrishnan ji&rdquo;, that &ldquo;I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.&rdquo;<br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1592, 'title' => 'In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law&rsquo;s ambit. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the &ldquo;framers of the RTI Act&rdquo; failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,&rdquo; the CJI wrote. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The list of &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a &ldquo;public authority&rdquo; under the RTI, &ldquo;several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India&rdquo; may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out to the judges&rsquo; move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how &ldquo;every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India&rdquo;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the CJI wrote in his letter. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as &ldquo;Justice Balakrishnan ji&rdquo;, that &ldquo;I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.&rdquo;<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 13 April, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary/605521/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1670, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1592 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the Right to Information Act, 2005 to exempt judiciary...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country&rsquo;s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law&rsquo;s ambit. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the &ldquo;framers of the RTI Act&rdquo; failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,&rdquo; the CJI wrote. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The list of &ldquo;sensitive&rdquo; matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister&rsquo;s Office. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a &ldquo;public authority&rdquo; under the RTI, &ldquo;several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India&rdquo; may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out to the judges&rsquo; move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how &ldquo;every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India&rdquo;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,&rdquo; the CJI wrote in his letter. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as &ldquo;Justice Balakrishnan ji&rdquo;, that &ldquo;I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.&rdquo;<br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country’s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the Right to Information Act, 2005 to exempt judiciary..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br /><font >Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country’s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law’s ambit. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the “framers of the RTI Act” failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,” the CJI wrote. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The list of “sensitive” matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister’s Office. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a “public authority” under the RTI, “several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India” may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out to the judges’ move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how “every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India”. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,” the CJI wrote in his letter. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as “Justice Balakrishnan ji”, that “I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.”<br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1592, 'title' => 'In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country’s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law’s ambit. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the “framers of the RTI Act” failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,” the CJI wrote. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The list of “sensitive” matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister’s Office. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a “public authority” under the RTI, “several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India” may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out to the judges’ move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how “every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India”. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,” the CJI wrote in his letter. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as “Justice Balakrishnan ji”, that “I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.”<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 13 April, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary/605521/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1670, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1592, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country’s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the Right to Information Act, 2005 to exempt judiciary...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country’s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law’s ambit. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the “framers of the RTI Act” failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,” the CJI wrote. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The list of “sensitive” matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister’s Office. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a “public authority” under the RTI, “several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India” may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out to the judges’ move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how “every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India”. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,” the CJI wrote in his letter. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as “Justice Balakrishnan ji”, that “I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.”<br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1592, 'title' => 'In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country’s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law’s ambit. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the “framers of the RTI Act” failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,” the CJI wrote. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The list of “sensitive” matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister’s Office. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a “public authority” under the RTI, “several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India” may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out to the judges’ move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how “every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India”. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,” the CJI wrote in his letter. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as “Justice Balakrishnan ji”, that “I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.”<br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 13 April, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary/605521/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'in-letter-to-pm-cji-sought-rti-exemption-for-judiciary-by-krishnadas-rajagopal-1670', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1670, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1592 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country’s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the Right to Information Act, 2005 to exempt judiciary...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><font >Contents of a four-page letter from Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh shows the country’s top judge recommending the inclusion of a specific clause in the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=58">Right to Information Act, 2005</a> to exempt judiciary from the transparency law’s ambit. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the “framers of the RTI Act” failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,” the CJI wrote. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The list of “sensitive” matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister’s Office. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a “public authority” under the RTI, “several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India” may have to be disclosed to citizens. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out to the judges’ move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how “every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India”. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,” the CJI wrote in his letter. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as “Justice Balakrishnan ji”, that “I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.”<br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
In letter to PM, CJI sought RTI exemption for judiciary by Krishnadas Rajagopal |
The CJI in his letter dated September 16, 2009 pointed out how the “framers of the RTI Act” failed to visualise the extent to which the RTI would intrude into the independence of the judiciary. So he recommended the inclusion of a specific clause in Section 8, which deals with the variety of information not meant for public eye. Some of the different kinds of information already exempted from RTI have to do with those affecting the sovereignty of India or foreign relations, those whose disclosure would be a breach of privilege in Parliament or state legislature and progress on a police investigation. “Quite frequently, information of highly confidential and sensitive nature of matters handled by the Chief Justice of India is being sought to be disclosed under the provisions of the RTI Act by applicant-citizens, but such information has to be refused,” the CJI wrote. The list of “sensitive” matters the judiciary is unwilling to give includes complaints making serious allegations about sitting judges of higher courts and consequent records of In-House inquiry proceedings, appointment of judges of high courts, written opinions/views on prospective judicial candidates and judgments/orders prepared and circulated to other members of the bench before they are officially declared. The correspondence was revealed to noted RTI activist SC Agrawal by the Prime Minister’s Office. The CJI also expressed his apprehension that after the Delhi High Court verdict declaring him a “public authority” under the RTI, “several confidential and sensitive matters exclusively in the custody of the Chief Justice of India” may have to be disclosed to citizens. He pointed out to the judges’ move to embrace transparency by declaring their assets online as a sign of how “every possible endeavour is thus being made to enhance the credibility of the courts of India”. “In this scenario, I earnestly and sincerely feel that Section 8 of the RTI Act needs to be suitably amended by inserting another specific clause to the effect that any information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the independence of the judiciary, should be exempted from disclosure under the provisions of the RTI Act,” the CJI wrote in his letter. A reply dated October 13, 2009 by the PM informed the CJI, whom he addressed as “Justice Balakrishnan ji”, that “I have asked the Minister of Law and Justice to look into the suggestions you have made in your letter.” |