Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f92bce508-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f92bce508-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f92bce508-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5608,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&amp;quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year&#039;s scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 27 January, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12/articleshow/7369175.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5701,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5608,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;rural development&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. 

The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&amp;quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year&#039;s scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5608,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&amp;quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year&#039;s scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 27 January, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12/articleshow/7369175.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5701,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 5608
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;rural development&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. 

The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&amp;quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year&#039;s scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12% | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission's demand for an 18% hike. 

The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission's demand for an 18% hike. <br /><br />The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . <br /><br />The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. <br /><br />&quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. <br /><br />Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. <br /><br />GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. <br /><br />The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year's scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. <br /><br />However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. <br /><br />Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. <br /><br />In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. <br /><br />Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. <br /><br />The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. <br /><br />The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. <br /><br />Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f92bce508-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f92bce508-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f92bce508-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5608,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&amp;quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year&#039;s scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 27 January, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12/articleshow/7369175.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5701,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5608,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;rural development&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. 

The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&amp;quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year&#039;s scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5608,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&amp;quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year&#039;s scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 27 January, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12/articleshow/7369175.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5701,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 5608
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;rural development&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. 

The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&amp;quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year&#039;s scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12% | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission's demand for an 18% hike. 

The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission's demand for an 18% hike. <br /><br />The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . <br /><br />The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. <br /><br />&quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. <br /><br />Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. <br /><br />GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. <br /><br />The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year's scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. <br /><br />However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. <br /><br />Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. <br /><br />In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. <br /><br />Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. <br /><br />The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. <br /><br />The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. <br /><br />Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f92bce508-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f92bce508-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f92bce508-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f92bce508-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5608,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&amp;quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year&#039;s scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 27 January, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12/articleshow/7369175.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5701,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5608,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;rural development&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. 

The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&amp;quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year&#039;s scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 5608,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&amp;quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year&#039;s scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 27 January, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12/articleshow/7369175.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 5701,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 5608
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;rural development&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. 

The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission&#039;s demand for an 18% hike. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&amp;quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year&#039;s scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12% | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission's demand for an 18% hike. 

The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission's demand for an 18% hike. <br /><br />The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . <br /><br />The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. <br /><br />&quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. <br /><br />Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. <br /><br />GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. <br /><br />The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year's scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. <br /><br />However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. <br /><br />Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. <br /><br />In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. <br /><br />Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. <br /><br />The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. <br /><br />The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. <br /><br />Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 5608,
		'title' => 'In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission's demand for an 18% hike. <br />
<br />
The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . <br />
<br />
The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. <br />
<br />
&quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. <br />
<br />
Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. <br />
<br />
GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. <br />
<br />
The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year's scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. <br />
<br />
However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. <br />
<br />
Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. <br />
<br />
In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. <br />
<br />
Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. <br />
<br />
The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. <br />
<br />
The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. <br />
<br />
Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 27 January, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12/articleshow/7369175.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 5701,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 5608,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%',
	'metaKeywords' => 'rural development',
	'metaDesc' => '

The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission's demand for an 18% hike. 

The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for...',
	'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission's demand for an 18% hike. <br /><br />The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . <br /><br />The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. <br /><br />&quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. <br /><br />Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. <br /><br />GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. <br /><br />The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year's scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. <br /><br />However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. <br /><br />Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. <br /><br />In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. <br /><br />Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. <br /><br />The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. <br /><br />The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. <br /><br />Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 5608,
	'title' => 'In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission's demand for an 18% hike. <br />
<br />
The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . <br />
<br />
The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. <br />
<br />
&quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. <br />
<br />
Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. <br />
<br />
GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. <br />
<br />
The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year's scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. <br />
<br />
However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. <br />
<br />
Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. <br />
<br />
In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. <br />
<br />
Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. <br />
<br />
The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. <br />
<br />
The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. <br />
<br />
Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 27 January, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12/articleshow/7369175.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'in-repeat-of-fy11-plan-panel-seeks-18-hike-in-budgetary-support-fm-offers-12-5701',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 5701,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 5608
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%'
$metaKeywords = 'rural development'
$metaDesc = '

The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission's demand for an 18% hike. 

The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission's demand for an 18% hike. <br /><br />The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . <br /><br />The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. <br /><br />&quot;(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%,&quot; said a government official privy to the discussions. <br /><br />Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. <br /><br />GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. <br /><br />The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year's scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. <br /><br />However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. <br /><br />Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. <br /><br />In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. <br /><br />Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. <br /><br />The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. <br /><br />The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. <br /><br />Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

In repeat of FY11, plan panel seeks 18% hike in budgetary support, FM offers 12%

The finance ministry has offered only a 12% increase in the budgetary support to the central plan for the coming fiscal against the Planning Commission's demand for an 18% hike. The plan panel sought higher support, citing increased requirement for the flagship schemes, particularly MGNREGA, or Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act . The North Block, constrained by its compulsion to return to fiscal consolidation and additional expenditure due to higher subsidy outgo, is finding it difficult to find funds to meet the expectations of the plan panel. "(The) finance ministry has offered a 12% increase, (and) given the near-8% inflation (it translates into) a real increase of only 4%," said a government official privy to the discussions. Such an increase will take the total gross budgetary support, or GBS, to the central plan to about 314,000 crore, against 280,600 crore last year. GBS is the amount sanctioned by the finance ministry for the central plan. Central, or annual plans, are essentially the five-year plans broken down into five annual installments. The wrangling over the GBS for next fiscal is almost a repeat of last year's scenario where Planning Commission demanded an 18% increase but eventually only got only 11.4%. However, with the 2011-12 being the terminal year of the 11th Five-Year Plan the commission wants a higher support to prevent work under some schemes from spilling over to the next plan. Also, the commission needs extra funds to step up allocation for the flagship rural employment scheme MGNREGA, the wages of which have been linked to inflation from the new calendar year. In the current year this will itself mean an increase in remuneration for the MGNREGA work in the range of 17% to 30%, requiring a much higher allocation than the 40,100 crore budgeted in the current year. Although, only 24,000 has been utilised so far in the current fiscal the total outgo due to increase in wages could be substantially higher and therefore provisioned for. Delivering on the right to education and food security promise will also require a much higher allocation. The food security act is expected to be rolled out from the next fiscal. Even a curtailed plan that was suggested by a committee set up to study the bill drafted by the UPA chairperson-led National Advisory Council involves a food subsidy outlay of 85,584 crore against the 55,578 crore budgeted in the current year. The commission had earlier suggested implementing food security act from the 12th plan as funds will have to be diverted from existing schemes in the current plan to fund it. Finance ministry has its own compulsions and may not be in position to step up allocation sharply. The ministry has committed to a fiscal deficit of 4.8% of the GDP in the current year and there is no one-time bonanza expected in the next financial year akin to the auction of spectrum that fetched more than 1 lakh crore in the current year. So, it would be largely relying on revenue buoyancy and proceeds from disinvestment.