Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fe29ea97614-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fe29ea97614-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fe29ea97614-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 58252,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&amp;rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&amp;rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &amp;ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Newsclick.in, 15 January, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 58252,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,NCDRC,Home Buyers,Consumer Rights,Developers,Real Estate Regulation Act,RERA&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;-Newsclick.in

&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.

In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&amp;rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&amp;rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &amp;ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot; title=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 58252,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&amp;rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&amp;rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &amp;ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Newsclick.in, 15 January, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 58252
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,NCDRC,Home Buyers,Consumer Rights,Developers,Real Estate Regulation Act,RERA&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;-Newsclick.in

&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.

In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&amp;rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&amp;rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &amp;ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot; title=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="-Newsclick.in

&lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.

In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&rsquo;s appeal on January..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p style="text-align:justify">-Newsclick.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>&lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.</p><p style="text-align:justify">In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&rdquo;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg" title="https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg">click here</a> to read more.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fe29ea97614-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fe29ea97614-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fe29ea97614-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 58252,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&amp;rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&amp;rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &amp;ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Newsclick.in, 15 January, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 58252,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,NCDRC,Home Buyers,Consumer Rights,Developers,Real Estate Regulation Act,RERA&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;-Newsclick.in

&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.

In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&amp;rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&amp;rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &amp;ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot; title=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 58252,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&amp;rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&amp;rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &amp;ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Newsclick.in, 15 January, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 58252
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,NCDRC,Home Buyers,Consumer Rights,Developers,Real Estate Regulation Act,RERA&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;-Newsclick.in

&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.

In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&amp;rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&amp;rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &amp;ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot; title=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="-Newsclick.in

&lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.

In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&rsquo;s appeal on January..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p style="text-align:justify">-Newsclick.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>&lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.</p><p style="text-align:justify">In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&rdquo;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg" title="https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg">click here</a> to read more.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fe29ea97614-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fe29ea97614-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fe29ea97614-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fe29ea97614-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 58252,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&amp;rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&amp;rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &amp;ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Newsclick.in, 15 January, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 58252,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,NCDRC,Home Buyers,Consumer Rights,Developers,Real Estate Regulation Act,RERA&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;-Newsclick.in

&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.

In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&amp;rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&amp;rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &amp;ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot; title=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 58252,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&amp;rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&amp;rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &amp;ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Newsclick.in, 15 January, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 58252
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,NCDRC,Home Buyers,Consumer Rights,Developers,Real Estate Regulation Act,RERA&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;-Newsclick.in

&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.

In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Newsclick.in&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&amp;rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&amp;rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&amp;rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&amp;rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &amp;ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot; title=&quot;https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="-Newsclick.in

&lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.

In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&rsquo;s appeal on January..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p style="text-align:justify">-Newsclick.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>&lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.</p><p style="text-align:justify">In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&rdquo;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg" title="https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg">click here</a> to read more.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 58252,
		'title' => 'In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in',
		'subheading' => null,
		'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-Newsclick.in</p>

<p style="text-align:justify"><em>&lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.</em></p>

<p style="text-align:justify">In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&rdquo;</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg">click here</a> to read more.</p>
',
		'credit_writer' => 'Newsclick.in, 15 January, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in',
		'meta_title' => '',
		'meta_keywords' => '',
		'meta_description' => '',
		'noindex' => (int) 1,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => null,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 58252,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in',
	'metaKeywords' => 'National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,NCDRC,Home Buyers,Consumer Rights,Developers,Real Estate Regulation Act,RERA',
	'metaDesc' => '-Newsclick.in

&lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.

In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&rsquo;s appeal on January...',
	'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-Newsclick.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>&lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.</p><p style="text-align:justify">In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&rdquo;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg" title="https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg">click here</a> to read more.</p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 58252,
	'title' => 'In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in',
	'subheading' => null,
	'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-Newsclick.in</p>

<p style="text-align:justify"><em>&lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.</em></p>

<p style="text-align:justify">In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&rdquo;</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg">click here</a> to read more.</p>
',
	'credit_writer' => 'Newsclick.in, 15 January, 2021, https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'in-significant-victory-for-home-buyers-sc-rejects-developer-s-appeal-on-excess-sale-area-newsclick-in',
	'meta_title' => '',
	'meta_keywords' => '',
	'meta_description' => '',
	'noindex' => (int) 1,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => null,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 58252
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in'
$metaKeywords = 'National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,NCDRC,Home Buyers,Consumer Rights,Developers,Real Estate Regulation Act,RERA'
$metaDesc = '-Newsclick.in

&lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.

In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&rsquo;s appeal on January...'
$disp = '<p style="text-align:justify">-Newsclick.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>&lsquo;In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,&rsquo; the NCDRC had said in its order.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder&rsquo;s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission&rsquo;s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder&rsquo;s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year.</p><p style="text-align:justify">In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that &ldquo;this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).&rdquo;</p><p style="text-align:justify">The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg" title="https://www.newsclick.in/in-significant-victory-home-buyer-SC-rejects-developer-appeal-excess-sale-area?fbclid=IwAR1yCi1Ja4ZeZMcFBqngg3pnaI1stYZOMvCU004_4Bfdu4gRqjfAMEyXhqg">click here</a> to read more.</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

In Significant Victory for Home Buyers, SC Rejects Developer’s Appeal on Excess Sale Area -Newsclick.in

-Newsclick.in ‘In fact, this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice,’ the NCDRC had said in its order. In a significant victory for home-buyers the Supreme Court dismissed a builder’s appeal on January 12 and upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission’s (NCDRC) ruling in favour of a home-buyer. It had held that the builder’s demand for more money over the contractual sale, on account of excess sale area, was illegal. The matter reached the apex court following an appeal by the developer after the NCDRC had ruled on the case in August last year. In its judgment on August 26, 2020, the NCDRC had said that “this is a common practice adopted by majority of builders/developers which is basically an unfair trade practice. This has become a meansto extract extra money from the allottees at the time when allottee cannot leave the project as his substantial amount is locked in the project and he is about to take possession (sic).” The case in question was filed by one Pawan Gupta against Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. The builder had referred to a clause in their contract which stated that Experion could ask for more money if the sale area of the property increased up to ten per cent. The NCDRC held the demand as illegal and the apex court also dismissed an appeal by the developer on Tuesday. Please click here to read more.