Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10594, 'title' => 'India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of &quot;separation of property.&quot; Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong>Box</strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong> Box </strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 October, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/India-lags-behind-the-West-in-matrimonial-property-rights/articleshow/10421989.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10705, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10594, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande', 'metaKeywords' => 'Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of &quot;separation of property.&quot; Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10594, 'title' => 'India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of &quot;separation of property.&quot; Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong>Box</strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong> Box </strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 October, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/India-lags-behind-the-West-in-matrimonial-property-rights/articleshow/10421989.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10705, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10594 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande' $metaKeywords = 'Gender' $metaDesc = ' When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of &quot;separation of property.&quot; Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of "separation of property." Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10594, 'title' => 'India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of &quot;separation of property.&quot; Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong>Box</strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong> Box </strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 October, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/India-lags-behind-the-West-in-matrimonial-property-rights/articleshow/10421989.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10705, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10594, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande', 'metaKeywords' => 'Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of &quot;separation of property.&quot; Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10594, 'title' => 'India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of &quot;separation of property.&quot; Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong>Box</strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong> Box </strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 October, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/India-lags-behind-the-West-in-matrimonial-property-rights/articleshow/10421989.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10705, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10594 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande' $metaKeywords = 'Gender' $metaDesc = ' When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of &quot;separation of property.&quot; Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of "separation of property." Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5ac3ba378f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10594, 'title' => 'India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of &quot;separation of property.&quot; Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong>Box</strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong> Box </strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 October, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/India-lags-behind-the-West-in-matrimonial-property-rights/articleshow/10421989.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10705, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10594, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande', 'metaKeywords' => 'Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of &quot;separation of property.&quot; Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10594, 'title' => 'India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of &quot;separation of property.&quot; Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong>Box</strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong> Box </strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 October, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/India-lags-behind-the-West-in-matrimonial-property-rights/articleshow/10421989.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10705, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10594 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande' $metaKeywords = 'Gender' $metaDesc = ' When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of &quot;separation of property.&quot; Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of "separation of property." Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10594, 'title' => 'India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of "separation of property." Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong>Box</strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong> Box </strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 October, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/India-lags-behind-the-West-in-matrimonial-property-rights/articleshow/10421989.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10705, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10594, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande', 'metaKeywords' => 'Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of "separation of property." Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10594, 'title' => 'India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of "separation of property." Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong>Box</strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><strong> Box </strong></em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Wives, down the ages---in law </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 20 October, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/India-lags-behind-the-West-in-matrimonial-property-rights/articleshow/10421989.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-lags-behind-the-west-in-matrimonial-property-rights-by-swati-deshpande-10705', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10705, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10594 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande' $metaKeywords = 'Gender' $metaDesc = ' When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of "separation of property." Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><strong>Box</strong></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Wives, down the ages---in law</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
India lags behind the West in matrimonial property rights by Swati Deshpande |
When it comes to property rights in matrimony, gender matters. The issue of property rights for women within a marriage has long been an area of concern across the world. While Maharashtra is now considering the idea of granting women equal rights in their husband's property, women's rights were being asserted in the US way back in 1771. Almost two-and-a-half centuries ago, New York brought in a law preventing a married man from selling or transferring his wife's property without her approval. Women's rights within their marriage have always put them at a disadvantage. Early laws in the United States followed the British law and gave women little financial independence over property, though things changed by 1900. But property rights of women in a marriage are still key areas of concern in an era where divorce rates are soaring. In India, those campaigning for women's matrimonial property rights, including leading women lawyers in the Supreme Court, have also highlighted the need to recognize equal rights of women, be they wives or live-in partners, to property and assets. There are currently no specific laws in India that give a woman joint ownership rights over her husband's property upon marriage. SC lawyer Kirti Singh points out that in the absence of a specific law that legalizes women's rights over her matrimonial or husband's property, courts tend to follow the Common Law practice of "separation of property." Women, especially working women, who work doubly hard in rearing a child and looking after the home, often end up getting very little during a divorce, despite their invaluable contribution towards the family, activists assert. A woman's contribution in kind gets ignored in India, but many countries have recognized its value. The Australian Family Law of 1975 provides for courts' assessment of the non-financial contribution made by wives to the welfare of the family through unpaid work at home and care of children. Elsewhere in Ireland, changes in law recognize a wife's domestic duties. A Canadian law governing division of matrimonial property also stipulates that child care, house management and providing finance is a joint responsibility that brings with it joint rights over property. In India, Goa is an exception as matrimonial property rights are afforded under the Portuguese Civil Code of 1867. But elsewhere across states, there is no legislation that provides for equitable division of property and assets upon marital separation, divorce or desertion. Box Wives, down the ages---in law In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. Box Wives, down the ages---in law In 1848: New York brought the Married Women's Property Act. An expansion of property rights of married women. 1860, New York introduced a law to govern rights and liabilities of husband and wife; expanded married women's property rights. 1882: The Married Women's Property Act, enacted in UK heralded significant property rights to married women, allowing them to own and control their own property. Matrimonial Property rights however are of concern even today in UK. Much depends on how the property is owned and whether it is in joint names. But couples can draw up prenuptial or co-habiting agreement when they first acquired the property. But a married woman has a right of occupation of the matrimonial property whether or not its in her name. |