Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ec327f9665b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ec327f9665b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ec327f9665b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15341, 'title' => 'India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website,&quot; the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments &quot;are currently being examined&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN &quot;convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances&quot;. With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still &quot;studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws&quot; it would need to make to comply with this international obligation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain &quot;disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination&quot;. While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 June, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-makes-dubious-claims-before-UN-on-human-rights/articleshow/13792624.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15467, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15341, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Rights,NREGS,NREGA,Social Audit', 'metaDesc' => ' It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website,&quot; the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments &quot;are currently being examined&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN &quot;convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances&quot;. With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still &quot;studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws&quot; it would need to make to comply with this international obligation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain &quot;disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination&quot;. While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15341, 'title' => 'India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website,&quot; the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments &quot;are currently being examined&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN &quot;convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances&quot;. With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still &quot;studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws&quot; it would need to make to comply with this international obligation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain &quot;disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination&quot;. While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 June, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-makes-dubious-claims-before-UN-on-human-rights/articleshow/13792624.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15467, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15341 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta' $metaKeywords = 'Human Rights,NREGS,NREGA,Social Audit' $metaDesc = ' It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website,&quot; the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments &quot;are currently being examined&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN &quot;convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances&quot;. With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still &quot;studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws&quot; it would need to make to comply with this international obligation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain &quot;disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination&quot;. While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website," the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments "are currently being examined".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN "convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances". With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still "studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws" it would need to make to comply with this international obligation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain "disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination". While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ec327f9665b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ec327f9665b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ec327f9665b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15341, 'title' => 'India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website,&quot; the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments &quot;are currently being examined&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN &quot;convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances&quot;. With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still &quot;studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws&quot; it would need to make to comply with this international obligation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain &quot;disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination&quot;. While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 June, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-makes-dubious-claims-before-UN-on-human-rights/articleshow/13792624.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15467, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15341, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Rights,NREGS,NREGA,Social Audit', 'metaDesc' => ' It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website,&quot; the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments &quot;are currently being examined&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN &quot;convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances&quot;. With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still &quot;studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws&quot; it would need to make to comply with this international obligation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain &quot;disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination&quot;. While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15341, 'title' => 'India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website,&quot; the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments &quot;are currently being examined&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN &quot;convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances&quot;. With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still &quot;studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws&quot; it would need to make to comply with this international obligation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain &quot;disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination&quot;. While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 June, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-makes-dubious-claims-before-UN-on-human-rights/articleshow/13792624.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15467, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15341 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta' $metaKeywords = 'Human Rights,NREGS,NREGA,Social Audit' $metaDesc = ' It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website,&quot; the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments &quot;are currently being examined&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN &quot;convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances&quot;. With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still &quot;studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws&quot; it would need to make to comply with this international obligation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain &quot;disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination&quot;. While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website," the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments "are currently being examined".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN "convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances". With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still "studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws" it would need to make to comply with this international obligation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain "disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination". While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ec327f9665b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec327f9665b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ec327f9665b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ec327f9665b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15341, 'title' => 'India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website,&quot; the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments &quot;are currently being examined&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN &quot;convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances&quot;. With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still &quot;studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws&quot; it would need to make to comply with this international obligation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain &quot;disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination&quot;. While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 June, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-makes-dubious-claims-before-UN-on-human-rights/articleshow/13792624.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15467, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15341, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Rights,NREGS,NREGA,Social Audit', 'metaDesc' => ' It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website,&quot; the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments &quot;are currently being examined&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN &quot;convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances&quot;. With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still &quot;studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws&quot; it would need to make to comply with this international obligation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain &quot;disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination&quot;. While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15341, 'title' => 'India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website,&quot; the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments &quot;are currently being examined&quot;. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN &quot;convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances&quot;. With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still &quot;studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws&quot; it would need to make to comply with this international obligation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain &quot;disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination&quot;. While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 June, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-makes-dubious-claims-before-UN-on-human-rights/articleshow/13792624.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15467, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15341 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta' $metaKeywords = 'Human Rights,NREGS,NREGA,Social Audit' $metaDesc = ' It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website,&quot; the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments &quot;are currently being examined&quot;.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN &quot;convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances&quot;. With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still &quot;studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws&quot; it would need to make to comply with this international obligation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain &quot;disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination&quot;. While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website," the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments "are currently being examined".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN "convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances". With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still "studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws" it would need to make to comply with this international obligation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain "disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination". While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15341, 'title' => 'India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website," the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments "are currently being examined". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN "convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances". With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still "studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws" it would need to make to comply with this international obligation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain "disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination". While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 June, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-makes-dubious-claims-before-UN-on-human-rights/articleshow/13792624.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15467, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15341, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Rights,NREGS,NREGA,Social Audit', 'metaDesc' => ' It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website," the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments "are currently being examined".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN "convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances". With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still "studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws" it would need to make to comply with this international obligation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain "disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination". While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15341, 'title' => 'India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website," the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments "are currently being examined". </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN "convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances". With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still "studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws" it would need to make to comply with this international obligation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain "disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination". While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Times View</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 June, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-makes-dubious-claims-before-UN-on-human-rights/articleshow/13792624.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india-makes-dubious-claims-before-un-on-human-rights-manoj-mitta-15467', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15467, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15341 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta' $metaKeywords = 'Human Rights,NREGS,NREGA,Social Audit' $metaDesc = ' It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website," the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments "are currently being examined".</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN "convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances". With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still "studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws" it would need to make to comply with this international obligation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain "disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination". While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Times View</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
India makes dubious claims before UN on human rights-Manoj Mitta |
It was due to a civil society struggle that the government only last year removed the bar on outsiders from participating in the social audit of projects executed under its showcase legislation of MGNREGA. Barring Andhra Pradesh, no state has so far implemented this reform. Yet, in its report for the ongoing universal periodic review (UPR) before the UN Human Rights Council, India cited the social audit clause in MGNREGA as an example of its policy of involving civil society in governance. "States have reported that social audit has been conducted in 91% of the Gram Panchayats. 2,44,000 reports on social audit have been uploaded on the MGNREGA website," the government said, although the social audit in most of those cases had been conducted without the involvement of a civil society group or independent agency. This is only one of the dubious claims made by India in a bid to downplay its failure to meet a lot of the commitments it had made at the end of the earlier UPR four years ago in Geneva. The council adopted a draft report on India's second UPR on May 30, comprising 169 recommendations on a range of human rights issues raised by 80 countries. The issue that drew the greatest attention was India's failure to keep the promise of ratifying the UN convention against torture (CAT). This predicament was caused by India's attempt to get away with the enactment of a weak law, as a prelude to its ratification of CAT. After Lok Sabha passed the Prevention of Torture Bill in 2010, Rajya Sabha, yielding to demands from civil society, referred it to a select committee. Though the committee's report suggesting improvements came in December 2010, the government's justification for the continuing stalemate on the Torture Bill was that the proposed amendments "are currently being examined". India betrayed even greater disregard for its promise to ratify the UN "convention for the protection of all persons from enforced disappearances". With this, unlike in the case of CAT, the government has so far come up with neither a legislative measure nor any other step towards ratification. Though the Indian legal system is notoriously prone to illegal detentions, the government just said that it was still "studying the extent of changes in the domestic laws" it would need to make to comply with this international obligation. Another controversial claim made by the government was on the first UPR's recommendation to maintain "disaggregated data on caste and related discrimination". While claiming that extensive data was available on dalits and tribals, the government skirted its failure to keep track of the atrocities committed against them across the country. This is in fact a statutory lapse because, under the Prevention of Atrocities Act, the government is required to table a report every year in Parliament. The last annual report tabled by the government on caste atrocities was of 2008, the year in which the recommendation for maintaining disaggregated data had been made by the earlier UPR. The recently enforced right to free and compulsory education up to the age of 14 has proved embarrassing because of its anachronistic labour law allowing child labour from the same age. The government, however, said given the socio-economic conditions in the country, the time was not ripe for banning child labour or ratifying the ILO conventions under which the minimum age for employment was 18. Other human rights issues on which India has been on the defensive included its failure to break the deadlock on enacting a law against communal and targeted violence, to strengthen legal mechanisms related to sexual violence and human trafficking, to impart human rights training to the police, to establish a moratorium on death penalty and to address iniquities based on the rural-urban divide. Times View The government's failure to enact a law against torture even four years after it made an international commitment that it would do so, its complete lack of movement on a law to deal with illegal detentions and its dubious response to other issues pertaining to human rights all paint a grim picture. It is difficult to escape the conclusion that we are a country that has to be dragged kicking and screaming into safeguarding basic human rights. Nothing could be more unfortunate for a society that sees itself as a modern, liberal democracy. Indeed these are safeguards that should have been put in place without any external pressure at all. At least now, the government should show some urgency in moving forward on these. |