Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 62553,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Hindustan Times&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &amp;ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&amp;rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &amp;ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&amp;rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &amp;ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The World Bank paper&amp;rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &amp;ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&amp;rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &amp;ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &amp;ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Hindustan Times, 9 April, 2022, https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 62553,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Consumption Expenditure Survey,National Sample Survey,World Bank,International Monetary Fund,IMF,Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;-Hindustan Times

Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.

Poverty...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Hindustan Times&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &amp;ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&amp;rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &amp;ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&amp;rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &amp;ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The World Bank paper&amp;rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &amp;ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&amp;rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &amp;ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &amp;ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot; title=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 62553,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Hindustan Times&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &amp;ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&amp;rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &amp;ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&amp;rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &amp;ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The World Bank paper&amp;rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &amp;ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&amp;rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &amp;ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &amp;ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Hindustan Times, 9 April, 2022, https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 62553
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Consumption Expenditure Survey,National Sample Survey,World Bank,International Monetary Fund,IMF,Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;-Hindustan Times

Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.

Poverty...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Hindustan Times&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &amp;ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&amp;rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &amp;ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&amp;rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &amp;ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The World Bank paper&amp;rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &amp;ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&amp;rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &amp;ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &amp;ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot; title=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="-Hindustan Times

Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.

Poverty..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p style="text-align:justify">-Hindustan Times</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.</p><p style="text-align:justify">What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The World Bank paper&rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html" title="https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 62553,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Hindustan Times&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &amp;ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&amp;rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &amp;ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&amp;rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &amp;ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The World Bank paper&amp;rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &amp;ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&amp;rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &amp;ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &amp;ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Hindustan Times, 9 April, 2022, https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 62553,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Consumption Expenditure Survey,National Sample Survey,World Bank,International Monetary Fund,IMF,Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;-Hindustan Times

Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.

Poverty...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Hindustan Times&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &amp;ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&amp;rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &amp;ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&amp;rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &amp;ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The World Bank paper&amp;rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &amp;ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&amp;rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &amp;ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &amp;ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot; title=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 62553,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Hindustan Times&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &amp;ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&amp;rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &amp;ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&amp;rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &amp;ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The World Bank paper&amp;rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &amp;ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&amp;rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &amp;ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &amp;ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Hindustan Times, 9 April, 2022, https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 62553
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Consumption Expenditure Survey,National Sample Survey,World Bank,International Monetary Fund,IMF,Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;-Hindustan Times

Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.

Poverty...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Hindustan Times&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &amp;ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&amp;rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &amp;ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&amp;rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &amp;ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The World Bank paper&amp;rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &amp;ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&amp;rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &amp;ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &amp;ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot; title=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="-Hindustan Times

Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.

Poverty..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p style="text-align:justify">-Hindustan Times</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.</p><p style="text-align:justify">What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The World Bank paper&rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html" title="https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f08ea5839cb-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 62553,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Hindustan Times&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &amp;ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&amp;rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &amp;ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&amp;rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &amp;ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The World Bank paper&amp;rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &amp;ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&amp;rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &amp;ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &amp;ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Hindustan Times, 9 April, 2022, https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 62553,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Consumption Expenditure Survey,National Sample Survey,World Bank,International Monetary Fund,IMF,Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;-Hindustan Times

Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.

Poverty...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Hindustan Times&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &amp;ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&amp;rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &amp;ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&amp;rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &amp;ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The World Bank paper&amp;rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &amp;ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&amp;rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &amp;ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &amp;ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot; title=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 62553,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Hindustan Times&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &amp;ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&amp;rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &amp;ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&amp;rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &amp;ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The World Bank paper&amp;rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &amp;ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&amp;rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &amp;ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &amp;ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Hindustan Times, 9 April, 2022, https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 62553
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Consumption Expenditure Survey,National Sample Survey,World Bank,International Monetary Fund,IMF,Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;-Hindustan Times

Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.

Poverty...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;-Hindustan Times&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &amp;ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&amp;rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &amp;lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&amp;rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &amp;ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&amp;rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &amp;ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;The World Bank paper&amp;rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &amp;ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&amp;rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &amp;ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &amp;ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;text-align:justify&quot;&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot; title=&quot;https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="-Hindustan Times

Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.

Poverty..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p style="text-align:justify">-Hindustan Times</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.</p><p style="text-align:justify">What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The World Bank paper&rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html" title="https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 62553,
		'title' => 'India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore',
		'subheading' => null,
		'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-Hindustan Times</p>

<p style="text-align:justify"><em>Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.</em></p>

<p style="text-align:justify">Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify"><em>What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?</em></p>

<p style="text-align:justify">First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">The World Bank paper&rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>
',
		'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 9 April, 2022, https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore',
		'meta_title' => '',
		'meta_keywords' => '',
		'meta_description' => '',
		'noindex' => (int) 1,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => null,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 62553,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Consumption Expenditure Survey,National Sample Survey,World Bank,International Monetary Fund,IMF,Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys',
	'metaDesc' => '-Hindustan Times

Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.

Poverty...',
	'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-Hindustan Times</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.</p><p style="text-align:justify">What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The World Bank paper&rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html" title="https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 62553,
	'title' => 'India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore',
	'subheading' => null,
	'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-Hindustan Times</p>

<p style="text-align:justify"><em>Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.</em></p>

<p style="text-align:justify">Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify"><em>What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?</em></p>

<p style="text-align:justify">First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">The World Bank paper&rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.</p>

<p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>
',
	'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 9 April, 2022, https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'india-s-great-poverty-debate-season-2-roshan-kishore',
	'meta_title' => '',
	'meta_keywords' => '',
	'meta_description' => '',
	'noindex' => (int) 1,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => null,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 62553
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore'
$metaKeywords = 'Consumption Expenditure Survey,National Sample Survey,World Bank,International Monetary Fund,IMF,Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys'
$metaDesc = '-Hindustan Times

Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.

Poverty...'
$disp = '<p style="text-align:justify">-Hindustan Times</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the &ldquo;great Indian poverty debate&rdquo;. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey&rsquo;s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the &lsquo;great Indian poverty debate&rsquo; seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty &ndash; it is compatible with the World Bank&rsquo;s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line &ndash; in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%.</p><p style="text-align:justify">What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers?</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The World Bank paper&rsquo;s title is self-explanatory. &ldquo;Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought&rdquo;, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) &ndash; many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS &ndash; conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html" title="https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indias-great-poverty-debate-season-2-101649270552832.html">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

India’s great poverty debate: Season 2 -Roshan Kishore

-Hindustan Times Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) was scrapped, the ‘great Indian poverty debate’ seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Poverty statistics in India have always been the subject of controversy. The country saw a big debate on the trend in poverty and the veracity of poverty estimates in the 2000s. Such was the intensity of the debate and the polemics involved that the episode was termed as the “great Indian poverty debate”. It continued through the decade and into the next, but was interrupted when the current government decided to junk the findings of the 2017-18 National Sample Survey’s (NSS) Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) in November 2019. CES is the official source of data for calculating poverty numbers in India. The latest available CES data is for 2011-12. Almost two and a half years after the 2017-18 CES was scrapped, the ‘great Indian poverty debate’ seems to have resurrected itself. The second season of this debate, interestingly, has started from Washington DC, not India. Two new working papers, one published by the World Bank and another by IMF, have given drastically different estimates of extreme poverty – it is compatible with the World Bank’s $1.9 purchasing power parity (PPP) poverty line – in India. The World Bank paper puts it at 10%, while the IMF one puts it at 0.86%. What explains this wide discrepancy? Here are three charts which explain the issues involved in detail. What are the summary findings of the IMF and World Bank papers? First, the disclaimer. While these papers have been published by the IMF and the World Bank, they are to be considered as views of the authors and not the institutions. The World Bank paper’s title is self-explanatory. “Poverty in India has declined over the last decade but not as much as previously thought”, Sutirtha Sinha Roy and Roy van der Weide argue in their paper. The paper gives estimates of poverty in India until 2019 using recalibrated data from the Consumer Pyramid Household Surveys (CPHS) – many economists have argued that the really poor are underrepresented in the CPHS – conducted by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). At 10.2%, extreme poverty is 12.3 percentage points lower in 2019 than in 2011, the paper argues. Please click here to read more.