Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680092a589105-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680092a589105-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680092a589105-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17414, 'title' => 'India&#039;s score in the &#039;Global Hunger Index&#039; back to 1996 levels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Business Standard<br /> <br /> <em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /> </em><br /> Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /> <br /> According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by&nbsp; the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India&rsquo;s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /> <br /> In 1990, India&rsquo;s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996.&nbsp; But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /> <br /> India&rsquo;s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /> <br /> This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India&rsquo;s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India&rsquo;s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /> <br /> &quot;In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh,&quot; the report said.<br /> Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /> <br /> &ldquo;India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India&rsquo;s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /> <br /> For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006&ndash;08, and India&rsquo;s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005&ndash;06.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India&rsquo;s track record is disappointing,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an &lsquo;serious&rsquo;. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 &ndash; mainly by reducing the share of underweight children&mdash;but could not maintain the rapid progress,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 October, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/indias-score-inglobal-hunger-index-back-to-1996-levels/190873/on', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17542, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17414, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India&#039;s score in the &#039;Global Hunger Index&#039; back to 1996 levels', 'metaKeywords' => 'Hunger,Starvation,Right to Food,Food Security,Malnutrition', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Business Standard<br /><br /><em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /></em><br />Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /><br />According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by&nbsp; the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India&rsquo;s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /><br />In 1990, India&rsquo;s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996.&nbsp; But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /><br />India&rsquo;s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /><br />This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India&rsquo;s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India&rsquo;s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /><br />&quot;In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh,&quot; the report said.<br />Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /><br />&ldquo;India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India&rsquo;s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /><br />For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006&ndash;08, and India&rsquo;s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005&ndash;06.<br /><br />&ldquo;Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India&rsquo;s track record is disappointing,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an &lsquo;serious&rsquo;. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /><br />&ldquo;South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 &ndash; mainly by reducing the share of underweight children&mdash;but could not maintain the rapid progress,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17414, 'title' => 'India&#039;s score in the &#039;Global Hunger Index&#039; back to 1996 levels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Business Standard<br /> <br /> <em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /> </em><br /> Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /> <br /> According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by&nbsp; the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India&rsquo;s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /> <br /> In 1990, India&rsquo;s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996.&nbsp; But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /> <br /> India&rsquo;s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /> <br /> This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India&rsquo;s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India&rsquo;s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /> <br /> &quot;In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh,&quot; the report said.<br /> Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /> <br /> &ldquo;India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India&rsquo;s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /> <br /> For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006&ndash;08, and India&rsquo;s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005&ndash;06.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India&rsquo;s track record is disappointing,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an &lsquo;serious&rsquo;. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 &ndash; mainly by reducing the share of underweight children&mdash;but could not maintain the rapid progress,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 October, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/indias-score-inglobal-hunger-index-back-to-1996-levels/190873/on', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17542, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17414 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India&#039;s score in the &#039;Global Hunger Index&#039; back to 1996 levels' $metaKeywords = 'Hunger,Starvation,Right to Food,Food Security,Malnutrition' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Business Standard<br /><br /><em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /></em><br />Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /><br />According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by&nbsp; the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India&rsquo;s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /><br />In 1990, India&rsquo;s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996.&nbsp; But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /><br />India&rsquo;s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /><br />This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India&rsquo;s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India&rsquo;s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /><br />&quot;In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh,&quot; the report said.<br />Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /><br />&ldquo;India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India&rsquo;s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /><br />For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006&ndash;08, and India&rsquo;s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005&ndash;06.<br /><br />&ldquo;Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India&rsquo;s track record is disappointing,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an &lsquo;serious&rsquo;. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /><br />&ldquo;South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 &ndash; mainly by reducing the share of underweight children&mdash;but could not maintain the rapid progress,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India's score in the 'Global Hunger Index' back to 1996 levels | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Business Standard China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>India's score in the 'Global Hunger Index' back to 1996 levels</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Business Standard<br /><br /><em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /></em><br />Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /><br />According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India’s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /><br />In 1990, India’s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996. But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /><br />India’s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /><br />This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India’s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India’s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /><br />"In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh," the report said.<br />Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /><br />“India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India’s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,” the report said.<br /><br />In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /><br />For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006–08, and India’s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005–06.<br /><br />“Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India’s track record is disappointing,” the report said.<br /><br />Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an ‘serious’. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /><br />“South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 – mainly by reducing the share of underweight children—but could not maintain the rapid progress,” the report said.<br /><br />It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680092a589105-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680092a589105-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680092a589105-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17414, 'title' => 'India&#039;s score in the &#039;Global Hunger Index&#039; back to 1996 levels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Business Standard<br /> <br /> <em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /> </em><br /> Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /> <br /> According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by&nbsp; the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India&rsquo;s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /> <br /> In 1990, India&rsquo;s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996.&nbsp; But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /> <br /> India&rsquo;s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /> <br /> This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India&rsquo;s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India&rsquo;s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /> <br /> &quot;In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh,&quot; the report said.<br /> Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /> <br /> &ldquo;India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India&rsquo;s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /> <br /> For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006&ndash;08, and India&rsquo;s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005&ndash;06.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India&rsquo;s track record is disappointing,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an &lsquo;serious&rsquo;. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 &ndash; mainly by reducing the share of underweight children&mdash;but could not maintain the rapid progress,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 October, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/indias-score-inglobal-hunger-index-back-to-1996-levels/190873/on', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17542, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17414, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India&#039;s score in the &#039;Global Hunger Index&#039; back to 1996 levels', 'metaKeywords' => 'Hunger,Starvation,Right to Food,Food Security,Malnutrition', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Business Standard<br /><br /><em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /></em><br />Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /><br />According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by&nbsp; the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India&rsquo;s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /><br />In 1990, India&rsquo;s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996.&nbsp; But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /><br />India&rsquo;s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /><br />This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India&rsquo;s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India&rsquo;s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /><br />&quot;In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh,&quot; the report said.<br />Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /><br />&ldquo;India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India&rsquo;s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /><br />For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006&ndash;08, and India&rsquo;s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005&ndash;06.<br /><br />&ldquo;Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India&rsquo;s track record is disappointing,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an &lsquo;serious&rsquo;. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /><br />&ldquo;South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 &ndash; mainly by reducing the share of underweight children&mdash;but could not maintain the rapid progress,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17414, 'title' => 'India&#039;s score in the &#039;Global Hunger Index&#039; back to 1996 levels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Business Standard<br /> <br /> <em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /> </em><br /> Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /> <br /> According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by&nbsp; the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India&rsquo;s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /> <br /> In 1990, India&rsquo;s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996.&nbsp; But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /> <br /> India&rsquo;s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /> <br /> This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India&rsquo;s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India&rsquo;s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /> <br /> &quot;In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh,&quot; the report said.<br /> Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /> <br /> &ldquo;India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India&rsquo;s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /> <br /> For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006&ndash;08, and India&rsquo;s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005&ndash;06.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India&rsquo;s track record is disappointing,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an &lsquo;serious&rsquo;. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 &ndash; mainly by reducing the share of underweight children&mdash;but could not maintain the rapid progress,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 October, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/indias-score-inglobal-hunger-index-back-to-1996-levels/190873/on', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17542, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17414 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India&#039;s score in the &#039;Global Hunger Index&#039; back to 1996 levels' $metaKeywords = 'Hunger,Starvation,Right to Food,Food Security,Malnutrition' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Business Standard<br /><br /><em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /></em><br />Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /><br />According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by&nbsp; the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India&rsquo;s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /><br />In 1990, India&rsquo;s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996.&nbsp; But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /><br />India&rsquo;s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /><br />This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India&rsquo;s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India&rsquo;s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /><br />&quot;In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh,&quot; the report said.<br />Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /><br />&ldquo;India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India&rsquo;s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /><br />For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006&ndash;08, and India&rsquo;s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005&ndash;06.<br /><br />&ldquo;Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India&rsquo;s track record is disappointing,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an &lsquo;serious&rsquo;. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /><br />&ldquo;South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 &ndash; mainly by reducing the share of underweight children&mdash;but could not maintain the rapid progress,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India's score in the 'Global Hunger Index' back to 1996 levels | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Business Standard China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>India's score in the 'Global Hunger Index' back to 1996 levels</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Business Standard<br /><br /><em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /></em><br />Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /><br />According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India’s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /><br />In 1990, India’s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996. But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /><br />India’s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /><br />This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India’s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India’s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /><br />"In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh," the report said.<br />Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /><br />“India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India’s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,” the report said.<br /><br />In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /><br />For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006–08, and India’s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005–06.<br /><br />“Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India’s track record is disappointing,” the report said.<br /><br />Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an ‘serious’. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /><br />“South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 – mainly by reducing the share of underweight children—but could not maintain the rapid progress,” the report said.<br /><br />It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680092a589105-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680092a589105-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680092a589105-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680092a589105-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17414, 'title' => 'India&#039;s score in the &#039;Global Hunger Index&#039; back to 1996 levels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Business Standard<br /> <br /> <em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /> </em><br /> Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /> <br /> According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by&nbsp; the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India&rsquo;s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /> <br /> In 1990, India&rsquo;s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996.&nbsp; But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /> <br /> India&rsquo;s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /> <br /> This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India&rsquo;s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India&rsquo;s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /> <br /> &quot;In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh,&quot; the report said.<br /> Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /> <br /> &ldquo;India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India&rsquo;s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /> <br /> For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006&ndash;08, and India&rsquo;s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005&ndash;06.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India&rsquo;s track record is disappointing,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an &lsquo;serious&rsquo;. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 &ndash; mainly by reducing the share of underweight children&mdash;but could not maintain the rapid progress,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 October, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/indias-score-inglobal-hunger-index-back-to-1996-levels/190873/on', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17542, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17414, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India&#039;s score in the &#039;Global Hunger Index&#039; back to 1996 levels', 'metaKeywords' => 'Hunger,Starvation,Right to Food,Food Security,Malnutrition', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Business Standard<br /><br /><em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /></em><br />Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /><br />According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by&nbsp; the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India&rsquo;s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /><br />In 1990, India&rsquo;s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996.&nbsp; But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /><br />India&rsquo;s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /><br />This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India&rsquo;s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India&rsquo;s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /><br />&quot;In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh,&quot; the report said.<br />Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /><br />&ldquo;India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India&rsquo;s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /><br />For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006&ndash;08, and India&rsquo;s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005&ndash;06.<br /><br />&ldquo;Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India&rsquo;s track record is disappointing,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an &lsquo;serious&rsquo;. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /><br />&ldquo;South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 &ndash; mainly by reducing the share of underweight children&mdash;but could not maintain the rapid progress,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17414, 'title' => 'India&#039;s score in the &#039;Global Hunger Index&#039; back to 1996 levels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Business Standard<br /> <br /> <em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /> </em><br /> Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /> <br /> According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by&nbsp; the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India&rsquo;s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /> <br /> In 1990, India&rsquo;s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996.&nbsp; But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /> <br /> India&rsquo;s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /> <br /> This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India&rsquo;s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India&rsquo;s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /> <br /> &quot;In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh,&quot; the report said.<br /> Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /> <br /> &ldquo;India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India&rsquo;s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /> <br /> For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006&ndash;08, and India&rsquo;s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005&ndash;06.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India&rsquo;s track record is disappointing,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an &lsquo;serious&rsquo;. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 &ndash; mainly by reducing the share of underweight children&mdash;but could not maintain the rapid progress,&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 October, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/indias-score-inglobal-hunger-index-back-to-1996-levels/190873/on', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17542, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17414 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India&#039;s score in the &#039;Global Hunger Index&#039; back to 1996 levels' $metaKeywords = 'Hunger,Starvation,Right to Food,Food Security,Malnutrition' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Business Standard<br /><br /><em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /></em><br />Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /><br />According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by&nbsp; the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India&rsquo;s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /><br />In 1990, India&rsquo;s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996.&nbsp; But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /><br />India&rsquo;s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /><br />This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India&rsquo;s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India&rsquo;s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /><br />&quot;In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh,&quot; the report said.<br />Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /><br />&ldquo;India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India&rsquo;s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /><br />For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006&ndash;08, and India&rsquo;s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005&ndash;06.<br /><br />&ldquo;Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India&rsquo;s track record is disappointing,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an &lsquo;serious&rsquo;. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /><br />&ldquo;South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 &ndash; mainly by reducing the share of underweight children&mdash;but could not maintain the rapid progress,&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India's score in the 'Global Hunger Index' back to 1996 levels | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Business Standard China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>India's score in the 'Global Hunger Index' back to 1996 levels</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Business Standard<br /><br /><em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /></em><br />Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /><br />According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India’s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /><br />In 1990, India’s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996. But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /><br />India’s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /><br />This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India’s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India’s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /><br />"In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh," the report said.<br />Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /><br />“India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India’s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,” the report said.<br /><br />In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /><br />For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006–08, and India’s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005–06.<br /><br />“Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India’s track record is disappointing,” the report said.<br /><br />Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an ‘serious’. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /><br />“South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 – mainly by reducing the share of underweight children—but could not maintain the rapid progress,” the report said.<br /><br />It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17414, 'title' => 'India's score in the 'Global Hunger Index' back to 1996 levels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Business Standard<br /> <br /> <em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /> </em><br /> Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /> <br /> According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India’s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /> <br /> In 1990, India’s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996. But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /> <br /> India’s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /> <br /> This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India’s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India’s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /> <br /> "In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh," the report said.<br /> Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /> <br /> “India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India’s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,” the report said.<br /> <br /> In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /> <br /> For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006–08, and India’s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005–06.<br /> <br /> “Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India’s track record is disappointing,” the report said.<br /> <br /> Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an ‘serious’. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /> <br /> “South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 – mainly by reducing the share of underweight children—but could not maintain the rapid progress,” the report said.<br /> <br /> It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 October, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/indias-score-inglobal-hunger-index-back-to-1996-levels/190873/on', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17542, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17414, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India's score in the 'Global Hunger Index' back to 1996 levels', 'metaKeywords' => 'Hunger,Starvation,Right to Food,Food Security,Malnutrition', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Business Standard China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Business Standard<br /><br /><em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /></em><br />Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /><br />According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India’s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /><br />In 1990, India’s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996. But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /><br />India’s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /><br />This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India’s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India’s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /><br />"In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh," the report said.<br />Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /><br />“India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India’s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,” the report said.<br /><br />In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /><br />For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006–08, and India’s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005–06.<br /><br />“Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India’s track record is disappointing,” the report said.<br /><br />Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an ‘serious’. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /><br />“South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 – mainly by reducing the share of underweight children—but could not maintain the rapid progress,” the report said.<br /><br />It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17414, 'title' => 'India's score in the 'Global Hunger Index' back to 1996 levels', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Business Standard<br /> <br /> <em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /> </em><br /> Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /> <br /> According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India’s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /> <br /> In 1990, India’s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996. But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /> <br /> India’s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /> <br /> This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India’s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India’s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /> <br /> "In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh," the report said.<br /> Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /> <br /> “India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India’s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,” the report said.<br /> <br /> In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /> <br /> For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006–08, and India’s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005–06.<br /> <br /> “Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India’s track record is disappointing,” the report said.<br /> <br /> Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an ‘serious’. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /> <br /> “South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 – mainly by reducing the share of underweight children—but could not maintain the rapid progress,” the report said.<br /> <br /> It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 11 October, 2012, http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/indias-score-inglobal-hunger-index-back-to-1996-levels/190873/on', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'india039s-score-in-the-039global-hunger-index039-back-to-1996-levels-17542', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17542, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17414 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | India's score in the 'Global Hunger Index' back to 1996 levels' $metaKeywords = 'Hunger,Starvation,Right to Food,Food Security,Malnutrition' $metaDesc = ' -The Business Standard China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Business Standard<br /><br /><em>China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world <br /></em><br />Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality.<br /><br />According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India’s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index.<br /><br />In 1990, India’s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996. But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal.<br /><br />India’s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed<br /><br />This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India’s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India’s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index.<br /><br />"In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh," the report said.<br />Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. <br /><br />“India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India’s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,” the report said.<br /><br />In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world.<br /><br />For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006–08, and India’s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005–06.<br /><br />“Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India’s track record is disappointing,” the report said.<br /><br />Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an ‘serious’. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa.<br /><br />“South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 – mainly by reducing the share of underweight children—but could not maintain the rapid progress,” the report said.<br /><br />It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
India's score in the 'Global Hunger Index' back to 1996 levels |
-The Business Standard
China, India's nearest economic rival has the second best score in the world Despite steady economic growth and robust social sector spending, India's score in Global Hunger Index has returned back to the 1996 level raising questions over the speed at which it has brought down the proportion of undernourished people, underweight children and child mortality. According to the findings of the Global Hunger Index 2012 by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), India’s latest score in the Hunger Index (GHI) has once again returned to the 1996 levels, after showing a minor deterioration between 1996 and 2001. Concern Worldwide and Welthungerhilfe also contributed in framing the annual Hunger Index. In 1990, India’s GHI score as monitored by IFPRI was 30.3, which fell to 22.6 in 1996. But again rose to 24.2 in 2001 and stood at 22.9 in 2012, much closer to 1996 levels. The lower the index, lower is number of incidence of hunger. Overall, India is ranked 65th among 79 major countries where hunger is prevalent, much below smaller nations like Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan and Nepal. India’s nearest economic rival, China has the second best score in GHI among the entire global world. Not, only that even Bangladesh has overtaken India on a range of social indicators including how fast it has reduced child mortality, the report showed This effectively means that from 1996 onwards, India’s hunger index has shown little improvement, despite India’s gross national income (GNI) per capita almost doubling between 1995-97 to 2008-10, the report said. The GHI index combines three equally weighted indicators like undernourishment, child underweight and child mortality in one index. "In India, 43.5 per cent of the children under five are underweight, which accounts for almost two-thirds of the country's alarmingly high GHI score. From 2005-2012, India is ranked second to last on child underweight -- below Ethiopia, Niger, Nepal and Bangladesh," the report said. Later talking to reporters, senior officials from IFPRI said that the biggest challenge in India is to translate the good sounding intentions into practical results on ground. “India has lagged behind in improving its GHI score despite strong economic growth. After a small increase between 1996 and 2001, India’s GHI score fell only slightly, and the latest GHI returned to about the 1996 level,” the report said. In comparison, China had a managed to consistently lower its hunger index scores from 11.8 in 1990 to 8.9 in 1996 to 6.7 in 2001 and in 2012 it stood at 5.1, among the lowest in the world. For India, the report acknowledges that it has arrived at that conclusion by including child mortality data from 2010, FAO data on undernourishment from 2006–08, and India’s latest available nationally representative data on child underweight collected in 2005–06. “Given that the Government of India has failed to monitor national trends in child under-nutrition for more than six years, any recent progress in the fight against child under-nutrition cannot be taken into account by the 2012 GHI. Nonetheless, even bearing in mind that possible recent advances in the fight against child under nutrition are not yet visible in the latest GHI, India’s track record is disappointing,” the report said. Globally, the report said that world hunger has somewhat declined since 1990, but still remains at an ‘serious’. The highest GHI scores are in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. “South Asia reduced its GHI score significantly between 1990 and 1996 – mainly by reducing the share of underweight children—but could not maintain the rapid progress,” the report said. It said sub-Saharan Africa made less progress in reducing hunger since 1990s, but caught up with South Asia since the turn of the millennium with its 2012 GHI score falling below that of South Asia. |