Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680503f636252-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680503f636252-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680503f636252-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10034, 'title' => 'Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /> <br /> Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; she alleged.<br /> <br /> Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for &mdash; clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /> <br /> However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates &ldquo;suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /> <br /> The Committee said its &ldquo;proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that &ldquo;although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /> <br /> The Commission, however, said &ldquo;final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> <em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /> </em><br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2471783.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10143, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10034, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai', 'metaKeywords' => 'bpl,Poverty,Right to Food,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo; The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo;<br /><br />The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /><br />Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; she alleged.<br /><br />Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for &mdash; clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /><br />&ldquo;The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.&rdquo;<br /><br />In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /><br />However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates &ldquo;suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].&rdquo;<br /><br />Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /><br />The Committee said its &ldquo;proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.&rdquo;<br /><br />N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that &ldquo;although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.&rdquo;<br /><br />The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /><br />The Commission, however, said &ldquo;final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /></em><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10034, 'title' => 'Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /> <br /> Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; she alleged.<br /> <br /> Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for &mdash; clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /> <br /> However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates &ldquo;suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /> <br /> The Committee said its &ldquo;proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that &ldquo;although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /> <br /> The Commission, however, said &ldquo;final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> <em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /> </em><br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2471783.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10143, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10034 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai' $metaKeywords = 'bpl,Poverty,Right to Food,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo; The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo;<br /><br />The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /><br />Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; she alleged.<br /><br />Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for &mdash; clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /><br />&ldquo;The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.&rdquo;<br /><br />In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /><br />However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates &ldquo;suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].&rdquo;<br /><br />Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /><br />The Committee said its &ldquo;proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.&rdquo;<br /><br />N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that &ldquo;although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.&rdquo;<br /><br />The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /><br />The Commission, however, said &ldquo;final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /></em><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate “private expenditure on food, education and health.” The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate “private expenditure on food, education and health.”<br /><br />The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /><br />Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. “This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,” she alleged.<br /><br />Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for — clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /><br />“The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.”<br /><br />In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /><br />However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates “suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].”<br /><br />Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /><br />The Committee said its “proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.”<br /><br />N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that “although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.”<br /><br />The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /><br />The Commission, however, said “final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.”<br /><br /><em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /></em><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680503f636252-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680503f636252-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680503f636252-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10034, 'title' => 'Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /> <br /> Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; she alleged.<br /> <br /> Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for &mdash; clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /> <br /> However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates &ldquo;suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /> <br /> The Committee said its &ldquo;proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that &ldquo;although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /> <br /> The Commission, however, said &ldquo;final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> <em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /> </em><br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2471783.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10143, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10034, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai', 'metaKeywords' => 'bpl,Poverty,Right to Food,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo; The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo;<br /><br />The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /><br />Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; she alleged.<br /><br />Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for &mdash; clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /><br />&ldquo;The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.&rdquo;<br /><br />In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /><br />However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates &ldquo;suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].&rdquo;<br /><br />Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /><br />The Committee said its &ldquo;proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.&rdquo;<br /><br />N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that &ldquo;although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.&rdquo;<br /><br />The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /><br />The Commission, however, said &ldquo;final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /></em><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10034, 'title' => 'Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /> <br /> Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; she alleged.<br /> <br /> Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for &mdash; clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /> <br /> However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates &ldquo;suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /> <br /> The Committee said its &ldquo;proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that &ldquo;although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /> <br /> The Commission, however, said &ldquo;final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> <em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /> </em><br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2471783.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10143, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10034 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai' $metaKeywords = 'bpl,Poverty,Right to Food,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo; The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo;<br /><br />The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /><br />Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; she alleged.<br /><br />Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for &mdash; clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /><br />&ldquo;The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.&rdquo;<br /><br />In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /><br />However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates &ldquo;suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].&rdquo;<br /><br />Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /><br />The Committee said its &ldquo;proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.&rdquo;<br /><br />N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that &ldquo;although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.&rdquo;<br /><br />The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /><br />The Commission, however, said &ldquo;final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /></em><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate “private expenditure on food, education and health.” The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate “private expenditure on food, education and health.”<br /><br />The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /><br />Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. “This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,” she alleged.<br /><br />Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for — clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /><br />“The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.”<br /><br />In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /><br />However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates “suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].”<br /><br />Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /><br />The Committee said its “proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.”<br /><br />N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that “although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.”<br /><br />The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /><br />The Commission, however, said “final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.”<br /><br /><em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /></em><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680503f636252-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680503f636252-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680503f636252-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680503f636252-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10034, 'title' => 'Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /> <br /> Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; she alleged.<br /> <br /> Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for &mdash; clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /> <br /> However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates &ldquo;suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /> <br /> The Committee said its &ldquo;proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that &ldquo;although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /> <br /> The Commission, however, said &ldquo;final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> <em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /> </em><br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2471783.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10143, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10034, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai', 'metaKeywords' => 'bpl,Poverty,Right to Food,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo; The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo;<br /><br />The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /><br />Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; she alleged.<br /><br />Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for &mdash; clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /><br />&ldquo;The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.&rdquo;<br /><br />In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /><br />However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates &ldquo;suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].&rdquo;<br /><br />Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /><br />The Committee said its &ldquo;proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.&rdquo;<br /><br />N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that &ldquo;although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.&rdquo;<br /><br />The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /><br />The Commission, however, said &ldquo;final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /></em><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10034, 'title' => 'Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /> <br /> Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; she alleged.<br /> <br /> Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for &mdash; clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /> <br /> However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates &ldquo;suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /> <br /> The Committee said its &ldquo;proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that &ldquo;although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /> <br /> The Commission, however, said &ldquo;final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> <em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /> </em><br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2471783.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10143, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10034 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai' $metaKeywords = 'bpl,Poverty,Right to Food,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo; The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate &ldquo;private expenditure on food, education and health.&rdquo;<br /><br />The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /><br />Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. &ldquo;This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,&rdquo; she alleged.<br /><br />Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for &mdash; clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /><br />&ldquo;The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.&rdquo;<br /><br />In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /><br />However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates &ldquo;suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].&rdquo;<br /><br />Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /><br />The Committee said its &ldquo;proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.&rdquo;<br /><br />N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that &ldquo;although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.&rdquo;<br /><br />The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /><br />The Commission, however, said &ldquo;final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.&rdquo;<br /><br /><em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /></em><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate “private expenditure on food, education and health.” The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate “private expenditure on food, education and health.”<br /><br />The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /><br />Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. “This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,” she alleged.<br /><br />Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for — clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /><br />“The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.”<br /><br />In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /><br />However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates “suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].”<br /><br />Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /><br />The Committee said its “proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.”<br /><br />N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that “although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.”<br /><br />The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /><br />The Commission, however, said “final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.”<br /><br /><em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /></em><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10034, 'title' => 'Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate “private expenditure on food, education and health.”<br /> <br /> The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /> <br /> Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. “This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,” she alleged.<br /> <br /> Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for — clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /> <br /> “The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.”<br /> <br /> In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /> <br /> However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates “suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].”<br /> <br /> Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /> <br /> The Committee said its “proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.”<br /> <br /> N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that “although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.”<br /> <br /> The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /> <br /> The Commission, however, said “final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.”<br /> <br /> <em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /> </em><br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2471783.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10143, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10034, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai', 'metaKeywords' => 'bpl,Poverty,Right to Food,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate “private expenditure on food, education and health.” The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate “private expenditure on food, education and health.”<br /><br />The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /><br />Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. “This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,” she alleged.<br /><br />Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for — clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /><br />“The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.”<br /><br />In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /><br />However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates “suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].”<br /><br />Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /><br />The Committee said its “proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.”<br /><br />N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that “although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.”<br /><br />The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /><br />The Commission, however, said “final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.”<br /><br /><em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /></em><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10034, 'title' => 'Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate “private expenditure on food, education and health.”<br /> <br /> The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /> <br /> Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. “This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,” she alleged.<br /> <br /> Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for — clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /> <br /> “The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.”<br /> <br /> In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /> <br /> However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates “suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].”<br /> <br /> Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /> <br /> The Committee said its “proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.”<br /> <br /> N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that “although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.”<br /> <br /> The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /> <br /> The Commission, however, said “final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.”<br /> <br /> <em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /> </em><br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 September, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2471783.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-rs-25-all-that-you-need-for-a-day-by-gargi-parsai-10143', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10143, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10034 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai' $metaKeywords = 'bpl,Poverty,Right to Food,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate “private expenditure on food, education and health.” The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate “private expenditure on food, education and health.”<br /><br />The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices.<br /><br />Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. “This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,” she alleged.<br /><br />Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for — clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government.<br /><br />“The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.”<br /><br />In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005.<br /><br />However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates “suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].”<br /><br />Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim.<br /><br />The Committee said its “proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.”<br /><br />N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that “although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.”<br /><br />The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report.<br /><br />The Commission, however, said “final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.”<br /><br /><em>Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court<br /></em><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Is Rs. 25 all that you need for a day? by Gargi Parsai |
In a startling affidavit before the Supreme Court, the Planning Commission has said an individual income of just Rs. 25 a day constitutes adequate “private expenditure on food, education and health.”
The affidavit, submitted on Tuesday, bases its assertion on the findings of the Suresh Tendulkar Committee, which pegged the poverty line at Rs. 447 a month, or about Rs. 15 a day, at 2004-2005 prices. Experts reacted with dismay to the affidavit. National Advisory Council member Aruna Roy said it reflected the government's lack of empathy for the poor. “This extremely low estimated expenditure is aimed at artificially reducing the number of persons Below the Poverty Line and thus reduce government expenditure on the poor,” she alleged. Planning Commission Member Abhijit Sen admitted that the affidavit did not answer what the court had asked for — clear criteria on who would qualify for subsidised foodgrains from the government. “The poverty line figures in the affidavit are the ones arrived at by the Tendulkar Committee and the government has to accept those. But, I agree, this affidavit does not address the issue of who is entitled to a BPL card.” In its affidavit, the Commission says the total BPL population now being served by the Public Distribution System is 35.98 crore. The Tendulkar Committee had called for that number to be revised to 40.74 crore, on the basis of the projected population on March 1, 2005. However, the affidavit states the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) data and provisional estimates “suggest that the total BPL population may be lower than what would have emerged from [the] Tendulkar [report].” Commission sources said their affidavit relied on the NSSO and Tendulkar Committee findings, and did not make any independent claim. The Committee said its “proposed poverty lines have been validated by checking the adequacy of actual private expenditure per capita near the poverty lines on food, education and health by comparing them with normative expenditures consistent with nutritional, education and health outcomes.” N.C. Saxena, another NAC member, felt that “although the Planning Commission has only quoted NSSO's survey statistics, it could have been more sensitive.” The affidavit was filed in response to the May 14 court order advising the Commission to update its BPL norms to reflect prices as on May 2011. The court had observed that it was impossible for an individual in an urban area to consume 2,100 calories with Rs. 20 and 2,400 calories with Rs. 15 in rural area, the figures in the Tendulkar report. The Commission, however, said “final poverty lines following Tendulkar Committee [report] will be available only after completion of the 2011-12 NSS Survey and these will vary from State to State because of price differentials.” Planning Commission affidavit in Supreme Court |