Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f411b5a8184-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f411b5a8184-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f411b5a8184-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 57976, 'title' => 'Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger', 'subheading' => null, 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;backward&rdquo;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into &ldquo;backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category &ldquo;backward class of citizens&rdquo; and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 21 December, 2020, https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 1, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => null, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 57976, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger', 'metaKeywords' => 'Scheduled Castes,Constitution,Supreme Court', 'metaDesc' => '-TheWire.in The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged. In State of Punjab...', 'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;backward&rdquo;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p><p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into &ldquo;backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category &ldquo;backward class of citizens&rdquo; and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment" title="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 57976, 'title' => 'Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger', 'subheading' => null, 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;backward&rdquo;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into &ldquo;backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category &ldquo;backward class of citizens&rdquo; and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 21 December, 2020, https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 1, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => null, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 57976 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger' $metaKeywords = 'Scheduled Castes,Constitution,Supreme Court' $metaDesc = '-TheWire.in The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged. In State of Punjab...' $disp = '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;backward&rdquo;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p><p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into &ldquo;backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category &ldquo;backward class of citizens&rdquo; and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment" title="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="-TheWire.in The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as 'more backward' and 'backward', and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged. In State of Punjab..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as 'more backward' and 'backward', and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into “more backward” and “backward”, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p><p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into “backward” and “more backward” arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category “backward class of citizens” and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment" title="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f411b5a8184-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f411b5a8184-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f411b5a8184-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 57976, 'title' => 'Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger', 'subheading' => null, 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;backward&rdquo;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into &ldquo;backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category &ldquo;backward class of citizens&rdquo; and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 21 December, 2020, https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 1, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => null, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 57976, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger', 'metaKeywords' => 'Scheduled Castes,Constitution,Supreme Court', 'metaDesc' => '-TheWire.in The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged. In State of Punjab...', 'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;backward&rdquo;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p><p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into &ldquo;backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category &ldquo;backward class of citizens&rdquo; and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment" title="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 57976, 'title' => 'Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger', 'subheading' => null, 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;backward&rdquo;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into &ldquo;backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category &ldquo;backward class of citizens&rdquo; and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 21 December, 2020, https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 1, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => null, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 57976 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger' $metaKeywords = 'Scheduled Castes,Constitution,Supreme Court' $metaDesc = '-TheWire.in The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged. In State of Punjab...' $disp = '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;backward&rdquo;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p><p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into &ldquo;backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category &ldquo;backward class of citizens&rdquo; and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment" title="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="-TheWire.in The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as 'more backward' and 'backward', and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged. In State of Punjab..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as 'more backward' and 'backward', and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into “more backward” and “backward”, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p><p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into “backward” and “more backward” arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category “backward class of citizens” and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment" title="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f411b5a8184-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f411b5a8184-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f411b5a8184-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f411b5a8184-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 57976, 'title' => 'Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger', 'subheading' => null, 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;backward&rdquo;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into &ldquo;backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category &ldquo;backward class of citizens&rdquo; and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 21 December, 2020, https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 1, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => null, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 57976, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger', 'metaKeywords' => 'Scheduled Castes,Constitution,Supreme Court', 'metaDesc' => '-TheWire.in The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged. In State of Punjab...', 'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;backward&rdquo;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p><p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into &ldquo;backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category &ldquo;backward class of citizens&rdquo; and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment" title="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 57976, 'title' => 'Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger', 'subheading' => null, 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;backward&rdquo;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into &ldquo;backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category &ldquo;backward class of citizens&rdquo; and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 21 December, 2020, https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 1, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => null, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 57976 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger' $metaKeywords = 'Scheduled Castes,Constitution,Supreme Court' $metaDesc = '-TheWire.in The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged. In State of Punjab...' $disp = '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as &#39;more backward&#39; and &#39;backward&#39;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;backward&rdquo;, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p><p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into &ldquo;backward&rdquo; and &ldquo;more backward&rdquo; arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category &ldquo;backward class of citizens&rdquo; and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment" title="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="-TheWire.in The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as 'more backward' and 'backward', and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged. In State of Punjab..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as 'more backward' and 'backward', and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into “more backward” and “backward”, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p><p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into “backward” and “more backward” arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category “backward class of citizens” and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment" title="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 57976, 'title' => 'Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger', 'subheading' => null, 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as 'more backward' and 'backward', and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into “more backward” and “backward”, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into “backward” and “more backward” arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category “backward class of citizens” and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 21 December, 2020, https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 1, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => null, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 57976, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger', 'metaKeywords' => 'Scheduled Castes,Constitution,Supreme Court', 'metaDesc' => '-TheWire.in The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as 'more backward' and 'backward', and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged. In State of Punjab...', 'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as 'more backward' and 'backward', and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into “more backward” and “backward”, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p><p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into “backward” and “more backward” arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category “backward class of citizens” and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment" title="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 57976, 'title' => 'Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger', 'subheading' => null, 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as 'more backward' and 'backward', and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into “more backward” and “backward”, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into “backward” and “more backward” arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category “backward class of citizens” and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 21 December, 2020, https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-the-sub-classification-of-scheduled-castes-justified-kailash-jeenger', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 1, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => null, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 57976 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger' $metaKeywords = 'Scheduled Castes,Constitution,Supreme Court' $metaDesc = '-TheWire.in The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as 'more backward' and 'backward', and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged. In State of Punjab...' $disp = '<p style="text-align:justify">-TheWire.in</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as 'more backward' and 'backward', and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into “more backward” and “backward”, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments.</p><p style="text-align:justify">However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case.</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into “backward” and “more backward” arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category “backward class of citizens” and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment" title="https://thewire.in/caste/sub-classification-scs-reservation-appointment">click here</a> to read more.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Is the Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes Justified? -Kailash Jeenger |
-TheWire.in The bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported classification of the SCs as 'more backward' and 'backward', and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, different views on the matter have emerged. In State of Punjab and Others versus Davinder Singh and Others (August 27, 2020), the bench led by retired Justice Arun Mishra supported the classification of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) into “more backward” and “backward”, and preference to the more backward castes for reservation in appointments. However, the five-judge bench decided to refer the question for the final decision to an 11-judge bench, because in its opinion, the nine-judge bench in Indra Sawhney versus Union Of India And Others (1992) observed that such sub-classification is permissible, whereas the bench in E.V. Chinnaiah versus State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others (2004) misread the Indra Sawhney case. Ambiguities in Indra Sawhney case At the outset, it must be understood that the sub-classification into “backward” and “more backward” arises because Article 16(4) of the Constitution recognises a category “backward class of citizens” and, therefore, ideally, sub-classification, if any, should be done for that only. There is no need to further classifying the sub-categories. However, paragraph 92A of the judgment which deals with the issue is ambiguous on this point. Please click here to read more. |