Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13704, 'title' => 'Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. &ldquo;How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?&rdquo; Ramesh had replied. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: &ldquo;I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 19 March, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/2012/03/19131013/Views--Is-this-the-end-of-the.html?h=A1', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13827, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13704, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS,NREGA', 'metaDesc' => ' In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. &ldquo;How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?&rdquo; Ramesh had replied.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education.</div><div style="text-align: justify">One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: &ldquo;I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13704, 'title' => 'Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. &ldquo;How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?&rdquo; Ramesh had replied. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: &ldquo;I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 19 March, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/2012/03/19131013/Views--Is-this-the-end-of-the.html?h=A1', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13827, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13704 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS,NREGA' $metaDesc = ' In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. &ldquo;How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?&rdquo; Ramesh had replied.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education.</div><div style="text-align: justify">One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: &ldquo;I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. “How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?” Ramesh had replied.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education.</div><div style="text-align: justify">One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: “I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13704, 'title' => 'Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. &ldquo;How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?&rdquo; Ramesh had replied. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: &ldquo;I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 19 March, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/2012/03/19131013/Views--Is-this-the-end-of-the.html?h=A1', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13827, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13704, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS,NREGA', 'metaDesc' => ' In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. &ldquo;How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?&rdquo; Ramesh had replied.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education.</div><div style="text-align: justify">One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: &ldquo;I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13704, 'title' => 'Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. &ldquo;How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?&rdquo; Ramesh had replied. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: &ldquo;I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 19 March, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/2012/03/19131013/Views--Is-this-the-end-of-the.html?h=A1', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13827, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13704 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS,NREGA' $metaDesc = ' In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. &ldquo;How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?&rdquo; Ramesh had replied.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education.</div><div style="text-align: justify">One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: &ldquo;I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. “How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?” Ramesh had replied.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education.</div><div style="text-align: justify">One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: “I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801ef7d6d5ab-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13704, 'title' => 'Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. &ldquo;How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?&rdquo; Ramesh had replied. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: &ldquo;I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 19 March, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/2012/03/19131013/Views--Is-this-the-end-of-the.html?h=A1', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13827, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13704, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS,NREGA', 'metaDesc' => ' In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. &ldquo;How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?&rdquo; Ramesh had replied.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education.</div><div style="text-align: justify">One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: &ldquo;I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13704, 'title' => 'Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. &ldquo;How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?&rdquo; Ramesh had replied. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: &ldquo;I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 19 March, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/2012/03/19131013/Views--Is-this-the-end-of-the.html?h=A1', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13827, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13704 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS,NREGA' $metaDesc = ' In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. &ldquo;How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?&rdquo; Ramesh had replied.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education.</div><div style="text-align: justify">One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: &ldquo;I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. “How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?” Ramesh had replied.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education.</div><div style="text-align: justify">One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: “I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13704, 'title' => 'Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. “How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?” Ramesh had replied. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: “I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 19 March, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/2012/03/19131013/Views--Is-this-the-end-of-the.html?h=A1', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13827, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13704, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS,NREGA', 'metaDesc' => ' In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. “How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?” Ramesh had replied.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education.</div><div style="text-align: justify">One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: “I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13704, 'title' => 'Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. “How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?” Ramesh had replied. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: “I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 19 March, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/2012/03/19131013/Views--Is-this-the-end-of-the.html?h=A1', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'is-this-the-end-of-the-road-for-mgnrega-niranjan-rajadhyaksha-13827', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13827, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13704 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS,NREGA' $metaDesc = ' In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. “How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?” Ramesh had replied.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education.</div><div style="text-align: justify">One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: “I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Is this the end of the road for MGNREGA?-Niranjan Rajadhyaksha |
In an interview with Mint in February, Jairam Ramesh, minister of rural development, was asked whether the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) would be rolled back in the upcoming budget as part of a plan to reduce the fiscal deficit. “How can we roll back a demand-driven programme?” Ramesh had replied. But that is precisely what seems to have happened. On Friday, finance minister Pranab Mukherjee announced a budget that cut spending on this controversial scheme that legally guarantees every one adult in every rural family 100 days of work a year. The outlay MGRNREGS was reduced by Rs7,000 crore. In contrast, the government hiked allocations to other social programmes such as the Integrated Child Development Scheme and the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, suggesting that its inclusive-growth focus has shifted to nourishment and education. One popular interpretation of the cutback is that the flagship scheme of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) has lost out after criticisms about corruption as well as fears that it has led to a labour shortage in the rural areas, especially at harvest time. That the import duties on several types of farm equipment have been slashed is perhaps also an indication that the government wants to encourage farm mechanization in response to the labour shortages. But the point Ramesh made is still a valid one. The MGNREGS mandates that the government has to provide work to anybody who demands it. So the government will have to spend more than budgeted in case the demand for work increases in the course of this year. There is no escape clause. Two other issues are also important. One, many states send inflated estimates for job-related spending that they do not later use. Two states --- Jharkhand and West Bengal --- have been specifically mentioned in reports about this problem. Two, the demand for work has actually declined in rural India thanks to good harvests. If that is indeed the case, then more research is needed to understand whether MGNREGS has become a counter-cyclical automatic stabilizer in the rural economy, with spending and rural output moving in opposite directions. For either or both of these two reasons, MGNREGS spending was just 62.74% of total funds available this year till February, or at least 10 percentage points lower than in previous years. There are many flaws in MGNREGS, as Mint has often argued. In fact, Ramesh even reminded us in February: “I know your newspaper has been in the forefront of this campaign to paint MGNREGA in such a light, saying that this whole thing is a digging exercise and a ditch-filling exercise. This is a completely bogus argument.” Yet, it is still too early to speculate about its waning popularity in the UPA government.
|