Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68132baa58450-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68132baa58450-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68132baa58450-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 959, 'title' => 'It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: &ldquo;Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. &ldquo;You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. &ldquo;In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. &ldquo;Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court &ldquo;is deciding its own case,&rdquo; Mr. Vahanvati said &ldquo;this is absurd&rdquo; and added &ldquo;several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.&rdquo; He said: &ldquo;I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.&rdquo; <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/16/stories/2010011660981300.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1033, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 959, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ><em>Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: &ldquo;Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. &ldquo;You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. &ldquo;In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. &ldquo;Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court &ldquo;is deciding its own case,&rdquo; Mr. Vahanvati said &ldquo;this is absurd&rdquo; and added &ldquo;several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.&rdquo; He said: &ldquo;I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.&rdquo; <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 959, 'title' => 'It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: &ldquo;Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. &ldquo;You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. &ldquo;In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. &ldquo;Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court &ldquo;is deciding its own case,&rdquo; Mr. Vahanvati said &ldquo;this is absurd&rdquo; and added &ldquo;several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.&rdquo; He said: &ldquo;I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.&rdquo; <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/16/stories/2010011660981300.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1033, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 959 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ><em>Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: &ldquo;Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. &ldquo;You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. &ldquo;In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. &ldquo;Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court &ldquo;is deciding its own case,&rdquo; Mr. Vahanvati said &ldquo;this is absurd&rdquo; and added &ldquo;several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.&rdquo; He said: &ldquo;I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.&rdquo; <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Substantial questions of law are involved The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ><em>Substantial questions of law are involved </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: “Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. “You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. “In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. “Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court “is deciding its own case,” Mr. Vahanvati said “this is absurd” and added “several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.” He said: “I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.” <br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68132baa58450-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68132baa58450-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68132baa58450-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 959, 'title' => 'It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: &ldquo;Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. &ldquo;You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. &ldquo;In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. &ldquo;Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court &ldquo;is deciding its own case,&rdquo; Mr. Vahanvati said &ldquo;this is absurd&rdquo; and added &ldquo;several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.&rdquo; He said: &ldquo;I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.&rdquo; <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/16/stories/2010011660981300.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1033, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 959, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ><em>Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: &ldquo;Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. &ldquo;You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. &ldquo;In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. &ldquo;Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court &ldquo;is deciding its own case,&rdquo; Mr. Vahanvati said &ldquo;this is absurd&rdquo; and added &ldquo;several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.&rdquo; He said: &ldquo;I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.&rdquo; <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 959, 'title' => 'It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: &ldquo;Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. &ldquo;You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. &ldquo;In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. &ldquo;Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court &ldquo;is deciding its own case,&rdquo; Mr. Vahanvati said &ldquo;this is absurd&rdquo; and added &ldquo;several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.&rdquo; He said: &ldquo;I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.&rdquo; <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/16/stories/2010011660981300.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1033, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 959 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ><em>Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: &ldquo;Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. &ldquo;You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. &ldquo;In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. &ldquo;Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court &ldquo;is deciding its own case,&rdquo; Mr. Vahanvati said &ldquo;this is absurd&rdquo; and added &ldquo;several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.&rdquo; He said: &ldquo;I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.&rdquo; <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Substantial questions of law are involved The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ><em>Substantial questions of law are involved </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: “Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. “You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. “In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. “Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court “is deciding its own case,” Mr. Vahanvati said “this is absurd” and added “several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.” He said: “I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.” <br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68132baa58450-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68132baa58450-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68132baa58450-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68132baa58450-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 959, 'title' => 'It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: &ldquo;Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. &ldquo;You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. &ldquo;In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. &ldquo;Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court &ldquo;is deciding its own case,&rdquo; Mr. Vahanvati said &ldquo;this is absurd&rdquo; and added &ldquo;several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.&rdquo; He said: &ldquo;I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.&rdquo; <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/16/stories/2010011660981300.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1033, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 959, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ><em>Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: &ldquo;Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. &ldquo;You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. &ldquo;In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. &ldquo;Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court &ldquo;is deciding its own case,&rdquo; Mr. Vahanvati said &ldquo;this is absurd&rdquo; and added &ldquo;several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.&rdquo; He said: &ldquo;I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.&rdquo; <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 959, 'title' => 'It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: &ldquo;Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. &ldquo;You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. &ldquo;In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. &ldquo;Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court &ldquo;is deciding its own case,&rdquo; Mr. Vahanvati said &ldquo;this is absurd&rdquo; and added &ldquo;several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.&rdquo; He said: &ldquo;I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.&rdquo; <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/16/stories/2010011660981300.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1033, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 959 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ><em>Substantial questions of law are involved&nbsp; </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: &ldquo;Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. &ldquo;You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. &ldquo;In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. &ldquo;Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court &ldquo;is deciding its own case,&rdquo; Mr. Vahanvati said &ldquo;this is absurd&rdquo; and added &ldquo;several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.&rdquo; He said: &ldquo;I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.&rdquo; <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Substantial questions of law are involved The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ><em>Substantial questions of law are involved </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: “Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. “You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. “In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. “Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court “is deciding its own case,” Mr. Vahanvati said “this is absurd” and added “several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.” He said: “I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.” <br /></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 959, 'title' => 'It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Substantial questions of law are involved </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: “Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.” </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. “You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.” </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. “In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.” </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. “Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?” </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court “is deciding its own case,” Mr. Vahanvati said “this is absurd” and added “several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.” He said: “I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.” <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/16/stories/2010011660981300.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1033, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 959, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Substantial questions of law are involved The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ><em>Substantial questions of law are involved </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: “Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. “You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. “In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. “Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court “is deciding its own case,” Mr. Vahanvati said “this is absurd” and added “several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.” He said: “I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.” <br /></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 959, 'title' => 'It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Substantial questions of law are involved </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: “Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.” </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. “You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.” </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. “In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.” </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. “Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?” </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court “is deciding its own case,” Mr. Vahanvati said “this is absurd” and added “several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.” He said: “I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.” <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 16 January, 2010, http://www.hindu.com/2010/01/16/stories/2010011660981300.htm', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'its-for-supreme-court-to-decide-on-rti-applicability-to-cji-attorney-general-by-j-venkatesan-1033', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1033, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 959 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Substantial questions of law are involved The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ><em>Substantial questions of law are involved </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: “Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. “You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. “In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. “Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court “is deciding its own case,” Mr. Vahanvati said “this is absurd” and added “several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.” He said: “I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.” <br /></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
It’s for Supreme Court to decide on RTI applicability to CJI: Attorney-General by J Venkatesan |
Substantial questions of law are involved The issues of applicability of the Right to Information Act to the office of the Chief Justice of India should be finally decided by the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law and general importance were involved, Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati said on Friday. Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Vahanvati, who appeared on behalf of the Secretary-General of the Supreme Court, said: “Various people have publicly expressed their views that no further appeal should be filed challenging the [Delhi] High Court judgment. In fact, some have even alleged that I, in my capacity as Attorney-General, am keen that an appeal be filed.” He pointed out that the High Court itself had granted a certificate of appeal to the Supreme Court as substantial questions of law were involved in the case. A Full Court of the Supreme Court would take the final decision on whether or not to prefer an appeal. Mr. Vahanvati said certain issues dealt with by the Supreme Court collegium on appointment of judges, personal opinions given by judges, and response to complaints against judges could not be revealed. Doing so would affect the independence of the judiciary. “You must accept that there are various constitutional obligations where strict confidentiality is required.” If reasons given by judges for non-selection of a judge for elevation or for some other appointment were to be disclosed, then no judge in the know of things would give a free and frank opinion. “In such matters, it is pointless to proceed on public perception, and the collegium will be justified in its wisdom not to make reasons public.” Not only the judiciary but also the offices of the President and the Prime Minister dealt with various sensitive issues day in and day out, and there was a constitutional mandate and fiduciary principle that these must be kept confidential, Mr. Vahanvati said. “Who will tell the CJI or the judge concerned that everything he says has to be made public?” Referring to the criticism that the Supreme Court “is deciding its own case,” Mr. Vahanvati said “this is absurd” and added “several administrative decisions have been set aside on the judicial side.” He said: “I have taken up this case on behalf of the Supreme Court not just as a matter of legal duty but on the basis of a firm conviction that the independence of the judiciary cannot be compromised by exposing every aspect of the work of the courts to public scrutiny.” |