Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680152b4d861a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680152b4d861a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680152b4d861a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 30023,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Now, the questions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &amp;ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &amp;lsquo;statutory&amp;rsquo; control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Affordability matters&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The DoF&amp;rsquo;s argument is flawed. &amp;lsquo;Controlled&amp;rsquo; urea or &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &amp;lsquo;affordable&amp;rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &amp;lsquo;uniform&amp;rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&amp;rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &amp;lsquo;pick and choose&amp;rsquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Check vested interests&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &amp;ldquo;top priority&amp;rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Juxtaposed with the DoF&amp;rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&amp;rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &amp;lsquo;policy driven&amp;rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The writer is a policy analyst &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 16 December, 2015, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector/article7996954.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4678082,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 30023,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Nutrient based subsidy,Fertilizer,Fertilizer Subsidy,fertilizers&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line

And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance

The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Now, the questions&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &amp;ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &amp;lsquo;statutory&amp;rsquo; control.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Affordability matters&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DoF&amp;rsquo;s argument is flawed. &amp;lsquo;Controlled&amp;rsquo; urea or &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &amp;lsquo;affordable&amp;rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &amp;lsquo;uniform&amp;rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&amp;rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &amp;lsquo;pick and choose&amp;rsquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Check vested interests&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &amp;ldquo;top priority&amp;rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Juxtaposed with the DoF&amp;rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&amp;rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &amp;lsquo;policy driven&amp;rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The writer is a policy analyst &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 30023,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Now, the questions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &amp;ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &amp;lsquo;statutory&amp;rsquo; control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Affordability matters&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The DoF&amp;rsquo;s argument is flawed. &amp;lsquo;Controlled&amp;rsquo; urea or &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &amp;lsquo;affordable&amp;rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &amp;lsquo;uniform&amp;rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&amp;rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &amp;lsquo;pick and choose&amp;rsquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Check vested interests&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &amp;ldquo;top priority&amp;rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Juxtaposed with the DoF&amp;rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&amp;rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &amp;lsquo;policy driven&amp;rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The writer is a policy analyst &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 16 December, 2015, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector/article7996954.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4678082,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 30023
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Nutrient based subsidy,Fertilizer,Fertilizer Subsidy,fertilizers&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line

And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance

The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Now, the questions&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &amp;ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &amp;lsquo;statutory&amp;rsquo; control.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Affordability matters&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DoF&amp;rsquo;s argument is flawed. &amp;lsquo;Controlled&amp;rsquo; urea or &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &amp;lsquo;affordable&amp;rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &amp;lsquo;uniform&amp;rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&amp;rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &amp;lsquo;pick and choose&amp;rsquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Check vested interests&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &amp;ldquo;top priority&amp;rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Juxtaposed with the DoF&amp;rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&amp;rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &amp;lsquo;policy driven&amp;rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The writer is a policy analyst &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu Business Line

And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance

The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line<br /><br /><em>And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance<br /></em><br />The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .<br /><br />Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?<br /><br />A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.<br /><br />The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.<br /><br /><em>Now, the questions<br /></em><br />Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?<br /><br />In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?<br /><br />The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &lsquo;decontrolled&rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).<br /><br />Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.<br /><br />On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &lsquo;statutory&rsquo; control.<br /><br />Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.<br /><br /><em>Affordability matters<br /></em><br />The DoF&rsquo;s argument is flawed. &lsquo;Controlled&rsquo; urea or &lsquo;decontrolled&rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.<br /><br />Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &lsquo;affordable&rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).<br /><br />DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.<br /><br />In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &lsquo;uniform&rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.<br /><br />As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &lsquo;pick and choose&rsquo;.<br /><br /><em>Check vested interests<br /></em><br />The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.<br /><br />This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &ldquo;top priority&rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.<br /><br />Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.<br /><br />Juxtaposed with the DoF&rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.<br /><br />The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.<br /><br />Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &lsquo;policy driven&rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.<br /><em><br />The writer is a policy analyst </em><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680152b4d861a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680152b4d861a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680152b4d861a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 30023,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Now, the questions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &amp;ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &amp;lsquo;statutory&amp;rsquo; control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Affordability matters&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The DoF&amp;rsquo;s argument is flawed. &amp;lsquo;Controlled&amp;rsquo; urea or &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &amp;lsquo;affordable&amp;rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &amp;lsquo;uniform&amp;rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&amp;rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &amp;lsquo;pick and choose&amp;rsquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Check vested interests&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &amp;ldquo;top priority&amp;rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Juxtaposed with the DoF&amp;rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&amp;rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &amp;lsquo;policy driven&amp;rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The writer is a policy analyst &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 16 December, 2015, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector/article7996954.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4678082,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 30023,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Nutrient based subsidy,Fertilizer,Fertilizer Subsidy,fertilizers&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line

And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance

The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Now, the questions&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &amp;ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &amp;lsquo;statutory&amp;rsquo; control.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Affordability matters&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DoF&amp;rsquo;s argument is flawed. &amp;lsquo;Controlled&amp;rsquo; urea or &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &amp;lsquo;affordable&amp;rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &amp;lsquo;uniform&amp;rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&amp;rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &amp;lsquo;pick and choose&amp;rsquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Check vested interests&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &amp;ldquo;top priority&amp;rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Juxtaposed with the DoF&amp;rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&amp;rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &amp;lsquo;policy driven&amp;rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The writer is a policy analyst &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 30023,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Now, the questions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &amp;ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &amp;lsquo;statutory&amp;rsquo; control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Affordability matters&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The DoF&amp;rsquo;s argument is flawed. &amp;lsquo;Controlled&amp;rsquo; urea or &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &amp;lsquo;affordable&amp;rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &amp;lsquo;uniform&amp;rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&amp;rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &amp;lsquo;pick and choose&amp;rsquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Check vested interests&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &amp;ldquo;top priority&amp;rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Juxtaposed with the DoF&amp;rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&amp;rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &amp;lsquo;policy driven&amp;rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The writer is a policy analyst &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 16 December, 2015, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector/article7996954.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4678082,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 30023
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Nutrient based subsidy,Fertilizer,Fertilizer Subsidy,fertilizers&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line

And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance

The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Now, the questions&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &amp;ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &amp;lsquo;statutory&amp;rsquo; control.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Affordability matters&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DoF&amp;rsquo;s argument is flawed. &amp;lsquo;Controlled&amp;rsquo; urea or &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &amp;lsquo;affordable&amp;rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &amp;lsquo;uniform&amp;rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&amp;rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &amp;lsquo;pick and choose&amp;rsquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Check vested interests&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &amp;ldquo;top priority&amp;rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Juxtaposed with the DoF&amp;rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&amp;rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &amp;lsquo;policy driven&amp;rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The writer is a policy analyst &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu Business Line

And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance

The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line<br /><br /><em>And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance<br /></em><br />The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .<br /><br />Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?<br /><br />A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.<br /><br />The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.<br /><br /><em>Now, the questions<br /></em><br />Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?<br /><br />In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?<br /><br />The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &lsquo;decontrolled&rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).<br /><br />Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.<br /><br />On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &lsquo;statutory&rsquo; control.<br /><br />Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.<br /><br /><em>Affordability matters<br /></em><br />The DoF&rsquo;s argument is flawed. &lsquo;Controlled&rsquo; urea or &lsquo;decontrolled&rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.<br /><br />Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &lsquo;affordable&rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).<br /><br />DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.<br /><br />In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &lsquo;uniform&rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.<br /><br />As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &lsquo;pick and choose&rsquo;.<br /><br /><em>Check vested interests<br /></em><br />The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.<br /><br />This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &ldquo;top priority&rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.<br /><br />Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.<br /><br />Juxtaposed with the DoF&rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.<br /><br />The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.<br /><br />Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &lsquo;policy driven&rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.<br /><em><br />The writer is a policy analyst </em><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680152b4d861a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680152b4d861a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680152b4d861a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680152b4d861a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 30023,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Now, the questions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &amp;ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &amp;lsquo;statutory&amp;rsquo; control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Affordability matters&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The DoF&amp;rsquo;s argument is flawed. &amp;lsquo;Controlled&amp;rsquo; urea or &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &amp;lsquo;affordable&amp;rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &amp;lsquo;uniform&amp;rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&amp;rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &amp;lsquo;pick and choose&amp;rsquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Check vested interests&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &amp;ldquo;top priority&amp;rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Juxtaposed with the DoF&amp;rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&amp;rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &amp;lsquo;policy driven&amp;rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The writer is a policy analyst &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 16 December, 2015, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector/article7996954.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4678082,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 30023,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Nutrient based subsidy,Fertilizer,Fertilizer Subsidy,fertilizers&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line

And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance

The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Now, the questions&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &amp;ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &amp;lsquo;statutory&amp;rsquo; control.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Affordability matters&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DoF&amp;rsquo;s argument is flawed. &amp;lsquo;Controlled&amp;rsquo; urea or &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &amp;lsquo;affordable&amp;rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &amp;lsquo;uniform&amp;rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&amp;rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &amp;lsquo;pick and choose&amp;rsquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Check vested interests&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &amp;ldquo;top priority&amp;rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Juxtaposed with the DoF&amp;rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&amp;rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &amp;lsquo;policy driven&amp;rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The writer is a policy analyst &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 30023,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Now, the questions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &amp;ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &amp;lsquo;statutory&amp;rsquo; control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Affordability matters&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The DoF&amp;rsquo;s argument is flawed. &amp;lsquo;Controlled&amp;rsquo; urea or &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &amp;lsquo;affordable&amp;rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &amp;lsquo;uniform&amp;rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&amp;rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &amp;lsquo;pick and choose&amp;rsquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Check vested interests&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &amp;ldquo;top priority&amp;rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Juxtaposed with the DoF&amp;rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&amp;rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &amp;lsquo;policy driven&amp;rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The writer is a policy analyst &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu Business Line, 16 December, 2015, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector/article7996954.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4678082,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 30023
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Nutrient based subsidy,Fertilizer,Fertilizer Subsidy,fertilizers&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu Business Line

And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance

The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu Business Line&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Now, the questions&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &amp;ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &amp;lsquo;statutory&amp;rsquo; control.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Affordability matters&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The DoF&amp;rsquo;s argument is flawed. &amp;lsquo;Controlled&amp;rsquo; urea or &amp;lsquo;decontrolled&amp;rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &amp;lsquo;affordable&amp;rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &amp;lsquo;uniform&amp;rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&amp;rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &amp;lsquo;pick and choose&amp;rsquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Check vested interests&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &amp;ldquo;top priority&amp;rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Juxtaposed with the DoF&amp;rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&amp;rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &amp;lsquo;policy driven&amp;rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The writer is a policy analyst &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu Business Line

And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance

The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line<br /><br /><em>And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance<br /></em><br />The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .<br /><br />Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?<br /><br />A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.<br /><br />The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.<br /><br /><em>Now, the questions<br /></em><br />Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?<br /><br />In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?<br /><br />The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &lsquo;decontrolled&rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).<br /><br />Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.<br /><br />On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &lsquo;statutory&rsquo; control.<br /><br />Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.<br /><br /><em>Affordability matters<br /></em><br />The DoF&rsquo;s argument is flawed. &lsquo;Controlled&rsquo; urea or &lsquo;decontrolled&rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.<br /><br />Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &lsquo;affordable&rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).<br /><br />DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.<br /><br />In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &lsquo;uniform&rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.<br /><br />As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &lsquo;pick and choose&rsquo;.<br /><br /><em>Check vested interests<br /></em><br />The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.<br /><br />This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &ldquo;top priority&rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.<br /><br />Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.<br /><br />Juxtaposed with the DoF&rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.<br /><br />The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.<br /><br />Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &lsquo;policy driven&rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.<br /><em><br />The writer is a policy analyst </em><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 30023,
		'title' => 'It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu Business Line<br />
<br />
<em>And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance<br />
</em><br />
The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .<br />
<br />
Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?<br />
<br />
A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.<br />
<br />
The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.<br />
<br />
<em>Now, the questions<br />
</em><br />
Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?<br />
<br />
In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?<br />
<br />
The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &lsquo;decontrolled&rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).<br />
<br />
Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &lsquo;statutory&rsquo; control.<br />
<br />
Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.<br />
<br />
<em>Affordability matters<br />
</em><br />
The DoF&rsquo;s argument is flawed. &lsquo;Controlled&rsquo; urea or &lsquo;decontrolled&rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.<br />
<br />
Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &lsquo;affordable&rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).<br />
<br />
DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.<br />
<br />
In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &lsquo;uniform&rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.<br />
<br />
As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &lsquo;pick and choose&rsquo;.<br />
<br />
<em>Check vested interests<br />
</em><br />
The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.<br />
<br />
This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &ldquo;top priority&rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.<br />
<br />
Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.<br />
<br />
Juxtaposed with the DoF&rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.<br />
<br />
The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.<br />
<br />
Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &lsquo;policy driven&rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.<br />
<em><br />
The writer is a policy analyst </em><br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu Business Line, 16 December, 2015, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector/article7996954.ece?homepage=true',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4678082,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 30023,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Nutrient based subsidy,Fertilizer,Fertilizer Subsidy,fertilizers',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Hindu Business Line

And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance

The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line<br /><br /><em>And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance<br /></em><br />The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .<br /><br />Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?<br /><br />A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.<br /><br />The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.<br /><br /><em>Now, the questions<br /></em><br />Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?<br /><br />In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?<br /><br />The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &lsquo;decontrolled&rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).<br /><br />Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.<br /><br />On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &lsquo;statutory&rsquo; control.<br /><br />Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.<br /><br /><em>Affordability matters<br /></em><br />The DoF&rsquo;s argument is flawed. &lsquo;Controlled&rsquo; urea or &lsquo;decontrolled&rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.<br /><br />Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &lsquo;affordable&rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).<br /><br />DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.<br /><br />In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &lsquo;uniform&rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.<br /><br />As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &lsquo;pick and choose&rsquo;.<br /><br /><em>Check vested interests<br /></em><br />The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.<br /><br />This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &ldquo;top priority&rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.<br /><br />Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.<br /><br />Juxtaposed with the DoF&rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.<br /><br />The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.<br /><br />Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &lsquo;policy driven&rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.<br /><em><br />The writer is a policy analyst </em><br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 30023,
	'title' => 'It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu Business Line<br />
<br />
<em>And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance<br />
</em><br />
The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .<br />
<br />
Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?<br />
<br />
A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.<br />
<br />
The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.<br />
<br />
<em>Now, the questions<br />
</em><br />
Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?<br />
<br />
In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?<br />
<br />
The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &lsquo;decontrolled&rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).<br />
<br />
Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &lsquo;statutory&rsquo; control.<br />
<br />
Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.<br />
<br />
<em>Affordability matters<br />
</em><br />
The DoF&rsquo;s argument is flawed. &lsquo;Controlled&rsquo; urea or &lsquo;decontrolled&rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.<br />
<br />
Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &lsquo;affordable&rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).<br />
<br />
DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.<br />
<br />
In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &lsquo;uniform&rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.<br />
<br />
As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &lsquo;pick and choose&rsquo;.<br />
<br />
<em>Check vested interests<br />
</em><br />
The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.<br />
<br />
This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &ldquo;top priority&rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.<br />
<br />
Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.<br />
<br />
Juxtaposed with the DoF&rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.<br />
<br />
The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.<br />
<br />
Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &lsquo;policy driven&rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.<br />
<em><br />
The writer is a policy analyst </em><br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu Business Line, 16 December, 2015, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector/article7996954.ece?homepage=true',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'its-wrong-to-deny-gas-to-the-fertiliser-sector-uttam-gupta-4678082',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4678082,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 30023
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta'
$metaKeywords = 'Nutrient based subsidy,Fertilizer,Fertilizer Subsidy,fertilizers'
$metaDesc = '
-The Hindu Business Line

And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance

The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu Business Line<br /><br /><em>And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance<br /></em><br />The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) .<br /><br />Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other?<br /><br />A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year.<br /><br />The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies.<br /><br /><em>Now, the questions<br /></em><br />Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser &ndash; or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category?<br /><br />In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)?<br /><br />The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of &lsquo;decontrolled&rsquo; fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP).<br /><br />Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP.<br /><br />On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under &lsquo;statutory&rsquo; control.<br /><br />Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low.<br /><br /><em>Affordability matters<br /></em><br />The DoF&rsquo;s argument is flawed. &lsquo;Controlled&rsquo; urea or &lsquo;decontrolled&rsquo; complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results.<br /><br />Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be &lsquo;affordable&rsquo; to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination).<br /><br />DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers.<br /><br />In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of &lsquo;uniform&rsquo; subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised.<br /><br />As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF&rsquo;s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by &lsquo;pick and choose&rsquo;.<br /><br /><em>Check vested interests<br /></em><br />The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat.<br /><br />This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging &ldquo;top priority&rdquo; status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas.<br /><br />Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry.<br /><br />Juxtaposed with the DoF&rsquo;s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won&rsquo;t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings.<br /><br />The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage.<br /><br />Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely &lsquo;policy driven&rsquo; eliminating scope for discretion.<br /><em><br />The writer is a policy analyst </em><br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

It’s wrong to deny gas to the fertiliser sector -Uttam Gupta

-The Hindu Business Line And worse still, to favour urea producers over decontrolled fertiliser units in gas allocation, exacerbating the nutrient imbalance The manner in which gas is allocated within the fertiliser sector smacks of arbitrariness. The Centre gives a uniform subsidy to all manufacturers, including those of decontrolled complex fertilisers, under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS) . Why, then, does it use a different yardstick for allocation of gas to manufacturers of urea on the one hand and decontrolled fertiliser on the other? A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has ordered the government to resume supply of natural gas to Deepak Fertiliser and Petrochemicals Corporation (DFPCL), a manufacturer of decontrolled phosphatic fertilisers, which was arbitrarily suspended last year. The bench has stated that gas supply to DFPCL will continue till the government finalises the guidelines on supply of gas to fertiliser companies. Now, the questions Why is the government averse to supplying gas to manufacturers of decontrolled fertiliser – or worse, denying domestic gas only to some manufacturers in this category? In other words, within the complex group, why did it deny supply only to DFPCL even while continuing supplies to Gujarat State Fertilisers and Chemicals Limited (GSFCL) and Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Limited (RCFL)? The Department of Fertilisers (DoF) on whose recommendation ministry of petroleum and natural gas (MPNG) allocates gas, argued that manufacturers of ‘decontrolled’ fertilisers are free to fix maximum retail price (MRP). Therefore, even if they use imported LNG (liquefied natural gas) which costs more, they can recover higher cost of production by increasing MRP. On the other hand, manufacturers of urea are not free to fix MRP which is under ‘statutory’ control. Cheaper domestic gas being in short supply is reserved exclusively for urea manufacturing units so that its production cost and subsidy outgo (excess of cost over MRP) can be kept low. Affordability matters The DoF’s argument is flawed. ‘Controlled’ urea or ‘decontrolled’ complex fertilisers or decontrolled MOP (muriate of potash) are essential plant nutrients. These have to be used in proper balance for getting optimum results. Consequently, all categories of fertilisers including complex fertilisers have to be ‘affordable’ to farmers and no particular group can be singled out for preferential treatment (or discrimination). DFPCL, RCF and GSFC use gas for making ammonia, which when combined with phosphoric acid yields complex fertilisers. In this backdrop, denial of domestic gas will force them to use costlier imported LNG, increasing production cost. In the face of ‘uniform’ subsidy (or NBS), they will either have to increase MRP or stop production. Either way, farmers will be penalised. As regards denial of gas only to DFPCL, the DoF’s logic is that it produces only complex fertilisers whereas RCF/GSFC have integrated urea and complex operations and are government undertakings. This is absurd and reminiscent of pre-reform era of 1970s and 1980s when policies were guided by ‘pick and choose’. Check vested interests The absurdity crosses all limits when having continued domestic gas supply to RCF/GSFC, the DoF treats resultant saving in cost as a bonanza and decides to mop up. The decontrolled segment of fertiliser industry faces a bigger threat. This arises due to vested interests from sectors such as power and steel challenging “top priority” status hitherto enjoyed by fertilisers in allocation of gas. Fertiliser companies already face diminished supplies (courtesy, virtual drying up of supplies from the KG-D6 field) and if the government acquiesces to pressure tactics, this will further reduce allocation for fertiliser industry. Juxtaposed with the DoF’s flawed policy (gas to be reserved only for urea units) there won’t be any gas left for manufacturers of decontrolled fertilisers, not even for its favoured undertakings. The government should take urgent steps to end this policy mess. It should maintain top priority for use of domestic gas in fertilisers where it yields maximum national economic advantage. Second, it should ensure its supply to manufacturers of all fertilisers without discrimination. Finally, the process of gas allocation should be entirely ‘policy driven’ eliminating scope for discretion. The writer is a policy analyst