Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801307a98d5e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801307a98d5e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801307a98d5e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11278,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Jairam Ramesh&amp;#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-India Today
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&amp;quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&amp;quot; he added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &amp;quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&amp;quot; Pillai added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &amp;quot;includes everything&amp;quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &amp;quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&amp;quot; Dhavan said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &amp;quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&amp;quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;India Today, 20 November, 2011, http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/land-acquisition-bill-jairam-ramesh-parliament/1/160747.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11393,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11278,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Jairam Ramesh&amp;#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Bill&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-India Today


&amp;nbsp;


Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-India Today&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&amp;quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&amp;quot; he added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &amp;quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&amp;quot; Pillai added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &amp;quot;includes everything&amp;quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &amp;quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&amp;quot; Dhavan said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &amp;quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&amp;quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11278,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Jairam Ramesh&amp;#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-India Today
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&amp;quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&amp;quot; he added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &amp;quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&amp;quot; Pillai added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &amp;quot;includes everything&amp;quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &amp;quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&amp;quot; Dhavan said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &amp;quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&amp;quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;India Today, 20 November, 2011, http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/land-acquisition-bill-jairam-ramesh-parliament/1/160747.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11393,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 11278
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Jairam Ramesh&amp;#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Bill&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-India Today


&amp;nbsp;


Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-India Today&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&amp;quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&amp;quot; he added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &amp;quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&amp;quot; Pillai added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &amp;quot;includes everything&amp;quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &amp;quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&amp;quot; Dhavan said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &amp;quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&amp;quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Jairam Ramesh&#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-India Today


&nbsp;


Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh's pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers' organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Jairam Ramesh&#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-India Today</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh's pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers' organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.<br /><br />The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.<br /><br />The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.<br /><br />&quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.<br /><br />&quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&quot; he added.<br /><br />Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&quot; Pillai added.<br /><br />The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &quot;includes everything&quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&quot; Dhavan said.<br /><br />The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.<br /><br />However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801307a98d5e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801307a98d5e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801307a98d5e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11278,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Jairam Ramesh&amp;#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-India Today
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&amp;quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&amp;quot; he added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &amp;quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&amp;quot; Pillai added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &amp;quot;includes everything&amp;quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &amp;quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&amp;quot; Dhavan said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &amp;quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&amp;quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;India Today, 20 November, 2011, http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/land-acquisition-bill-jairam-ramesh-parliament/1/160747.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11393,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11278,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Jairam Ramesh&amp;#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Bill&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-India Today


&amp;nbsp;


Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-India Today&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&amp;quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&amp;quot; he added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &amp;quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&amp;quot; Pillai added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &amp;quot;includes everything&amp;quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &amp;quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&amp;quot; Dhavan said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &amp;quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&amp;quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11278,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Jairam Ramesh&amp;#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-India Today
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&amp;quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&amp;quot; he added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &amp;quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&amp;quot; Pillai added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &amp;quot;includes everything&amp;quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &amp;quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&amp;quot; Dhavan said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &amp;quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&amp;quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;India Today, 20 November, 2011, http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/land-acquisition-bill-jairam-ramesh-parliament/1/160747.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11393,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 11278
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Jairam Ramesh&amp;#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Bill&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-India Today


&amp;nbsp;


Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-India Today&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&amp;quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&amp;quot; he added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &amp;quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&amp;quot; Pillai added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &amp;quot;includes everything&amp;quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &amp;quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&amp;quot; Dhavan said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &amp;quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&amp;quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Jairam Ramesh&#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-India Today


&nbsp;


Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh's pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers' organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Jairam Ramesh&#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-India Today</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh's pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers' organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.<br /><br />The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.<br /><br />The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.<br /><br />&quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.<br /><br />&quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&quot; he added.<br /><br />Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&quot; Pillai added.<br /><br />The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &quot;includes everything&quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&quot; Dhavan said.<br /><br />The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.<br /><br />However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801307a98d5e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801307a98d5e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801307a98d5e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801307a98d5e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11278,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Jairam Ramesh&amp;#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-India Today
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&amp;quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&amp;quot; he added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &amp;quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&amp;quot; Pillai added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &amp;quot;includes everything&amp;quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &amp;quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&amp;quot; Dhavan said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &amp;quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&amp;quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;India Today, 20 November, 2011, http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/land-acquisition-bill-jairam-ramesh-parliament/1/160747.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11393,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11278,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Jairam Ramesh&amp;#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Bill&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-India Today


&amp;nbsp;


Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-India Today&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&amp;quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&amp;quot; he added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &amp;quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&amp;quot; Pillai added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &amp;quot;includes everything&amp;quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &amp;quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&amp;quot; Dhavan said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &amp;quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&amp;quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11278,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Jairam Ramesh&amp;#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-India Today
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&amp;quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&amp;quot; he added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &amp;quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&amp;quot; Pillai added.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &amp;quot;includes everything&amp;quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &amp;quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&amp;quot; Dhavan said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &amp;quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&amp;quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;India Today, 20 November, 2011, http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/land-acquisition-bill-jairam-ramesh-parliament/1/160747.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11393,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 11278
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Jairam Ramesh&amp;#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Bill&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-India Today


&amp;nbsp;


Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-India Today&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh&#039;s pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers&#039; organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&amp;quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&amp;quot; he added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &amp;quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&amp;quot; Pillai added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &amp;quot;includes everything&amp;quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &amp;quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&amp;quot; Dhavan said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &amp;quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&amp;quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Jairam Ramesh&#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-India Today


&nbsp;


Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh's pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers' organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Jairam Ramesh&#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-India Today</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh's pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers' organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.<br /><br />The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.<br /><br />The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.<br /><br />&quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.<br /><br />&quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&quot; he added.<br /><br />Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&quot; Pillai added.<br /><br />The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &quot;includes everything&quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&quot; Dhavan said.<br /><br />The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.<br /><br />However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 11278,
		'title' => 'Jairam Ramesh's controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<p>
-India Today
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="justify">
Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh's pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers' organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.<br />
<br />
The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.<br />
<br />
The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.<br />
<br />
&quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.<br />
<br />
&quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&quot; he added.<br />
<br />
Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&quot; Pillai added.<br />
<br />
The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &quot;includes everything&quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&quot; Dhavan said.<br />
<br />
The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.<br />
<br />
However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.<br />
<br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'India Today, 20 November, 2011, http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/land-acquisition-bill-jairam-ramesh-parliament/1/160747.html',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 11393,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 11278,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Jairam Ramesh&#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Bill',
	'metaDesc' => '
-India Today


&nbsp;


Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh's pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers' organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the...',
	'disp' => '<p>-India Today</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh's pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers' organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.<br /><br />The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.<br /><br />The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.<br /><br />&quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.<br /><br />&quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&quot; he added.<br /><br />Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&quot; Pillai added.<br /><br />The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &quot;includes everything&quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&quot; Dhavan said.<br /><br />The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.<br /><br />However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.<br /><br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 11278,
	'title' => 'Jairam Ramesh&#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<p>
-India Today
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="justify">
Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh's pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers' organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.<br />
<br />
The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.<br />
<br />
The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.<br />
<br />
&quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.<br />
<br />
&quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&quot; he added.<br />
<br />
Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&quot; Pillai added.<br />
<br />
The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &quot;includes everything&quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&quot; Dhavan said.<br />
<br />
The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.<br />
<br />
However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.<br />
<br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'India Today, 20 November, 2011, http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/land-acquisition-bill-jairam-ramesh-parliament/1/160747.html',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'jairam-ramesh039s-controversial-land-bill-draws-flak-by-am-jigeesh-11393',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 11393,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 11278
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Jairam Ramesh&#039;s controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Bill'
$metaDesc = '
-India Today


&nbsp;


Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh's pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers' organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the...'
$disp = '<p>-India Today</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh's pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers' organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country.<br /><br />The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill.<br /><br />The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903.<br /><br />&quot;It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation,&quot; Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8.<br /><br />&quot;We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other,&quot; he added.<br /><br />Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. &quot;Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government,&quot; Pillai added.<br /><br />The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition &quot;includes everything&quot;. Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: &quot;A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions,&quot; Dhavan said.<br /><br />The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process.<br /><br />However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. &quot;It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation.&quot; Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.<br /><br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Jairam Ramesh's controversial Land Bill draws flak by AM Jigeesh

-India Today   Rural Development Minister Jairam Ramesh's pet land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement Bill, 2011 has run into major roadblocks in the parliamentary standing committee. Various stakeholders, including farmers' organisations, NGOs and legal experts contend that in its present form, the Bill is an empty shell that exempts 90 per cent major development projects - highways, nuclear plants, mines, SEZs et al-in the name of which, land is being acquired across the country. The major bones of contention are sections 97, 98 and 99 of the Bill. Section 97 states that the provisions of the Bill shall not be in derogation of any other law in force. Sub-section (1) of Section 98 says that the provisions of the Bill shall not apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule of the Bill. The Fourth Schedule has 16 Bills, including the ancient monuments and archaeological sites and remains Act, 1958, the atomic energy Act, 1962, the cantonments Act, 2006, the metro railways (construction of works) Act, 1978, the national highways Act, 1956, the special economic zones Act, 2005, the railways Act, 1989 and the works of defence Act, 1903. "It is an exercise in deceit. The government is trying to hoodwink the people by claiming that this is a comprehensive legislation," Kisan Sabha president and CPM politburo member S. Ramachandran Pillai told Mail Today all appear before the panel with a point-by-point analysis of the Bill on December 8. "We will campaign against this Bill. What is claimed to be given by one hand is taken away by the other," he added. Sub section (1) of Section 99 has also raised a controversy. It says that the Union government may, by notification, amend or alter any of the schedules of this Bill. "Such a provision is surprising. This clause has been added to suit the neo-liberal economic agenda of the UPA government," Pillai added. The definition of public purpose in the Bill has also come under criticism. Critics say that the definition "includes everything". Supreme Court lawyer Rajeev Dhavan, who made a detailed presentation before the panel, said: "A novel feature of the Bill is to support private acquisitions for a public purpose where the private company has consent of 80 per cent of the affected persons. It seems untidily clear from the applicability clause 2(1) that there is a distinction between public-private partnership acquisition and other acquisitions," Dhavan said. The Parliamentary standing committee on rural development, which is headed by BJP MP Sumitra Mahajan, has started taking objections and suggestion from various organisations and individuals on the Bill. The government was in touch with Mahajan for an early completion of the process. However, it is learnt that the panel will take some more time to table its report. "It is an important Bill. We need to study it in detail. Many individuals and organisations are keen to make their presentations on the legislation." Civil rights activist Medha Patkar had said the Bill will trigger more conflicts.