Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 20533,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament&#039;s jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &amp;quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&amp;quot; A view that ran through his life.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples&#039; person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - &#039;Goodbye old friend.&#039; (The writer is eminent lawyer) 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 25 April, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/JS-Verma-Left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy/articleshow/19719088.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20675,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20533,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Human Rights,Gender,Gender Equality&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India



No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws....&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament&#039;s jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &amp;quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&amp;quot; A view that ran through his life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples&#039; person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - &#039;Goodbye old friend.&#039; (The writer is eminent lawyer) &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 20533,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament&#039;s jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &amp;quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&amp;quot; A view that ran through his life.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples&#039; person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - &#039;Goodbye old friend.&#039; (The writer is eminent lawyer) 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 25 April, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/JS-Verma-Left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy/articleshow/19719088.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20675,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 20533
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Human Rights,Gender,Gender Equality&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India



No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws....&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament&#039;s jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &amp;quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&amp;quot; A view that ran through his life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples&#039; person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - &#039;Goodbye old friend.&#039; (The writer is eminent lawyer) &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India



No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws...."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br />No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.</p><p align="justify">His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.</p><p align="justify">His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament's jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.</p><p align="justify">It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.</p><p align="justify">There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&quot; A view that ran through his life.</p><p align="justify">This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.</p><p align="justify">It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples' person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.</p><p align="justify">His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - 'Goodbye old friend.' (The writer is eminent lawyer) </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 20533,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament&#039;s jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &amp;quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&amp;quot; A view that ran through his life.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples&#039; person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - &#039;Goodbye old friend.&#039; (The writer is eminent lawyer) 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 25 April, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/JS-Verma-Left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy/articleshow/19719088.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20675,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20533,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Human Rights,Gender,Gender Equality&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India



No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws....&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament&#039;s jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &amp;quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&amp;quot; A view that ran through his life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples&#039; person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - &#039;Goodbye old friend.&#039; (The writer is eminent lawyer) &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 20533,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament&#039;s jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &amp;quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&amp;quot; A view that ran through his life.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples&#039; person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - &#039;Goodbye old friend.&#039; (The writer is eminent lawyer) 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 25 April, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/JS-Verma-Left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy/articleshow/19719088.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20675,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 20533
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Human Rights,Gender,Gender Equality&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India



No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws....&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament&#039;s jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &amp;quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&amp;quot; A view that ran through his life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples&#039; person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - &#039;Goodbye old friend.&#039; (The writer is eminent lawyer) &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India



No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws...."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br />No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.</p><p align="justify">His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.</p><p align="justify">His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament's jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.</p><p align="justify">It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.</p><p align="justify">There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&quot; A view that ran through his life.</p><p align="justify">This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.</p><p align="justify">It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples' person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.</p><p align="justify">His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - 'Goodbye old friend.' (The writer is eminent lawyer) </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fd21e2a9033-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 20533,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament&#039;s jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &amp;quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&amp;quot; A view that ran through his life.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples&#039; person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - &#039;Goodbye old friend.&#039; (The writer is eminent lawyer) 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 25 April, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/JS-Verma-Left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy/articleshow/19719088.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20675,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20533,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Human Rights,Gender,Gender Equality&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India



No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws....&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament&#039;s jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &amp;quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&amp;quot; A view that ran through his life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples&#039; person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - &#039;Goodbye old friend.&#039; (The writer is eminent lawyer) &lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 20533,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament&#039;s jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &amp;quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&amp;quot; A view that ran through his life.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples&#039; person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - &#039;Goodbye old friend.&#039; (The writer is eminent lawyer) 
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 25 April, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/JS-Verma-Left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy/articleshow/19719088.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 20675,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 20533
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Human Rights,Gender,Gender Equality&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India



No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws....&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament&#039;s jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &amp;quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&amp;quot; A view that ran through his life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples&#039; person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - &#039;Goodbye old friend.&#039; (The writer is eminent lawyer) &lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India



No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws...."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br />No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.</p><p align="justify">His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.</p><p align="justify">His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament's jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.</p><p align="justify">It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.</p><p align="justify">There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&quot; A view that ran through his life.</p><p align="justify">This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.</p><p align="justify">It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples' person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.</p><p align="justify">His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - 'Goodbye old friend.' (The writer is eminent lawyer) </p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 20533,
		'title' => 'JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.
</p>
<p align="justify">
His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.
</p>
<p align="justify">
His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament's jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.
</p>
<p align="justify">
There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&quot; A view that ran through his life.
</p>
<p align="justify">
This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples' person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.
</p>
<p align="justify">
His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - 'Goodbye old friend.' (The writer is eminent lawyer) 
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 25 April, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/JS-Verma-Left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy/articleshow/19719088.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 20675,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 20533,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Human Rights,Gender,Gender Equality',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Times of India



No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws....',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br />No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.</p><p align="justify">His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.</p><p align="justify">His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament's jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.</p><p align="justify">It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.</p><p align="justify">There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&quot; A view that ran through his life.</p><p align="justify">This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.</p><p align="justify">It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples' person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.</p><p align="justify">His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - 'Goodbye old friend.' (The writer is eminent lawyer) </p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 20533,
	'title' => 'JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.
</p>
<p align="justify">
His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.
</p>
<p align="justify">
His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament's jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.
</p>
<p align="justify">
There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&quot; A view that ran through his life.
</p>
<p align="justify">
This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples' person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.
</p>
<p align="justify">
His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - 'Goodbye old friend.' (The writer is eminent lawyer) 
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 25 April, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/JS-Verma-Left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy/articleshow/19719088.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'js-verma-left-behind-little-as-inheritance-lot-as-legacy-rajeev-dhavan-20675',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 20675,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 20533
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan'
$metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Human Rights,Gender,Gender Equality'
$metaDesc = '
-The Times of India



No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws....'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br />No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy.</p><p align="justify">His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place.</p><p align="justify">His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament's jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all.</p><p align="justify">It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them.</p><p align="justify">There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said &quot;We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another.&quot; A view that ran through his life.</p><p align="justify">This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country.</p><p align="justify">It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples' person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive.</p><p align="justify">His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - 'Goodbye old friend.' (The writer is eminent lawyer) </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

JS Verma: Left behind little as inheritance, lot as legacy -Rajeev Dhavan

-The Times of India No obituary notice can do justice to Justice J S Verma. A judge for over 25 years, Chief Justice of India (CJI), Chairman National Human Right (NHRC), Verma Commission on Security Lapses, Verma Commission on rape laws. The list is endless. Many judges hanker for post-retirement jobs, Justice Verma did not. A CJI has to chair of NHRC. He did not ask for the job, but did a good job. He earned no money from post-retirement practice or arbitrations. Incorruptible, he left behind little by way of inheritance but a lot as legacy. His high court judgments were rarely overturned by the Supreme Court. No one doubted his knowledge across a large canvass of law. He loved to expound it. I used to send accompany my trainees to his court simply to hear his clear expositions of the law. Each institution has its politics. The Supreme Court is no stranger to this. In little time, he became the part of a powerful cabal which dominated the business of the court, including Justices Venkatachaliah (another giant in his own right), Sharma, himself and others. The importance of this lay in his majority judgment in the Judges case (1993) which wrested the power of judicial appointments from the executive to locate High Court and Supreme Court appointments in High Court and, eventually, Supreme Court collegiums. In retrospect, it seems that this experiment has gone wrong and is crying for reversal. In the hands of better collegiums it may have worked well. It became an autocracy. Justice Verma expressed to me his doubts on the experiment, but was still wary of political interference which is why a collegium was instituted in the first place. His most remarkable foray into gender justice was his judgment in Visaka (1997) which signaled three judicial adventures: incorporating international human rights treaties and regimes into Indian law, expanding the role of gender justice in Indian law and, most significantly, creating the actionable wrong of sexual harassment and providing for its enforcement at the workplace. This enabled Indian human rights to acquire a universal perspective without losing touch with Indian realities. But he did not step on Parliament's jurisdiction. Judicial craftsmanship does not come to all. It seems ironic that Justice Verma thought Presidents Rule (1993) was not judicially reviewable. His views on judicial review are not to be judged by his forbearance in that case. He expanded judicial review but kept it under a tight leash. In the Hawala case in (1998) he decided that the Court could ask the CBI to investigate the matter; and, that, the court would monitor the investigation till the charge sheet was filed by the CBI. Why this procedure? In such a case, political interference could take place. This was not a prescription in all cases but where political interference was likely. In the 2G case, the Supreme Court has lost its reticence both in supervision of the CBI (issuing contempt notices at the drop of a hat) and supervising beyond the investigation stage. This shows the difference between judicial oversight and hands-on supervision, juristic technique and its antithesis. Justice Verma understood the challenges of the time and the need for a measured response to them. There are many cases he was involved in. An earlier round of the Accelerated Seniority Reservation cases (1996) and innumerable civil liberty ones. It was Justice Verma who appointed me amicus in the Noida cases which led to the criminal case against Neera Yadav IAS and which still continues. While I was not happy with his Babri Masjid majority judgment (1994), because of what he said about Muslim prayer and tilting the status quo in the Hindus favour, yet it remains an elaboration of secularism and establishing a status quo. Typically (quoting Swift) he said "We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another." A view that ran through his life. This secular commitment was visible when as chairman, NHRC he sent his teams to Gujarat in the aftermath of Godra. His reports indicted religion based genocide. He wanted political follow-through which was wanting. At a Karan Thappar programme, I asked why he stopped after the NHRC indictment. He added, wryly, that he could only go up to a point. Compare that with our present NHRC chairman who does not show any human rights drive and Press Council Chairman who wants to run the country. It was during the last ten odd years (2003-2013) when Justice Verma became a peoples' person and resource, With no great love for foreign travel, he responded to invitation from activists, gracing each occasion with thought. The last time I heard him was a Sahmat meeting where he kept the fires of a tolerative secularism alive. His legacy is a tribute to his life and his life a tribute to all of us - 'Goodbye old friend.' (The writer is eminent lawyer)