Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68222add93917-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68222add93917-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68222add93917-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11898,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Judges can&amp;#039;t shoot from lip: Govt&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has also expanded the standing committee&#039;s recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers&#039; protection bill and citizens&#039; charter bill, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &amp;quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year&#039;s rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &amp;quot;in camera&amp;quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &amp;quot;unwarranted defamation&amp;quot; in the initial stage of investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 13 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Judges-cant-shoot-from-lip-Govt/articleshow/11087799.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12017,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11898,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Judges can&amp;#039;t shoot from lip: Govt&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Judicial Accountability&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India


&amp;nbsp;


The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.

The decision forms part of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has also expanded the standing committee&#039;s recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers&#039; protection bill and citizens&#039; charter bill, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &amp;quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year&#039;s rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &amp;quot;in camera&amp;quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &amp;quot;unwarranted defamation&amp;quot; in the initial stage of investigation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11898,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Judges can&amp;#039;t shoot from lip: Govt&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has also expanded the standing committee&#039;s recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers&#039; protection bill and citizens&#039; charter bill, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &amp;quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year&#039;s rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &amp;quot;in camera&amp;quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &amp;quot;unwarranted defamation&amp;quot; in the initial stage of investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 13 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Judges-cant-shoot-from-lip-Govt/articleshow/11087799.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12017,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 11898
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Judges can&amp;#039;t shoot from lip: Govt&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Judicial Accountability&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India


&amp;nbsp;


The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.

The decision forms part of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has also expanded the standing committee&#039;s recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers&#039; protection bill and citizens&#039; charter bill, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &amp;quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year&#039;s rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &amp;quot;in camera&amp;quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &amp;quot;unwarranted defamation&amp;quot; in the initial stage of investigation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Judges can&#039;t shoot from lip: Govt | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India


&nbsp;


The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament's standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don't concern them directly.

The decision forms part of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Judges can&#039;t shoot from lip: Govt</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-The Times of India</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament's standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don't concern them directly.<br /><br />The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.<br /><br />The government has also expanded the standing committee's recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.<br /><br />The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers' protection bill and citizens' charter bill, respectively.<br /><br />The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&quot;<br /><br />The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year's rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.<br /><br />The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &quot;in camera&quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &quot;unwarranted defamation&quot; in the initial stage of investigation.<br /><br />To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.<br /><br />The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68222add93917-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68222add93917-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68222add93917-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11898,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Judges can&amp;#039;t shoot from lip: Govt&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has also expanded the standing committee&#039;s recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers&#039; protection bill and citizens&#039; charter bill, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &amp;quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year&#039;s rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &amp;quot;in camera&amp;quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &amp;quot;unwarranted defamation&amp;quot; in the initial stage of investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 13 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Judges-cant-shoot-from-lip-Govt/articleshow/11087799.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12017,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11898,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Judges can&amp;#039;t shoot from lip: Govt&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Judicial Accountability&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India


&amp;nbsp;


The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.

The decision forms part of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has also expanded the standing committee&#039;s recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers&#039; protection bill and citizens&#039; charter bill, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &amp;quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year&#039;s rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &amp;quot;in camera&amp;quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &amp;quot;unwarranted defamation&amp;quot; in the initial stage of investigation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11898,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Judges can&amp;#039;t shoot from lip: Govt&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has also expanded the standing committee&#039;s recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers&#039; protection bill and citizens&#039; charter bill, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &amp;quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year&#039;s rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &amp;quot;in camera&amp;quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &amp;quot;unwarranted defamation&amp;quot; in the initial stage of investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 13 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Judges-cant-shoot-from-lip-Govt/articleshow/11087799.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12017,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 11898
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Judges can&amp;#039;t shoot from lip: Govt&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Judicial Accountability&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India


&amp;nbsp;


The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.

The decision forms part of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has also expanded the standing committee&#039;s recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers&#039; protection bill and citizens&#039; charter bill, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &amp;quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year&#039;s rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &amp;quot;in camera&amp;quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &amp;quot;unwarranted defamation&amp;quot; in the initial stage of investigation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Judges can&#039;t shoot from lip: Govt | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India


&nbsp;


The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament's standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don't concern them directly.

The decision forms part of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Judges can&#039;t shoot from lip: Govt</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-The Times of India</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament's standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don't concern them directly.<br /><br />The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.<br /><br />The government has also expanded the standing committee's recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.<br /><br />The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers' protection bill and citizens' charter bill, respectively.<br /><br />The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&quot;<br /><br />The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year's rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.<br /><br />The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &quot;in camera&quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &quot;unwarranted defamation&quot; in the initial stage of investigation.<br /><br />To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.<br /><br />The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68222add93917-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68222add93917-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68222add93917-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68222add93917-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11898,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Judges can&amp;#039;t shoot from lip: Govt&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has also expanded the standing committee&#039;s recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers&#039; protection bill and citizens&#039; charter bill, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &amp;quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year&#039;s rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &amp;quot;in camera&amp;quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &amp;quot;unwarranted defamation&amp;quot; in the initial stage of investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 13 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Judges-cant-shoot-from-lip-Govt/articleshow/11087799.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12017,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 11898,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Judges can&amp;#039;t shoot from lip: Govt&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Judicial Accountability&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India


&amp;nbsp;


The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.

The decision forms part of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has also expanded the standing committee&#039;s recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers&#039; protection bill and citizens&#039; charter bill, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &amp;quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year&#039;s rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &amp;quot;in camera&amp;quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &amp;quot;unwarranted defamation&amp;quot; in the initial stage of investigation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 11898,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Judges can&amp;#039;t shoot from lip: Govt&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Times of India
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has also expanded the standing committee&#039;s recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers&#039; protection bill and citizens&#039; charter bill, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &amp;quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year&#039;s rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &amp;quot;in camera&amp;quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &amp;quot;unwarranted defamation&amp;quot; in the initial stage of investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 13 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Judges-cant-shoot-from-lip-Govt/articleshow/11087799.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 12017,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 11898
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Judges can&amp;#039;t shoot from lip: Govt&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Judicial Accountability&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India


&amp;nbsp;


The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.

The decision forms part of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Times of India&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament&#039;s standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don&#039;t concern them directly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has also expanded the standing committee&#039;s recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers&#039; protection bill and citizens&#039; charter bill, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &amp;quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year&#039;s rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &amp;quot;in camera&amp;quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &amp;quot;unwarranted defamation&amp;quot; in the initial stage of investigation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Judges can&#039;t shoot from lip: Govt | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India


&nbsp;


The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament's standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don't concern them directly.

The decision forms part of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Judges can&#039;t shoot from lip: Govt</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-The Times of India</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament's standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don't concern them directly.<br /><br />The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.<br /><br />The government has also expanded the standing committee's recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.<br /><br />The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers' protection bill and citizens' charter bill, respectively.<br /><br />The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&quot;<br /><br />The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year's rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.<br /><br />The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &quot;in camera&quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &quot;unwarranted defamation&quot; in the initial stage of investigation.<br /><br />To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.<br /><br />The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 11898,
		'title' => 'Judges can't shoot from lip: Govt',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<p>
-The Times of India
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="justify">
The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament's standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don't concern them directly.<br />
<br />
The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.<br />
<br />
The government has also expanded the standing committee's recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.<br />
<br />
The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers' protection bill and citizens' charter bill, respectively.<br />
<br />
The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&quot;<br />
<br />
The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year's rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.<br />
<br />
The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &quot;in camera&quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &quot;unwarranted defamation&quot; in the initial stage of investigation.<br />
<br />
To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.<br />
<br />
The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 13 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Judges-cant-shoot-from-lip-Govt/articleshow/11087799.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 12017,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 11898,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Judges can&#039;t shoot from lip: Govt',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Judicial Accountability',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Times of India


&nbsp;


The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament's standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don't concern them directly.

The decision forms part of...',
	'disp' => '<p>-The Times of India</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament's standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don't concern them directly.<br /><br />The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.<br /><br />The government has also expanded the standing committee's recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.<br /><br />The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers' protection bill and citizens' charter bill, respectively.<br /><br />The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&quot;<br /><br />The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year's rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.<br /><br />The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &quot;in camera&quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &quot;unwarranted defamation&quot; in the initial stage of investigation.<br /><br />To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.<br /><br />The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 11898,
	'title' => 'Judges can&#039;t shoot from lip: Govt',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<p>
-The Times of India
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="justify">
The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament's standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don't concern them directly.<br />
<br />
The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.<br />
<br />
The government has also expanded the standing committee's recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.<br />
<br />
The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers' protection bill and citizens' charter bill, respectively.<br />
<br />
The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&quot;<br />
<br />
The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year's rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.<br />
<br />
The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &quot;in camera&quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &quot;unwarranted defamation&quot; in the initial stage of investigation.<br />
<br />
To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.<br />
<br />
The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 13 December, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Judges-cant-shoot-from-lip-Govt/articleshow/11087799.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'judges-can039t-shoot-from-lip-govt-12017',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 12017,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 11898
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Judges can&#039;t shoot from lip: Govt'
$metaKeywords = 'Judicial Accountability'
$metaDesc = '
-The Times of India


&nbsp;


The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament's standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don't concern them directly.

The decision forms part of...'
$disp = '<p>-The Times of India</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament's standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don't concern them directly.<br /><br />The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday.<br /><br />The government has also expanded the standing committee's recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances.<br /><br />The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers' protection bill and citizens' charter bill, respectively.<br /><br />The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, &quot;For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge.&quot;<br /><br />The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year's rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment.<br /><br />The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held &quot;in camera&quot; so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face &quot;unwarranted defamation&quot; in the initial stage of investigation.<br /><br />To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges.<br /><br />The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Judges can't shoot from lip: Govt

-The Times of India   The government has endorsed a recommendation of Parliament's standing committee to restrain judges from making baseless comments against constitutional and statutory bodies and their functionaries even in cases which don't concern them directly. The decision forms part of the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill that is to be discussed by the Union Cabinet on Tuesday. The government has also expanded the standing committee's recommendation that close relatives of judges should not practise in the same court to include even close social acquaintances. The Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill is part of a bouquet of anti-graft legislations the Cabinet plans to discuss on Tuesday. Other bills include Public Interest Disclosure and Protection to Persons Making the Disclosure Bills, 2010, and the Grievances Redressal (Draft) Bill, popularly known as whistleblowers' protection bill and citizens' charter bill, respectively. The note prepared for the Cabinet meeting says, "For a sitting judge to make unsubstantiated comment on persons holding constitutional office or statutory bodies, and not connected with the case, is unwarranted. It gives rise to controversies and affects the working of constitutional bodies against which comment has been made by any judge." The government has also accepted a recommendation diluting punishment and fine for frivolous comments of corruption against judges to Rs 1 lakh and a year's rigorous imprisonment. The bill provided for a fine of Rs 5 lakh and five years imprisonment. The government has accepted the suggestion that proceedings of the scrutiny panel, to be constituted under the proposed Judicial Standards and Accountability law, be held "in camera" so that the judge against whom the complaint has been made does not face "unwarranted defamation" in the initial stage of investigation. To ensure that speculative stories about the inquiry panel are not done by the media, the government has accepted the recommendation that an official should be appointed to brief the media. However, the government has not accepted the recommendation that it should create a new machinery to scrutinize declaration of assets by judges. The government said once the declaration of assets is made public and uploaded on the website. The government also did not agree with the parliamentary panel that one MP each from both Houses should find a place in bodies like the National Oversight Committee and Complaints Scrutiny Panel - which probes allegations of corruption against judges.