Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
if (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 60389,
'title' => 'Labour pangs ',
'subheading' => null,
'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;</em></p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 2 August, 2021, https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'labour-pangs',
'meta_title' => '',
'meta_keywords' => '',
'meta_description' => '',
'noindex' => (int) 1,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => null,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 60389,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Labour pangs ',
'metaKeywords' => 'Periodic Labour Force Survey,PLFS,Current Weekly Status,Usual Status,Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy,CMIE',
'metaDesc' => '-The Telegraph
Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;
The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a...',
'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 60389,
'title' => 'Labour pangs ',
'subheading' => null,
'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;</em></p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 2 August, 2021, https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'labour-pangs',
'meta_title' => '',
'meta_keywords' => '',
'meta_description' => '',
'noindex' => (int) 1,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => null,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 60389
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Labour pangs '
$metaKeywords = 'Periodic Labour Force Survey,PLFS,Current Weekly Status,Usual Status,Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy,CMIE'
$metaDesc = '-The Telegraph
Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;
The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a...'
$disp = '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/labour-pangs.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Labour pangs | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="-The Telegraph
Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception
The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Labour pangs </strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception </em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more. </p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 60389,
'title' => 'Labour pangs ',
'subheading' => null,
'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;</em></p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 2 August, 2021, https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'labour-pangs',
'meta_title' => '',
'meta_keywords' => '',
'meta_description' => '',
'noindex' => (int) 1,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => null,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 60389,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Labour pangs ',
'metaKeywords' => 'Periodic Labour Force Survey,PLFS,Current Weekly Status,Usual Status,Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy,CMIE',
'metaDesc' => '-The Telegraph
Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;
The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a...',
'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 60389,
'title' => 'Labour pangs ',
'subheading' => null,
'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;</em></p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 2 August, 2021, https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'labour-pangs',
'meta_title' => '',
'meta_keywords' => '',
'meta_description' => '',
'noindex' => (int) 1,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => null,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 60389
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Labour pangs '
$metaKeywords = 'Periodic Labour Force Survey,PLFS,Current Weekly Status,Usual Status,Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy,CMIE'
$metaDesc = '-The Telegraph
Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;
The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a...'
$disp = '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/labour-pangs.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Labour pangs | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="-The Telegraph
Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception
The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Labour pangs </strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception </em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more. </p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5cb50a4615-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 60389,
'title' => 'Labour pangs ',
'subheading' => null,
'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;</em></p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 2 August, 2021, https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'labour-pangs',
'meta_title' => '',
'meta_keywords' => '',
'meta_description' => '',
'noindex' => (int) 1,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => null,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 60389,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Labour pangs ',
'metaKeywords' => 'Periodic Labour Force Survey,PLFS,Current Weekly Status,Usual Status,Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy,CMIE',
'metaDesc' => '-The Telegraph
Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;
The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a...',
'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 60389,
'title' => 'Labour pangs ',
'subheading' => null,
'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;</em></p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 2 August, 2021, https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'labour-pangs',
'meta_title' => '',
'meta_keywords' => '',
'meta_description' => '',
'noindex' => (int) 1,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => null,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 60389
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Labour pangs '
$metaKeywords = 'Periodic Labour Force Survey,PLFS,Current Weekly Status,Usual Status,Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy,CMIE'
$metaDesc = '-The Telegraph
Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;
The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a...'
$disp = '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception&nbsp;</em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more.&nbsp;</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/labour-pangs.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Labour pangs | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="-The Telegraph
Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception
The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Labour pangs </strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception </em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more. </p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$cookies = []
$values = [
(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 60389,
'title' => 'Labour pangs ',
'subheading' => null,
'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception </em></p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more. </p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 2 August, 2021, https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'labour-pangs',
'meta_title' => '',
'meta_keywords' => '',
'meta_description' => '',
'noindex' => (int) 1,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => null,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 60389,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Labour pangs ',
'metaKeywords' => 'Periodic Labour Force Survey,PLFS,Current Weekly Status,Usual Status,Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy,CMIE',
'metaDesc' => '-The Telegraph
Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception
The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a...',
'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception </em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more. </p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 60389,
'title' => 'Labour pangs ',
'subheading' => null,
'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception </em></p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more. </p>
',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 2 August, 2021, https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'labour-pangs',
'meta_title' => '',
'meta_keywords' => '',
'meta_description' => '',
'noindex' => (int) 1,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => null,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 60389
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Labour pangs '
$metaKeywords = 'Periodic Labour Force Survey,PLFS,Current Weekly Status,Usual Status,Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy,CMIE'
$metaDesc = '-The Telegraph
Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception
The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a...'
$disp = '<p style="text-align:justify">-The Telegraph</p><p style="text-align:justify"><em>Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception </em></p><p style="text-align:justify">The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.</p><p style="text-align:justify">The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.</p><p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/labour-force-survey-pangs/cid/1824878">click here</a> to read more. </p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
latest-news-updates/labour-pangs.html"/>
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Labour pangs | Im4change.org
Labour pangs
-The Telegraph
Trying to make labour force survey results look artificially attractive by the government may only be an attempt at self-deception
The latest Periodic Labour Force Survey data for July 2019 to June 2020 released by the Central government shows a rise in the labour force participation rate and a fall in the unemployment rate even when the economy registered a sharp deceleration in the rate of growth. This is surprising because what the result suggests is that there are more workers coming into the labour force looking for work and that many more are actually obtaining employment. This looks awkward in a year when growth was abysmally low. The claim is made more problematic by the fact that other surveys, including the one carried out by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy, have yielded exactly the opposite results. The reason may be because of a difference in the methodology used in the surveys to measure unemployment. The international norm and the one followed by the CMIE focus on the current weekly status where workers are asked about their employment position during the past seven days. The other method, adopted by the government, looks at the usual status, which checks for the employment record 365 days prior to the survey.
The responses of workers could differ legitimately. For instance, a worker employed during the past year but recently unemployed might be recorded as employed in the US method but unemployed in the CWS method. India, typically, has a very low LFPR, indicating not many people come into the labour force looking for work.
