Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19543,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes &#039;urbanization&#039; has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Community rights granted through UPA&#039;s other &#039;aam aadmi&#039; legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for &#039;involuntary displacement&#039; of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these &#039;flexibilities&#039; are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 26 February, 2013, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-02-26/india/37308924_1_land-acquisition-bill-land-owners-resettlement-and-rehabilitation-provisions&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19680,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19543,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.

Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes &#039;urbanization&#039; has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Community rights granted through UPA&#039;s other &#039;aam aadmi&#039; legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for &#039;involuntary displacement&#039; of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these &#039;flexibilities&#039; are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19543,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes &#039;urbanization&#039; has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Community rights granted through UPA&#039;s other &#039;aam aadmi&#039; legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for &#039;involuntary displacement&#039; of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these &#039;flexibilities&#039; are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 26 February, 2013, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-02-26/india/37308924_1_land-acquisition-bill-land-owners-resettlement-and-rehabilitation-provisions&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19680,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 19543
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.

Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes &#039;urbanization&#039; has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Community rights granted through UPA&#039;s other &#039;aam aadmi&#039; legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for &#039;involuntary displacement&#039; of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these &#039;flexibilities&#039; are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.

Out of the 26 'substantive' measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.<br /></em><br />Out of the 26 'substantive' measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.<br /><br />&nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes 'urbanization' has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.<br /><br />The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.<br /><br />Community rights granted through UPA's other 'aam aadmi' legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for 'involuntary displacement' of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.<br /><br />But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these 'flexibilities' are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.<br /><br />Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.<br /><br />The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19543,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes &#039;urbanization&#039; has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Community rights granted through UPA&#039;s other &#039;aam aadmi&#039; legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for &#039;involuntary displacement&#039; of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these &#039;flexibilities&#039; are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 26 February, 2013, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-02-26/india/37308924_1_land-acquisition-bill-land-owners-resettlement-and-rehabilitation-provisions&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19680,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19543,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.

Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes &#039;urbanization&#039; has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Community rights granted through UPA&#039;s other &#039;aam aadmi&#039; legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for &#039;involuntary displacement&#039; of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these &#039;flexibilities&#039; are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19543,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes &#039;urbanization&#039; has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Community rights granted through UPA&#039;s other &#039;aam aadmi&#039; legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for &#039;involuntary displacement&#039; of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these &#039;flexibilities&#039; are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 26 February, 2013, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-02-26/india/37308924_1_land-acquisition-bill-land-owners-resettlement-and-rehabilitation-provisions&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19680,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 19543
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.

Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes &#039;urbanization&#039; has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Community rights granted through UPA&#039;s other &#039;aam aadmi&#039; legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for &#039;involuntary displacement&#039; of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these &#039;flexibilities&#039; are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.

Out of the 26 'substantive' measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.<br /></em><br />Out of the 26 'substantive' measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.<br /><br />&nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes 'urbanization' has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.<br /><br />The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.<br /><br />Community rights granted through UPA's other 'aam aadmi' legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for 'involuntary displacement' of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.<br /><br />But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these 'flexibilities' are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.<br /><br />Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.<br /><br />The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f812d3b0c4e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19543,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes &#039;urbanization&#039; has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Community rights granted through UPA&#039;s other &#039;aam aadmi&#039; legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for &#039;involuntary displacement&#039; of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these &#039;flexibilities&#039; are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 26 February, 2013, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-02-26/india/37308924_1_land-acquisition-bill-land-owners-resettlement-and-rehabilitation-provisions&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19680,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19543,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.

Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes &#039;urbanization&#039; has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Community rights granted through UPA&#039;s other &#039;aam aadmi&#039; legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for &#039;involuntary displacement&#039; of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these &#039;flexibilities&#039; are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 19543,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes &#039;urbanization&#039; has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Community rights granted through UPA&#039;s other &#039;aam aadmi&#039; legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for &#039;involuntary displacement&#039; of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these &#039;flexibilities&#039; are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 26 February, 2013, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-02-26/india/37308924_1_land-acquisition-bill-land-owners-resettlement-and-rehabilitation-provisions&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 19680,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 19543
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.

Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Out of the 26 &#039;substantive&#039; measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes &#039;urbanization&#039; has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Community rights granted through UPA&#039;s other &#039;aam aadmi&#039; legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for &#039;involuntary displacement&#039; of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these &#039;flexibilities&#039; are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.

Out of the 26 'substantive' measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.<br /></em><br />Out of the 26 'substantive' measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.<br /><br />&nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes 'urbanization' has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.<br /><br />The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.<br /><br />Community rights granted through UPA's other 'aam aadmi' legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for 'involuntary displacement' of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.<br /><br />But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these 'flexibilities' are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.<br /><br />Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.<br /><br />The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 19543,
		'title' => 'Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India<br />
<br />
<em>The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.<br />
</em><br />
Out of the 26 'substantive' measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.<br />
<br />
&nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes 'urbanization' has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.<br />
<br />
The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.<br />
<br />
Community rights granted through UPA's other 'aam aadmi' legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for 'involuntary displacement' of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.<br />
<br />
But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these 'flexibilities' are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.<br />
<br />
Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.<br />
<br />
The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 26 February, 2013, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-02-26/india/37308924_1_land-acquisition-bill-land-owners-resettlement-and-rehabilitation-provisions',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 19680,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 19543,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Times of India

The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.

Out of the 26 'substantive' measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.<br /></em><br />Out of the 26 'substantive' measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.<br /><br />&nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes 'urbanization' has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.<br /><br />The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.<br /><br />Community rights granted through UPA's other 'aam aadmi' legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for 'involuntary displacement' of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.<br /><br />But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these 'flexibilities' are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.<br /><br />Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.<br /><br />The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 19543,
	'title' => 'Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India<br />
<br />
<em>The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.<br />
</em><br />
Out of the 26 'substantive' measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.<br />
<br />
&nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes 'urbanization' has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.<br />
<br />
The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.<br />
<br />
Community rights granted through UPA's other 'aam aadmi' legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for 'involuntary displacement' of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.<br />
<br />
But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these 'flexibilities' are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.<br />
<br />
Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.<br />
<br />
The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 26 February, 2013, http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-02-26/india/37308924_1_land-acquisition-bill-land-owners-resettlement-and-rehabilitation-provisions',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'land-acquisition-bill-to-re-enter-with-157-changes-nitin-sethi-19680',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 19680,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 19543
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
-The Times of India

The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.

Out of the 26 'substantive' measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament.<br /></em><br />Out of the 26 'substantive' measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.<br /><br />&nbsp;Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes 'urbanization' has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter.<br /><br />The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task.<br /><br />Community rights granted through UPA's other 'aam aadmi' legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for 'involuntary displacement' of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people.<br /><br />But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these 'flexibilities' are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands.<br /><br />Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&amp;R committee too has been left to states for a final decision.<br /><br />The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Land acquisition bill to re-enter with 157 changes -Nitin Sethi

-The Times of India The UPA government is likely to reintroduce the Land Acquisition Bill with a mammoth 157 amendments in the budget session of Parliament. Out of the 26 'substantive' measure the government plans to push through includes a provision that in case of acquisition for urbanization purposes, 20% of the developed land would be reserved and offered to the original owners at a price equal to the cost of acquisition and development. But as has been the case in previous versions of the bill, the finer details of such provisions will decide who it favours in the end.  Say, in this case, the definition of what constitutes 'urbanization' has been left undefined. Government managers claim it will give flexibility to state governments to decide upon the matter. The case for protecting rights of tribals in Schedule V areas has also fallen in such a grey zone. Consent from the tribal gram sabha concerned may not be a must for acquiring their lands as state governments will have the option of getting consent from a higher level panchayati raj body, such as zilla parishad or the autonomous district councils - an easier task. Community rights granted through UPA's other 'aam aadmi' legislation, the Forest Rights Act, can be taken away by giving money to individuals but the bill fails to define how it will be done. It also allows for 'involuntary displacement' of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe families but suggests higher compensation for SCs/STs over other categories of displaced people. But the Centre is likely to claim that several of these 'flexibilities' are part of its attempt to accommodate the wishes of state governments while reworking the bill. State governments have been given the powers to do away with the land-for-land formula in case of irrigated multi-crop or agricultural lands. Similarly, deciding at what threshold the resettlement and rehabilitation provisions will be invoked in the case of purchase by private parties has been left for state governments to decide. If the projects fall above the threshold, consent would be required from 70% of land owners in case of PPP projects and 80% of landowners in case of private projects but not other project affected people. The functioning of the critical R&R committee too has been left to states for a final decision. The states will also have the flexibility to decide the compensation amount for rural lands within a given range of market value. The upper limit on how much irrigated farm land can be acquired in each district would also be decided upon the discretion of the state governments. District magistrates will have the power to calculate market value in a more flexible manner.