Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15834,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Mandatory requirement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said in an order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&amp;rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench cited the apex court&amp;rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 30 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3587069.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15961,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15834,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI

Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mandatory requirement&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said in an order.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&amp;rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench cited the apex court&amp;rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15834,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Mandatory requirement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said in an order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&amp;rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench cited the apex court&amp;rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 30 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3587069.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15961,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15834
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI

Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mandatory requirement&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said in an order.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&amp;rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench cited the apex court&amp;rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’ | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI

Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br />Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.<br /><br /><em>Mandatory requirement<br /></em><br />&ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.<br /><br />&ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&rdquo; the Bench said in an order.<br /><br />Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.<br /><br />On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.<br /><br />According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.<br /><br />But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.<br /><br />The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.<br /><br />The Bench cited the apex court&rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15834,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Mandatory requirement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said in an order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&amp;rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench cited the apex court&amp;rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 30 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3587069.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15961,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15834,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI

Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mandatory requirement&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said in an order.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&amp;rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench cited the apex court&amp;rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15834,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Mandatory requirement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said in an order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&amp;rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench cited the apex court&amp;rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 30 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3587069.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15961,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15834
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI

Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mandatory requirement&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said in an order.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&amp;rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench cited the apex court&amp;rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’ | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI

Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br />Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.<br /><br /><em>Mandatory requirement<br /></em><br />&ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.<br /><br />&ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&rdquo; the Bench said in an order.<br /><br />Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.<br /><br />On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.<br /><br />According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.<br /><br />But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.<br /><br />The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.<br /><br />The Bench cited the apex court&rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681cc0e2690ad-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15834,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Mandatory requirement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said in an order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&amp;rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench cited the apex court&amp;rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 30 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3587069.ece&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15961,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15834,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI

Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mandatory requirement&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said in an order.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&amp;rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench cited the apex court&amp;rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15834,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-PTI&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Mandatory requirement&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said in an order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&amp;rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench cited the apex court&amp;rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 30 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3587069.ece&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15961,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15834
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI

Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-PTI&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mandatory requirement&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&amp;rdquo; the Bench said in an order.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&amp;rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench cited the apex court&amp;rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’ | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI

Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br />Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.<br /><br /><em>Mandatory requirement<br /></em><br />&ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.<br /><br />&ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&rdquo; the Bench said in an order.<br /><br />Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.<br /><br />On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.<br /><br />According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.<br /><br />But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.<br /><br />The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.<br /><br />The Bench cited the apex court&rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 15834,
		'title' => '‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-PTI<br />
<br />
Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.<br />
<br />
A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.<br />
<br />
<em>Mandatory requirement<br />
</em><br />
&ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&rdquo; the Bench said in an order.<br />
<br />
Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.<br />
<br />
On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.<br />
<br />
According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.<br />
<br />
But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.<br />
<br />
The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.<br />
<br />
The Bench cited the apex court&rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 30 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3587069.ece',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 15961,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 15834,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition',
	'metaDesc' => '
-PTI

Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br />Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.<br /><br /><em>Mandatory requirement<br /></em><br />&ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.<br /><br />&ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&rdquo; the Bench said in an order.<br /><br />Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.<br /><br />On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.<br /><br />According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.<br /><br />But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.<br /><br />The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.<br /><br />The Bench cited the apex court&rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 15834,
	'title' => '‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-PTI<br />
<br />
Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.<br />
<br />
A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.<br />
<br />
<em>Mandatory requirement<br />
</em><br />
&ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&rdquo; the Bench said in an order.<br />
<br />
Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.<br />
<br />
On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.<br />
<br />
According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.<br />
<br />
But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.<br />
<br />
The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.<br />
<br />
The Bench cited the apex court&rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 30 June, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article3587069.ece',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'land-acquisition-without-public-notice-illegal-15961',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 15961,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 15834
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | ‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
-PTI

Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-PTI<br /><br />Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government&rsquo;s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.<br /><br />A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region.<br /><br /><em>Mandatory requirement<br /></em><br />&ldquo;Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.<br /><br />&ldquo;We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,&rdquo; the Bench said in an order.<br /><br />Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition.<br /><br />On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.<br /><br />According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.<br /><br />But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986.<br /><br />The apex court agreed with the legal heirs&rsquo; contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition.<br /><br />The Bench cited the apex court&rsquo;s earlier ruling in the J&amp;K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

‘Land acquisition without public notice illegal’

-PTI Land acquisition proceedings will become illegal if the Government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing the Maharashtra Government’s acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit. A Bench of Justices H. L. Dattu and A. R. Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official Gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through at least two newspapers in the local region. Mandatory requirement “Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void. “We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban,” the Bench said in an order. Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the Supreme Court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quash the acquisition. On October 24, 1975, the State Government had issued a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot. According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala. But the authorities issued no notice to them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the State government on September 23, 1986. The apex court agreed with the legal heirs’ contention that the authorities ought to have issued public notice at the time of the acquisition. The Bench cited the apex court’s earlier ruling in the J&K Housing Board v. Kunwar Sanjay Krishan Kaul (2011), wherein, it was observed that all the formalities of serving notice to the interested person, stipulated under Section 4 of the Act, has to be mandatorily complied with in the manner provided therein, even though the interested persons have knowledge of the acquisition proceedings.