Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680230d97ed26-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680230d97ed26-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680230d97ed26-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22160, 'title' => 'Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. </p> <p align="justify"> Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre. </p> <p align="justify"> The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect. </p> <p align="justify"> She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come,&quot; the ASG said. </p> <p align="justify"> The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned,&quot; the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an &quot;apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh,&quot; the NGO said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request,&quot; the NGO said in its application. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha. </p> <p align="justify"> Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and &quot;hardly found faults with the working of the Act&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats. </p> <p align="justify"> Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD). </p> <p align="justify"> The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 12 August, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=806818', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22310, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22160, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC', 'metaKeywords' => 'mgnrega,NREGS,NREGA,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Outlook</div><p align="justify"><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO.</p><p align="justify">Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre.</p><p align="justify">The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect.</p><p align="justify">She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come,&quot; the ASG said.</p><p align="justify">The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit.</p><p align="justify">The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks.</p><p align="justify">Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned,&quot; the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard.</p><p align="justify">The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an &quot;apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP&quot;.</p><p align="justify">&quot;After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh,&quot; the NGO said. </p><p align="justify">&quot;In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request,&quot; the NGO said in its application.</p><p align="justify">The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha.</p><p align="justify">Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and &quot;hardly found faults with the working of the Act&quot;.</p><p align="justify">However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats.</p><p align="justify">Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme.</p><p align="justify">The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order.</p><p align="justify">The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD).</p><p align="justify">The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said.</p><p align="justify">The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22160, 'title' => 'Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. </p> <p align="justify"> Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre. </p> <p align="justify"> The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect. </p> <p align="justify"> She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come,&quot; the ASG said. </p> <p align="justify"> The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned,&quot; the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an &quot;apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh,&quot; the NGO said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request,&quot; the NGO said in its application. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha. </p> <p align="justify"> Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and &quot;hardly found faults with the working of the Act&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats. </p> <p align="justify"> Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD). </p> <p align="justify"> The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 12 August, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=806818', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22310, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22160 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC' $metaKeywords = 'mgnrega,NREGS,NREGA,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Outlook</div><p align="justify"><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO.</p><p align="justify">Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre.</p><p align="justify">The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect.</p><p align="justify">She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come,&quot; the ASG said.</p><p align="justify">The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit.</p><p align="justify">The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks.</p><p align="justify">Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned,&quot; the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard.</p><p align="justify">The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an &quot;apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP&quot;.</p><p align="justify">&quot;After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh,&quot; the NGO said. </p><p align="justify">&quot;In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request,&quot; the NGO said in its application.</p><p align="justify">The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha.</p><p align="justify">Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and &quot;hardly found faults with the working of the Act&quot;.</p><p align="justify">However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats.</p><p align="justify">Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme.</p><p align="justify">The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order.</p><p align="justify">The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD).</p><p align="justify">The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said.</p><p align="justify">The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Outlook The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Outlook</div><p align="justify"><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO.</p><p align="justify">Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre.</p><p align="justify">The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect.</p><p align="justify">She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency.</p><p align="justify">"We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come," the ASG said.</p><p align="justify">The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit.</p><p align="justify">The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks.</p><p align="justify">Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it.</p><p align="justify">"The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned," the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard.</p><p align="justify">The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an "apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP".</p><p align="justify">"After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh," the NGO said. </p><p align="justify">"In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request," the NGO said in its application.</p><p align="justify">The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha.</p><p align="justify">Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and "hardly found faults with the working of the Act".</p><p align="justify">However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats.</p><p align="justify">Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme.</p><p align="justify">The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order.</p><p align="justify">The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD).</p><p align="justify">The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said.</p><p align="justify">The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680230d97ed26-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680230d97ed26-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680230d97ed26-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22160, 'title' => 'Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. </p> <p align="justify"> Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre. </p> <p align="justify"> The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect. </p> <p align="justify"> She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come,&quot; the ASG said. </p> <p align="justify"> The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned,&quot; the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an &quot;apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh,&quot; the NGO said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request,&quot; the NGO said in its application. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha. </p> <p align="justify"> Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and &quot;hardly found faults with the working of the Act&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats. </p> <p align="justify"> Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD). </p> <p align="justify"> The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 12 August, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=806818', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22310, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22160, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC', 'metaKeywords' => 'mgnrega,NREGS,NREGA,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Outlook</div><p align="justify"><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO.</p><p align="justify">Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre.</p><p align="justify">The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect.</p><p align="justify">She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come,&quot; the ASG said.</p><p align="justify">The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit.</p><p align="justify">The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks.</p><p align="justify">Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned,&quot; the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard.</p><p align="justify">The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an &quot;apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP&quot;.</p><p align="justify">&quot;After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh,&quot; the NGO said. </p><p align="justify">&quot;In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request,&quot; the NGO said in its application.</p><p align="justify">The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha.</p><p align="justify">Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and &quot;hardly found faults with the working of the Act&quot;.</p><p align="justify">However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats.</p><p align="justify">Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme.</p><p align="justify">The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order.</p><p align="justify">The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD).</p><p align="justify">The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said.</p><p align="justify">The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22160, 'title' => 'Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. </p> <p align="justify"> Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre. </p> <p align="justify"> The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect. </p> <p align="justify"> She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come,&quot; the ASG said. </p> <p align="justify"> The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned,&quot; the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an &quot;apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh,&quot; the NGO said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request,&quot; the NGO said in its application. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha. </p> <p align="justify"> Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and &quot;hardly found faults with the working of the Act&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats. </p> <p align="justify"> Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD). </p> <p align="justify"> The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 12 August, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=806818', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22310, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22160 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC' $metaKeywords = 'mgnrega,NREGS,NREGA,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Outlook</div><p align="justify"><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO.</p><p align="justify">Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre.</p><p align="justify">The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect.</p><p align="justify">She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come,&quot; the ASG said.</p><p align="justify">The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit.</p><p align="justify">The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks.</p><p align="justify">Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned,&quot; the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard.</p><p align="justify">The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an &quot;apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP&quot;.</p><p align="justify">&quot;After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh,&quot; the NGO said. </p><p align="justify">&quot;In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request,&quot; the NGO said in its application.</p><p align="justify">The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha.</p><p align="justify">Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and &quot;hardly found faults with the working of the Act&quot;.</p><p align="justify">However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats.</p><p align="justify">Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme.</p><p align="justify">The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order.</p><p align="justify">The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD).</p><p align="justify">The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said.</p><p align="justify">The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Outlook The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Outlook</div><p align="justify"><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO.</p><p align="justify">Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre.</p><p align="justify">The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect.</p><p align="justify">She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency.</p><p align="justify">"We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come," the ASG said.</p><p align="justify">The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit.</p><p align="justify">The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks.</p><p align="justify">Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it.</p><p align="justify">"The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned," the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard.</p><p align="justify">The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an "apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP".</p><p align="justify">"After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh," the NGO said. </p><p align="justify">"In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request," the NGO said in its application.</p><p align="justify">The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha.</p><p align="justify">Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and "hardly found faults with the working of the Act".</p><p align="justify">However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats.</p><p align="justify">Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme.</p><p align="justify">The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order.</p><p align="justify">The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD).</p><p align="justify">The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said.</p><p align="justify">The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680230d97ed26-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680230d97ed26-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680230d97ed26-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680230d97ed26-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22160, 'title' => 'Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. </p> <p align="justify"> Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre. </p> <p align="justify"> The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect. </p> <p align="justify"> She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come,&quot; the ASG said. </p> <p align="justify"> The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned,&quot; the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an &quot;apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh,&quot; the NGO said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request,&quot; the NGO said in its application. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha. </p> <p align="justify"> Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and &quot;hardly found faults with the working of the Act&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats. </p> <p align="justify"> Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD). </p> <p align="justify"> The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 12 August, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=806818', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22310, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22160, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC', 'metaKeywords' => 'mgnrega,NREGS,NREGA,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Outlook</div><p align="justify"><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO.</p><p align="justify">Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre.</p><p align="justify">The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect.</p><p align="justify">She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come,&quot; the ASG said.</p><p align="justify">The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit.</p><p align="justify">The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks.</p><p align="justify">Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned,&quot; the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard.</p><p align="justify">The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an &quot;apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP&quot;.</p><p align="justify">&quot;After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh,&quot; the NGO said. </p><p align="justify">&quot;In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request,&quot; the NGO said in its application.</p><p align="justify">The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha.</p><p align="justify">Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and &quot;hardly found faults with the working of the Act&quot;.</p><p align="justify">However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats.</p><p align="justify">Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme.</p><p align="justify">The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order.</p><p align="justify">The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD).</p><p align="justify">The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said.</p><p align="justify">The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22160, 'title' => 'Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. </p> <p align="justify"> Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre. </p> <p align="justify"> The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect. </p> <p align="justify"> She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come,&quot; the ASG said. </p> <p align="justify"> The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned,&quot; the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an &quot;apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh,&quot; the NGO said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request,&quot; the NGO said in its application. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha. </p> <p align="justify"> Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and &quot;hardly found faults with the working of the Act&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats. </p> <p align="justify"> Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD). </p> <p align="justify"> The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 12 August, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=806818', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22310, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22160 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC' $metaKeywords = 'mgnrega,NREGS,NREGA,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Outlook</div><p align="justify"><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO.</p><p align="justify">Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre.</p><p align="justify">The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect.</p><p align="justify">She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come,&quot; the ASG said.</p><p align="justify">The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit.</p><p align="justify">The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks.</p><p align="justify">Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned,&quot; the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard.</p><p align="justify">The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an &quot;apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP&quot;.</p><p align="justify">&quot;After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh,&quot; the NGO said. </p><p align="justify">&quot;In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request,&quot; the NGO said in its application.</p><p align="justify">The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha.</p><p align="justify">Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and &quot;hardly found faults with the working of the Act&quot;.</p><p align="justify">However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats.</p><p align="justify">Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme.</p><p align="justify">The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order.</p><p align="justify">The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD).</p><p align="justify">The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said.</p><p align="justify">The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Outlook The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Outlook</div><p align="justify"><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO.</p><p align="justify">Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre.</p><p align="justify">The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect.</p><p align="justify">She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency.</p><p align="justify">"We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come," the ASG said.</p><p align="justify">The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit.</p><p align="justify">The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks.</p><p align="justify">Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it.</p><p align="justify">"The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned," the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard.</p><p align="justify">The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an "apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP".</p><p align="justify">"After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh," the NGO said. </p><p align="justify">"In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request," the NGO said in its application.</p><p align="justify">The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha.</p><p align="justify">Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and "hardly found faults with the working of the Act".</p><p align="justify">However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats.</p><p align="justify">Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme.</p><p align="justify">The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order.</p><p align="justify">The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD).</p><p align="justify">The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said.</p><p align="justify">The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22160, 'title' => 'Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. </p> <p align="justify"> Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre. </p> <p align="justify"> The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect. </p> <p align="justify"> She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency. </p> <p align="justify"> "We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come," the ASG said. </p> <p align="justify"> The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it. </p> <p align="justify"> "The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned," the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an "apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP". </p> <p align="justify"> "After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh," the NGO said. </p> <p align="justify"> "In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request," the NGO said in its application. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha. </p> <p align="justify"> Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and "hardly found faults with the working of the Act". </p> <p align="justify"> However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats. </p> <p align="justify"> Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD). </p> <p align="justify"> The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 12 August, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=806818', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22310, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22160, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC', 'metaKeywords' => 'mgnrega,NREGS,NREGA,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Outlook</div><p align="justify"><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO.</p><p align="justify">Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre.</p><p align="justify">The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect.</p><p align="justify">She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency.</p><p align="justify">"We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come," the ASG said.</p><p align="justify">The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit.</p><p align="justify">The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks.</p><p align="justify">Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it.</p><p align="justify">"The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned," the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard.</p><p align="justify">The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an "apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP".</p><p align="justify">"After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh," the NGO said. </p><p align="justify">"In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request," the NGO said in its application.</p><p align="justify">The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha.</p><p align="justify">Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and "hardly found faults with the working of the Act".</p><p align="justify">However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats.</p><p align="justify">Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme.</p><p align="justify">The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order.</p><p align="justify">The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD).</p><p align="justify">The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said.</p><p align="justify">The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22160, 'title' => 'Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Outlook </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. </p> <p align="justify"> Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre. </p> <p align="justify"> The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect. </p> <p align="justify"> She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency. </p> <p align="justify"> "We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come," the ASG said. </p> <p align="justify"> The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks. </p> <p align="justify"> Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it. </p> <p align="justify"> "The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned," the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an "apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP". </p> <p align="justify"> "After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh," the NGO said. </p> <p align="justify"> "In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request," the NGO said in its application. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha. </p> <p align="justify"> Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and "hardly found faults with the working of the Act". </p> <p align="justify"> However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats. </p> <p align="justify"> Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD). </p> <p align="justify"> The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 12 August, 2013, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=806818', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lapses-in-mnrega-implementation-in-up-centre-to-sc-22310', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22310, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22160 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC' $metaKeywords = 'mgnrega,NREGS,NREGA,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO. Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Outlook</div><p align="justify"><br />The Centre today told the Supreme Court that there has been large-scale violation in MNREGA implementation in Uttar Pradesh for which CBI probe has been sought by an NGO.</p><p align="justify">Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre.</p><p align="justify">The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect.</p><p align="justify">She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency.</p><p align="justify">"We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come," the ASG said.</p><p align="justify">The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit.</p><p align="justify">The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks.</p><p align="justify">Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it.</p><p align="justify">"The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned," the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard.</p><p align="justify">The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an "apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP".</p><p align="justify">"After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh," the NGO said. </p><p align="justify">"In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request," the NGO said in its application.</p><p align="justify">The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha.</p><p align="justify">Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and "hardly found faults with the working of the Act".</p><p align="justify">However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats.</p><p align="justify">Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme.</p><p align="justify">The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order.</p><p align="justify">The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD).</p><p align="justify">The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said.</p><p align="justify">The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Lapses in MNREGA Implementation in UP: Centre to SC |
-Outlook
Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising told a bench comprising Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai that details of the violation have been documented in the affidavit filed by the Centre. The ASG said the money which is released from the central fund was not reaching the workers and there were irregularities on the construction aspect. She said it was for the state government to take a call on the issue of the CBI probe as the Centre on its own cannot direct investigation by the agency. "We have written to the Uttar Pradesh government and no reply has come," the ASG said. The state government said it did not have a copy of the Centre's affidavit and needed time to respond to the irregularities mentioned in its affidavit. The bench asked the state government to respond to the affidavit within six weeks. Earlier last year, the court had directed the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government to produce relevant records before it. "The records so produced shall contain reports that have been submitted by the National Level Monitoring Committee to the ministry concerned," the court had said. The court has been hearing the issue of effective implementation of the rural job guarantee scheme under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) since 2007 when the NGO, Centre for Environment and Food Security, had filed the petition in this regard. The bench had first taken the allegation of irregularities in Odisha and later the NGO had filed an application claiming that despite receiving investigation reports and intimations from the Rural Development Ministry about the lapses, there is an "apparent indifference on the part of the state government of UP". "After receipt of a large number of complaints, the central government had reached a conclusion that the CBI investigation is necessary in the case of implementation of the MNREGA in the state of Uttar Pradesh," the NGO said. "In this regard, the Ministry of Rural Development (nodal agency for implementation of the MNREGA) has written twice to the Uttar Pradesh chief minister requesting that the state government should order a CBI investigation. The UP government rejected the said request," the NGO said in its application. The bench on May 12, 2011 had ordered a CBI probe into the alleged irregularities in implementing the rural job guarantee scheme in Odisha. Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the Odisha government, said CBI had completed its probe on February 13, 2012 and "hardly found faults with the working of the Act". However, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the NGO, said regular case has to be registered by the CBI as there has been fault by the bureaucrats. Bhushan said there was a need for one general direction that will go a long way in putting the things on right track as most of the states are not following the guidelines of the Centre for the proper implementation of the scheme. The bench said it will hear all the matters on the issue on September 18 and after going through previous orders and records pass the order. The court had ordered CBI probe into alleged lapses in implementation of MNREGA in Odisha on basis of survey reports provided by the NGO, CAG and the National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD). The irregularities had been detected in the districts of Kalahandi, Mayurbhanj, Rayagada, Bhawanipatna, Koraput and Malakangiri of Odisha, where there was misappropriation of funds between 53 per cent and 88 per cent, the reports had said. The bench had asked the CBI to conduct a free and fair investigation. |