Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681757ef903e0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681757ef903e0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681757ef903e0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16505, 'title' => 'Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta &amp; Pradeep Thakur', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through &quot;administrative directive&quot; as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on &quot;corruption&quot; in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, &quot;Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry.&quot; It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take &mdash; administrative or legislative &mdash; for holding auctions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, &quot;Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block.&quot; The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more &quot;transparent and objective process&quot; like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. &quot;Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009,&quot; the CAG said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants &mdash; existing or proposed. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 August, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-CAG/articleshow/15538401.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16633, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16505, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta &amp; Pradeep Thakur', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through &quot;administrative directive&quot; as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on &quot;corruption&quot; in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, &quot;Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry.&quot; It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take &mdash; administrative or legislative &mdash; for holding auctions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, &quot;Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block.&quot; The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more &quot;transparent and objective process&quot; like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. &quot;Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009,&quot; the CAG said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants &mdash; existing or proposed.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16505, 'title' => 'Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta &amp; Pradeep Thakur', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through &quot;administrative directive&quot; as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on &quot;corruption&quot; in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, &quot;Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry.&quot; It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take &mdash; administrative or legislative &mdash; for holding auctions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, &quot;Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block.&quot; The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more &quot;transparent and objective process&quot; like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. &quot;Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009,&quot; the CAG said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants &mdash; existing or proposed. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 August, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-CAG/articleshow/15538401.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16633, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16505 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta &amp; Pradeep Thakur' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through &quot;administrative directive&quot; as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on &quot;corruption&quot; in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, &quot;Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry.&quot; It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take &mdash; administrative or legislative &mdash; for holding auctions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, &quot;Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block.&quot; The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more &quot;transparent and objective process&quot; like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. &quot;Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009,&quot; the CAG said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants &mdash; existing or proposed.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta & Pradeep Thakur | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, "A part of this financial gain could have accrued..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta & Pradeep Thakur</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, "A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through "administrative directive" as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on "corruption" in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, "Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry." It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take — administrative or legislative — for holding auctions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, "Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block." The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more "transparent and objective process" like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. "Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009," the CAG said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants — existing or proposed.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681757ef903e0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681757ef903e0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681757ef903e0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16505, 'title' => 'Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta &amp; Pradeep Thakur', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through &quot;administrative directive&quot; as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on &quot;corruption&quot; in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, &quot;Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry.&quot; It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take &mdash; administrative or legislative &mdash; for holding auctions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, &quot;Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block.&quot; The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more &quot;transparent and objective process&quot; like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. &quot;Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009,&quot; the CAG said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants &mdash; existing or proposed. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 August, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-CAG/articleshow/15538401.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16633, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16505, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta &amp; Pradeep Thakur', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through &quot;administrative directive&quot; as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on &quot;corruption&quot; in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, &quot;Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry.&quot; It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take &mdash; administrative or legislative &mdash; for holding auctions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, &quot;Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block.&quot; The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more &quot;transparent and objective process&quot; like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. &quot;Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009,&quot; the CAG said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants &mdash; existing or proposed.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16505, 'title' => 'Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta &amp; Pradeep Thakur', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through &quot;administrative directive&quot; as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on &quot;corruption&quot; in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, &quot;Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry.&quot; It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take &mdash; administrative or legislative &mdash; for holding auctions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, &quot;Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block.&quot; The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more &quot;transparent and objective process&quot; like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. &quot;Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009,&quot; the CAG said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants &mdash; existing or proposed. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 August, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-CAG/articleshow/15538401.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16633, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16505 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta &amp; Pradeep Thakur' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through &quot;administrative directive&quot; as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on &quot;corruption&quot; in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, &quot;Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry.&quot; It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take &mdash; administrative or legislative &mdash; for holding auctions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, &quot;Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block.&quot; The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more &quot;transparent and objective process&quot; like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. &quot;Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009,&quot; the CAG said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants &mdash; existing or proposed.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta & Pradeep Thakur | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, "A part of this financial gain could have accrued..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta & Pradeep Thakur</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, "A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through "administrative directive" as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on "corruption" in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, "Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry." It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take — administrative or legislative — for holding auctions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, "Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block." The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more "transparent and objective process" like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. "Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009," the CAG said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants — existing or proposed.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681757ef903e0-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681757ef903e0-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681757ef903e0-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681757ef903e0-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16505, 'title' => 'Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta &amp; Pradeep Thakur', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through &quot;administrative directive&quot; as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on &quot;corruption&quot; in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, &quot;Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry.&quot; It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take &mdash; administrative or legislative &mdash; for holding auctions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, &quot;Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block.&quot; The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more &quot;transparent and objective process&quot; like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. &quot;Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009,&quot; the CAG said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants &mdash; existing or proposed. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 August, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-CAG/articleshow/15538401.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16633, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16505, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta &amp; Pradeep Thakur', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through &quot;administrative directive&quot; as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on &quot;corruption&quot; in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, &quot;Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry.&quot; It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take &mdash; administrative or legislative &mdash; for holding auctions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, &quot;Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block.&quot; The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more &quot;transparent and objective process&quot; like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. &quot;Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009,&quot; the CAG said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants &mdash; existing or proposed.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16505, 'title' => 'Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta &amp; Pradeep Thakur', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through &quot;administrative directive&quot; as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on &quot;corruption&quot; in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, &quot;Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry.&quot; It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take &mdash; administrative or legislative &mdash; for holding auctions.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, &quot;Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block.&quot; The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more &quot;transparent and objective process&quot; like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. &quot;Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009,&quot; the CAG said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants &mdash; existing or proposed. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 August, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-CAG/articleshow/15538401.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16633, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16505 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta &amp; Pradeep Thakur' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, &quot;A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through &quot;administrative directive&quot; as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on &quot;corruption&quot; in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, &quot;Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry.&quot; It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take &mdash; administrative or legislative &mdash; for holding auctions.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, &quot;Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block.&quot; The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more &quot;transparent and objective process&quot; like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. &quot;Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009,&quot; the CAG said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants &mdash; existing or proposed.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta & Pradeep Thakur | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, "A part of this financial gain could have accrued..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta & Pradeep Thakur</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, "A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through "administrative directive" as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on "corruption" in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, "Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry." It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take — administrative or legislative — for holding auctions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, "Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block." The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more "transparent and objective process" like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. "Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009," the CAG said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants — existing or proposed.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16505, 'title' => 'Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta & Pradeep Thakur', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, "A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through "administrative directive" as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on "corruption" in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, "Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry." It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take — administrative or legislative — for holding auctions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, "Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block." The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more "transparent and objective process" like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. "Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009," the CAG said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants — existing or proposed. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 August, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-CAG/articleshow/15538401.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16633, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16505, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta & Pradeep Thakur', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, "A part of this financial gain could have accrued...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, "A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through "administrative directive" as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on "corruption" in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, "Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry." It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take — administrative or legislative — for holding auctions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, "Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block." The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more "transparent and objective process" like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. "Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009," the CAG said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants — existing or proposed.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16505, 'title' => 'Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta & Pradeep Thakur', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Times of India </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, "A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through "administrative directive" as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on "corruption" in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, "Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry." It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take — administrative or legislative — for holding auctions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, "Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block." The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more "transparent and objective process" like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. "Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009," the CAG said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants — existing or proposed. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 August, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-CAG/articleshow/15538401.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'law-ministry-twice-advised-for-auction-but-coal-ministry-ignored-cag-sanjay-dutta-pradeep-thakur-16633', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 16633, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16505 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta & Pradeep Thakur' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, "A part of this financial gain could have accrued...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Times of India</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, "A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through "administrative directive" as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on "corruption" in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, "Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry." It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take — administrative or legislative — for holding auctions. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, "Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block." The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more "transparent and objective process" like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. "Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009," the CAG said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants — existing or proposed.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Law ministry twice advised for auction but coal ministry ignored: CAG-Sanjay Dutta & Pradeep Thakur |
-The Times of India Pointing out that the government extended windfall gains of Rs 1.86 lakh crore to private players by distributing coal blocks without bidding over years, the CAG has said, "A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalizing the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks. Therefore, audit is of strong opinion that there is a need for strict regulatory and monitoring mechanism to ensure that benefit of cheaper coal is passed on to the consumers." In a report, which was tabled in Parliament on Friday, the auditor noted that the government had set a cut-off date of June 28, 2004, for distributing blocks through nomination but kept on awarding coal blocks through the screening committee route till 2009. The government could have introduced competitive bidding in 2006 through "administrative directive" as advised by the law ministry, the report said. In fact, while the CAG stopped short of asking for cancellation of allocations, it did ask for a review of the decisions. Politically, the latest volley of censures from the auditor will ensure that the focus on "corruption" in the allocation of natural resources during the two UPA regimes does not fade away. Buoyed by the three reports, the opposition demanded the PM's resignation saying that the auditor has validated its charge of crony capitalism with free rein to carpet baggers. The government, which had anticipated the onslaught, reacted by rejecting the charge and criticizing the national auditor who has been a source of intense political headache. Official sources said bidding could not be invited for blocks since doing so would have required amending the mining law, a lengthy process which could have proven counter-productive in view of the rising demand for coal for power generation and other industries. Further, they argued that the allocations were done based on recommendations of a screening committee that included representatives of states, including those ruled by the opposition. But the final CAG report has addressed the coal ministry's argument why the ministry could not switch to auction despite strong opinions from within as well as the law ministry since 2004: it would have held up release of coal for crucial consumers. The auditor pointed out that the law ministry had said government could introduce auctions by merely amending the existing administrative procedure and without having to legislate afresh. This opinion is significant as it addresses the concern that enacting a law would hold up distribution of coal. Obviously, CAG stressed, "Thus, competitive bidding could have been introduced in 2006 as per the advice of the law ministry." It also emphasized that the law ministry had left it for the coal ministry to decide which route to take — administrative or legislative — for holding auctions. The report also noted that the coal ministry did not stir even when the law secretary repeated the same advice in August 2006. Going into the sequence of how the ministry went on handing out blocks in spite of strong advice to the contrary, the auditor said the then coal secretary had noted in 2004, "Since there is substantial difference between the price of coal supplied by Coal India and coal produced by captive mining, there is windfall gain for the person who is allotted a captive block." The seniormost official of the ministry had argued for a more "transparent and objective process" like competitive bidding, but failed to goad the ministry into a rethink. "Despite such clear advice, coal ministry went ahead for allocation of coal blocks through screening committee for allocation of 38 coal blocks and continued with the process till 2009," the CAG said. Altogether, 75 mines with 15.35 billion tonnes of geological reserves of coal were given out to private companies, including 57 open cast mines. The report estimates 6.3 billion of the reserves in open cast mines as recoverable, assuming an extraction rate of 73% for open cast mines and 37% for mixed mines. This is good enough for generating over 50,000 mw for 25 years. CAG has taken the open cast mines alone for calculating the gains. It has first taken the difference between the average sale price of Rs 1,028.42 per tonne for all grades of coal mined from open cast mines by state-run Coal India Ltd and the average production cost of Rs 583 per tonne. Then it has made an allowance of Rs 150 per tonne towards financing cost in line with the coal ministry's suggestion. After adjustment of this allowance, the final benefit has been taken at Rs 295.41 per tonne for the extractable reserve. The final CAG report, however, is silent on one count: the final report does not argue against giving coal blocks to private cement, steel and power plants — existing or proposed.
|