Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
if (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6809bae014434-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6809bae014434-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6809bae014434-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 20423,
'title' => 'Left for land bill debate',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed,&quot; CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area,&quot; Yechury said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee,&quot; a statement from the Left parties said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said the Left was not in &quot;agreement with some basic provisions&quot; in the present bill.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 20 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130420/jsp/nation/story_16807019.jsp#.UXJOS1ftOP9',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'left-for-land-bill-debate-20565',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 20565,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 20423,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Left for land bill debate',
'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
&quot;The present bill...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed,&quot; CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.</p><p align="justify">Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area,&quot; Yechury said.</p><p align="justify">During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.</p><p align="justify">However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.</p><p align="justify">The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee,&quot; a statement from the Left parties said.</p><p align="justify">It said the Left was not in &quot;agreement with some basic provisions&quot; in the present bill.</p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 20423,
'title' => 'Left for land bill debate',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed,&quot; CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area,&quot; Yechury said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee,&quot; a statement from the Left parties said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said the Left was not in &quot;agreement with some basic provisions&quot; in the present bill.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 20 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130420/jsp/nation/story_16807019.jsp#.UXJOS1ftOP9',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'left-for-land-bill-debate-20565',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 20565,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 20423
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Left for land bill debate'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
&quot;The present bill...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed,&quot; CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.</p><p align="justify">Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area,&quot; Yechury said.</p><p align="justify">During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.</p><p align="justify">However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.</p><p align="justify">The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee,&quot; a statement from the Left parties said.</p><p align="justify">It said the Left was not in &quot;agreement with some basic provisions&quot; in the present bill.</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/left-for-land-bill-debate-20565.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Left for land bill debate | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
"The present bill..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Left for land bill debate</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.</p><p align="justify">"The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed," CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.</p><p align="justify">Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.</p><p align="justify">"We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area," Yechury said.</p><p align="justify">During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.</p><p align="justify">However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.</p><p align="justify">The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.</p><p align="justify">"Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee," a statement from the Left parties said.</p><p align="justify">It said the Left was not in "agreement with some basic provisions" in the present bill.</p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6809bae014434-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6809bae014434-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6809bae014434-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 20423,
'title' => 'Left for land bill debate',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed,&quot; CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area,&quot; Yechury said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee,&quot; a statement from the Left parties said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said the Left was not in &quot;agreement with some basic provisions&quot; in the present bill.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 20 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130420/jsp/nation/story_16807019.jsp#.UXJOS1ftOP9',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'left-for-land-bill-debate-20565',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 20565,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 20423,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Left for land bill debate',
'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
&quot;The present bill...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed,&quot; CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.</p><p align="justify">Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area,&quot; Yechury said.</p><p align="justify">During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.</p><p align="justify">However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.</p><p align="justify">The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee,&quot; a statement from the Left parties said.</p><p align="justify">It said the Left was not in &quot;agreement with some basic provisions&quot; in the present bill.</p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 20423,
'title' => 'Left for land bill debate',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed,&quot; CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area,&quot; Yechury said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee,&quot; a statement from the Left parties said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said the Left was not in &quot;agreement with some basic provisions&quot; in the present bill.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 20 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130420/jsp/nation/story_16807019.jsp#.UXJOS1ftOP9',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'left-for-land-bill-debate-20565',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 20565,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 20423
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Left for land bill debate'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
&quot;The present bill...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed,&quot; CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.</p><p align="justify">Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area,&quot; Yechury said.</p><p align="justify">During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.</p><p align="justify">However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.</p><p align="justify">The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee,&quot; a statement from the Left parties said.</p><p align="justify">It said the Left was not in &quot;agreement with some basic provisions&quot; in the present bill.</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/left-for-land-bill-debate-20565.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Left for land bill debate | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
"The present bill..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Left for land bill debate</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.</p><p align="justify">"The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed," CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.</p><p align="justify">Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.</p><p align="justify">"We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area," Yechury said.</p><p align="justify">During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.</p><p align="justify">However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.</p><p align="justify">The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.</p><p align="justify">"Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee," a statement from the Left parties said.</p><p align="justify">It said the Left was not in "agreement with some basic provisions" in the present bill.</p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6809bae014434-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6809bae014434-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6809bae014434-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6809bae014434-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 20423,
'title' => 'Left for land bill debate',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed,&quot; CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area,&quot; Yechury said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee,&quot; a statement from the Left parties said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said the Left was not in &quot;agreement with some basic provisions&quot; in the present bill.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 20 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130420/jsp/nation/story_16807019.jsp#.UXJOS1ftOP9',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'left-for-land-bill-debate-20565',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 20565,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 20423,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Left for land bill debate',
'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
&quot;The present bill...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed,&quot; CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.</p><p align="justify">Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area,&quot; Yechury said.</p><p align="justify">During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.</p><p align="justify">However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.</p><p align="justify">The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee,&quot; a statement from the Left parties said.</p><p align="justify">It said the Left was not in &quot;agreement with some basic provisions&quot; in the present bill.</p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 20423,
'title' => 'Left for land bill debate',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed,&quot; CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area,&quot; Yechury said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee,&quot; a statement from the Left parties said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said the Left was not in &quot;agreement with some basic provisions&quot; in the present bill.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 20 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130420/jsp/nation/story_16807019.jsp#.UXJOS1ftOP9',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'left-for-land-bill-debate-20565',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 20565,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 20423
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Left for land bill debate'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
&quot;The present bill...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed,&quot; CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.</p><p align="justify">Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.</p><p align="justify">&quot;We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area,&quot; Yechury said.</p><p align="justify">During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.</p><p align="justify">However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.</p><p align="justify">The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee,&quot; a statement from the Left parties said.</p><p align="justify">It said the Left was not in &quot;agreement with some basic provisions&quot; in the present bill.</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/left-for-land-bill-debate-20565.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Left for land bill debate | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
"The present bill..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Left for land bill debate</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.</p><p align="justify">"The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed," CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.</p><p align="justify">Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.</p><p align="justify">"We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area," Yechury said.</p><p align="justify">During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.</p><p align="justify">However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.</p><p align="justify">The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.</p><p align="justify">"Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee," a statement from the Left parties said.</p><p align="justify">It said the Left was not in "agreement with some basic provisions" in the present bill.</p> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$cookies = []
$values = [
(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 20423,
'title' => 'Left for land bill debate',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
</p>
<p align="justify">
"The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed," CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.
</p>
<p align="justify">
"We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area," Yechury said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.
</p>
<p align="justify">
"Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee," a statement from the Left parties said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said the Left was not in "agreement with some basic provisions" in the present bill.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 20 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130420/jsp/nation/story_16807019.jsp#.UXJOS1ftOP9',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'left-for-land-bill-debate-20565',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 20565,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 20423,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Left for land bill debate',
'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition',
'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
"The present bill...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.</p><p align="justify">"The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed," CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.</p><p align="justify">Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.</p><p align="justify">"We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area," Yechury said.</p><p align="justify">During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.</p><p align="justify">However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.</p><p align="justify">The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.</p><p align="justify">"Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee," a statement from the Left parties said.</p><p align="justify">It said the Left was not in "agreement with some basic provisions" in the present bill.</p>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 20423,
'title' => 'Left for land bill debate',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
</p>
<p align="justify">
"The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed," CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.
</p>
<p align="justify">
"We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area," Yechury said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.
</p>
<p align="justify">
"Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee," a statement from the Left parties said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It said the Left was not in "agreement with some basic provisions" in the present bill.
</p>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 20 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130420/jsp/nation/story_16807019.jsp#.UXJOS1ftOP9',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'left-for-land-bill-debate-20565',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 20565,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 20423
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Left for land bill debate'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition Bill,Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
"The present bill...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br />The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.</p><p align="justify">"The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed," CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.</p><p align="justify">Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.</p><p align="justify">"We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area," Yechury said.</p><p align="justify">During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.</p><p align="justify">However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.</p><p align="justify">The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.</p><p align="justify">"Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee," a statement from the Left parties said.</p><p align="justify">It said the Left was not in "agreement with some basic provisions" in the present bill.</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
latest-news-updates/left-for-land-bill-debate-20565.html"/>
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Left for land bill debate | Im4change.org
Left for land bill debate
-The Telegraph
The Left today said a degree of consent should be obtained even for land acquisition for public purpose and demanded the land acquisition bill be sent back to a parliamentary committee and not taken up for passage.
"The present bill says there is no need for consent of those affected if land is acquired for government purpose. We are opposed to it. We feel a degree of consent is needed even in cases of acquisition made by the government. What the degree would be can be discussed," CPM politburo member Sitaram Yechury said after a meeting of the four Left parties today.
Yechury, however, indicated the Left's intention to scale down its demand for 100 per cent consent for private projects to 80 per cent.
"We are okay with 80 per cent consent since it is difficult to acquire land when some owners refuse in a contiguous area," Yechury said.
During a meeting with rural development minister Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday, the CPM had insisted on the consent of 100 per cent landowners if land was being acquired for private developers.
However, the party appears to have softened its stand under pressure from the Bengal unit, which argued it would be virtually impossible to acquire any land for industrialisation with the 100 per cent consent clause. It pointed to Singur, where the then Left Front government had acquired land for the Nano plant despite opposition from a section of the farmers.
The Trinamul Congress wants 100 per cent consent for all projects, including public purpose.
"Since the bill presented now has been totally changed from that which was considered by the standing committee, the Left parties reiterate their demand that it be referred back to the standing committee or be taken up by a joint select committee," a statement from the Left parties said.
It said the Left was not in "agreement with some basic provisions" in the present bill.
