Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fe1a567efe-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fe1a567efe-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fe1a567efe-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8298, 'title' => ''Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /> <br /> As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /> <br /> However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /> <br /> The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /> <br /> To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /> <br /> The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become &quot;dysfunctional&quot;. Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /> <br /> The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /> <br /> If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /> <br /> In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /> <br /> Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 13 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Let-PM-be-probed-by-independent-agency/articleshow/8831828.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8298, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption,lokpal', 'metaDesc' => ' Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. As of today,...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /><br />As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /><br />However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /><br />The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /><br />To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /><br />The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become &quot;dysfunctional&quot;. Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /><br />The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /><br />If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /><br />In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /><br />Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8298, 'title' => ''Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /> <br /> As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /> <br /> However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /> <br /> The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /> <br /> To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /> <br /> The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become &quot;dysfunctional&quot;. Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /> <br /> The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /> <br /> If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /> <br /> In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /> <br /> Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 13 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Let-PM-be-probed-by-independent-agency/articleshow/8831828.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8298 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption,lokpal' $metaDesc = ' Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. As of today,...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /><br />As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /><br />However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /><br />The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /><br />To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /><br />The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become &quot;dysfunctional&quot;. Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /><br />The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /><br />If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /><br />In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /><br />Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. As of today,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /><br />As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /><br />However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /><br />The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /><br />To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /><br />The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become "dysfunctional". Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become "dysfunctional" due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become "dysfunctional" due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /><br />The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /><br />If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /><br />In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /><br />Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fe1a567efe-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fe1a567efe-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fe1a567efe-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8298, 'title' => ''Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /> <br /> As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /> <br /> However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /> <br /> The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /> <br /> To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /> <br /> The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become &quot;dysfunctional&quot;. Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /> <br /> The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /> <br /> If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /> <br /> In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /> <br /> Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 13 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Let-PM-be-probed-by-independent-agency/articleshow/8831828.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8298, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption,lokpal', 'metaDesc' => ' Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. As of today,...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /><br />As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /><br />However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /><br />The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /><br />To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /><br />The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become &quot;dysfunctional&quot;. Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /><br />The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /><br />If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /><br />In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /><br />Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8298, 'title' => ''Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /> <br /> As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /> <br /> However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /> <br /> The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /> <br /> To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /> <br /> The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become &quot;dysfunctional&quot;. Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /> <br /> The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /> <br /> If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /> <br /> In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /> <br /> Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 13 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Let-PM-be-probed-by-independent-agency/articleshow/8831828.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8298 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption,lokpal' $metaDesc = ' Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. As of today,...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /><br />As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /><br />However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /><br />The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /><br />To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /><br />The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become &quot;dysfunctional&quot;. Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /><br />The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /><br />If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /><br />In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /><br />Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. As of today,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /><br />As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /><br />However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /><br />The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /><br />To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /><br />The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become "dysfunctional". Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become "dysfunctional" due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become "dysfunctional" due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /><br />The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /><br />If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /><br />In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /><br />Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fe1a567efe-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fe1a567efe-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fe1a567efe-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fe1a567efe-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8298, 'title' => ''Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /> <br /> As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /> <br /> However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /> <br /> The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /> <br /> To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /> <br /> The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become &quot;dysfunctional&quot;. Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /> <br /> The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /> <br /> If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /> <br /> In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /> <br /> Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 13 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Let-PM-be-probed-by-independent-agency/articleshow/8831828.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8298, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption,lokpal', 'metaDesc' => ' Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. As of today,...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /><br />As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /><br />However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /><br />The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /><br />To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /><br />The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become &quot;dysfunctional&quot;. Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /><br />The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /><br />If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /><br />In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /><br />Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8298, 'title' => ''Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /> <br /> As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /> <br /> However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /> <br /> The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /> <br /> To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /> <br /> The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become &quot;dysfunctional&quot;. Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /> <br /> The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /> <br /> If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /> <br /> In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /> <br /> Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 13 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Let-PM-be-probed-by-independent-agency/articleshow/8831828.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8298 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption,lokpal' $metaDesc = ' Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. As of today,...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /><br />As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /><br />However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /><br />The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /><br />To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /><br />The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become &quot;dysfunctional&quot;. Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become &quot;dysfunctional&quot; due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /><br />The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /><br />If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /><br />In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /><br />Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. As of today,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /><br />As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /><br />However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /><br />The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /><br />To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /><br />The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become "dysfunctional". Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become "dysfunctional" due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become "dysfunctional" due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /><br />The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /><br />If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /><br />In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /><br />Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8298, 'title' => ''Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /> <br /> As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /> <br /> However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /> <br /> The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /> <br /> To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /> <br /> The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become "dysfunctional". Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become "dysfunctional" due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become "dysfunctional" due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /> <br /> The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /> <br /> If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /> <br /> In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /> <br /> Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 13 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Let-PM-be-probed-by-independent-agency/articleshow/8831828.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8298, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal', 'metaKeywords' => 'Corruption,lokpal', 'metaDesc' => ' Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. As of today,...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /><br />As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /><br />However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /><br />The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /><br />To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /><br />The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become "dysfunctional". Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become "dysfunctional" due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become "dysfunctional" due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /><br />The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /><br />If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /><br />In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /><br />Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8298, 'title' => ''Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /> <br /> As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /> <br /> However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /> <br /> The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /> <br /> To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /> <br /> The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become "dysfunctional". Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become "dysfunctional" due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become "dysfunctional" due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /> <br /> The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /> <br /> If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /> <br /> In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /> <br /> Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 13 June, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Let-PM-be-probed-by-independent-agency/articleshow/8831828.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-pm-be-probed-by-independent-agency-by-arvind-kejriwal-8399', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8399, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8298 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal' $metaKeywords = 'Corruption,lokpal' $metaDesc = ' Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. As of today,...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations. <br /><br />As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. <br /><br />However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. <br /><br />The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. <br /><br />To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. <br /><br />The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become "dysfunctional". Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become "dysfunctional" due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become "dysfunctional" due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? <br /><br />The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? <br /><br />If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? <br /><br />In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? <br /><br />Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
'Let PM be probed by independent agency' by Arvind Kejriwal |
Dr Manmohan Singh is one of the most honest Prime Ministers that the country has had. It is ironical that his own government should seek to take the Prime Minister out of the purview of Lokpal's investigations.
As of today, the Prime Minister is covered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Under that law, any allegation of corruption against a Prime Minister can be investigated. No exception has been made for either the Prime Minister or any of his activities (like external affairs, defence etc). Every activity of the PM could be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act. However, as of today, the investigations are done by the CBI, which is directly under the control of the PM himself. The only change that we are proposing in the present system is that rather than being investigated by an agency directly under his control, let the PM be investigated by an agency which is independent, like the Lokpal. We are not proposing any other change. The five ministers, who are members of the drafting committee, unanimously feel that the PM should be kept out of Lokpal's investigations. The Constitution does not grant any such immunity to the PM. Only President has been granted immunity from any investigations and trials. To take the PM out of Lokpal's ambit or even to take some part of his jurisdiction out of the ambit of Lokpal's investigations, the government would need to amend the Constitution and the Prevention of Corruption Act and grant him immunity similar to that of the President. Is the government planning to do that? Why? We thought we would get a better and stronger anti-corruption regime after such a strong anti-corruption movement. On the contrary, the government seems to be shrinking the scope of anti-corruption regime. Taking the PM out of any probe would be a retrograde step. The government's stand is that a PM under the scanner would become "dysfunctional". Does the Congress really feel like that? Did Rajiv Gandhi, the then PM, become "dysfunctional" due to the Bofors probe? Or did P V Narasimha Rao become "dysfunctional" due to a probe in the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha case? The Prime Minister is privy to a lot of security-related sensitive information. Suppose tomorrow, a corrupt person became PM. Won't the security of the country itself would be seriously compromised if Prime Minister enjoyed complete immunity from any investigations and trials? If PM is holding several portfolios, would exclusion of the PM from Lokpal's ambit become a licence for open loot in all these ministries? And if there were a corrupt PM and if he were granted immunity, would he not become a conduit for receiving bribes on behalf of all his ministerial colleagues? In the past, Dr Manmohan Singh had himself offered to be brought under the purview of Lokpal Bill. Then why are his own ministers opposing his inclusion in Lokpal's ambit? Is there a disconnect or communication gap within the government? Till now PM was investigated by the CBI. Why should Prime Minister be scared of being investigated by an independent Lokpal? The government should make its stand clear. |