Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680da0edc627f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680da0edc627f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680da0edc627f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10321, 'title' => 'Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari &mdash; in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act &mdash; stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue &ldquo;to play itself out.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. &ldquo;There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,&rdquo; he said, adding, &ldquo;but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting &ldquo;institutional efficacy and efficiency,&rdquo; with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /> <br /> A &ldquo;balance,&rdquo; therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers &ldquo;which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /> <br /> <em>Finding a balance<br /> </em><br /> Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to &ldquo;prematurely impose a party view&rdquo; on the subject &mdash; it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution &mdash; he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: &ldquo;In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> But even as he pointed out that &ldquo;the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,&rdquo; he said that &ldquo;if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings&rdquo; for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 8 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2519416.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10432, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10321, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari &mdash; in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act &mdash; stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue &ldquo;to play itself out.&rdquo;<br /><br />Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. &ldquo;There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,&rdquo; he said, adding, &ldquo;but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.&rdquo;<br /><br />The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting &ldquo;institutional efficacy and efficiency,&rdquo; with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /><br />A &ldquo;balance,&rdquo; therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers &ldquo;which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.&rdquo;<br /><br />With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /><br /><em>Finding a balance<br /></em><br />Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to &ldquo;prematurely impose a party view&rdquo; on the subject &mdash; it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution &mdash; he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: &ldquo;In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />But even as he pointed out that &ldquo;the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,&rdquo; he said that &ldquo;if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings&rdquo; for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10321, 'title' => 'Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari &mdash; in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act &mdash; stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue &ldquo;to play itself out.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. &ldquo;There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,&rdquo; he said, adding, &ldquo;but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting &ldquo;institutional efficacy and efficiency,&rdquo; with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /> <br /> A &ldquo;balance,&rdquo; therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers &ldquo;which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /> <br /> <em>Finding a balance<br /> </em><br /> Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to &ldquo;prematurely impose a party view&rdquo; on the subject &mdash; it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution &mdash; he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: &ldquo;In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> But even as he pointed out that &ldquo;the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,&rdquo; he said that &ldquo;if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings&rdquo; for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 8 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2519416.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10432, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10321 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari &mdash; in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act &mdash; stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue &ldquo;to play itself out.&rdquo;<br /><br />Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. &ldquo;There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,&rdquo; he said, adding, &ldquo;but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.&rdquo;<br /><br />The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting &ldquo;institutional efficacy and efficiency,&rdquo; with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /><br />A &ldquo;balance,&rdquo; therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers &ldquo;which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.&rdquo;<br /><br />With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /><br /><em>Finding a balance<br /></em><br />Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to &ldquo;prematurely impose a party view&rdquo; on the subject &mdash; it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution &mdash; he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: &ldquo;In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />But even as he pointed out that &ldquo;the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,&rdquo; he said that &ldquo;if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings&rdquo; for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari — in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act — stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue “to play itself out.”<br /><br />Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. “There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,” he said, adding, “but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.”<br /><br />The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting “institutional efficacy and efficiency,” with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /><br />A “balance,” therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers “which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.”<br /><br />With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /><br /><em>Finding a balance<br /></em><br />Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to “prematurely impose a party view” on the subject — it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution — he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: “In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,” he said.<br /><br />But even as he pointed out that “the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,” he said that “if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings” for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680da0edc627f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680da0edc627f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680da0edc627f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10321, 'title' => 'Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari &mdash; in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act &mdash; stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue &ldquo;to play itself out.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. &ldquo;There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,&rdquo; he said, adding, &ldquo;but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting &ldquo;institutional efficacy and efficiency,&rdquo; with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /> <br /> A &ldquo;balance,&rdquo; therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers &ldquo;which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /> <br /> <em>Finding a balance<br /> </em><br /> Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to &ldquo;prematurely impose a party view&rdquo; on the subject &mdash; it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution &mdash; he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: &ldquo;In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> But even as he pointed out that &ldquo;the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,&rdquo; he said that &ldquo;if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings&rdquo; for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 8 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2519416.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10432, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10321, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari &mdash; in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act &mdash; stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue &ldquo;to play itself out.&rdquo;<br /><br />Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. &ldquo;There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,&rdquo; he said, adding, &ldquo;but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.&rdquo;<br /><br />The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting &ldquo;institutional efficacy and efficiency,&rdquo; with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /><br />A &ldquo;balance,&rdquo; therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers &ldquo;which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.&rdquo;<br /><br />With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /><br /><em>Finding a balance<br /></em><br />Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to &ldquo;prematurely impose a party view&rdquo; on the subject &mdash; it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution &mdash; he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: &ldquo;In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />But even as he pointed out that &ldquo;the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,&rdquo; he said that &ldquo;if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings&rdquo; for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10321, 'title' => 'Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari &mdash; in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act &mdash; stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue &ldquo;to play itself out.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. &ldquo;There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,&rdquo; he said, adding, &ldquo;but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting &ldquo;institutional efficacy and efficiency,&rdquo; with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /> <br /> A &ldquo;balance,&rdquo; therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers &ldquo;which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /> <br /> <em>Finding a balance<br /> </em><br /> Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to &ldquo;prematurely impose a party view&rdquo; on the subject &mdash; it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution &mdash; he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: &ldquo;In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> But even as he pointed out that &ldquo;the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,&rdquo; he said that &ldquo;if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings&rdquo; for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 8 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2519416.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10432, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10321 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari &mdash; in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act &mdash; stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue &ldquo;to play itself out.&rdquo;<br /><br />Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. &ldquo;There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,&rdquo; he said, adding, &ldquo;but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.&rdquo;<br /><br />The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting &ldquo;institutional efficacy and efficiency,&rdquo; with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /><br />A &ldquo;balance,&rdquo; therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers &ldquo;which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.&rdquo;<br /><br />With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /><br /><em>Finding a balance<br /></em><br />Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to &ldquo;prematurely impose a party view&rdquo; on the subject &mdash; it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution &mdash; he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: &ldquo;In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />But even as he pointed out that &ldquo;the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,&rdquo; he said that &ldquo;if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings&rdquo; for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari — in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act — stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue “to play itself out.”<br /><br />Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. “There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,” he said, adding, “but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.”<br /><br />The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting “institutional efficacy and efficiency,” with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /><br />A “balance,” therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers “which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.”<br /><br />With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /><br /><em>Finding a balance<br /></em><br />Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to “prematurely impose a party view” on the subject — it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution — he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: “In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,” he said.<br /><br />But even as he pointed out that “the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,” he said that “if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings” for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680da0edc627f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da0edc627f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680da0edc627f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680da0edc627f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10321, 'title' => 'Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari &mdash; in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act &mdash; stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue &ldquo;to play itself out.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. &ldquo;There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,&rdquo; he said, adding, &ldquo;but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting &ldquo;institutional efficacy and efficiency,&rdquo; with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /> <br /> A &ldquo;balance,&rdquo; therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers &ldquo;which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /> <br /> <em>Finding a balance<br /> </em><br /> Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to &ldquo;prematurely impose a party view&rdquo; on the subject &mdash; it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution &mdash; he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: &ldquo;In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> But even as he pointed out that &ldquo;the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,&rdquo; he said that &ldquo;if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings&rdquo; for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 8 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2519416.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10432, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10321, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari &mdash; in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act &mdash; stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue &ldquo;to play itself out.&rdquo;<br /><br />Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. &ldquo;There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,&rdquo; he said, adding, &ldquo;but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.&rdquo;<br /><br />The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting &ldquo;institutional efficacy and efficiency,&rdquo; with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /><br />A &ldquo;balance,&rdquo; therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers &ldquo;which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.&rdquo;<br /><br />With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /><br /><em>Finding a balance<br /></em><br />Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to &ldquo;prematurely impose a party view&rdquo; on the subject &mdash; it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution &mdash; he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: &ldquo;In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />But even as he pointed out that &ldquo;the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,&rdquo; he said that &ldquo;if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings&rdquo; for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10321, 'title' => 'Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari &mdash; in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act &mdash; stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue &ldquo;to play itself out.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. &ldquo;There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,&rdquo; he said, adding, &ldquo;but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting &ldquo;institutional efficacy and efficiency,&rdquo; with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /> <br /> A &ldquo;balance,&rdquo; therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers &ldquo;which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /> <br /> <em>Finding a balance<br /> </em><br /> Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to &ldquo;prematurely impose a party view&rdquo; on the subject &mdash; it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution &mdash; he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: &ldquo;In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,&rdquo; he said.<br /> <br /> But even as he pointed out that &ldquo;the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,&rdquo; he said that &ldquo;if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings&rdquo; for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 8 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2519416.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10432, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10321 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari &mdash; in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act &mdash; stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue &ldquo;to play itself out.&rdquo;<br /><br />Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. &ldquo;There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,&rdquo; he said, adding, &ldquo;but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.&rdquo;<br /><br />The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting &ldquo;institutional efficacy and efficiency,&rdquo; with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /><br />A &ldquo;balance,&rdquo; therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers &ldquo;which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.&rdquo;<br /><br />With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /><br /><em>Finding a balance<br /></em><br />Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to &ldquo;prematurely impose a party view&rdquo; on the subject &mdash; it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution &mdash; he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: &ldquo;In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />But even as he pointed out that &ldquo;the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,&rdquo; he said that &ldquo;if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings&rdquo; for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <br /><div align="justify">The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari — in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act — stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue “to play itself out.”<br /><br />Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. “There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,” he said, adding, “but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.”<br /><br />The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting “institutional efficacy and efficiency,” with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /><br />A “balance,” therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers “which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.”<br /><br />With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /><br /><em>Finding a balance<br /></em><br />Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to “prematurely impose a party view” on the subject — it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution — he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: “In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,” he said.<br /><br />But even as he pointed out that “the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,” he said that “if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings” for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10321, 'title' => 'Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari — in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act — stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue “to play itself out.”<br /> <br /> Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. “There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,” he said, adding, “but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.”<br /> <br /> The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting “institutional efficacy and efficiency,” with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /> <br /> A “balance,” therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers “which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.”<br /> <br /> With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /> <br /> <em>Finding a balance<br /> </em><br /> Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to “prematurely impose a party view” on the subject — it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution — he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: “In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,” he said.<br /> <br /> But even as he pointed out that “the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,” he said that “if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings” for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 8 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2519416.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10432, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10321, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari...', 'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari — in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act — stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue “to play itself out.”<br /><br />Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. “There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,” he said, adding, “but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.”<br /><br />The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting “institutional efficacy and efficiency,” with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /><br />A “balance,” therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers “which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.”<br /><br />With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /><br /><em>Finding a balance<br /></em><br />Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to “prematurely impose a party view” on the subject — it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution — he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: “In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,” he said.<br /><br />But even as he pointed out that “the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,” he said that “if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings” for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10321, 'title' => 'Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<br /> <div align="justify"> The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari — in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act — stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue “to play itself out.”<br /> <br /> Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. “There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,” he said, adding, “but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.”<br /> <br /> The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting “institutional efficacy and efficiency,” with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /> <br /> A “balance,” therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers “which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.”<br /> <br /> With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /> <br /> <em>Finding a balance<br /> </em><br /> Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to “prematurely impose a party view” on the subject — it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution — he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: “In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,” he said.<br /> <br /> But even as he pointed out that “the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,” he said that “if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings” for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 8 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2519416.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'let-rti-debate-play-out-congress-by-smita-gupta-10432', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10432, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10321 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari...' $disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari — in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act — stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue “to play itself out.”<br /><br />Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. “There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,” he said, adding, “but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.”<br /><br />The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting “institutional efficacy and efficiency,” with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion.<br /><br />A “balance,” therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers “which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.”<br /><br />With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements.<br /><br /><em>Finding a balance<br /></em><br />Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to “prematurely impose a party view” on the subject — it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution — he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: “In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,” he said.<br /><br />But even as he pointed out that “the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,” he said that “if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings” for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Let RTI debate play out: Congress by Smita Gupta |
The Congress has decided to adopt a cautious approach to suggestions coming from within the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government that the Right to Information (RTI) Act be re-examined as it affects government functioning. On Friday, party spokesperson Manish Tewari — in response to a question whether changes were being contemplated in the seminal Act — stressed it was important for the ongoing debate on the issue “to play itself out.”
Mr. Tewari said there was a vigorous debate on, with the entire spectrum of views on display. “There is no denying that the RTI has been an instrument of empowerment,” he said, adding, “but people are also beginning to ask whether its efficacy is being blunted by the way it has begun to impinge on governance. So let's wait for the debate to play out.” The debate in the Congress comes in the wake of concerns expressed by Union Law Minister Salman Khursheed and, before him, Corporate Affairs Minister M. Veerappa Moily, at the way the RTI was beginning to adversely affect governance. Mr. Khursheed, while clarifying that there was no proposal to amend the RTI Act yet, recently said it needed to be looked at afresh. For, misuse of the Act was affecting “institutional efficacy and efficiency,” with even the bureaucracy becoming reluctant to record its opinion. A “balance,” therefore, needed to be maintained between transparency and accountability and institutional efficiency, he had said, adding that, for instance, it was not right to claim under the RTI papers “which are part of internal communications ahead of a Cabinet decision until such time that a decision is finally taken.” With these statements coming after the recent controversy over documents accessed from the Prime Minister's Office on the 2G spectrum through the RTI, plunging the government into a crisis, the Congress is concerned about how to put the genie back into the bottle, but is clearly loath to make any pronouncements on it, given that it counts the enactment of the law as one of its great achievements. Finding a balance Later, party sources said that since it was only six years since the RTI had been enacted, the Congress did not wish to “prematurely impose a party view” on the subject — it preferred to wait. A functionary said diluting the RTI was not the solution — he believed that over a period of time, an equilibrium would be found: “In a country as diverse and huge as ours, the government needs to be held to account,” he said. But even as he pointed out that “the doctrine of candour is intrinsic to good governance,” he said that “if recent events lead to those in government not putting down their thoughts in file notings” for fear any comment could be read as mala fide, decision-making would simply slow down. |