Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680da696e75e7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680da696e75e7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680da696e75e7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11425, 'title' => 'Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 25 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body/articleshow/10863445.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11541, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11425, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill,lokpal', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11425, 'title' => 'Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 25 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body/articleshow/10863445.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11541, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11425 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill,lokpal' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680da696e75e7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680da696e75e7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680da696e75e7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11425, 'title' => 'Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 25 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body/articleshow/10863445.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11541, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11425, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill,lokpal', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11425, 'title' => 'Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 25 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body/articleshow/10863445.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11541, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11425 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill,lokpal' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680da696e75e7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da696e75e7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680da696e75e7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680da696e75e7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11425, 'title' => 'Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 25 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body/articleshow/10863445.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11541, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11425, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill,lokpal', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11425, 'title' => 'Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 25 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body/articleshow/10863445.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11541, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11425 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill,lokpal' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11425, 'title' => 'Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 25 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body/articleshow/10863445.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11541, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 11425, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill,lokpal', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 11425, 'title' => 'Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 25 November, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body/articleshow/10863445.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-likely-to-be-a-constitutional-body-11541', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 11541, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 11425 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill,lokpal' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Lokpal likely to be a constitutional body |
-The Economic Times The standing committee vetting the Lokpal Bill has reached a consensus on making the proposed anti-graft ombudsman a constitutional body. The suggestion to upgrade the status of Lokpal to a constitutional body had first come from Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP from Amethi Rahul Gandhi. At its meeting on Thursday, all members of the standing committee, headed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, were unanimous that Lokpal should be a constitutional body on the lines of the Election Commission. This would entail a constitutional amendment, which would require to be passed by two-thirds majority in both the Houses. The standing committee, which concluded its deliberations on Thursday, however could not evolve a consensus on the issue of bringing the prime minister under Lokpal. There was three-way split at the meeting, with a section comprising RJD's Lalu Prasad, LJP chief Ram Vilas Paswan, Independent MP Amar Singh and Congress MP Arun Yadav totally opposing the inclusion of prime minister under the proposed anti-corruption body. Another section, comprising the likes of Congress MP Meenakshi Natarajan, stuck to the government's stated position of putting prime ministers under Lokpal's scrutiny only after demitting office. The third group, comprising members of the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Biju Janata Dal and the Left, rooted for inclusion of prime minister but with safeguards. With no consensus emerging on the bringing the prime minister under Lokpal, the government is likely to go by the sense of the House. There was also consensus on reservation for women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Lokpal search committee. Incidentally, Ram Vilas Paswan demanded reservation even in the Lokpal main body, but was countered by BJP's Pinaki Mishra who argued that there was no provision of quota in any of the constitutional bodies in the country. The standing committee is expected to meet once again next week to finalise its recommendations. Chances are that report may be presented by the end of next week. |