Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8447, 'title' => 'Lokpal success? Yes and no', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was the most successful of the panel&rsquo;s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,&rdquo; said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted &ldquo;complete disagreement&rdquo; on several key points.<br /> <br /> Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a &ldquo;non-acrimonious atmosphere&rdquo;, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /> <br /> The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /> <br /> Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the &ldquo;whole model&rdquo; and claimed another key matter didn&rsquo;t even figure in the meeting. &ldquo;The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 &mdash; around 27.5 per cent.<br /> <br /> The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /> <br /> The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament&rsquo;s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /> <br /> The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. &ldquo;Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; said Sibal.<br /> <br /> Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /> <br /> <em>PM calls meet<br /> </em><br /> Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /> <br /> The ruling allies don&rsquo;t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 21 June, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110621/jsp/nation/story_14140129.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8548, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8447, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal success? Yes and no', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter. &ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Telegraph </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /><br />&ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was the most successful of the panel&rsquo;s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,&rdquo; said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted &ldquo;complete disagreement&rdquo; on several key points.<br /><br />Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a &ldquo;non-acrimonious atmosphere&rdquo;, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /><br />The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /><br />Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the &ldquo;whole model&rdquo; and claimed another key matter didn&rsquo;t even figure in the meeting. &ldquo;The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.&rdquo;<br /><br />Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 &mdash; around 27.5 per cent.<br /><br />The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /><br />The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament&rsquo;s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /><br />The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. &ldquo;Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; said Sibal.<br /><br />Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /><br /><em>PM calls meet<br /></em><br />Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /><br />The ruling allies don&rsquo;t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8447, 'title' => 'Lokpal success? Yes and no', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was the most successful of the panel&rsquo;s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,&rdquo; said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted &ldquo;complete disagreement&rdquo; on several key points.<br /> <br /> Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a &ldquo;non-acrimonious atmosphere&rdquo;, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /> <br /> The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /> <br /> Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the &ldquo;whole model&rdquo; and claimed another key matter didn&rsquo;t even figure in the meeting. &ldquo;The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 &mdash; around 27.5 per cent.<br /> <br /> The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /> <br /> The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament&rsquo;s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /> <br /> The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. &ldquo;Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; said Sibal.<br /> <br /> Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /> <br /> <em>PM calls meet<br /> </em><br /> Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /> <br /> The ruling allies don&rsquo;t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 21 June, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110621/jsp/nation/story_14140129.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8548, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8447 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal success? Yes and no' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter. &ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was...' $disp = '<p>-The Telegraph </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /><br />&ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was the most successful of the panel&rsquo;s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,&rdquo; said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted &ldquo;complete disagreement&rdquo; on several key points.<br /><br />Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a &ldquo;non-acrimonious atmosphere&rdquo;, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /><br />The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /><br />Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the &ldquo;whole model&rdquo; and claimed another key matter didn&rsquo;t even figure in the meeting. &ldquo;The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.&rdquo;<br /><br />Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 &mdash; around 27.5 per cent.<br /><br />The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /><br />The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament&rsquo;s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /><br />The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. &ldquo;Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; said Sibal.<br /><br />Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /><br /><em>PM calls meet<br /></em><br />Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /><br />The ruling allies don&rsquo;t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal success? Yes and no | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Lokpal bill committee’s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government’s representatives claimed agreement on “80 per cent” of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter. “Today’s was..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Lokpal success? Yes and no</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Telegraph </p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Lokpal bill committee’s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government’s representatives claimed agreement on “80 per cent” of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /><br />“Today’s was the most successful of the panel’s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,” said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted “complete disagreement” on several key points.<br /><br />Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a “non-acrimonious atmosphere”, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /><br />The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /><br />Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the “whole model” and claimed another key matter didn’t even figure in the meeting. “The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.”<br /><br />Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 — around 27.5 per cent.<br /><br />The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /><br />The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament’s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /><br />The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. “Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,” said Sibal.<br /><br />Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /><br /><em>PM calls meet<br /></em><br />Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /><br />The ruling allies don’t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8447, 'title' => 'Lokpal success? Yes and no', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was the most successful of the panel&rsquo;s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,&rdquo; said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted &ldquo;complete disagreement&rdquo; on several key points.<br /> <br /> Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a &ldquo;non-acrimonious atmosphere&rdquo;, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /> <br /> The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /> <br /> Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the &ldquo;whole model&rdquo; and claimed another key matter didn&rsquo;t even figure in the meeting. &ldquo;The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 &mdash; around 27.5 per cent.<br /> <br /> The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /> <br /> The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament&rsquo;s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /> <br /> The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. &ldquo;Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; said Sibal.<br /> <br /> Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /> <br /> <em>PM calls meet<br /> </em><br /> Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /> <br /> The ruling allies don&rsquo;t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 21 June, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110621/jsp/nation/story_14140129.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8548, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8447, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal success? Yes and no', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter. &ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Telegraph </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /><br />&ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was the most successful of the panel&rsquo;s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,&rdquo; said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted &ldquo;complete disagreement&rdquo; on several key points.<br /><br />Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a &ldquo;non-acrimonious atmosphere&rdquo;, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /><br />The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /><br />Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the &ldquo;whole model&rdquo; and claimed another key matter didn&rsquo;t even figure in the meeting. &ldquo;The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.&rdquo;<br /><br />Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 &mdash; around 27.5 per cent.<br /><br />The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /><br />The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament&rsquo;s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /><br />The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. &ldquo;Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; said Sibal.<br /><br />Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /><br /><em>PM calls meet<br /></em><br />Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /><br />The ruling allies don&rsquo;t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8447, 'title' => 'Lokpal success? Yes and no', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was the most successful of the panel&rsquo;s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,&rdquo; said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted &ldquo;complete disagreement&rdquo; on several key points.<br /> <br /> Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a &ldquo;non-acrimonious atmosphere&rdquo;, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /> <br /> The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /> <br /> Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the &ldquo;whole model&rdquo; and claimed another key matter didn&rsquo;t even figure in the meeting. &ldquo;The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 &mdash; around 27.5 per cent.<br /> <br /> The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /> <br /> The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament&rsquo;s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /> <br /> The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. &ldquo;Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; said Sibal.<br /> <br /> Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /> <br /> <em>PM calls meet<br /> </em><br /> Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /> <br /> The ruling allies don&rsquo;t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 21 June, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110621/jsp/nation/story_14140129.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8548, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8447 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal success? Yes and no' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter. &ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was...' $disp = '<p>-The Telegraph </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /><br />&ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was the most successful of the panel&rsquo;s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,&rdquo; said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted &ldquo;complete disagreement&rdquo; on several key points.<br /><br />Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a &ldquo;non-acrimonious atmosphere&rdquo;, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /><br />The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /><br />Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the &ldquo;whole model&rdquo; and claimed another key matter didn&rsquo;t even figure in the meeting. &ldquo;The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.&rdquo;<br /><br />Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 &mdash; around 27.5 per cent.<br /><br />The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /><br />The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament&rsquo;s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /><br />The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. &ldquo;Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; said Sibal.<br /><br />Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /><br /><em>PM calls meet<br /></em><br />Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /><br />The ruling allies don&rsquo;t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal success? Yes and no | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Lokpal bill committee’s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government’s representatives claimed agreement on “80 per cent” of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter. “Today’s was..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Lokpal success? Yes and no</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Telegraph </p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Lokpal bill committee’s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government’s representatives claimed agreement on “80 per cent” of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /><br />“Today’s was the most successful of the panel’s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,” said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted “complete disagreement” on several key points.<br /><br />Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a “non-acrimonious atmosphere”, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /><br />The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /><br />Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the “whole model” and claimed another key matter didn’t even figure in the meeting. “The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.”<br /><br />Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 — around 27.5 per cent.<br /><br />The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /><br />The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament’s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /><br />The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. “Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,” said Sibal.<br /><br />Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /><br /><em>PM calls meet<br /></em><br />Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /><br />The ruling allies don’t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6806b87c53f2d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8447, 'title' => 'Lokpal success? Yes and no', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was the most successful of the panel&rsquo;s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,&rdquo; said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted &ldquo;complete disagreement&rdquo; on several key points.<br /> <br /> Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a &ldquo;non-acrimonious atmosphere&rdquo;, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /> <br /> The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /> <br /> Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the &ldquo;whole model&rdquo; and claimed another key matter didn&rsquo;t even figure in the meeting. &ldquo;The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 &mdash; around 27.5 per cent.<br /> <br /> The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /> <br /> The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament&rsquo;s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /> <br /> The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. &ldquo;Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; said Sibal.<br /> <br /> Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /> <br /> <em>PM calls meet<br /> </em><br /> Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /> <br /> The ruling allies don&rsquo;t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 21 June, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110621/jsp/nation/story_14140129.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8548, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8447, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal success? Yes and no', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter. &ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Telegraph </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /><br />&ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was the most successful of the panel&rsquo;s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,&rdquo; said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted &ldquo;complete disagreement&rdquo; on several key points.<br /><br />Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a &ldquo;non-acrimonious atmosphere&rdquo;, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /><br />The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /><br />Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the &ldquo;whole model&rdquo; and claimed another key matter didn&rsquo;t even figure in the meeting. &ldquo;The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.&rdquo;<br /><br />Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 &mdash; around 27.5 per cent.<br /><br />The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /><br />The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament&rsquo;s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /><br />The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. &ldquo;Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; said Sibal.<br /><br />Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /><br /><em>PM calls meet<br /></em><br />Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /><br />The ruling allies don&rsquo;t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8447, 'title' => 'Lokpal success? Yes and no', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was the most successful of the panel&rsquo;s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,&rdquo; said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted &ldquo;complete disagreement&rdquo; on several key points.<br /> <br /> Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a &ldquo;non-acrimonious atmosphere&rdquo;, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /> <br /> The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /> <br /> Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the &ldquo;whole model&rdquo; and claimed another key matter didn&rsquo;t even figure in the meeting. &ldquo;The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 &mdash; around 27.5 per cent.<br /> <br /> The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /> <br /> The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament&rsquo;s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /> <br /> The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. &ldquo;Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; said Sibal.<br /> <br /> Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /> <br /> <em>PM calls meet<br /> </em><br /> Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /> <br /> The ruling allies don&rsquo;t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 21 June, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110621/jsp/nation/story_14140129.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8548, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8447 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal success? Yes and no' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter. &ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was...' $disp = '<p>-The Telegraph </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Lokpal bill committee&rsquo;s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government&rsquo;s representatives claimed agreement on &ldquo;80 per cent&rdquo; of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /><br />&ldquo;Today&rsquo;s was the most successful of the panel&rsquo;s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,&rdquo; said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted &ldquo;complete disagreement&rdquo; on several key points.<br /><br />Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a &ldquo;non-acrimonious atmosphere&rdquo;, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /><br />The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /><br />Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the &ldquo;whole model&rdquo; and claimed another key matter didn&rsquo;t even figure in the meeting. &ldquo;The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.&rdquo;<br /><br />Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 &mdash; around 27.5 per cent.<br /><br />The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /><br />The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament&rsquo;s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /><br />The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. &ldquo;Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; said Sibal.<br /><br />Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /><br /><em>PM calls meet<br /></em><br />Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /><br />The ruling allies don&rsquo;t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal success? Yes and no | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Lokpal bill committee’s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government’s representatives claimed agreement on “80 per cent” of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter. “Today’s was..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Lokpal success? Yes and no</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Telegraph </p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Lokpal bill committee’s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government’s representatives claimed agreement on “80 per cent” of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /><br />“Today’s was the most successful of the panel’s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,” said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted “complete disagreement” on several key points.<br /><br />Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a “non-acrimonious atmosphere”, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /><br />The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /><br />Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the “whole model” and claimed another key matter didn’t even figure in the meeting. “The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.”<br /><br />Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 — around 27.5 per cent.<br /><br />The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /><br />The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament’s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /><br />The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. “Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,” said Sibal.<br /><br />Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /><br /><em>PM calls meet<br /></em><br />Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /><br />The ruling allies don’t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8447, 'title' => 'Lokpal success? Yes and no', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> </p> <div align="justify"> The Lokpal bill committee’s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government’s representatives claimed agreement on “80 per cent” of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /> <br /> “Today’s was the most successful of the panel’s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,” said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted “complete disagreement” on several key points.<br /> <br /> Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a “non-acrimonious atmosphere”, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /> <br /> The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /> <br /> Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the “whole model” and claimed another key matter didn’t even figure in the meeting. “The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.”<br /> <br /> Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 — around 27.5 per cent.<br /> <br /> The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /> <br /> The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament’s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /> <br /> The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. “Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,” said Sibal.<br /> <br /> Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /> <br /> <em>PM calls meet<br /> </em><br /> Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /> <br /> The ruling allies don’t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 21 June, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110621/jsp/nation/story_14140129.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8548, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 8447, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal success? Yes and no', 'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Lokpal bill committee’s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government’s representatives claimed agreement on “80 per cent” of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter. “Today’s was...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Telegraph </p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Lokpal bill committee’s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government’s representatives claimed agreement on “80 per cent” of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /><br />“Today’s was the most successful of the panel’s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,” said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted “complete disagreement” on several key points.<br /><br />Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a “non-acrimonious atmosphere”, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /><br />The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /><br />Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the “whole model” and claimed another key matter didn’t even figure in the meeting. “The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.”<br /><br />Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 — around 27.5 per cent.<br /><br />The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /><br />The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament’s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /><br />The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. “Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,” said Sibal.<br /><br />Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /><br /><em>PM calls meet<br /></em><br />Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /><br />The ruling allies don’t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 8447, 'title' => 'Lokpal success? Yes and no', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> </p> <div align="justify"> The Lokpal bill committee’s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government’s representatives claimed agreement on “80 per cent” of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /> <br /> “Today’s was the most successful of the panel’s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,” said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted “complete disagreement” on several key points.<br /> <br /> Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a “non-acrimonious atmosphere”, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /> <br /> The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /> <br /> Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the “whole model” and claimed another key matter didn’t even figure in the meeting. “The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.”<br /> <br /> Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 — around 27.5 per cent.<br /> <br /> The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /> <br /> The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament’s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /> <br /> The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. “Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,” said Sibal.<br /> <br /> Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /> <br /> <em>PM calls meet<br /> </em><br /> Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /> <br /> The ruling allies don’t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 21 June, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110621/jsp/nation/story_14140129.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'lokpal-success-yes-and-no-8548', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 8548, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 8447 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Lokpal success? Yes and no' $metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Lokpal bill committee’s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government’s representatives claimed agreement on “80 per cent” of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter. “Today’s was...' $disp = '<p>-The Telegraph </p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Lokpal bill committee’s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government’s representatives claimed agreement on “80 per cent” of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.<br /><br />“Today’s was the most successful of the panel’s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,” said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted “complete disagreement” on several key points.<br /><br />Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a “non-acrimonious atmosphere”, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour.<br /><br />The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together.<br /><br />Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the “whole model” and claimed another key matter didn’t even figure in the meeting. “The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.”<br /><br />Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 — around 27.5 per cent.<br /><br />The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline.<br /><br />The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament’s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group.<br /><br />The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. “Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,” said Sibal.<br /><br />Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure.<br /><br /><em>PM calls meet<br /></em><br />Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI.<br /><br />The ruling allies don’t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Lokpal success? Yes and no |
-The Telegraph
The Lokpal bill committee’s penultimate meeting ended today with a conflicting picture as the government’s representatives claimed agreement on “80 per cent” of the points while the Anna Hazare group suggested it was just over a quarter.
“Today’s was the most successful of the panel’s meetings thus far. We achieved a lot,” said human resource development minister Kapil Sibal, adding there was consensus on 80 to 85 per cent of the 40 contentious points. He, however, admitted “complete disagreement” on several key points. Sibal stressed the discussions took place in a “non-acrimonious atmosphere”, contrasting it with earlier meetings that had ended in rancour. The points of divergence included those related to the power and structure of the Lokpal, Sibal said, adding these would be spelt out once the final draft was put together. Hazare group member Arvind Kejriwal said they had disagreed over the “whole model” and claimed another key matter didn’t even figure in the meeting. “The issue of bringing the Prime Minister under the Lokpal was not discussed today.” Kejriwal said the government had circulated an exhaustive note which detailed the areas of agreement and disagreement. He added that out of the 40 issues raised by the Hazare team, the government had agreed on 11 — around 27.5 per cent. The panel will meet tomorrow for the last time to exchange drafts. The two sides will then email each other their critiques of the blueprints before it is sent to the cabinet by the June 30 deadline. The government will convene an all-party meeting next month to discuss the draft bill before it is tabled in Parliament’s monsoon session. Several parties, including the BJP, have criticised the government for not consulting them and setting up the drafting committee with the Hazare group. The Centre now wants to broadbase its consultations. “Political parties will be consulted sometime in July... I think there ultimately will be a strong Lokpal,” said Sibal. Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, another Hazare group member, also described the meeting as cordial but said disagreements persisted over key issues like the composition of the committee to appoint the Lokpal and the removal procedure. PM calls meet Manmohan Singh has convened a meeting of UPA leaders to get their views on the Lokpal bill, especially on the question of whether Prime Ministers should be brought under its purview, according to PTI. The ruling allies don’t agree on the issue. The Congress and NCP oppose the provision but the DMK reportedly favours it. |