Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4261,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&amp;rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &amp;quot;India Shining&amp;quot; story.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &amp;mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &amp;mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government&#039;s efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &amp;mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India&#039;s financial capital rated the government&#039;s performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government&#039;s performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn&#039;t know how the &amp;quot;other half&amp;quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And here&#039;s a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &amp;mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &amp;quot;lack of effective distribution&amp;quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &amp;mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn&#039;t.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;We&#039;ll leave that for a future survey.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 15 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor/Article1-626773.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4352,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4261,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Poverty,rural development,NREGS&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;


Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&amp;rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &amp;quot;India Shining&amp;quot; story.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &amp;mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &amp;mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government&#039;s efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &amp;mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India&#039;s financial capital rated the government&#039;s performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government&#039;s performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn&#039;t know how the &amp;quot;other half&amp;quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And here&#039;s a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &amp;mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &amp;quot;lack of effective distribution&amp;quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &amp;mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn&#039;t.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;We&#039;ll leave that for a future survey.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4261,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&amp;rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &amp;quot;India Shining&amp;quot; story.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &amp;mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &amp;mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government&#039;s efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &amp;mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India&#039;s financial capital rated the government&#039;s performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government&#039;s performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn&#039;t know how the &amp;quot;other half&amp;quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And here&#039;s a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &amp;mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &amp;quot;lack of effective distribution&amp;quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &amp;mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn&#039;t.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;We&#039;ll leave that for a future survey.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 15 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor/Article1-626773.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4352,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4261
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Poverty,rural development,NREGS&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;


Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&amp;rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &amp;quot;India Shining&amp;quot; story.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &amp;mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &amp;mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government&#039;s efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &amp;mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India&#039;s financial capital rated the government&#039;s performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government&#039;s performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn&#039;t know how the &amp;quot;other half&amp;quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And here&#039;s a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &amp;mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &amp;quot;lack of effective distribution&amp;quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &amp;mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn&#039;t.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;We&#039;ll leave that for a future survey.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="


Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &quot;India Shining&quot; story.</font><br /><br /><font >A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.</font><br /><br /><font >But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government's efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.</font><br /><br /><font >A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.</font><br /><br /><font >The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.</font><br /><br /><font >Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.</font><br /><br /><font >Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India's financial capital rated the government's performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.</font><br /><br /><font >And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government's performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.</font><br /><br /><font >It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn't know how the &quot;other half&quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.</font><br /><br /><font >And here's a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &quot;lack of effective distribution&quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.</font><br /><br /><font >And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the</font><br /><br /><font >central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.</font><br /><br /><font >And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn't.</font><br /><br /><font >Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?</font><br /><br /><font >We'll leave that for a future survey.</font></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4261,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&amp;rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &amp;quot;India Shining&amp;quot; story.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &amp;mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &amp;mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government&#039;s efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &amp;mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India&#039;s financial capital rated the government&#039;s performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government&#039;s performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn&#039;t know how the &amp;quot;other half&amp;quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And here&#039;s a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &amp;mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &amp;quot;lack of effective distribution&amp;quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &amp;mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn&#039;t.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;We&#039;ll leave that for a future survey.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 15 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor/Article1-626773.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4352,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4261,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Poverty,rural development,NREGS&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;


Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&amp;rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &amp;quot;India Shining&amp;quot; story.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &amp;mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &amp;mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government&#039;s efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &amp;mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India&#039;s financial capital rated the government&#039;s performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government&#039;s performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn&#039;t know how the &amp;quot;other half&amp;quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And here&#039;s a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &amp;mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &amp;quot;lack of effective distribution&amp;quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &amp;mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn&#039;t.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;We&#039;ll leave that for a future survey.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4261,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&amp;rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &amp;quot;India Shining&amp;quot; story.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &amp;mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &amp;mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government&#039;s efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &amp;mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India&#039;s financial capital rated the government&#039;s performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government&#039;s performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn&#039;t know how the &amp;quot;other half&amp;quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And here&#039;s a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &amp;mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &amp;quot;lack of effective distribution&amp;quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &amp;mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn&#039;t.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;We&#039;ll leave that for a future survey.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 15 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor/Article1-626773.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4352,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4261
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Poverty,rural development,NREGS&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;


Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&amp;rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &amp;quot;India Shining&amp;quot; story.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &amp;mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &amp;mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government&#039;s efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &amp;mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India&#039;s financial capital rated the government&#039;s performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government&#039;s performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn&#039;t know how the &amp;quot;other half&amp;quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And here&#039;s a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &amp;mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &amp;quot;lack of effective distribution&amp;quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &amp;mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn&#039;t.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;We&#039;ll leave that for a future survey.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="


Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &quot;India Shining&quot; story.</font><br /><br /><font >A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.</font><br /><br /><font >But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government's efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.</font><br /><br /><font >A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.</font><br /><br /><font >The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.</font><br /><br /><font >Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.</font><br /><br /><font >Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India's financial capital rated the government's performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.</font><br /><br /><font >And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government's performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.</font><br /><br /><font >It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn't know how the &quot;other half&quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.</font><br /><br /><font >And here's a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &quot;lack of effective distribution&quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.</font><br /><br /><font >And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the</font><br /><br /><font >central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.</font><br /><br /><font >And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn't.</font><br /><br /><font >Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?</font><br /><br /><font >We'll leave that for a future survey.</font></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ef6a740a0f6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4261,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&amp;rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &amp;quot;India Shining&amp;quot; story.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &amp;mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &amp;mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government&#039;s efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &amp;mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India&#039;s financial capital rated the government&#039;s performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government&#039;s performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn&#039;t know how the &amp;quot;other half&amp;quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And here&#039;s a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &amp;mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &amp;quot;lack of effective distribution&amp;quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &amp;mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn&#039;t.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;We&#039;ll leave that for a future survey.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 15 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor/Article1-626773.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4352,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4261,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Poverty,rural development,NREGS&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;


Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&amp;rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &amp;quot;India Shining&amp;quot; story.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &amp;mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &amp;mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government&#039;s efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &amp;mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India&#039;s financial capital rated the government&#039;s performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government&#039;s performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn&#039;t know how the &amp;quot;other half&amp;quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And here&#039;s a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &amp;mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &amp;quot;lack of effective distribution&amp;quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &amp;mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn&#039;t.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;We&#039;ll leave that for a future survey.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4261,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&amp;rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &amp;quot;India Shining&amp;quot; story.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &amp;mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &amp;mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government&#039;s efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &amp;mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India&#039;s financial capital rated the government&#039;s performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government&#039;s performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn&#039;t know how the &amp;quot;other half&amp;quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And here&#039;s a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &amp;mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &amp;quot;lack of effective distribution&amp;quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &amp;mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn&#039;t.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;We&#039;ll leave that for a future survey.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 15 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor/Article1-626773.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4352,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4261
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Poverty,rural development,NREGS&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;


Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;font &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&amp;rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &amp;quot;India Shining&amp;quot; story.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &amp;mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &amp;mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government&#039;s efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &amp;mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India&#039;s financial capital rated the government&#039;s performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government&#039;s performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn&#039;t know how the &amp;quot;other half&amp;quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And here&#039;s a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &amp;mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &amp;quot;lack of effective distribution&amp;quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &amp;mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn&#039;t.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;We&#039;ll leave that for a future survey.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="


Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &quot;India Shining&quot; story.</font><br /><br /><font >A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.</font><br /><br /><font >But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government's efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.</font><br /><br /><font >A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.</font><br /><br /><font >The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.</font><br /><br /><font >Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.</font><br /><br /><font >Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India's financial capital rated the government's performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.</font><br /><br /><font >And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government's performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.</font><br /><br /><font >It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn't know how the &quot;other half&quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.</font><br /><br /><font >And here's a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &quot;lack of effective distribution&quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.</font><br /><br /><font >And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the</font><br /><br /><font >central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.</font><br /><br /><font >And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn't.</font><br /><br /><font >Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?</font><br /><br /><font >We'll leave that for a future survey.</font></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 4261,
		'title' => 'Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br />
</font>
<div align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &quot;India Shining&quot; story.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government's efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India's financial capital rated the government's performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government's performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn't know how the &quot;other half&quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And here's a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &quot;lack of effective distribution&quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn't.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">We'll leave that for a future survey.</font>
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 15 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor/Article1-626773.aspx',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4352,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 4261,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,rural development,NREGS',
	'metaDesc' => '


Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits...',
	'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &quot;India Shining&quot; story.</font><br /><br /><font >A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.</font><br /><br /><font >But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government's efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.</font><br /><br /><font >A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.</font><br /><br /><font >The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.</font><br /><br /><font >Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.</font><br /><br /><font >Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India's financial capital rated the government's performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.</font><br /><br /><font >And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government's performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.</font><br /><br /><font >It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn't know how the &quot;other half&quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.</font><br /><br /><font >And here's a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &quot;lack of effective distribution&quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.</font><br /><br /><font >And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the</font><br /><br /><font >central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.</font><br /><br /><font >And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn't.</font><br /><br /><font >Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?</font><br /><br /><font >We'll leave that for a future survey.</font></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 4261,
	'title' => 'Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br />
</font>
<div align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &quot;India Shining&quot; story.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government's efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India's financial capital rated the government's performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government's performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn't know how the &quot;other half&quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And here's a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &quot;lack of effective distribution&quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn't.</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?</font><br />
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">We'll leave that for a future survey.</font>
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 15 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor/Article1-626773.aspx',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'majority-of-indians-back-state-schemes-for-poor-4352',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4352,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 4261
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor'
$metaKeywords = 'Poverty,rural development,NREGS'
$metaDesc = '


Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits...'
$disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India&rsquo;s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the &quot;India Shining&quot; story.</font><br /><br /><font >A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents &mdash; cutting across age groups and locations &mdash; felt that such schemes could make a difference.</font><br /><br /><font >But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government's efforts at distributing benefits to the poor &mdash; 56% rate it as very bad or bad.</font><br /><br /><font >A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good.</font><br /><br /><font >The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore.</font><br /><br /><font >Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent.</font><br /><br /><font >Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India's financial capital rated the government's performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view.</font><br /><br /><font >And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government's performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence.</font><br /><br /><font >It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn't know how the &quot;other half&quot; lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai.</font><br /><br /><font >And here's a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain &mdash; 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted &quot;lack of effective distribution&quot; as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India.</font><br /><br /><font >And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the</font><br /><br /><font >central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice.</font><br /><br /><font >And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor &mdash; 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn't.</font><br /><br /><font >Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition?</font><br /><br /><font >We'll leave that for a future survey.</font></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Majority of Indians back state schemes for poor

Now, India is saying what the government already knew. Two-thirds of India (66%) feel government programmes like the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, Bharat Nirman and Rural Health Mission are the best way to ensure that the benefits of India’s steroid-charged growth rates reach those who have been left out of the "India Shining" story. A Hindustan Times-CNN IBN survey conducted by research organisation C fore of 1,621 adults across eight cities found that an overwhelming majority of respondents — cutting across age groups and locations — felt that such schemes could make a difference. But even as large sections of the population gave these schemes an overwhelming vote of confidence, they signalled their unhappiness over the government's efforts at distributing benefits to the poor — 56% rate it as very bad or bad. A further one-third feels it as average. And only 11% say it is excellent or good. The disappointment is most acute in Chandigarh (85%) and Bangaloreans (80%). In Chennai (52%) and Patna (56%), smaller majorities agreed with the majority opinion in Chandigarh and Bangalore. Residents of Kolkata and Delhi (45% each) and Mumbai (40%) were more charitable towards the government, but very few people, except in Mumbai, rated its performance as good or excellent. Almost one third of respondents (32%) in India's financial capital rated the government's performance at distributing benefits to the poor as either excellent or good. In fact, not a single respondent in Bangalore agreed with this view. And except for Kolkata, where 20% rated the government's performance as excellent or good, less than 15% gave the government its vote of confidence. It may be time to bury the notion that young India doesn't know how the "other half" lives. Our survey shows that 65% (only 1% less than the overall score) of young adults (between 18 and 30 years) are aware that food is a major problem even in cities like Delhi and Mumbai. And here's a strong message for those who oppose reforms in the food distribution chain — 40% of respondents, the single-largest group, voted "lack of effective distribution" as the primary reason for hunger and malnourishment in India. And the onus is on the government to make a difference. More than three out of five Indians (62%) said the central and state governments have to wake and deliver. Well, the people are putting their representatives on notice. And yes, Indians are divided over whether excess grains should be distributed free to the poor — 47% say it is a practical solution and 40% feel it isn't. Does this say something about our social conscience? Or does this point to the fact that India is a society in transition? We'll leave that for a future survey.