Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680030be12793-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680030be12793-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680030be12793-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13398, 'title' => 'Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill.</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though Thomas&rsquo; office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thomas&rsquo; visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre&rsquo;s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee&rsquo;s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s heart. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions &ldquo;to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.&rdquo; Banerjee&rsquo;s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded &lsquo;universal coverage&rsquo; under the proposed food security net. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal&rsquo;s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Deccan Herald, 4 March, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/232112/mamata-shuns-centre-food-bill.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13520, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13398, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill. Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas,...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill.</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though Thomas&rsquo; office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Thomas&rsquo; visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre&rsquo;s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee&rsquo;s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s heart.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions &ldquo;to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.&rdquo; Banerjee&rsquo;s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded &lsquo;universal coverage&rsquo; under the proposed food security net.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal&rsquo;s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13398, 'title' => 'Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill.</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though Thomas&rsquo; office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thomas&rsquo; visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre&rsquo;s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee&rsquo;s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s heart. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions &ldquo;to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.&rdquo; Banerjee&rsquo;s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded &lsquo;universal coverage&rsquo; under the proposed food security net. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal&rsquo;s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Deccan Herald, 4 March, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/232112/mamata-shuns-centre-food-bill.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13520, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13398 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill. Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas,...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill.</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though Thomas&rsquo; office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Thomas&rsquo; visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre&rsquo;s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee&rsquo;s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s heart.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions &ldquo;to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.&rdquo; Banerjee&rsquo;s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded &lsquo;universal coverage&rsquo; under the proposed food security net.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal&rsquo;s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre’s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress’ support for the National Food Security Bill. Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre’s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress’ support for the National Food Security Bill.</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though Thomas’ office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Thomas’ visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre’s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee’s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi’s heart.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions “to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.” Banerjee’s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded ‘universal coverage’ under the proposed food security net.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal’s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680030be12793-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680030be12793-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680030be12793-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13398, 'title' => 'Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill.</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though Thomas&rsquo; office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thomas&rsquo; visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre&rsquo;s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee&rsquo;s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s heart. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions &ldquo;to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.&rdquo; Banerjee&rsquo;s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded &lsquo;universal coverage&rsquo; under the proposed food security net. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal&rsquo;s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Deccan Herald, 4 March, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/232112/mamata-shuns-centre-food-bill.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13520, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13398, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill. Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas,...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill.</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though Thomas&rsquo; office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Thomas&rsquo; visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre&rsquo;s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee&rsquo;s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s heart.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions &ldquo;to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.&rdquo; Banerjee&rsquo;s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded &lsquo;universal coverage&rsquo; under the proposed food security net.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal&rsquo;s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13398, 'title' => 'Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill.</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though Thomas&rsquo; office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thomas&rsquo; visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre&rsquo;s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee&rsquo;s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s heart. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions &ldquo;to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.&rdquo; Banerjee&rsquo;s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded &lsquo;universal coverage&rsquo; under the proposed food security net. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal&rsquo;s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Deccan Herald, 4 March, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/232112/mamata-shuns-centre-food-bill.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13520, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13398 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill. Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas,...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill.</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though Thomas&rsquo; office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Thomas&rsquo; visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre&rsquo;s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee&rsquo;s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s heart.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions &ldquo;to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.&rdquo; Banerjee&rsquo;s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded &lsquo;universal coverage&rsquo; under the proposed food security net.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal&rsquo;s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre’s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress’ support for the National Food Security Bill. Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre’s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress’ support for the National Food Security Bill.</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though Thomas’ office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Thomas’ visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre’s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee’s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi’s heart.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions “to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.” Banerjee’s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded ‘universal coverage’ under the proposed food security net.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal’s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680030be12793-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680030be12793-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680030be12793-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680030be12793-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13398, 'title' => 'Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill.</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though Thomas&rsquo; office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thomas&rsquo; visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre&rsquo;s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee&rsquo;s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s heart. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions &ldquo;to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.&rdquo; Banerjee&rsquo;s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded &lsquo;universal coverage&rsquo; under the proposed food security net. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal&rsquo;s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Deccan Herald, 4 March, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/232112/mamata-shuns-centre-food-bill.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13520, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13398, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill. Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas,...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill.</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though Thomas&rsquo; office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Thomas&rsquo; visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre&rsquo;s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee&rsquo;s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s heart.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions &ldquo;to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.&rdquo; Banerjee&rsquo;s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded &lsquo;universal coverage&rsquo; under the proposed food security net.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal&rsquo;s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13398, 'title' => 'Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill.</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though Thomas&rsquo; office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thomas&rsquo; visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre&rsquo;s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee&rsquo;s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s heart. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions &ldquo;to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.&rdquo; Banerjee&rsquo;s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded &lsquo;universal coverage&rsquo; under the proposed food security net. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal&rsquo;s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Deccan Herald, 4 March, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/232112/mamata-shuns-centre-food-bill.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13520, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13398 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill. Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas,...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre&rsquo;s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress&rsquo; support for the National Food Security Bill.</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though Thomas&rsquo; office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">Thomas&rsquo; visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre&rsquo;s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee&rsquo;s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi&rsquo;s heart.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions &ldquo;to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.&rdquo; Banerjee&rsquo;s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded &lsquo;universal coverage&rsquo; under the proposed food security net.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal&rsquo;s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre’s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress’ support for the National Food Security Bill. Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre’s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress’ support for the National Food Security Bill.</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though Thomas’ office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Thomas’ visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre’s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee’s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi’s heart.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions “to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.” Banerjee’s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded ‘universal coverage’ under the proposed food security net.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal’s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13398, 'title' => 'Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre’s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress’ support for the National Food Security Bill.</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though Thomas’ office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thomas’ visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre’s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee’s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi’s heart. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions “to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.” Banerjee’s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded ‘universal coverage’ under the proposed food security net. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal’s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Deccan Herald, 4 March, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/232112/mamata-shuns-centre-food-bill.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13520, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13398, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik', 'metaKeywords' => 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security', 'metaDesc' => ' West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre’s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress’ support for the National Food Security Bill. Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas,...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre’s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress’ support for the National Food Security Bill.</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though Thomas’ office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Thomas’ visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre’s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee’s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi’s heart.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions “to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.” Banerjee’s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded ‘universal coverage’ under the proposed food security net.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal’s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13398, 'title' => 'Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre’s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress’ support for the National Food Security Bill.</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Though Thomas’ office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Thomas’ visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre’s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee’s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi’s heart. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions “to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.” Banerjee’s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded ‘universal coverage’ under the proposed food security net. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal’s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Deccan Herald, 4 March, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/232112/mamata-shuns-centre-food-bill.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'mamata-shuns-centre-on-food-bill-by-anirban-bhaumik-13520', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13520, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13398 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik' $metaKeywords = 'food security bill,Right to Food,Food Security' $metaDesc = ' West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre’s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress’ support for the National Food Security Bill. Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas,...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre’s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress’ support for the National Food Security Bill.</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Though Thomas’ office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">Thomas’ visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre’s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee’s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi’s heart.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions “to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.” Banerjee’s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded ‘universal coverage’ under the proposed food security net.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal’s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Mamata shuns Centre on Food Bill by Anirban Bhaumik |
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has once again cold-shouldered the Centre’s overtures to win the Trinamool Congress’ support for the National Food Security Bill. Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, K V Thomas, visited Kolkata on Friday, but returned without meeting Banerjee. Though Thomas’ office had written to Banerjee to propose the meeting to allay concerns of the Bengal government over the bill, it did nor finally materialise. Thomas’ visit to Kolkata was apparently in line with the Centre’s efforts to lessen chances of confrontation with Banerjee’s TMC over the bill considered close to Sonia Gandhi’s heart. The bill was introduced in Lok Sabha on December 22 last year. It is now being vetted by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution. The Congress hopes that the Bill, if passed by the Parliament, would boost its chances in the 2014 general election, as much as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had in 2009. While 75 per cent of the rural population will be covered by the food security net that the proposed legislation seeks to lay down, 46 per cent of them will be designated as priority households. Half of the urban population will be covered by the proposed legislation, while 28 per cent of them will be tagged as priority households. But West Bengal Government pointed out that the NFSB should have some provisions “to allow the state government, in the interest of social justice, to modify, include or exclude certain categories of people in the priority and general household groups in view of the certain local conditions prevailing in the State.” Banerjee’s Government also declined to take any additional financial burden that the proposed legislation might result in. The Janata Dal (United) government in Bihar also opposed the imposition of criteria and limit on the number of beneficiaries by the Centre. The All India Anna Dravida Munnethra Kazhagam Government in Tamil Nadu too demanded ‘universal coverage’ under the proposed food security net. The union Ministry of Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution argued that the perception of some States about the coverage under Targeted Public Distribution System provided in the Bill being restrictive was misplaced. Thomas said that the State Governments should not feel that the NFSB would come in the way of the universal PDS being implemented by them with much higher coverage. The Food minister however did not get the opportunity to meet Banerjee. He instead met the West Bengal’s Governor M K Narayanan, apart from some high officials of the state government before returning to New Delhi.
|