Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6815224114440-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6815224114440-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6815224114440-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8561,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-Press Trust of India 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Goa, known to many as &amp;quot;Pearl of the Orient&amp;quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa&#039;s population is 1,457,723.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &amp;quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&amp;quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 26 June, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/MGNREGA-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas/Article1-713938.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8662,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8561,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;NREGS&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Press Trust of India 


&amp;nbsp;


In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-Press Trust of India &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Goa, known to many as &amp;quot;Pearl of the Orient&amp;quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa&#039;s population is 1,457,723.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &amp;quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&amp;quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8561,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-Press Trust of India 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Goa, known to many as &amp;quot;Pearl of the Orient&amp;quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa&#039;s population is 1,457,723.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &amp;quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&amp;quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 26 June, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/MGNREGA-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas/Article1-713938.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8662,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8561
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;NREGS&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Press Trust of India 


&amp;nbsp;


In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-Press Trust of India &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Goa, known to many as &amp;quot;Pearl of the Orient&amp;quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa&#039;s population is 1,457,723.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &amp;quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&amp;quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Press Trust of India 


&nbsp;


In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government's flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-Press Trust of India </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government's flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.<br /><br />The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.<br /><br />According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.<br /><br />Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.<br /><br />In Goa, known to many as &quot;Pearl of the Orient&quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa's population is 1,457,723.<br /><br />In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.<br /><br />In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.<br /><br />Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.<br /><br />The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.<br /><br />The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.<br /><br />The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.<br /><br />The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.<br /><br />It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.<br /><br />Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.<br /><br />A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6815224114440-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6815224114440-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6815224114440-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8561,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-Press Trust of India 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Goa, known to many as &amp;quot;Pearl of the Orient&amp;quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa&#039;s population is 1,457,723.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &amp;quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&amp;quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 26 June, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/MGNREGA-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas/Article1-713938.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8662,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8561,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;NREGS&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Press Trust of India 


&amp;nbsp;


In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-Press Trust of India &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Goa, known to many as &amp;quot;Pearl of the Orient&amp;quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa&#039;s population is 1,457,723.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &amp;quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&amp;quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8561,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-Press Trust of India 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Goa, known to many as &amp;quot;Pearl of the Orient&amp;quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa&#039;s population is 1,457,723.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &amp;quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&amp;quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 26 June, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/MGNREGA-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas/Article1-713938.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8662,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8561
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;NREGS&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Press Trust of India 


&amp;nbsp;


In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-Press Trust of India &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Goa, known to many as &amp;quot;Pearl of the Orient&amp;quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa&#039;s population is 1,457,723.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &amp;quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&amp;quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Press Trust of India 


&nbsp;


In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government's flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-Press Trust of India </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government's flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.<br /><br />The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.<br /><br />According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.<br /><br />Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.<br /><br />In Goa, known to many as &quot;Pearl of the Orient&quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa's population is 1,457,723.<br /><br />In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.<br /><br />In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.<br /><br />Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.<br /><br />The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.<br /><br />The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.<br /><br />The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.<br /><br />The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.<br /><br />It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.<br /><br />Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.<br /><br />A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6815224114440-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6815224114440-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6815224114440-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6815224114440-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8561,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-Press Trust of India 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Goa, known to many as &amp;quot;Pearl of the Orient&amp;quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa&#039;s population is 1,457,723.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &amp;quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&amp;quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 26 June, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/MGNREGA-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas/Article1-713938.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8662,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8561,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;NREGS&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Press Trust of India 


&amp;nbsp;


In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-Press Trust of India &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Goa, known to many as &amp;quot;Pearl of the Orient&amp;quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa&#039;s population is 1,457,723.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &amp;quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&amp;quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 8561,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-Press Trust of India 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Goa, known to many as &amp;quot;Pearl of the Orient&amp;quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa&#039;s population is 1,457,723.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &amp;quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&amp;quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 26 June, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/MGNREGA-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas/Article1-713938.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 8662,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 8561
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;NREGS&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Press Trust of India 


&amp;nbsp;


In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-Press Trust of India &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government&#039;s flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Goa, known to many as &amp;quot;Pearl of the Orient&amp;quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa&#039;s population is 1,457,723.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &amp;quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&amp;quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp;amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Press Trust of India 


&nbsp;


In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government's flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-Press Trust of India </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government's flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.<br /><br />The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.<br /><br />According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.<br /><br />Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.<br /><br />In Goa, known to many as &quot;Pearl of the Orient&quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa's population is 1,457,723.<br /><br />In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.<br /><br />In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.<br /><br />Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.<br /><br />The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.<br /><br />The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.<br /><br />The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.<br /><br />The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.<br /><br />It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.<br /><br />Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.<br /><br />A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 8561,
		'title' => 'MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<p>
-Press Trust of India 
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="justify">
In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government's flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.<br />
<br />
The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.<br />
<br />
According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.<br />
<br />
Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.<br />
<br />
In Goa, known to many as &quot;Pearl of the Orient&quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa's population is 1,457,723.<br />
<br />
In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.<br />
<br />
In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.<br />
<br />
Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.<br />
<br />
The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.<br />
<br />
The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.<br />
<br />
The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.<br />
<br />
The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.<br />
<br />
It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.<br />
<br />
Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.<br />
<br />
A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 26 June, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/MGNREGA-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas/Article1-713938.aspx',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 8662,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 8561,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas',
	'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS',
	'metaDesc' => '
-Press Trust of India 


&nbsp;


In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government's flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu...',
	'disp' => '<p>-Press Trust of India </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government's flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.<br /><br />The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.<br /><br />According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.<br /><br />Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.<br /><br />In Goa, known to many as &quot;Pearl of the Orient&quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa's population is 1,457,723.<br /><br />In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.<br /><br />In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.<br /><br />Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.<br /><br />The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.<br /><br />The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.<br /><br />The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.<br /><br />The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.<br /><br />It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.<br /><br />Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.<br /><br />A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 8561,
	'title' => 'MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<p>
-Press Trust of India 
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="justify">
In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government's flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.<br />
<br />
The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.<br />
<br />
According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.<br />
<br />
Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.<br />
<br />
In Goa, known to many as &quot;Pearl of the Orient&quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa's population is 1,457,723.<br />
<br />
In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.<br />
<br />
In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.<br />
<br />
Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.<br />
<br />
The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.<br />
<br />
The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.<br />
<br />
The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.<br />
<br />
The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.<br />
<br />
It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.<br />
<br />
Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.<br />
<br />
A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 26 June, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/MGNREGA-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas/Article1-713938.aspx',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'mgnrega-not-a-hit-in-far-off-areas-8662',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 8662,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 8561
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas'
$metaKeywords = 'NREGS'
$metaDesc = '
-Press Trust of India 


&nbsp;


In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government's flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu...'
$disp = '<p>-Press Trust of India </p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government's flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year.<br /><br />The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009.<br /><br />According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar &amp; Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853.<br /><br />Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull.<br /><br />In Goa, known to many as &quot;Pearl of the Orient&quot;, a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa's population is 1,457,723.<br /><br />In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as &quot;weather window to the Indian Peninsula&quot;, a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944.<br /><br />In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11.<br /><br />Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme.<br /><br />The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar &amp; Nagar Haveli in 2010-11.<br /><br />The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period.<br /><br />The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11.<br /><br />The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period.<br /><br />It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme.<br /><br />Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said.<br /><br />A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

MGNREGA not a hit in far off areas

-Press Trust of India   In spite of achieving success in the bigger states, the UPA government's flagship MGNREGA scheme appears to have failed in fulfilling its objective in small and remote places like Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. According to Rural Development Ministry data, no household or person was provided employment under the scheme in Daman and Diu in 2010-11, while it was only 2290 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli in the last financial year. The programme which was introduced in 2006-07 was extended across the country in 2009. According to the provisional report of Census 2011 released last week, Daman and Diu has a population of 2,42,911 and that of Dadar & Nagar Haveli is 3,42,853. Though the total number of households provided job under the programme were in four and five digits in Goa, Andaman and Nicobar and Lakshadweep, their performance under the scheme remained dull. In Goa, known to many as "Pearl of the Orient", a total number of 13,897 households were provided job under the scheme in 2010-11, the ministry data said. Goa's population is 1,457,723. In Andaman and Nicobar, referred to as "weather window to the Indian Peninsula", a total of 17,636 households were provided job under the scheme in the last financial year. Its population is 3,79,944. In Lakshadweep, 4507 households were given employment during the period while it was 38,118 in Pondicherry during 2010-11. Even if the households provided jobs in these small and remote state was low, only a limited number of them availed 100 days of employment, as promised in the scheme. The figures show that no household availed 100 days of employment under the scheme in Dadar & Nagar Haveli in 2010-11. The scenario was no good in other areas. While 174 households availed 100 days employment in Andaman and Nicobar it was 413 in Goa, Lakshdweep (71) and Pondicherry (137) during 2010-11 period. The financial statement of the scheme says that Rs 11.99 crore was made available to Andaman and Nicobar under the scheme in the fiscal 2010-11. The same was Rs 1.27 crore for Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (Rs 16.10 crore), Lakshdweep (Rs 5.80 cr) and Pondicherry (Rs 5.80 crore) during the period. It was no no better in the previous financial year 2009-10 too in these places in terms of physical achievements despite the centre pumping handsome cash under the scheme. Number of households completing 100 days employment in 2009-10 was 24 in Dadar and Nagar Haveli, Goa (121),Lakshdweep (20) and Pondicherry (385), the figures said. A senior officer of Union Rural Development Ministry involved with the MGNREGA scheme admitted low key implementation of the scheme in these far off places and said steps would be taken to improve it.