Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/mine-and-theirs-6591/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/mine-and-theirs-6591/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/mine-and-theirs-6591/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/mine-and-theirs-6591/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68084c59e6c07-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68084c59e6c07-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68084c59e6c07-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6495,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Mine and theirs&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &amp;ldquo;shared&amp;rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &amp;ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&amp;rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &amp;ldquo;social responsibility&amp;rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&amp;rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &amp;mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&amp;rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&amp;rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 15 March, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/mine-and-theirs/762408/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;mine-and-theirs-6591&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6591,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6495,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mine and theirs&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Mining&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &amp;ldquo;shared&amp;rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &amp;ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&amp;rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &amp;ldquo;social responsibility&amp;rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&amp;rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &amp;mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&amp;rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&amp;rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6495,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Mine and theirs&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &amp;ldquo;shared&amp;rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &amp;ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&amp;rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &amp;ldquo;social responsibility&amp;rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&amp;rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &amp;mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&amp;rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&amp;rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 15 March, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/mine-and-theirs/762408/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;mine-and-theirs-6591&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6591,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6495
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mine and theirs&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Mining&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &amp;ldquo;shared&amp;rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &amp;ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&amp;rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &amp;ldquo;social responsibility&amp;rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&amp;rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &amp;mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&amp;rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&amp;rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/mine-and-theirs-6591.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mine and theirs | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Mine and theirs</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-<br /><br />ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &ldquo;shared&rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&rdquo;<br /><br />Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &ldquo;social responsibility&rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. <br /><br />This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68084c59e6c07-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68084c59e6c07-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68084c59e6c07-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6495,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Mine and theirs&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &amp;ldquo;shared&amp;rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &amp;ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&amp;rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &amp;ldquo;social responsibility&amp;rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&amp;rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &amp;mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&amp;rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&amp;rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 15 March, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/mine-and-theirs/762408/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;mine-and-theirs-6591&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6591,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6495,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mine and theirs&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Mining&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &amp;ldquo;shared&amp;rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &amp;ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&amp;rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &amp;ldquo;social responsibility&amp;rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&amp;rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &amp;mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&amp;rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&amp;rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6495,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Mine and theirs&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &amp;ldquo;shared&amp;rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &amp;ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&amp;rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &amp;ldquo;social responsibility&amp;rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&amp;rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &amp;mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&amp;rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&amp;rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 15 March, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/mine-and-theirs/762408/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;mine-and-theirs-6591&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6591,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6495
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mine and theirs&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Mining&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &amp;ldquo;shared&amp;rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &amp;ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&amp;rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &amp;ldquo;social responsibility&amp;rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&amp;rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &amp;mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&amp;rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&amp;rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/mine-and-theirs-6591.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mine and theirs | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Mine and theirs</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-<br /><br />ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &ldquo;shared&rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&rdquo;<br /><br />Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &ldquo;social responsibility&rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. <br /><br />This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68084c59e6c07-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68084c59e6c07-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68084c59e6c07-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68084c59e6c07-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6495,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Mine and theirs&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &amp;ldquo;shared&amp;rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &amp;ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&amp;rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &amp;ldquo;social responsibility&amp;rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&amp;rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &amp;mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&amp;rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&amp;rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 15 March, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/mine-and-theirs/762408/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;mine-and-theirs-6591&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6591,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6495,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mine and theirs&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Mining&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &amp;ldquo;shared&amp;rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &amp;ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&amp;rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &amp;ldquo;social responsibility&amp;rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&amp;rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &amp;mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&amp;rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&amp;rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6495,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Mine and theirs&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &amp;ldquo;shared&amp;rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &amp;ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&amp;rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &amp;ldquo;social responsibility&amp;rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&amp;rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &amp;mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&amp;rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&amp;rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 15 March, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/mine-and-theirs/762408/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;mine-and-theirs-6591&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6591,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6495
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mine and theirs&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Mining&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&amp;rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &amp;mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp;amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &amp;mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &amp;ldquo;shared&amp;rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &amp;ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&amp;rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &amp;ldquo;social responsibility&amp;rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&amp;rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &amp;mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&amp;rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&amp;rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/mine-and-theirs-6591.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mine and theirs | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Mine and theirs</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-<br /><br />ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &ldquo;shared&rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&rdquo;<br /><br />Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &ldquo;social responsibility&rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. <br /><br />This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 6495,
		'title' => 'Mine and theirs',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-<br />
<br />
ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &ldquo;shared&rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &ldquo;social responsibility&rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. <br />
<br />
This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 15 March, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/mine-and-theirs/762408/',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'mine-and-theirs-6591',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 6591,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 6495,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mine and theirs',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Mining',
	'metaDesc' => '
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-<br /><br />ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &ldquo;shared&rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&rdquo;<br /><br />Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &ldquo;social responsibility&rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. <br /><br />This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 6495,
	'title' => 'Mine and theirs',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-<br />
<br />
ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &ldquo;shared&rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &ldquo;social responsibility&rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. <br />
<br />
This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 15 March, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/mine-and-theirs/762408/',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'mine-and-theirs-6591',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 6591,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 6495
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Mine and theirs'
$metaKeywords = 'Mining'
$metaDesc = '
The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India&rsquo;s outdated and archaic mining regulations &mdash; the Mines and Minerals (Development &amp; Regulation) Bill, 2010 &mdash; had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan-<br /><br />ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be &ldquo;shared&rdquo; with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, &ldquo;if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.&rdquo;<br /><br />Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it&rsquo;s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough &ldquo;social responsibility&rdquo; funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company&rsquo;s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. <br /><br />This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not &mdash; and thus who knows what sort of job they&rsquo;ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill&rsquo;s current mechanism does not seem to do the job. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Mine and theirs

The draft bill from the mines ministry that is meant to begin the overhaul of India’s outdated and archaic mining regulations — the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Bill, 2010 — had already been generally agreed to by the group of ministers scrutinising the legislation. Yet the deputy chairman of the Plan- ning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, has made a telling point or two about a particular provision in the bill: to ensure that 26 per cent of the net profits from mining should be “shared” with local populations. The exact mechanism of this provision is still a little hazy. But Ahluwalia is concerned, reportedly, about the more macro implications. He feels that, “if we end up with too high a cumulative royalty burden compared with international standards, this will only discourage future investments in the mining sector.” Even so, the argument for ensuring that mining industries are seen to be empowering local communities is strong. However, it’s questionable whether this is a sensible way of going about it. How would this work administratively, anyway? How will the money be distributed? Is it not likely that it will become just another way for companies to plough “social responsibility” funds into the favoured, cash-bleeding projects of those connected to the company’s management or owners? The problems with the implementation of this particular rule do not stop there, either. If the levy is 26 per cent of net profit, will not mining companies be able to fiddle their balance sheets in such a way that they get away with showing minimal net profit for the actual extractive business? That would not cause a reasonably competent accountant to break out in even a light sweat. This is a provision that needs to be thought through better. Areas that surround mining sites are some of the least developed, in terms of social indicators, in India. But the responsibility for increasing social indicators there cannot be shrugged off by government. And particularly not to individual companies. Governments are, in the end, accountable to people; mining companies are not — and thus who knows what sort of job they’ll do? The equitable sharing of super-normal mining profits is something we need to get done. One efficient way to do this would be at the stage at which mining rights are auctioned; we would also need a market-based system that automatically detects windfall profits, too. The bill’s current mechanism does not seem to do the job.