Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34172,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Minus money, PM &amp;#039;model&amp;#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &amp;quot;model villages&amp;quot; for others to emulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs&#039; participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &amp;quot;phase&amp;quot; of the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme&#039;s announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry&#039;s efforts last year to get some allocation for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&amp;quot; an official said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages &#039; adarsh&#039; in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&amp;quot; he told The Telegraph.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Still, since the act of &#039;adoption&#039; focuses some attention on the villages, I&#039;m likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 9 July, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682275,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 34172,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Minus money, PM &amp;#039;model&amp;#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Gram Panchayat,Gram Panchayats,Members of Parliament,pradhan mantri sansad adarsh gram yojana,rural development,Social Welfare&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.

Over a quarter into...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &amp;quot;model villages&amp;quot; for others to emulate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs&#039; participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &amp;quot;phase&amp;quot; of the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme&#039;s announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry&#039;s efforts last year to get some allocation for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&amp;quot; an official said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages &#039; adarsh&#039; in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&amp;quot; he told The Telegraph.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Still, since the act of &#039;adoption&#039; focuses some attention on the villages, I&#039;m likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34172,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Minus money, PM &amp;#039;model&amp;#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &amp;quot;model villages&amp;quot; for others to emulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs&#039; participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &amp;quot;phase&amp;quot; of the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme&#039;s announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry&#039;s efforts last year to get some allocation for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&amp;quot; an official said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages &#039; adarsh&#039; in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&amp;quot; he told The Telegraph.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Still, since the act of &#039;adoption&#039; focuses some attention on the villages, I&#039;m likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 9 July, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682275,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 34172
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Minus money, PM &amp;#039;model&amp;#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Gram Panchayat,Gram Panchayats,Members of Parliament,pradhan mantri sansad adarsh gram yojana,rural development,Social Welfare&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.

Over a quarter into...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &amp;quot;model villages&amp;quot; for others to emulate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs&#039; participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &amp;quot;phase&amp;quot; of the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme&#039;s announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry&#039;s efforts last year to get some allocation for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&amp;quot; an official said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages &#039; adarsh&#039; in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&amp;quot; he told The Telegraph.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Still, since the act of &#039;adoption&#039; focuses some attention on the villages, I&#039;m likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Minus money, PM &#039;model&#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.

Over a quarter into..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Minus money, PM &#039;model&#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.<br /><br />Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &quot;model villages&quot; for others to emulate.<br /><br />The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs' participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &quot;phase&quot; of the scheme.<br /><br />In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme's announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.<br /><br />Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.<br /><br />Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.<br /><br />That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.<br /><br />Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry's efforts last year to get some allocation for it.<br /><br />While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.<br /><br />To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.<br /><br />&quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&quot; an official said.<br /><br />But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.<br /><br />&quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages ' adarsh' in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&quot; he told The Telegraph.<br /><br />Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.<br /><br />&quot;Still, since the act of 'adoption' focuses some attention on the villages, I'm likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter">click here</a> to read more. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34172,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Minus money, PM &amp;#039;model&amp;#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &amp;quot;model villages&amp;quot; for others to emulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs&#039; participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &amp;quot;phase&amp;quot; of the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme&#039;s announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry&#039;s efforts last year to get some allocation for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&amp;quot; an official said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages &#039; adarsh&#039; in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&amp;quot; he told The Telegraph.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Still, since the act of &#039;adoption&#039; focuses some attention on the villages, I&#039;m likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 9 July, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682275,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 34172,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Minus money, PM &amp;#039;model&amp;#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Gram Panchayat,Gram Panchayats,Members of Parliament,pradhan mantri sansad adarsh gram yojana,rural development,Social Welfare&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.

Over a quarter into...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &amp;quot;model villages&amp;quot; for others to emulate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs&#039; participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &amp;quot;phase&amp;quot; of the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme&#039;s announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry&#039;s efforts last year to get some allocation for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&amp;quot; an official said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages &#039; adarsh&#039; in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&amp;quot; he told The Telegraph.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Still, since the act of &#039;adoption&#039; focuses some attention on the villages, I&#039;m likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34172,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Minus money, PM &amp;#039;model&amp;#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &amp;quot;model villages&amp;quot; for others to emulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs&#039; participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &amp;quot;phase&amp;quot; of the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme&#039;s announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry&#039;s efforts last year to get some allocation for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&amp;quot; an official said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages &#039; adarsh&#039; in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&amp;quot; he told The Telegraph.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Still, since the act of &#039;adoption&#039; focuses some attention on the villages, I&#039;m likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 9 July, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682275,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 34172
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Minus money, PM &amp;#039;model&amp;#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Gram Panchayat,Gram Panchayats,Members of Parliament,pradhan mantri sansad adarsh gram yojana,rural development,Social Welfare&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.

Over a quarter into...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &amp;quot;model villages&amp;quot; for others to emulate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs&#039; participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &amp;quot;phase&amp;quot; of the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme&#039;s announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry&#039;s efforts last year to get some allocation for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&amp;quot; an official said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages &#039; adarsh&#039; in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&amp;quot; he told The Telegraph.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Still, since the act of &#039;adoption&#039; focuses some attention on the villages, I&#039;m likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Minus money, PM &#039;model&#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.

Over a quarter into..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Minus money, PM &#039;model&#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.<br /><br />Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &quot;model villages&quot; for others to emulate.<br /><br />The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs' participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &quot;phase&quot; of the scheme.<br /><br />In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme's announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.<br /><br />Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.<br /><br />Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.<br /><br />That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.<br /><br />Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry's efforts last year to get some allocation for it.<br /><br />While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.<br /><br />To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.<br /><br />&quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&quot; an official said.<br /><br />But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.<br /><br />&quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages ' adarsh' in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&quot; he told The Telegraph.<br /><br />Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.<br /><br />&quot;Still, since the act of 'adoption' focuses some attention on the villages, I'm likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter">click here</a> to read more. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f266f3c1b1a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34172,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Minus money, PM &amp;#039;model&amp;#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &amp;quot;model villages&amp;quot; for others to emulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs&#039; participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &amp;quot;phase&amp;quot; of the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme&#039;s announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry&#039;s efforts last year to get some allocation for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&amp;quot; an official said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages &#039; adarsh&#039; in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&amp;quot; he told The Telegraph.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Still, since the act of &#039;adoption&#039; focuses some attention on the villages, I&#039;m likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 9 July, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682275,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 34172,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Minus money, PM &amp;#039;model&amp;#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Gram Panchayat,Gram Panchayats,Members of Parliament,pradhan mantri sansad adarsh gram yojana,rural development,Social Welfare&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.

Over a quarter into...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &amp;quot;model villages&amp;quot; for others to emulate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs&#039; participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &amp;quot;phase&amp;quot; of the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme&#039;s announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry&#039;s efforts last year to get some allocation for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&amp;quot; an official said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages &#039; adarsh&#039; in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&amp;quot; he told The Telegraph.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Still, since the act of &#039;adoption&#039; focuses some attention on the villages, I&#039;m likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 34172,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Minus money, PM &amp;#039;model&amp;#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &amp;quot;model villages&amp;quot; for others to emulate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs&#039; participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &amp;quot;phase&amp;quot; of the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme&#039;s announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry&#039;s efforts last year to get some allocation for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&amp;quot; an official said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages &#039; adarsh&#039; in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&amp;quot; he told The Telegraph.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Still, since the act of &#039;adoption&#039; focuses some attention on the villages, I&#039;m likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. 
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 9 July, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4682275,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 34172
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Minus money, PM &amp;#039;model&amp;#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Gram Panchayat,Gram Panchayats,Members of Parliament,pradhan mantri sansad adarsh gram yojana,rural development,Social Welfare&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.

Over a quarter into...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &amp;quot;model villages&amp;quot; for others to emulate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs&#039; participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &amp;quot;phase&amp;quot; of the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme&#039;s announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry&#039;s efforts last year to get some allocation for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&amp;quot; an official said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages &#039; adarsh&#039; in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&amp;quot; he told The Telegraph.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Still, since the act of &#039;adoption&#039; focuses some attention on the villages, I&#039;m likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot; title=&quot;https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter&quot;&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt; to read more. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Minus money, PM &#039;model&#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.

Over a quarter into..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Minus money, PM &#039;model&#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.<br /><br />Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &quot;model villages&quot; for others to emulate.<br /><br />The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs' participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &quot;phase&quot; of the scheme.<br /><br />In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme's announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.<br /><br />Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.<br /><br />Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.<br /><br />That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.<br /><br />Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry's efforts last year to get some allocation for it.<br /><br />While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.<br /><br />To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.<br /><br />&quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&quot; an official said.<br /><br />But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.<br /><br />&quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages ' adarsh' in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&quot; he told The Telegraph.<br /><br />Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.<br /><br />&quot;Still, since the act of 'adoption' focuses some attention on the villages, I'm likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter">click here</a> to read more. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 34172,
		'title' => 'Minus money, PM 'model' loses sheen -Anita Joshua',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.<br />
<br />
Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &quot;model villages&quot; for others to emulate.<br />
<br />
The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs' participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &quot;phase&quot; of the scheme.<br />
<br />
In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme's announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.<br />
<br />
Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.<br />
<br />
Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.<br />
<br />
That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.<br />
<br />
Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry's efforts last year to get some allocation for it.<br />
<br />
While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.<br />
<br />
To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.<br />
<br />
&quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&quot; an official said.<br />
<br />
But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.<br />
<br />
&quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages ' adarsh' in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&quot; he told The Telegraph.<br />
<br />
Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.<br />
<br />
&quot;Still, since the act of 'adoption' focuses some attention on the villages, I'm likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&quot; he said.<br />
<br />
Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter">click here</a> to read more. 
</div>
<div align="justify">
&nbsp;
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 July, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4682275,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 34172,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Minus money, PM &#039;model&#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Gram Panchayat,Gram Panchayats,Members of Parliament,pradhan mantri sansad adarsh gram yojana,rural development,Social Welfare',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.

Over a quarter into...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.<br /><br />Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &quot;model villages&quot; for others to emulate.<br /><br />The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs' participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &quot;phase&quot; of the scheme.<br /><br />In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme's announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.<br /><br />Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.<br /><br />Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.<br /><br />That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.<br /><br />Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry's efforts last year to get some allocation for it.<br /><br />While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.<br /><br />To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.<br /><br />&quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&quot; an official said.<br /><br />But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.<br /><br />&quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages ' adarsh' in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&quot; he told The Telegraph.<br /><br />Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.<br /><br />&quot;Still, since the act of 'adoption' focuses some attention on the villages, I'm likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter">click here</a> to read more. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 34172,
	'title' => 'Minus money, PM &#039;model&#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.<br />
<br />
Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &quot;model villages&quot; for others to emulate.<br />
<br />
The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs' participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &quot;phase&quot; of the scheme.<br />
<br />
In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme's announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.<br />
<br />
Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.<br />
<br />
Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.<br />
<br />
That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.<br />
<br />
Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry's efforts last year to get some allocation for it.<br />
<br />
While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.<br />
<br />
To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.<br />
<br />
&quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&quot; an official said.<br />
<br />
But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.<br />
<br />
&quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages ' adarsh' in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&quot; he told The Telegraph.<br />
<br />
Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.<br />
<br />
&quot;Still, since the act of 'adoption' focuses some attention on the villages, I'm likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&quot; he said.<br />
<br />
Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter">click here</a> to read more. 
</div>
<div align="justify">
&nbsp;
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 July, 2017, https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'minus-money-pm-039model039-loses-sheen-anita-joshua-4682275',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4682275,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 34172
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Minus money, PM &#039;model&#039; loses sheen -Anita Joshua'
$metaKeywords = 'Gram Panchayat,Gram Panchayats,Members of Parliament,pradhan mantri sansad adarsh gram yojana,rural development,Social Welfare'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.

Over a quarter into...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana.<br /><br />Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into &quot;model villages&quot; for others to emulate.<br /><br />The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs' participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second &quot;phase&quot; of the scheme.<br /><br />In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme's announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election.<br /><br />Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal.<br /><br />Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry.<br /><br />That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium.<br /><br />Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry's efforts last year to get some allocation for it.<br /><br />While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village.<br /><br />To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages.<br /><br />&quot;Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires,&quot; an official said.<br /><br />But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed.<br /><br />&quot;While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages ' adarsh' in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them,&quot; he told The Telegraph.<br /><br />Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal.<br /><br />&quot;Still, since the act of 'adoption' focuses some attention on the villages, I'm likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter" title="https://www.telegraphindia.com/1170710/jsp/nation/story_161121.jsp#.WWLgqt42YT0.twitter">click here</a> to read more. </div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Minus money, PM 'model' loses sheen -Anita Joshua

-The Telegraph New Delhi: Parliamentarians, even those from the BJP, have been dragging their feet for the second year in a row over adopting villages in their constituencies (or states) under the Pradhan Mantri Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana. Over a quarter into this fiscal, only 40 of the 788 MPs have identified gram panchayats for adoption under the programme, which mandates them to develop these villages into "model villages" for others to emulate. The reason the lawmakers cite is the absence of a specific fund allocation, which kept MPs' participation well below 50 per cent during the last financial year - the second "phase" of the scheme. In the first phase, which stretched from the scheme's announcement in October 2014 till the end of the 2015-16 fiscal, some 88 per cent of the MPs had joined in. The current phase, the third, is expected to be the last before the 2019 election. Only eight among the ministers - Sushma Swaraj, Ashok Gajapati Raju, M.J. Akbar, Nirmala Sitharaman, Piyush Goyal, Babul Supriyo and Vijay Goel, apart from Prime Minister Narendra Modi - have identified villages for adoption till date this fiscal. Modi is said to have identified one recently - his third after Jayapur and Nagepur -and the paperwork is still in progress as the name of Kakrahia is yet to make it to the central list maintained by the rural development ministry. That Kakrahia - known for its wrestlers - has been picked for adoption was announced by Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath last Sunday. Reports from Varanasi suggest that efforts are under way to locate a venue for a stadium. Interest in the scheme had flagged further with the finance ministry rejecting the rural development ministry's efforts last year to get some allocation for it. While the government wants the MPs to dip into their local area development funds for the purpose, the members are reluctant, highlighting the political costs of giving preferential treatment to one village. To skirt this problem, the rural development ministry, which oversees the programme, said that all its centrally sponsored schemes would be made available on priority for the selected villages. "Many of the existing schemes have been prioritised for implementation in model villages if an MP so desires," an official said. But the Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram, Shashi Tharoor, argued that separate funding was a must for the programme to succeed. "While I am doing what I can out of existing funds and schemes to help the adopted villages, I have no illusion that the very resources that had failed to make the villages ' adarsh' in the past will suddenly transform them because we have put a new label on them," he told The Telegraph. Tharoor had adopted villages in both the earlier phases but is yet to do so this fiscal. "Still, since the act of 'adoption' focuses some attention on the villages, I'm likely to adopt a village under Phase III as well, while still arguing for the central government to contribute additional resources under the scheme," he said. Off the record, members of ministerial staff aired the same scepticism. Asked why his minister had not adopted a village in the third phase, a staff member dismissed it as a programme meant for mere posturing. Please click here to read more.