Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f76a5d08344-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f76a5d08344-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f76a5d08344-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 33047, 'title' => 'Modi Government&#039;s Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -TheWire.in<br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> <em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget.</em> <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new &ldquo;record&rdquo;, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /> <br /> The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year&rsquo;s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year&rsquo;s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /> <br /> Highlighting this point, the People&rsquo;s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn&rsquo;t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /> <br /> Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister&rsquo;s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people&rsquo;s eyes?<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 February, 2017, https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4681134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 33047, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Modi Government&#039;s Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase', 'metaKeywords' => 'Union Budget,mgnrega,MGNREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' -TheWire.in &nbsp; Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget. &nbsp; New Delhi: The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-TheWire.in<br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget.</em> <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new &ldquo;record&rdquo;, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /><br />The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year&rsquo;s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year&rsquo;s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /><br />Highlighting this point, the People&rsquo;s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn&rsquo;t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /><br />Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister&rsquo;s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people&rsquo;s eyes?<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/" title="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 33047, 'title' => 'Modi Government&#039;s Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -TheWire.in<br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> <em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget.</em> <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new &ldquo;record&rdquo;, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /> <br /> The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year&rsquo;s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year&rsquo;s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /> <br /> Highlighting this point, the People&rsquo;s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn&rsquo;t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /> <br /> Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister&rsquo;s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people&rsquo;s eyes?<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 February, 2017, https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4681134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 33047 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Modi Government&#039;s Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase' $metaKeywords = 'Union Budget,mgnrega,MGNREGS' $metaDesc = ' -TheWire.in &nbsp; Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget. &nbsp; New Delhi: The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-TheWire.in<br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget.</em> <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new &ldquo;record&rdquo;, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /><br />The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year&rsquo;s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year&rsquo;s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /><br />Highlighting this point, the People&rsquo;s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn&rsquo;t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /><br />Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister&rsquo;s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people&rsquo;s eyes?<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/" title="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Modi Government's Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -TheWire.in Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there’s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year’s Budget. New Delhi: The finance minister claimed that this year’s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Modi Government's Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-TheWire.in<br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"><em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there’s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year’s Budget.</em> <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year’s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new “record”, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /><br />The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year’s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year’s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /><br />Highlighting this point, the People’s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn’t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /><br />Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister’s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people’s eyes?<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/" title="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f76a5d08344-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f76a5d08344-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f76a5d08344-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 33047, 'title' => 'Modi Government&#039;s Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -TheWire.in<br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> <em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget.</em> <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new &ldquo;record&rdquo;, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /> <br /> The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year&rsquo;s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year&rsquo;s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /> <br /> Highlighting this point, the People&rsquo;s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn&rsquo;t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /> <br /> Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister&rsquo;s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people&rsquo;s eyes?<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 February, 2017, https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4681134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 33047, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Modi Government&#039;s Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase', 'metaKeywords' => 'Union Budget,mgnrega,MGNREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' -TheWire.in &nbsp; Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget. &nbsp; New Delhi: The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-TheWire.in<br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget.</em> <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new &ldquo;record&rdquo;, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /><br />The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year&rsquo;s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year&rsquo;s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /><br />Highlighting this point, the People&rsquo;s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn&rsquo;t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /><br />Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister&rsquo;s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people&rsquo;s eyes?<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/" title="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 33047, 'title' => 'Modi Government&#039;s Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -TheWire.in<br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> <em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget.</em> <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new &ldquo;record&rdquo;, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /> <br /> The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year&rsquo;s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year&rsquo;s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /> <br /> Highlighting this point, the People&rsquo;s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn&rsquo;t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /> <br /> Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister&rsquo;s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people&rsquo;s eyes?<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 February, 2017, https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4681134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 33047 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Modi Government&#039;s Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase' $metaKeywords = 'Union Budget,mgnrega,MGNREGS' $metaDesc = ' -TheWire.in &nbsp; Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget. &nbsp; New Delhi: The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-TheWire.in<br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget.</em> <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new &ldquo;record&rdquo;, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /><br />The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year&rsquo;s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year&rsquo;s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /><br />Highlighting this point, the People&rsquo;s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn&rsquo;t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /><br />Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister&rsquo;s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people&rsquo;s eyes?<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/" title="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Modi Government's Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -TheWire.in Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there’s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year’s Budget. New Delhi: The finance minister claimed that this year’s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Modi Government's Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-TheWire.in<br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"><em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there’s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year’s Budget.</em> <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year’s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new “record”, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /><br />The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year’s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year’s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /><br />Highlighting this point, the People’s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn’t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /><br />Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister’s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people’s eyes?<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/" title="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f76a5d08344-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f76a5d08344-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f76a5d08344-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f76a5d08344-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 33047, 'title' => 'Modi Government&#039;s Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -TheWire.in<br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> <em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget.</em> <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new &ldquo;record&rdquo;, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /> <br /> The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year&rsquo;s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year&rsquo;s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /> <br /> Highlighting this point, the People&rsquo;s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn&rsquo;t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /> <br /> Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister&rsquo;s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people&rsquo;s eyes?<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 February, 2017, https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4681134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 33047, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Modi Government&#039;s Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase', 'metaKeywords' => 'Union Budget,mgnrega,MGNREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' -TheWire.in &nbsp; Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget. &nbsp; New Delhi: The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-TheWire.in<br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget.</em> <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new &ldquo;record&rdquo;, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /><br />The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year&rsquo;s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year&rsquo;s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /><br />Highlighting this point, the People&rsquo;s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn&rsquo;t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /><br />Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister&rsquo;s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people&rsquo;s eyes?<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/" title="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 33047, 'title' => 'Modi Government&#039;s Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -TheWire.in<br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> <em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget.</em> <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new &ldquo;record&rdquo;, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /> <br /> The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year&rsquo;s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year&rsquo;s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /> <br /> Highlighting this point, the People&rsquo;s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn&rsquo;t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /> <br /> Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister&rsquo;s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people&rsquo;s eyes?<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 February, 2017, https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4681134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 33047 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Modi Government&#039;s Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase' $metaKeywords = 'Union Budget,mgnrega,MGNREGS' $metaDesc = ' -TheWire.in &nbsp; Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget. &nbsp; New Delhi: The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-TheWire.in<br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there&rsquo;s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year&rsquo;s Budget.</em> <br /></div><div align="justify">&nbsp;</div><div align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year&rsquo;s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new &ldquo;record&rdquo;, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /><br />The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year&rsquo;s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year&rsquo;s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /><br />Highlighting this point, the People&rsquo;s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn&rsquo;t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /><br />Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister&rsquo;s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people&rsquo;s eyes?<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/" title="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Modi Government's Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -TheWire.in Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there’s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year’s Budget. New Delhi: The finance minister claimed that this year’s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Modi Government's Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-TheWire.in<br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"><em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there’s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year’s Budget.</em> <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year’s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new “record”, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /><br />The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year’s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year’s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /><br />Highlighting this point, the People’s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn’t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /><br />Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister’s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people’s eyes?<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/" title="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 33047, 'title' => 'Modi Government's Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -TheWire.in<br /> </div> <div align="justify"> </div> <div align="justify"> <em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there’s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year’s Budget.</em> <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> </div> <div align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year’s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new “record”, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /> <br /> The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year’s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year’s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /> <br /> Highlighting this point, the People’s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn’t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /> <br /> Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister’s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people’s eyes?<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 February, 2017, https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4681134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 33047, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Modi Government's Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase', 'metaKeywords' => 'Union Budget,mgnrega,MGNREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' -TheWire.in Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there’s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year’s Budget. New Delhi: The finance minister claimed that this year’s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-TheWire.in<br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"><em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there’s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year’s Budget.</em> <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year’s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new “record”, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /><br />The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year’s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year’s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /><br />Highlighting this point, the People’s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn’t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /><br />Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister’s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people’s eyes?<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/" title="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 33047, 'title' => 'Modi Government's Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -TheWire.in<br /> </div> <div align="justify"> </div> <div align="justify"> <em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there’s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year’s Budget.</em> <br /> </div> <div align="justify"> </div> <div align="justify"> <em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year’s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new “record”, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /> <br /> The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year’s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year’s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /> <br /> Highlighting this point, the People’s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn’t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /> <br /> Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister’s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people’s eyes?<br /> <br /> Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'TheWire.in, 1 February, 2017, https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'modi-government039s-budgetary-allocation-for-mnrega-is-barely-an-increase-4681134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4681134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 33047 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Modi Government's Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase' $metaKeywords = 'Union Budget,mgnrega,MGNREGS' $metaDesc = ' -TheWire.in Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there’s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year’s Budget. New Delhi: The finance minister claimed that this year’s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-TheWire.in<br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"><em>Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there’s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year’s Budget.</em> <br /></div><div align="justify"> </div><div align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>The finance minister claimed that this year’s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new “record”, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?<br /><br />The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year’s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year’s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%.<br /><br />Highlighting this point, the People’s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn’t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly.<br /><br />Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister’s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people’s eyes?<br /><br />Please <a href="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/" title="https://thewire.in/104882/modi-government-budget-mnrega/">click here</a> to read more. <br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Modi Government's Budgetary Allocation for MNREGA Is Barely an Increase |
-TheWire.in Two supplementary MNREGA allocations were made by the government last year. This means, there’s only a 1%, not 25%, actual increase in this year’s Budget. New Delhi: The finance minister claimed that this year’s Budget allocations for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) were a new “record”, at Rs 48,000 crore. But is this really a substantial increase? And, more importantly, is it enough?
The 2016-17 Budget had allocated Rs 38,500 crore for the scheme; if you compare this year’s number to that, you see an increase of 25%. But what these numbers (that Arun Jaitley proudly announced) hide is that two supplementary allocations were made in the last year, making the final allocation Rs 47,500 crore. The increase in this year’s allocation, then, is of a mere Rs 500 crore, or 1%. Highlighting this point, the People’s Action for Employment Guarantee (PAEG, which includes activists such as Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Annie Raja) has issued a press release that attempts to explain why this changed allotment isn’t really a considerable increase at all and why MNREGA would need higher allocations to function smoothly. Being a demand-driven scheme, adequate resources for MNREGA need to be made available whenever there is demand for it. At the moment, the statement says, 22 of 34 states and union territories have negative balances in their MNREGA accounts. According to government data for the last year, 93% of the funds available for MNREGA have been spent while Rs 3,469 crore in pending liabilities have piled up. Given this situation, which the government has admitted, was the finance minister’s proud half-announcement an attempt to pull wool over people’s eyes? Please click here to read more. |