Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681632ce649ea-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681632ce649ea-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681632ce649ea-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10376, 'title' => 'NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a &ldquo;Basket of Lokpal measures&rdquo; intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that &ldquo;different types of mal-governance&rdquo; required &ldquo;different types of processes and resolutions.&rdquo; And thus &ldquo;the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.&rdquo; Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent and accessible.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a &ldquo;system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.&rdquo; The Bill was envisioned in two parts &mdash; a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Separate law hailed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. &ldquo;Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,&rdquo; she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. &ldquo;Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.&rdquo; She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: &ldquo;The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.&rdquo; . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent&rdquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 12 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2529918.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10487, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10376, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm', 'metaKeywords' => 'Whistleblower Protection Law,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a &ldquo;Basket of Lokpal measures&rdquo; intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that &ldquo;different types of mal-governance&rdquo; required &ldquo;different types of processes and resolutions.&rdquo; And thus &ldquo;the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.&rdquo; Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent and accessible.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a &ldquo;system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.&rdquo; The Bill was envisioned in two parts &mdash; a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Separate law hailed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. &ldquo;Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,&rdquo; she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. &ldquo;Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.&rdquo; She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: &ldquo;The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.&rdquo; .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent&rdquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10376, 'title' => 'NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a &ldquo;Basket of Lokpal measures&rdquo; intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that &ldquo;different types of mal-governance&rdquo; required &ldquo;different types of processes and resolutions.&rdquo; And thus &ldquo;the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.&rdquo; Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent and accessible.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a &ldquo;system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.&rdquo; The Bill was envisioned in two parts &mdash; a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Separate law hailed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. &ldquo;Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,&rdquo; she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. &ldquo;Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.&rdquo; She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: &ldquo;The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.&rdquo; . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent&rdquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 12 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2529918.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10487, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10376 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm' $metaKeywords = 'Whistleblower Protection Law,Governance' $metaDesc = ' The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a &ldquo;Basket of Lokpal measures&rdquo; intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that &ldquo;different types of mal-governance&rdquo; required &ldquo;different types of processes and resolutions.&rdquo; And thus &ldquo;the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.&rdquo; Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent and accessible.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a &ldquo;system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.&rdquo; The Bill was envisioned in two parts &mdash; a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Separate law hailed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. &ldquo;Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,&rdquo; she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. &ldquo;Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.&rdquo; She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: &ldquo;The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.&rdquo; .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent&rdquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which — along with other civil society groups — held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which — along with other civil society groups — held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a “Basket of Lokpal measures” intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that “different types of mal-governance” required “different types of processes and resolutions.” And thus “the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.” Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent and accessible.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a “system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.” The Bill was envisioned in two parts — a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Separate law hailed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. “Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,” she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. “Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.” She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: “The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.” .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent”</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681632ce649ea-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681632ce649ea-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681632ce649ea-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10376, 'title' => 'NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a &ldquo;Basket of Lokpal measures&rdquo; intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that &ldquo;different types of mal-governance&rdquo; required &ldquo;different types of processes and resolutions.&rdquo; And thus &ldquo;the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.&rdquo; Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent and accessible.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a &ldquo;system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.&rdquo; The Bill was envisioned in two parts &mdash; a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Separate law hailed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. &ldquo;Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,&rdquo; she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. &ldquo;Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.&rdquo; She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: &ldquo;The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.&rdquo; . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent&rdquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 12 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2529918.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10487, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10376, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm', 'metaKeywords' => 'Whistleblower Protection Law,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a &ldquo;Basket of Lokpal measures&rdquo; intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that &ldquo;different types of mal-governance&rdquo; required &ldquo;different types of processes and resolutions.&rdquo; And thus &ldquo;the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.&rdquo; Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent and accessible.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a &ldquo;system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.&rdquo; The Bill was envisioned in two parts &mdash; a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Separate law hailed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. &ldquo;Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,&rdquo; she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. &ldquo;Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.&rdquo; She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: &ldquo;The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.&rdquo; .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent&rdquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10376, 'title' => 'NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a &ldquo;Basket of Lokpal measures&rdquo; intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that &ldquo;different types of mal-governance&rdquo; required &ldquo;different types of processes and resolutions.&rdquo; And thus &ldquo;the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.&rdquo; Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent and accessible.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a &ldquo;system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.&rdquo; The Bill was envisioned in two parts &mdash; a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Separate law hailed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. &ldquo;Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,&rdquo; she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. &ldquo;Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.&rdquo; She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: &ldquo;The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.&rdquo; . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent&rdquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 12 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2529918.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10487, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10376 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm' $metaKeywords = 'Whistleblower Protection Law,Governance' $metaDesc = ' The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a &ldquo;Basket of Lokpal measures&rdquo; intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that &ldquo;different types of mal-governance&rdquo; required &ldquo;different types of processes and resolutions.&rdquo; And thus &ldquo;the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.&rdquo; Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent and accessible.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a &ldquo;system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.&rdquo; The Bill was envisioned in two parts &mdash; a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Separate law hailed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. &ldquo;Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,&rdquo; she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. &ldquo;Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.&rdquo; She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: &ldquo;The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.&rdquo; .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent&rdquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which — along with other civil society groups — held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which — along with other civil society groups — held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a “Basket of Lokpal measures” intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that “different types of mal-governance” required “different types of processes and resolutions.” And thus “the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.” Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent and accessible.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a “system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.” The Bill was envisioned in two parts — a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Separate law hailed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. “Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,” she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. “Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.” She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: “The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.” .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent”</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681632ce649ea-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681632ce649ea-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681632ce649ea-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681632ce649ea-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10376, 'title' => 'NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a &ldquo;Basket of Lokpal measures&rdquo; intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that &ldquo;different types of mal-governance&rdquo; required &ldquo;different types of processes and resolutions.&rdquo; And thus &ldquo;the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.&rdquo; Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent and accessible.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a &ldquo;system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.&rdquo; The Bill was envisioned in two parts &mdash; a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Separate law hailed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. &ldquo;Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,&rdquo; she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. &ldquo;Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.&rdquo; She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: &ldquo;The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.&rdquo; . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent&rdquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 12 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2529918.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10487, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10376, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm', 'metaKeywords' => 'Whistleblower Protection Law,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a &ldquo;Basket of Lokpal measures&rdquo; intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that &ldquo;different types of mal-governance&rdquo; required &ldquo;different types of processes and resolutions.&rdquo; And thus &ldquo;the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.&rdquo; Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent and accessible.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a &ldquo;system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.&rdquo; The Bill was envisioned in two parts &mdash; a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Separate law hailed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. &ldquo;Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,&rdquo; she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. &ldquo;Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.&rdquo; She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: &ldquo;The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.&rdquo; .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent&rdquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10376, 'title' => 'NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a &ldquo;Basket of Lokpal measures&rdquo; intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that &ldquo;different types of mal-governance&rdquo; required &ldquo;different types of processes and resolutions.&rdquo; And thus &ldquo;the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.&rdquo; Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent and accessible.&rdquo; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a &ldquo;system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.&rdquo; The Bill was envisioned in two parts &mdash; a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Separate law hailed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. &ldquo;Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,&rdquo; she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. &ldquo;Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.&rdquo; She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: &ldquo;The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.&rdquo; . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent&rdquo;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 12 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2529918.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10487, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10376 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm' $metaKeywords = 'Whistleblower Protection Law,Governance' $metaDesc = ' The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which &mdash; along with other civil society groups &mdash; held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a &ldquo;Basket of Lokpal measures&rdquo; intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that &ldquo;different types of mal-governance&rdquo; required &ldquo;different types of processes and resolutions.&rdquo; And thus &ldquo;the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.&rdquo; Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent and accessible.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a &ldquo;system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.&rdquo; The Bill was envisioned in two parts &mdash; a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Separate law hailed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. &ldquo;Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,&rdquo; she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. &ldquo;Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.&rdquo; She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: &ldquo;The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.&rdquo; .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be &ldquo;decentralised, transparent&rdquo;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which — along with other civil society groups — held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which — along with other civil society groups — held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a “Basket of Lokpal measures” intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that “different types of mal-governance” required “different types of processes and resolutions.” And thus “the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.” Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent and accessible.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a “system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.” The Bill was envisioned in two parts — a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Separate law hailed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. “Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,” she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. “Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.” She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: “The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.” .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent”</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10376, 'title' => 'NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which — along with other civil society groups — held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a “Basket of Lokpal measures” intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that “different types of mal-governance” required “different types of processes and resolutions.” And thus “the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.” Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent and accessible.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a “system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.” The Bill was envisioned in two parts — a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Separate law hailed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. “Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,” she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. “Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.” She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: “The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.” . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent”</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 12 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2529918.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10487, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10376, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm', 'metaKeywords' => 'Whistleblower Protection Law,Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which — along with other civil society groups — held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which — along with other civil society groups — held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a “Basket of Lokpal measures” intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that “different types of mal-governance” required “different types of processes and resolutions.” And thus “the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.” Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent and accessible.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a “system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.” The Bill was envisioned in two parts — a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Separate law hailed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. “Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,” she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. “Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.” She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: “The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.” .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent”</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10376, 'title' => 'NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which — along with other civil society groups — held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a “Basket of Lokpal measures” intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that “different types of mal-governance” required “different types of processes and resolutions.” And thus “the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.” Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent and accessible.” </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a “system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.” The Bill was envisioned in two parts — a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>Separate law hailed</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. “Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,” she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. “Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.” She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: “The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.” . </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent”</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em><br /> </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 12 October, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/article2529918.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ncpri-brainstorms-grievance-redress-whistleblower-protection-by-vidya-subrahmanianm-10487', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10487, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10376 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm' $metaKeywords = 'Whistleblower Protection Law,Governance' $metaDesc = ' The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which — along with other civil society groups — held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which — along with other civil society groups — held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a “Basket of Lokpal measures” intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Aruna Roy clarifies</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that “different types of mal-governance” required “different types of processes and resolutions.” And thus “the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.” Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent and accessible.”</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a “system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.” The Bill was envisioned in two parts — a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Separate law hailed</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. “Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,” she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. “Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.” She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: “The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.” .</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent”</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>* Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service</em></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
NCPRI brainstorms Grievance Redress, Whistleblower Protection by Vidya Subrahmanianm |
The National Campaign for the People's Right to Information (NCPRI), which — along with other civil society groups — held a two-day convention here on its draft Bills on Grievance Redress and Whistleblower Protection, has urged the government immediately to put up the drafts for wide public consultation. Earlier this year, the NCPRI unveiled a “Basket of Lokpal measures” intended to address corruption and grievances relating to delivery of services. Among these were legislative initiatives for grievance redress and whistleblower protection. The two-day convention, split into several sector-specific workshops, was attended by a range of stakeholders, including people from the grassroots. There was also an open session for bureaucrats and politicians, including National Advisory Council member Harsh Mander, Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, former Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, and Members of Parliament Brinda Karat and D. Raja. Aruna Roy clarifies The rationale for the basket of measures as opposed to a single overarching Lokpal, was provided by NCPRI leading light Aruna Roy. She argued that “different types of mal-governance” required “different types of processes and resolutions.” And thus “the separation of legislation for corruption and grievances in the Lokpal Basket.” Ms. Roy said effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent and accessible.” In a concept note, the NCPRI said the Grievance Redress Bill's aim was to create a “system whereby common citizens can make the government answerable in terms of its functions, specifically in relation to its duties, commitments and obligations towards citizens.” The Bill was envisioned in two parts — a statement of obligations from each public authority and the means by which redress could be obtained in case the obligations were not met. Under the statement of obligations, each public authority would define the services and goods it provides besides detailing the processes by which these can be accessed and laying down individual responsibility for providing the services and goods. To redress grievance each public authority would have a designated Grievance Redress Officer (GRO) who would receive and dispose of complaints within a specified timeframe and fix responsibility for the grievance occurring in the first place. Each district would have a District Grievance Redress Authority (DGRA) exercising appellate powers over the GRO, and an appeal against the DGRA would lie with the State or the Central Grievance Redress Commission. Shekhar Singh of the NCPRI equated non-performance by a State functionary with corruption and said both needed reparative and punitive action. Separate law hailed Ms. Karat welcomed the idea of a separate legislation for grievance redress. However, she underscored the need to widen the ambit sufficiently to cover private service providers. “Public service is gradually getting incorporated into the private sector and in the name of choice and competition, private players are getting free play,” she said, adding that it was important to keep the future in mind while drafting a Grievance Redress Bill aimed at service providers. The second problem area, she said, was defining the eligibility of citizens getting a service. “Every citizen should be eligible for a public service. Targeting is iniquitous and undemocratic. A grievance redress law that does not address the fraudulent nature of the current practice of targeting eligibility would end up legitimising it.” She cautioned against designing a law with too many layers of supervision: “The more tiers we create, the more problems we create, leading to a bureaucratic maze.” . * Aruna Roy: Effective grievance redress must be “decentralised, transparent” * Brinda Karat: Redress Bill aimed at service providers must cover private service
|