Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801f28655cf6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801f28655cf6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801f28655cf6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21969, 'title' => 'NE dams fail green test', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. </p> <p align="justify"> The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area. </p> <p align="justify"> Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas. </p> <p align="justify"> On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. &quot;The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded,&quot; the report stated. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average. </p> <p align="justify"> In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, &quot;No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. &quot;There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project,&quot; the committee said in its report. </p> <p align="justify"> It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project,&quot; Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph. </p> <p align="justify"> A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. &quot;The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare,&quot; the source said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 July, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130726/jsp/frontpage/story_17158266.jsp#.UfImQazcjco', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22117, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21969, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NE dams fail green test', 'metaKeywords' => 'dams,Environment,Forests,North East', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph Guwahati: The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12,...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area.</p><p align="justify">Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas.</p><p align="justify">On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. &quot;The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded,&quot; the report stated.</p><p align="justify">The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance.</p><p align="justify">The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average.</p><p align="justify">In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, &quot;No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation.&quot;</p><p align="justify">In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. &quot;There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project,&quot; the committee said in its report.</p><p align="justify">It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project,&quot; Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph.</p><p align="justify">A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. &quot;The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare,&quot; the source said.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21969, 'title' => 'NE dams fail green test', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. </p> <p align="justify"> The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area. </p> <p align="justify"> Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas. </p> <p align="justify"> On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. &quot;The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded,&quot; the report stated. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average. </p> <p align="justify"> In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, &quot;No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. &quot;There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project,&quot; the committee said in its report. </p> <p align="justify"> It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project,&quot; Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph. </p> <p align="justify"> A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. &quot;The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare,&quot; the source said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 July, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130726/jsp/frontpage/story_17158266.jsp#.UfImQazcjco', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22117, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21969 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NE dams fail green test' $metaKeywords = 'dams,Environment,Forests,North East' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph Guwahati: The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12,...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area.</p><p align="justify">Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas.</p><p align="justify">On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. &quot;The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded,&quot; the report stated.</p><p align="justify">The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance.</p><p align="justify">The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average.</p><p align="justify">In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, &quot;No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation.&quot;</p><p align="justify">In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. &quot;There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project,&quot; the committee said in its report.</p><p align="justify">It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project,&quot; Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph.</p><p align="justify">A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. &quot;The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare,&quot; the source said.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NE dams fail green test | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph Guwahati: The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>NE dams fail green test</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area.</p><p align="justify">Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas.</p><p align="justify">On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. "The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded," the report stated.</p><p align="justify">The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance.</p><p align="justify">The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average.</p><p align="justify">In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, "No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation."</p><p align="justify">In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. "There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project," the committee said in its report.</p><p align="justify">It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded.</p><p align="justify">"The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project," Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph.</p><p align="justify">A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. "The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare," the source said.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801f28655cf6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801f28655cf6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801f28655cf6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21969, 'title' => 'NE dams fail green test', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. </p> <p align="justify"> The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area. </p> <p align="justify"> Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas. </p> <p align="justify"> On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. &quot;The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded,&quot; the report stated. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average. </p> <p align="justify"> In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, &quot;No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. &quot;There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project,&quot; the committee said in its report. </p> <p align="justify"> It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project,&quot; Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph. </p> <p align="justify"> A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. &quot;The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare,&quot; the source said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 July, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130726/jsp/frontpage/story_17158266.jsp#.UfImQazcjco', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22117, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21969, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NE dams fail green test', 'metaKeywords' => 'dams,Environment,Forests,North East', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph Guwahati: The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12,...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area.</p><p align="justify">Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas.</p><p align="justify">On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. &quot;The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded,&quot; the report stated.</p><p align="justify">The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance.</p><p align="justify">The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average.</p><p align="justify">In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, &quot;No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation.&quot;</p><p align="justify">In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. &quot;There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project,&quot; the committee said in its report.</p><p align="justify">It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project,&quot; Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph.</p><p align="justify">A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. &quot;The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare,&quot; the source said.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21969, 'title' => 'NE dams fail green test', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. </p> <p align="justify"> The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area. </p> <p align="justify"> Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas. </p> <p align="justify"> On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. &quot;The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded,&quot; the report stated. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average. </p> <p align="justify"> In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, &quot;No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. &quot;There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project,&quot; the committee said in its report. </p> <p align="justify"> It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project,&quot; Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph. </p> <p align="justify"> A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. &quot;The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare,&quot; the source said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 July, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130726/jsp/frontpage/story_17158266.jsp#.UfImQazcjco', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22117, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21969 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NE dams fail green test' $metaKeywords = 'dams,Environment,Forests,North East' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph Guwahati: The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12,...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area.</p><p align="justify">Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas.</p><p align="justify">On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. &quot;The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded,&quot; the report stated.</p><p align="justify">The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance.</p><p align="justify">The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average.</p><p align="justify">In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, &quot;No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation.&quot;</p><p align="justify">In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. &quot;There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project,&quot; the committee said in its report.</p><p align="justify">It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project,&quot; Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph.</p><p align="justify">A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. &quot;The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare,&quot; the source said.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NE dams fail green test | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph Guwahati: The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>NE dams fail green test</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area.</p><p align="justify">Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas.</p><p align="justify">On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. "The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded," the report stated.</p><p align="justify">The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance.</p><p align="justify">The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average.</p><p align="justify">In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, "No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation."</p><p align="justify">In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. "There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project," the committee said in its report.</p><p align="justify">It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded.</p><p align="justify">"The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project," Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph.</p><p align="justify">A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. "The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare," the source said.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6801f28655cf6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6801f28655cf6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6801f28655cf6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6801f28655cf6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21969, 'title' => 'NE dams fail green test', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. </p> <p align="justify"> The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area. </p> <p align="justify"> Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas. </p> <p align="justify"> On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. &quot;The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded,&quot; the report stated. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average. </p> <p align="justify"> In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, &quot;No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. &quot;There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project,&quot; the committee said in its report. </p> <p align="justify"> It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project,&quot; Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph. </p> <p align="justify"> A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. &quot;The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare,&quot; the source said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 July, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130726/jsp/frontpage/story_17158266.jsp#.UfImQazcjco', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22117, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21969, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NE dams fail green test', 'metaKeywords' => 'dams,Environment,Forests,North East', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph Guwahati: The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12,...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area.</p><p align="justify">Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas.</p><p align="justify">On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. &quot;The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded,&quot; the report stated.</p><p align="justify">The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance.</p><p align="justify">The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average.</p><p align="justify">In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, &quot;No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation.&quot;</p><p align="justify">In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. &quot;There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project,&quot; the committee said in its report.</p><p align="justify">It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project,&quot; Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph.</p><p align="justify">A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. &quot;The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare,&quot; the source said.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21969, 'title' => 'NE dams fail green test', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. </p> <p align="justify"> The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area. </p> <p align="justify"> Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas. </p> <p align="justify"> On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. &quot;The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded,&quot; the report stated. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average. </p> <p align="justify"> In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, &quot;No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. &quot;There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project,&quot; the committee said in its report. </p> <p align="justify"> It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project,&quot; Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph. </p> <p align="justify"> A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. &quot;The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare,&quot; the source said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 July, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130726/jsp/frontpage/story_17158266.jsp#.UfImQazcjco', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22117, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21969 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NE dams fail green test' $metaKeywords = 'dams,Environment,Forests,North East' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph Guwahati: The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12,...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area.</p><p align="justify">Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas.</p><p align="justify">On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. &quot;The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded,&quot; the report stated.</p><p align="justify">The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance.</p><p align="justify">The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average.</p><p align="justify">In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, &quot;No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation.&quot;</p><p align="justify">In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. &quot;There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project,&quot; the committee said in its report.</p><p align="justify">It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project,&quot; Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph.</p><p align="justify">A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. &quot;The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare,&quot; the source said.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NE dams fail green test | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph Guwahati: The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>NE dams fail green test</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area.</p><p align="justify">Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas.</p><p align="justify">On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. "The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded," the report stated.</p><p align="justify">The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance.</p><p align="justify">The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average.</p><p align="justify">In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, "No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation."</p><p align="justify">In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. "There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project," the committee said in its report.</p><p align="justify">It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded.</p><p align="justify">"The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project," Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph.</p><p align="justify">A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. "The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare," the source said.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21969, 'title' => 'NE dams fail green test', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. </p> <p align="justify"> The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area. </p> <p align="justify"> Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas. </p> <p align="justify"> On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. "The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded," the report stated. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average. </p> <p align="justify"> In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, "No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation." </p> <p align="justify"> In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. "There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project," the committee said in its report. </p> <p align="justify"> It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded. </p> <p align="justify"> "The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project," Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph. </p> <p align="justify"> A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. "The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare," the source said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 July, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130726/jsp/frontpage/story_17158266.jsp#.UfImQazcjco', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22117, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21969, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NE dams fail green test', 'metaKeywords' => 'dams,Environment,Forests,North East', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph Guwahati: The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12,...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area.</p><p align="justify">Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas.</p><p align="justify">On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. "The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded," the report stated.</p><p align="justify">The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance.</p><p align="justify">The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average.</p><p align="justify">In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, "No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation."</p><p align="justify">In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. "There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project," the committee said in its report.</p><p align="justify">It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded.</p><p align="justify">"The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project," Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph.</p><p align="justify">A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. "The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare," the source said.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21969, 'title' => 'NE dams fail green test', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. </p> <p align="justify"> The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area. </p> <p align="justify"> Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas. </p> <p align="justify"> On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. "The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded," the report stated. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance. </p> <p align="justify"> The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average. </p> <p align="justify"> In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, "No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation." </p> <p align="justify"> In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. "There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project," the committee said in its report. </p> <p align="justify"> It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded. </p> <p align="justify"> "The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project," Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph. </p> <p align="justify"> A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. "The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare," the source said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 July, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130726/jsp/frontpage/story_17158266.jsp#.UfImQazcjco', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'ne-dams-fail-green-test-22117', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22117, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21969 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | NE dams fail green test' $metaKeywords = 'dams,Environment,Forests,North East' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph Guwahati: The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh. The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12,...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Guwahati: </em>The ministry of environment and forests has denied forest clearance to the 1,500MW Tipaimukh hydel project in Manipur and the 3,000MW Dibang multipurpose project in Arunachal Pradesh.</p><p align="justify">The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area.</p><p align="justify">Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas.</p><p align="justify">On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. "The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded," the report stated.</p><p align="justify">The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance.</p><p align="justify">The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average.</p><p align="justify">In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, "No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation."</p><p align="justify">In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. "There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project," the committee said in its report.</p><p align="justify">It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded.</p><p align="justify">"The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project," Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph.</p><p align="justify">A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. "The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare," the source said.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
NE dams fail green test |
-The Telegraph
The forest advisory committee (FAC), which met on July 11 and 12, has stated in its report that in both projects, the requirement of for-estland is large and will have an adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area. Civil society organisations had urged the ministry of environment and forests not to accord forest clearance to both projects, as these would destroy the rich forest resources in their respective areas. On the 1,500MW Tipai-mukh hydel project in Manipur, the committee said the requirement of forestland was large and disproportionate to its power generation capacity. "The very high ecological, environmental and social impact/cost of the diversion of the vast tract of forestland will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project. The FAC, therefore, stro-ngly recommended that the approval for the said forestland should not be accorded," the report stated. The committee recommended that in case the implementing agency desired, they could explore the feasibility of constructing smaller dams involving diversion of smaller forest areas commensurate with their power generation capacity. It had given the environment clearance to the project in 2008. Dibang has, however, not received environment clearance. The committee said the Tipaimukh dam required 24,329 hectares of forestland - more than one-fifth of the total 1,18,184 hectares of fore-stland diverted for execution of 497 hydel projects in the entire country after the Forest Conservation Act came into force. It said the forestland requirement against every meg-awatt of proposed electricity generation - 16 hectares per megawatt - was much higher than the national average. In its assessment report to the ministry, the Manipur forest department had earlier said, "No compensatory measure would help mitigate the adverse impact the loss of such large forest tracts would have on the habitat, flora, fauna, biodiversity, micro-climate and environment, unless additional non-forest areas in affected or adjoining districts are taken up for compensatory afforestation." In the case of the Dibang project, the committee said felling of more than 3.5 lakh trees was most likely to have adverse impact on the general ecosystem of the area, recovery of which may be very difficult through any type of mitigating measures. "There is no study conducted to assess the cumulative impact of all the reservoirs and the upstream and downstream impacts. The ecological, environmental and social costs of diversion of such a vast tract of forestland, which is a major source of livelihood of the tribal population of the state, will far outweigh the benefits likely to accrue from the project," the committee said in its report. It recommended that approval for diversion of the said land may not be accorded. "The committee's decision is an endorsement of the concerns of the people against the impact of the project," Jiten Yumnam of Citizens Concern for Dams and Development, Action Committee against Tipaimukh Dam Project, told The Telegraph. A source said the companies, could, if they wished, submit different proposals with reduced impact on forests and others. "The minister can, if she desires, turn down the recommendations of the committee as these are advisory in nature. But this is very rare," the source said. |