Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7792,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Deccan Herald
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&amp;quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&amp;quot; he quipped.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Deccan Herald, 22 May, 2011, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/163336/internet-rules-govt-asks-why.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7891,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7792,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;media,Law and Justice,Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Deccan Herald


&amp;nbsp;


Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Deccan Herald&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&amp;quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&amp;quot; he quipped.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7792,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Deccan Herald
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&amp;quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&amp;quot; he quipped.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Deccan Herald, 22 May, 2011, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/163336/internet-rules-govt-asks-why.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7891,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7792
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;media,Law and Justice,Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Deccan Herald


&amp;nbsp;


Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Deccan Herald&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&amp;quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&amp;quot; he quipped.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Deccan Herald


&nbsp;


Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-The Deccan Herald</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.<br /><br />R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.<br /><br />He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.<br /><br />&quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.<br /><br />The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.<br /><br />These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.<br /><br />The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.<br /><br />Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.<br /><br />&quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.<br /><br />This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.<br /><br />Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. <br /><br />However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.<br /><br />The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.<br /><br />However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.<br /><br />&quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&quot; he quipped.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7792,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Deccan Herald
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&amp;quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&amp;quot; he quipped.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Deccan Herald, 22 May, 2011, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/163336/internet-rules-govt-asks-why.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7891,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7792,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;media,Law and Justice,Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Deccan Herald


&amp;nbsp;


Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Deccan Herald&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&amp;quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&amp;quot; he quipped.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7792,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Deccan Herald
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&amp;quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&amp;quot; he quipped.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Deccan Herald, 22 May, 2011, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/163336/internet-rules-govt-asks-why.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7891,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7792
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;media,Law and Justice,Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Deccan Herald


&amp;nbsp;


Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Deccan Herald&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&amp;quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&amp;quot; he quipped.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Deccan Herald


&nbsp;


Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-The Deccan Herald</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.<br /><br />R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.<br /><br />He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.<br /><br />&quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.<br /><br />The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.<br /><br />These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.<br /><br />The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.<br /><br />Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.<br /><br />&quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.<br /><br />This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.<br /><br />Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. <br /><br />However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.<br /><br />The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.<br /><br />However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.<br /><br />&quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&quot; he quipped.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9241aa0f27-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7792,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Deccan Herald
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&amp;quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&amp;quot; he quipped.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Deccan Herald, 22 May, 2011, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/163336/internet-rules-govt-asks-why.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7891,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7792,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;media,Law and Justice,Governance&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Deccan Herald


&amp;nbsp;


Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Deccan Herald&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&amp;quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&amp;quot; he quipped.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 7792,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-The Deccan Herald
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&amp;quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&amp;quot; he quipped.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Deccan Herald, 22 May, 2011, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/163336/internet-rules-govt-asks-why.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 7891,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 7792
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;media,Law and Justice,Governance&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Deccan Herald


&amp;nbsp;


Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-The Deccan Herald&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&amp;quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&amp;quot; he quipped.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Deccan Herald


&nbsp;


Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-The Deccan Herald</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.<br /><br />R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.<br /><br />He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.<br /><br />&quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.<br /><br />The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.<br /><br />These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.<br /><br />The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.<br /><br />Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.<br /><br />&quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.<br /><br />This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.<br /><br />Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. <br /><br />However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.<br /><br />The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.<br /><br />However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.<br /><br />&quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&quot; he quipped.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 7792,
		'title' => 'New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<p>
-The Deccan Herald
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="justify">
Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.<br />
<br />
R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.<br />
<br />
He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.<br />
<br />
&quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.<br />
<br />
The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.<br />
<br />
These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.<br />
<br />
The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.<br />
<br />
Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.<br />
<br />
&quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&quot; he said.<br />
<br />
Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.<br />
<br />
This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.<br />
<br />
Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. <br />
<br />
However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.<br />
<br />
The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.<br />
<br />
However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.<br />
<br />
&quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&quot; he quipped.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Deccan Herald, 22 May, 2011, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/163336/internet-rules-govt-asks-why.html',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 7891,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 7792,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft',
	'metaKeywords' => 'media,Law and Justice,Governance',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Deccan Herald


&nbsp;


Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for...',
	'disp' => '<p>-The Deccan Herald</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.<br /><br />R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.<br /><br />He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.<br /><br />&quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.<br /><br />The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.<br /><br />These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.<br /><br />The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.<br /><br />Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.<br /><br />&quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.<br /><br />This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.<br /><br />Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. <br /><br />However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.<br /><br />The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.<br /><br />However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.<br /><br />&quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&quot; he quipped.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 7792,
	'title' => 'New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<p>
-The Deccan Herald
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="justify">
Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.<br />
<br />
R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.<br />
<br />
He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.<br />
<br />
&quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.<br />
<br />
The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.<br />
<br />
These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.<br />
<br />
The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.<br />
<br />
Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.<br />
<br />
&quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&quot; he said.<br />
<br />
Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.<br />
<br />
This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.<br />
<br />
Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. <br />
<br />
However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.<br />
<br />
The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.<br />
<br />
However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.<br />
<br />
&quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&quot; he quipped.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Deccan Herald, 22 May, 2011, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/163336/internet-rules-govt-asks-why.html',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'new-internet-rules-govt-asks-why-critics-were-silent-on-draft-7891',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 7891,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 7792
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft'
$metaKeywords = 'media,Law and Justice,Governance'
$metaDesc = '
-The Deccan Herald


&nbsp;


Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for...'
$disp = '<p>-The Deccan Herald</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion.<br /><br />R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules.<br /><br />He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users.<br /><br />&quot;The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done,&quot; Chandrashekhar clarified.<br /><br />The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers.<br /><br />These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government.<br /><br />The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases.<br /><br />Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose.<br /><br />&quot;Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed.<br /><br />This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive.<br /><br />Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. <br /><br />However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person.<br /><br />The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act.<br /><br />However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed.<br /><br />&quot;The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?&quot; he quipped.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

New Internet rules: Govt asks why critics were silent on draft

-The Deccan Herald   Under flak for the new Internet rules which are being interpreted as an attack on privacy of a user, the government while clarifying the rules questioned the why critics were silent when the draft rules were opened for public opinion. R Chandrashekhar, Secretary in the Department of Information Technology, in an interaction with PTI said views from all stakeholders were taken and the best practices prevalent globally were incorporated in the new rules. He said the government cannot allow complete insulation to anyone from any illegitimate activity which involves a body or person and hence the rules were framed to fix the liability on service providers, intermediaries, bodies looking after details of users, and users. "The rules were made to define that liability and restrict that liability and that has been precisely done," Chandrashekhar clarified. The new IT rules implemented by the government since April 11 allow the government agencies to obtain sensitive information of users like their passwords, sexual orientation, medical records, bank account details etc from service providers. These details could be demanded by the law enforcement agencies for verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation, including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences after getting due authorisation from the government. The procedure adopted by the agencies can be either through the government approval or by court orders mandating them to seek such personal details in case of investigation or prosecution in cases. Chandrashekhar said that these information can be accessed by the government agencies only under legal authorisation and for lawful purpose. "Their is absolutely no intention to put restriction on speech through these rules at all," he said. Chandrashekhar refuted industry apprehensions on another rule which mandates that any objectionable content on a website or a computer should be removed within 36 hours of it being noticed. This rule has been criticised by the industry as companies fear that they will have to increase manpower to keep a watch on the content being posted on their portals or servers, especially when most websites are becoming interactive. Certain sections of society and the industry said that this could restrain free flow of information and hence gag freedom of speech. However, Chandrashekhar said that the notification issued for implementation of new rule defines the objectionable content and clearly says that the content should be removed when the service provider notices it or is informed by the affected person. The secretary said department is open to make changes in the language of law if it is giving rise to any misconception about the intent of the act. However, Chandrashekhar questioned the silence of critics at the time rules were being framed. "The draft of the rule was on the website for two months.It was public and shared with everybody. Comments were solicited and received. Why you (critics) did not raise these issues at that point of time and give that particular feedback?" he quipped.