Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813849c1d74d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813849c1d74d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813849c1d74d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6011,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports&#039; against the fresh set of rules were `misleading&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate&#039; -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh&#039;s clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people&#039;s presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details&#039; of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 15 February, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/environment/developmental-issues/New-norms-do-not-flout-Forest-Rights-Act-says-Jairam/articleshow/7496832.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6105,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6011,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Tribal Rights&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports&#039; against the fresh set of rules were `misleading&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate&#039; -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh&#039;s clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people&#039;s presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details&#039; of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6011,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports&#039; against the fresh set of rules were `misleading&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate&#039; -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh&#039;s clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people&#039;s presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details&#039; of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 15 February, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/environment/developmental-issues/New-norms-do-not-flout-Forest-Rights-Act-says-Jairam/articleshow/7496832.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6105,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6011
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Tribal Rights&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports&#039; against the fresh set of rules were `misleading&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate&#039; -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh&#039;s clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people&#039;s presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details&#039; of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports' against the fresh set of rules were `misleading'.<br /><br />TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate' -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.<br /><br />While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.<br /><br />The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh's clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.<br /><br />The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.<br /><br />The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.<br /><br />The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.<br /><br />The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.<br /><br />The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people's presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details' of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813849c1d74d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813849c1d74d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813849c1d74d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6011,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports&#039; against the fresh set of rules were `misleading&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate&#039; -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh&#039;s clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people&#039;s presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details&#039; of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 15 February, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/environment/developmental-issues/New-norms-do-not-flout-Forest-Rights-Act-says-Jairam/articleshow/7496832.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6105,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6011,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Tribal Rights&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports&#039; against the fresh set of rules were `misleading&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate&#039; -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh&#039;s clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people&#039;s presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details&#039; of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6011,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports&#039; against the fresh set of rules were `misleading&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate&#039; -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh&#039;s clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people&#039;s presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details&#039; of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 15 February, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/environment/developmental-issues/New-norms-do-not-flout-Forest-Rights-Act-says-Jairam/articleshow/7496832.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6105,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6011
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Tribal Rights&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports&#039; against the fresh set of rules were `misleading&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate&#039; -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh&#039;s clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people&#039;s presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details&#039; of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports' against the fresh set of rules were `misleading'.<br /><br />TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate' -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.<br /><br />While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.<br /><br />The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh's clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.<br /><br />The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.<br /><br />The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.<br /><br />The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.<br /><br />The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.<br /><br />The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people's presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details' of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813849c1d74d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813849c1d74d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813849c1d74d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813849c1d74d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6011,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports&#039; against the fresh set of rules were `misleading&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate&#039; -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh&#039;s clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people&#039;s presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details&#039; of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 15 February, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/environment/developmental-issues/New-norms-do-not-flout-Forest-Rights-Act-says-Jairam/articleshow/7496832.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6105,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6011,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Tribal Rights&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports&#039; against the fresh set of rules were `misleading&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate&#039; -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh&#039;s clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people&#039;s presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details&#039; of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6011,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports&#039; against the fresh set of rules were `misleading&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate&#039; -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh&#039;s clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people&#039;s presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details&#039; of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 15 February, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/environment/developmental-issues/New-norms-do-not-flout-Forest-Rights-Act-says-Jairam/articleshow/7496832.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6105,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6011
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Tribal Rights&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports&#039; against the fresh set of rules were `misleading&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate&#039; -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh&#039;s clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people&#039;s presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details&#039; of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports' against the fresh set of rules were `misleading'.<br /><br />TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate' -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.<br /><br />While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.<br /><br />The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh's clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.<br /><br />The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.<br /><br />The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.<br /><br />The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.<br /><br />The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.<br /><br />The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people's presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details' of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 6011,
		'title' => 'New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports' against the fresh set of rules were `misleading'.<br />
<br />
TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate' -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.<br />
<br />
While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.<br />
<br />
The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh's clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.<br />
<br />
The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.<br />
<br />
The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.<br />
<br />
The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.<br />
<br />
The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.<br />
<br />
The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people's presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details' of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 15 February, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/environment/developmental-issues/New-norms-do-not-flout-Forest-Rights-Act-says-Jairam/articleshow/7496832.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 6105,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 6011,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Tribal Rights',
	'metaDesc' => '
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports' against the fresh set of rules were `misleading'.<br /><br />TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate' -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.<br /><br />While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.<br /><br />The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh's clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.<br /><br />The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.<br /><br />The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.<br /><br />The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.<br /><br />The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.<br /><br />The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people's presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details' of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 6011,
	'title' => 'New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports' against the fresh set of rules were `misleading'.<br />
<br />
TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate' -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.<br />
<br />
While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.<br />
<br />
The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh's clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.<br />
<br />
The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.<br />
<br />
The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.<br />
<br />
The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.<br />
<br />
The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.<br />
<br />
The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people's presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details' of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 15 February, 2011, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/environment/developmental-issues/New-norms-do-not-flout-Forest-Rights-Act-says-Jairam/articleshow/7496832.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'new-norms-do-not-flout-forest-rights-act-says-jairam-by-nitin-sethi-6105',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 6105,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 6011
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi'
$metaKeywords = 'Tribal Rights'
$metaDesc = '
Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports' against the fresh set of rules were `misleading'.<br /><br />TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate' -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods.<br /><br />While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date.<br /><br />The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh's clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified.<br /><br />The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all.<br /><br />The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts.<br /><br />The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land.<br /><br />The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA.<br /><br />The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people's presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details' of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

New norms do not flout Forest Rights Act, says Jairam by Nitin Sethi

Environment minister Jairam Ramesh tied himself in knots on Monday to defend the guidelines his ministry had issues on turning national parks and sanctuaries into inviolate critical wildlife habitats, bypassing provisions of the Forest Rights Act. Even as his statement contradicted the guidelines issued by the environment ministry on February 8, Ramesh defended them claiming that `news reports' against the fresh set of rules were `misleading'. TOI had reported how the guidelines meant to classify national parks and sanctuaries as critical wildlife habitats under the FRA in order to make them `inviolate' -- free of people -- were in violation of the Act. The Act requires the government to give scientific proof that these 600 national parks and sanctuaries are really impacted by human presence. The law requires the government to do so with the consent of the affected gram sabha and relocate people if the proof is accepted and the village council agrees to move out. The rules also require that the people be given alternative livelihoods. While these national parks and sanctuaries have been created since 1986 the rights of people have not been finally settled in a majority of them till date. The guidelines by the ministry on February 8 went beyond the law in asking foresters to demarcate not just the protected areas but even fresh forest areas as critical wildlife habitats. Ramesh's clarification said this would not be done but the minister did not order a change in the guidelines, which would legally continue to be in force unless he has them modified. The minister in his clarification stated that the exercise was to be carried out with consent of the affected people, but the guidelines require the foresters to continue demarcation and send proposals for declaration of such no-man zones even as consultations with people continue on ground. The guidelines do not mention the need for consent at all. The guidelines also bypass the people in the process of identifying such inviolate zones and leaves it to foresters and its appointed experts. The consultations, under the guidelines, are limited to how relocation should be done and even there the Centre offers a fixed package of Rs 10 lakh per family or equivalent in terms of amenities and land. The guidelines ask foresters to move people out in parts and parcels and not get the consent of the village council for such relocation of its people -- as is required under the FRA. The guidelines have also diluted the need for having concrete scientific proof of how people's presence is adversely impacting the wildlife in forests by simply asking the forest department to attach only `details' of the impact of human presence while they send their proposals up without consent of the affected people.